Clinical trials: BLS
Basic Life Support
Self-learning vs Instructor-led Learning in BLS
This study investigates whether there is a difference in the BLS skills in first year medical students directly after training and three months later, when randomly assigned to self-learning versus instructor-led training courses.
- Trial name
- NCT03141528
- Testing
- Self-learning, Instructor-led learning
- Where
- Switzerland
- Volunteers
- 240 people, healthy volunteers welcome
- Sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
BLS Competence, Debriefing
The Effect of Immediate Versus Delayed Debriefing on Basic Life Support Competence In Undergraduate Nursing Students.
The goal of this clinical trial is to find out if immediate (hot) or delayed (cold) debriefing is better for undergraduate nursing students during Basic Life Support (BLS) training.
- Trial name
- NCT06624449
- Testing
- Cold debriefing, Hot Debriefing
- Where
- United States
- Volunteers
- 44 people, healthy volunteers welcome
- Sponsor
- University of Cincinnati
Basic Life Support, Cardiac Arrest
Mastery Learning Versus Time-based Education: Skill Acquisition and Retention of Basic Life Support in Laypeople
Background: In cardiac arrest survival rates dramatically increase when bystanders are present and initiate Basic Life Support (BLS).
- Trial name
- NCT02059395
- Testing
- Mastery based learning, Time based learning
- Where
- Canada
- Volunteers
- 49 people, healthy volunteers welcome
- Sponsor
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Effects of a New Dispatcher-Assisted Basic Life Support Training Program
Despite aggressive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training, the outcome of cardiac arrest is not good. The problem is method of education.
- Trial name
- HEROS (NCT02142387)
- Testing
- BLS CPR program with dispatcher assisted CPR simulation
- Where
- South Korea
- Volunteers
- 18,822 people
- Sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital