StrokeEarly Phase 1SOLUTIONNCT07875868
Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy as an Adjunct to Botulinum Toxin Type A for Post-Stroke Lower Limb Spasticity (SOLUTION)
A Early Phase 1 study testing Radial shock Wave therapy (3000 pulses, 5 Hz, 2.5 bar). and Ultrasound-guided abobotulinumtoxin A in people with Stroke and Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke, run by Parc de Salut Mar at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to determine whether radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT), when used as an adjunct to ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injections, can enhance the therapeutic effect of BoNT-A in adults with post-stroke lower-limb spasticity. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke, Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke, Lower Limb Spasticity
- What is being tested?
- Radial shock Wave therapy (3000 pulses, 5 Hz, 2.5 bar). and Ultrasound-guided abobotulinumtoxin A
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Feb 2024to 1 Jan 2025
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults ≥18 years.
- Stroke ≥1 month previously.
- Lower limb spasticity involving triceps surae (MAS ≥1+).
- Able to walk with or without orthosis
Who cannot join
- Fixed ankle contracture.
- Botulinum toxin treatment within previous 6 months.
- Progressive neurological disease.
- Skin lesions or severe vascular disease affecting treatment area.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: SOLUTION: A Pilot Randomised, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy as an Adjunct to Botulinum Toxin Type A in Adults With Post-Stroke Lower Limb Spasticity
The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to determine whether radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT), when used as an adjunct to ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injections, can enhance the therapeutic effect of BoNT-A in adults with post-stroke lower-limb spasticity. The study will also evaluate the safety and tolerability of the combined treatment.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Read more
- Does the addition of active rESWT to BoNT-A result in a greater improvement in lower-limb spasticity, measured by the change in Modified Ashworth Scale score from baseline to 5 weeks after treatment?
- Does adjunctive rESWT improve other measures of muscle spasticity, ankle mobility, gait performance, perceived global improvement, and pain, and is the treatment safe and well tolerated?
Researchers will compare BoNT-A combined with active rESWT with BoNT-A combined with sham rESWT to determine whether the addition of active rESWT provides greater clinical benefit.
Participants will:
- Receive ultrasound-guided BoNT-A injections according to the study protocol.
- Receive either active rESWT or sham rESWT according to their randomly assigned treatment group.
- Attend scheduled follow-up visits for assessment of spasticity, ankle range of motion, gait performance, muscle length, global clinical improvement, pain, and treatment safety.
- Complete the planned assessments during the follow-up period, including evaluation at 5 weeks after treatment and subsequent follow-up assessments for up to 6 months.
Read the detailed description
The SOLUTION study is a pilot, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial designed to investigate the potential benefit of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) as an adjunctive treatment to botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) for the management of post-stroke lower-limb spasticity.
Post-stroke spasticity is a common complication that may contribute to restricted joint mobility, abnormal limb positioning, impaired gait, pain, and limitations in functional activities. Botulinum toxin type A is an established treatment for focal spasticity. However, its therapeutic effect is temporary, and the duration of clinical benefit may be limited. Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy is a non-invasive physical intervention that has been investigated as an adjunctive treatment for spasticity. The SOLUTION study was designed to investigate whether adding rESWT to BoNT-A could enhance the reduction in muscle spasticity and prolong the therapeutic effect of BoNT-A.
The study was conducted at the Neurorehabilitation Unit of the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Service of Hospital del Mar-Centre Esperança, Barcelona, Spain. The study protocol was evaluated and approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Parc de Salut Mar under project number 2022/10664/I. The protocol version evaluated by the committee was version 3, dated December 2, 2022, and the committee approval was documented in the meeting held on January 24, 2023.
Participants referred to the spasticity clinic were assessed for eligibility and, if eligible and willing to participate, were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to one of two parallel treatment groups. Both groups received ultrasound-guided intramuscular botulinum toxin type A treatment. The intervention group additionally received active radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy, whereas the control group received a sham rESWT procedure.
Randomization was performed using a computer-generated random sequence. Allocation concealment was maintained by withholding the randomization codes until the predefined study measurements had been completed. Physicians from the Neurorehabilitation Unit were responsible for participant recruitment. The randomization sequence was generated by a physician blinded to participant identification. BoNT-A was administered by a physician using ultrasound guidance, while rESWT was administered by an experienced physiotherapist.
The study used a blinded assessment approach. Investigators involved in recruitment and data analysis were blinded to treatment allocation. The physiotherapist administering rESWT did not participate in follow-up visits or outcome data collection and was responsible only for recording adverse effects related to the rESWT procedure. In the sham group, participants received an initial stimulation intended to reproduce the sensory experience of treatment, followed by a progressive reduction in intensity to zero. Treatment allocation was disclosed after completion of the statistical analysis.
The botulinum toxin preparation used in the study was abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®). BoNT-A was administered according to the European consensus recommendations for the use of botulinum toxin type A in adult spasticity, with ultrasound used to guide the intramuscular injections.
Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy was initiated approximately 24 hours after BoNT-A injection. Treatment was applied to the spastic triceps surae muscle group. Each active treatment session consisted of 3,000 pulses, with 1,500 pulses applied to the gastrocnemius muscle and 1,500 pulses to the soleus muscle, at a frequency of 5 Hz and an intensity of 2.5 bar. Three rESWT sessions were administered, at a frequency of one session per week for three consecutive weeks.
The sham rESWT procedure followed the same treatment schedule. Participants received an initial stimulation designed to provide a perceptible treatment experience, followed by a reduction in intensity to zero. This procedure was used as the sham comparator for the active rESWT intervention.
Both treatment groups received a session of instruction in stretching exercises targeting the injected muscle group. Participants were provided with a diary to record adherence to the prescribed exercises during the initial follow-up period.
Clinical assessments were performed at baseline, immediately before administration of BoNT-A and rESWT, and at 5 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after BoNT-A injection. Outcome data were collected by an investigator blinded to treatment allocation.
The primary efficacy assessment evaluated changes in lower-limb spasticity using the Modified Ashworth Scale. Additional clinical assessments were used to characterize changes in muscle spasticity, passive ankle mobility, gait performance, muscle contracture characteristics, patient-perceived clinical improvement, pain, and treatment-related adverse effects.
The study was designed as a superiority trial comparing BoNT-A combined with active rESWT with BoNT-A combined with sham rESWT. The main hypothesis was that adjunctive rESWT would improve the effect of BoNT-A on lower-limb spasticity and increase the duration of the therapeutic response.
The planned sample size was 20 participants, with 10 participants allocated to each treatment group. The sample size calculation was based on the detection of a between-group difference of at least 1 point on the Modified Ashworth Scale, assuming a common standard deviation of 0.7, a two-sided alpha level of 0.05, 90% statistical power, and an anticipated 20% loss to follow-up. Given the pilot nature of the study and the small sample size, the findings were intended to provide preliminary estimates of treatment effects and information regarding the feasibility and safety of the combined intervention.
Safety was assessed throughout the treatment period. Adverse effects associated with rESWT were recorded using a predefined checklist including pain, local discomfort, worsening of pain between sessions, petechiae, muscular ecchymosis, and focal oedema. The use of orthoses during walking was also recorded.
The study was conducted at Hospital del Mar-Centre Esperança in Barcelona, Spain, during the period from January 2023 to January 2025.
The study was designed to determine whether the addition of rESWT to BoNT-A could provide an additional and sustained reduction in lower-limb spasticity compared with BoNT-A combined with sham rESWT. The results are intended to provide preliminary evidence to inform the design of future randomized clinical trials evaluating adjunctive rESWT in the management of post-stroke lower-limb spasticity.
- Conditions
- Stroke, Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke, Lower Limb Spasticity, Upper Motor Neuron Syndrome
- Being tested
- Radial shock Wave therapy (3000 pulses, 5 Hz, 2.5 bar)., ARM B: Sham-radial shock Wave therapy, Ultrasound-guided abobotulinumtoxin A
- Keywords
- Stroke, Stroke Rehabilitation, Randomized Controlled Trial, Neurorehabilitation, Radial Shock Wave Therapy, AbobotulinumtoxinA, Muscle Spasticity
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Muscle Spasticity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Radial shock Wave therapy (3000 pulses, 5 Hz, 2.5 bar).Device
Ultrasound-guided abobotulinumtoxinA followed 24 hours later by three weekly sessions of radial shock Wave therapy (3000 pulses, 5 Hz, 2.5 bar) vs Identical BoNT-A protocol followed by sham radial ESWT using identical procedures without therapeutic energy.
ARM B: Sham-radial shock Wave therapyDevice
Sham-radial shock Wave therapy
Ultrasound-guided abobotulinumtoxin ADrug
Ultrasound-guided abobotulinumtoxin A for ARM A and ARM B
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BoNT-A + active rESWT | Experimental | Ultrasound-guided abobotulinumtoxinA followed 24 hours later by three weekly sessions of radial ESWT (3000 pulses, 5 Hz, 2.5 bar). Receives: Device: Radial shock Wave therapy (3000 pulses, 5 Hz, 2.5 bar).; Drug: Ultrasound-guided abobotulinumtoxin A |
| BoNT-A + sham rESWT. | Sham comparator | dentical BoNT-A protocol followed by sham radial ESWT using identical procedures without therapeutic energy. Receives: Device: ARM B: Sham-radial shock Wave therapy; Drug: Ultrasound-guided abobotulinumtoxin A |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score
The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is a 6-point categorical scale that measures resistance during passive muscle stretching. It is scored as follows: 0 = No increase in muscle tone;
1 = Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion;
1+ = Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout less than half of the remainder of the range of motion; 2 = More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion, but the affected part(s) are easily moved; 3 = Considerable increase in muscle tone, making passive movement difficult; 4 = Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension.
Measured: Change in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score from baseline to Week 5.
Secondary outcomes (7)
Tardieu Angle
The Tardieu angle is defined as the difference between the angle of arrest at low velocity and the angle of catch at high velocity.
Measurement position: Patients are positioned supine with the knee in full extension and the subtalar joint stabilized.
Measured: Weeks 5, Month 3, Month 6
Passive ankle range of motion
The passive range of motion (PROM) of the ankle will be measured using a handheld goniometer. The neutral ankle position will be defined as 90° (position 0). Dorsiflexion and plantarflexion angles will be recorded as positive values.
Measured: Weeks 5, Month 3, Month 6
10-Metre Walk Test
Gait speed will be assessed using the 10-Meter Walk Test. Patients will be instructed to walk 10 meters as quickly and safely as possible, with or without the use of orthoses, as required. Gait speed will be recorded in meters per second (m/s).
Measured: Weeks 5, Month 3, Month 6
Silfverskiöld Test
The Silfverskiöld test is used to identify isolated gastrocnemius contractures associated with various foot and ankle pathologies. Ankle dorsiflexion (DF) is measured with the knee extended and with the knee flexed to 90°. When ankle dorsiflexion increases with knee flexion, the equinus deformity is considered to be attributable to the gastrocnemius alone. Conversely, if the equinus deformity persists with knee flexion, it is considered to involve both the gastrocnemius and soleus muscles.
Measured: Weeks 5, Month 3, Month 6
Global Impression of Change Scale
The Patient Global Impression of Change Scale is a 7-point scale ranging from "very much improved" to "very much worse" compared with baseline. It is scored as follows:
- = Very much improved since the start of treatment.
- = Much improved.
- = Minimally improved.
- = No change since the start of treatment.
- = Minimally worse.
- = Much worse.
- = Very much worse since the start of treatment.
Measured: Weeks 5, Month 3, Month 6
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain
Pain related to spasticity will be assessed using a 10-point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable.
Measured: Weeks 5, Month 3, Month 6
Adverse events and treatment tolerability
Adverse events will be recorded using a checklist with a dichotomous (yes/no) record of the most common adverse effects reported in the literature, including pain, bruising or exacerbation of pain between sessions, petechiae, muscle ecchymosis, and focal edema.
Concomitant use of orthoses will be recorded dichotomously (yes/no)
Measured: Weeks 5, Month 3, Month 6
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Oct 2026
- Study start1 Feb 2024
- Primary completion4 Jul 2024
- Study completion1 Jan 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Stroke frequently leads to lower limb spasticity, limiting gait and daily activities. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is the standard focal treatment, although its effect is time-limited. Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) has demonstrated potential to reduce muscle hypertonia and may prolong the therapeutic effect of BoNT-A. The SOLUTION study is a prospective, randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot trial evaluating whether adjunctive rESWT enhances clinical outcomes following ultrasound-guided BoNT-A injection in adults with post-stroke lower limb spasticity. Participants are followed at baseline, 5 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Study Type: Interventional Design: Prospective, parallel-group, randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot trial. Allocation ratio: 1:1. Estimated enrolment: 20 participants. Primary purpose: Treatment. Masking: Participants and outcome assessors; treatment providers are not involved in assessments.
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Parc de Salut Mar
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sociedad Española de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Anna Guillen, Parc de Salut Mar
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07875868
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2022/10664/I
- Other IDs
- Beca IPSEN_NEUROREHABLITACION
- Acronym
- SOLUTION
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 1 Sep 2026
- Last updated
- 15 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: De-identified individual participant data may be made available upon reasonable request after publication of the primary manuscript, subject to approval by the Sponsor, ethics requirements and applicable data protection legislation. Supporting documents (protocol and data dictionary) may also be shared where appropriate
Publications
Wu YT, Chang CN, Chen YM, Hu GC. Comparison of the effect of focused and radial extracorporeal shock waves on spastic equinus in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Aug;54(4):518-525. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04801-8. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
PubMed 29072044Cabanas-Valdes R, Calvo-Sanz J, Urrutia G, Serra-Llobet P, Perez-Bellmunt A, German-Romero A. The effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy to reduce lower limb spasticity in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2020 Mar;27(2):137-157. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2019.1654242. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
PubMed 31710277Cabanas-Valdes R, Serra-Llobet P, Rodriguez-Rubio PR, Lopez-de-Celis C, Llauro-Fores M, Calvo-Sanz J. The effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for improving upper limb spasticity and functionality in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2020 Sep;34(9):1141-1156. doi: 10.1177/0269215520932196. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
PubMed 32513019Picelli A, Santamato A, Chemello E, Cinone N, Cisari C, Gandolfi M, Ranieri M, Smania N, Baricich A. Adjuvant treatments associated with botulinum toxin injection for managing spasticity: An overview of the literature. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Jul;62(4):291-296. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
PubMed 30219307Martinez IM, Sempere-Rubio N, Navarro O, Faubel R. Effectiveness of Shock Wave Therapy as a Treatment for Spasticity: A Systematic Review. Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 24;11(1):15. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11010015.
PubMed 33374359
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- SOLUTION: A Pilot Randomised, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy as an Adjunct to Botulinum Toxin Type A in Adults With Post-Stroke Lower Limb Spasticity
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07875868
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SOLUTION / 2022/10664/I
- Conditions
- Stroke, Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke, Lower Limb Spasticity, Upper Motor Neuron Syndrome
- Keywords
- Stroke, Stroke Rehabilitation, Randomized Controlled Trial, Neurorehabilitation, Radial Shock Wave Therapy, AbobotulinumtoxinA, Muscle Spasticity
- Phase
- Early Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Parc de Salut MarUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Sociedad Española de Medicina Física y Rehabilitación
- Study start
- 1 Feb 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 4 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to determine whether radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT), when used as an adjunct to ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) injections, can enhance the therapeutic effect of BoNT-A in adults with post-stroke lower-limb spasticity. The study will also evaluate the safety and tolerability of the combined treatment.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does the addition of active rESWT to BoNT-A result in a greater improvement in lower-limb spasticity, measured by the change in Modified Ashworth Scale score from baseline to 5 weeks after treatment?
- Does adjunctive rESWT improve other measures of muscle spasticity, ankle mobility, gait performance, perceived global improvement, and pain, and is the treatment safe and well tolerated?
Researchers will compare BoNT-A combined with active rESWT with BoNT-A combined with sham rESWT to determine whether the addition of active rESWT provides greater clinical benefit.
Participants will:
- Receive ultrasound-guided BoNT-A injections according to the study protocol.
- Receive either active rESWT or sham rESWT according to their randomly assigned treatment group.
- Attend scheduled follow-up visits for assessment of spasticity, ankle range of motion, gait performance, muscle length, global clinical improvement, pain, and treatment safety.
- Complete the planned assessments during the follow-up period, including evaluation at 5 weeks after treatment and subsequent follow-up assessments for up to 6 months.
Detailed description
The SOLUTION study is a pilot, randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial designed to investigate the potential benefit of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) as an adjunctive treatment to botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) for the management of post-stroke lower-limb spasticity.
Post-stroke spasticity is a common complication that may contribute to restricted joint mobility, abnormal limb positioning, impaired gait, pain, and limitations in functional activities. Botulinum toxin type A is an established treatment for focal spasticity. However, its therapeutic effect is temporary, and the duration of clinical benefit may be limited. Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy is a non-invasive physical intervention that has been investigated as an adjunctive treatment for spasticity. The SOLUTION study was designed to investigate whether adding rESWT to BoNT-A could enhance the reduction in muscle spasticity and prolong the therapeutic effect of BoNT-A.
The study was conducted at the Neurorehabilitation Unit of the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Service of Hospital del Mar-Centre Esperança, Barcelona, Spain. The study protocol was evaluated and approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Parc de Salut Mar under project number 2022/10664/I. The protocol version evaluated by the committee was version 3, dated December 2, 2022, and the committee approval was documented in the meeting held on January 24, 2023.
Participants referred to the spasticity clinic were assessed for eligibility and, if eligible and willing to participate, were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to one of two parallel treatment groups. Both groups received ultrasound-guided intramuscular botulinum toxin type A treatment. The intervention group additionally received active radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy, whereas the control group received a sham rESWT procedure.
Randomization was performed using a computer-generated random sequence. Allocation concealment was maintained by withholding the randomization codes until the predefined study measurements had been completed. Physicians from the Neurorehabilitation Unit were responsible for participant recruitment. The randomization sequence was generated by a physician blinded to participant identification. BoNT-A was administered by a physician using ultrasound guidance, while rESWT was administered by an experienced physiotherapist.
The study used a blinded assessment approach. Investigators involved in recruitment and data analysis were blinded to treatment allocation. The physiotherapist administering rESWT did not participate in follow-up visits or outcome data collection and was responsible only for recording adverse effects related to the rESWT procedure. In the sham group, participants received an initial stimulation intended to reproduce the sensory experience of treatment, followed by a progressive reduction in intensity to zero. Treatment allocation was disclosed after completion of the statistical analysis.
The botulinum toxin preparation used in the study was abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport®). BoNT-A was administered according to the European consensus recommendations for the use of botulinum toxin type A in adult spasticity, with ultrasound used to guide the intramuscular injections.
Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy was initiated approximately 24 hours after BoNT-A injection. Treatment was applied to the spastic triceps surae muscle group. Each active treatment session consisted of 3,000 pulses, with 1,500 pulses applied to the gastrocnemius muscle and 1,500 pulses to the soleus muscle, at a frequency of 5 Hz and an intensity of 2.5 bar. Three rESWT sessions were administered, at a frequency of one session per week for three consecutive weeks.
The sham rESWT procedure followed the same treatment schedule. Participants received an initial stimulation designed to provide a perceptible treatment experience, followed by a reduction in intensity to zero. This procedure was used as the sham comparator for the active rESWT intervention.
Both treatment groups received a session of instruction in stretching exercises targeting the injected muscle group. Participants were provided with a diary to record adherence to the prescribed exercises during the initial follow-up period.
Clinical assessments were performed at baseline, immediately before administration of BoNT-A and rESWT, and at 5 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months after BoNT-A injection. Outcome data were collected by an investigator blinded to treatment allocation.
The primary efficacy assessment evaluated changes in lower-limb spasticity using the Modified Ashworth Scale. Additional clinical assessments were used to characterize changes in muscle spasticity, passive ankle mobility, gait performance, muscle contracture characteristics, patient-perceived clinical improvement, pain, and treatment-related adverse effects.
The study was designed as a superiority trial comparing BoNT-A combined with active rESWT with BoNT-A combined with sham rESWT. The main hypothesis was that adjunctive rESWT would improve the effect of BoNT-A on lower-limb spasticity and increase the duration of the therapeutic response.
The planned sample size was 20 participants, with 10 participants allocated to each treatment group. The sample size calculation was based on the detection of a between-group difference of at least 1 point on the Modified Ashworth Scale, assuming a common standard deviation of 0.7, a two-sided alpha level of 0.05, 90% statistical power, and an anticipated 20% loss to follow-up. Given the pilot nature of the study and the small sample size, the findings were intended to provide preliminary estimates of treatment effects and information regarding the feasibility and safety of the combined intervention.
Safety was assessed throughout the treatment period. Adverse effects associated with rESWT were recorded using a predefined checklist including pain, local discomfort, worsening of pain between sessions, petechiae, muscular ecchymosis, and focal oedema. The use of orthoses during walking was also recorded.
The study was conducted at Hospital del Mar-Centre Esperança in Barcelona, Spain, during the period from January 2023 to January 2025.
The study was designed to determine whether the addition of rESWT to BoNT-A could provide an additional and sustained reduction in lower-limb spasticity compared with BoNT-A combined with sham rESWT. The results are intended to provide preliminary evidence to inform the design of future randomized clinical trials evaluating adjunctive rESWT in the management of post-stroke lower-limb spasticity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Stroke frequently leads to lower limb spasticity, limiting gait and daily activities. Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is the standard focal treatment, although its effect is time-limited. Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) has demonstrated potential to reduce muscle hypertonia and may prolong the therapeutic effect of BoNT-A. The SOLUTION study is a prospective, randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot trial evaluating whether adjunctive rESWT enhances clinical outcomes following ultrasound-guided BoNT-A injection in adults with post-stroke lower limb spasticity. Participants are followed at baseline, 5 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Study Type: Interventional Design: Prospective, parallel-group, randomised, double-blind, sham-controlled pilot trial. Allocation ratio: 1:1. Estimated enrolment: 20 participants. Primary purpose: Treatment. Masking: Participants and outcome assessors; treatment providers are not involved in assessments.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| BoNT-A + active rESWT | Experimental | Device: Radial shock Wave therapy (3000 pulses, 5 Hz, 2.5 bar)., Drug: Ultrasound-guided abobotulinumtoxin AUltrasound-guided abobotulinumtoxinA followed 24 hours later by three weekly sessions of radial ESWT (3000 pulses, 5 Hz, 2.5 bar). |
| BoNT-A + sham rESWT. | Sham comparator | Device: ARM B: Sham-radial shock Wave therapy, Drug: Ultrasound-guided abobotulinumtoxin Adentical BoNT-A protocol followed by sham radial ESWT using identical procedures without therapeutic energy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adults ≥18 years.
- Stroke ≥1 month previously.
- Lower limb spasticity involving triceps surae (MAS ≥1+).
- Able to walk with or without orthosis
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Fixed ankle contracture.
- Botulinum toxin treatment within previous 6 months.
- Progressive neurological disease.
- Skin lesions or severe vascular disease affecting treatment area.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Radial shock Wave therapy (3000 pulses, 5 Hz, 2.5 bar).Ultrasound-guided abobotulinumtoxinA followed 24 hours later by three weekly sessions of radial shock Wave therapy (3000 pulses, 5 Hz, 2.5 bar) vs Identical BoNT-A protocol followed by sham radial ESWT using identical procedures without therapeutic energy. | Device | BoNT-A + active rESWT |
| ARM B: Sham-radial shock Wave therapySham-radial shock Wave therapy | Device | BoNT-A + sham rESWT. |
| Ultrasound-guided abobotulinumtoxin AUltrasound-guided abobotulinumtoxin A for ARM A and ARM B | Drug | BoNT-A + active rESWT, BoNT-A + sham rESWT. |
Primary outcome
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score
Time frame: Change in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score from baseline to Week 5.
The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is a 6-point categorical scale that measures resistance during passive muscle stretching. It is scored as follows: 0 = No increase in muscle tone; 1 = Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion; 1+ = Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout less than half of the remainder of the range of motion; 2 = More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the range of motion, but the affected part(s) are easily moved; 3 = Considerable increase in muscle tone, making passive movement difficult; 4 = Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension.
7 secondary outcomes
Tardieu Angle
Time frame: Weeks 5, Month 3, Month 6
Passive ankle range of motion
Time frame: Weeks 5, Month 3, Month 6
10-Metre Walk Test
Time frame: Weeks 5, Month 3, Month 6
Silfverskiöld Test
Time frame: Weeks 5, Month 3, Month 6
Global Impression of Change Scale
Time frame: Weeks 5, Month 3, Month 6
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain
Time frame: Weeks 5, Month 3, Month 6
Adverse events and treatment tolerability
Time frame: Weeks 5, Month 3, Month 6
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 29072044Wu YT, Chang CN, Chen YM, Hu GC. Comparison of the effect of focused and radial extracorporeal shock waves on spastic equinus in patients with stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018 Aug;54(4):518-525. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.17.04801-8. Epub 2017 Oct 25.
- Background: PubMed 31710277Cabanas-Valdes R, Calvo-Sanz J, Urrutia G, Serra-Llobet P, Perez-Bellmunt A, German-Romero A. The effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy to reduce lower limb spasticity in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2020 Mar;27(2):137-157. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2019.1654242. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
- Background: PubMed 32513019Cabanas-Valdes R, Serra-Llobet P, Rodriguez-Rubio PR, Lopez-de-Celis C, Llauro-Fores M, Calvo-Sanz J. The effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for improving upper limb spasticity and functionality in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2020 Sep;34(9):1141-1156. doi: 10.1177/0269215520932196. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
- Background: PubMed 30219307Picelli A, Santamato A, Chemello E, Cinone N, Cisari C, Gandolfi M, Ranieri M, Smania N, Baricich A. Adjuvant treatments associated with botulinum toxin injection for managing spasticity: An overview of the literature. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Jul;62(4):291-296. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Sep 13.
- Background: PubMed 33374359Martinez IM, Sempere-Rubio N, Navarro O, Faubel R. Effectiveness of Shock Wave Therapy as a Treatment for Spasticity: A Systematic Review. Brain Sci. 2020 Dec 24;11(1):15. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11010015.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. De-identified individual participant data may be made available upon reasonable request after publication of the primary manuscript, subject to approval by the Sponsor, ethics requirements and applicable data protection legislation. Supporting documents (protocol and data dictionary) may also be shared where appropriate
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Early Phase 1 study testing Radial shock Wave therapy (3000 pulses, 5 Hz, 2.5 bar). and Ultrasound-guided abobotulinumtoxin A in people with Stroke and Spasticity as Sequela of Stroke, run by Parc de Salut Mar at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Early Phase 1 (sometimes called Phase 0) studies give a very small amount of a treatment to a few people, mainly to see how the body handles it.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score (time frame: Change in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score from baseline to Week 5.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07875868, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Oct 2026.