Lung CancerPhase 3NCT00002550
Chemotherapy Plus Radiation Therapy With or Without Surgery in Treating Patients With Stage IIIA Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing cisplatin, etoposide and conventional surgery in people with Lung Cancer, run by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group at 16 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining radiation therapy with chemotherapy may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known if chemotherapy plus radiation therapy is more effective with or without surgery for lung cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Cancer
- What is being tested?
- cisplatin, etoposide and conventional surgery
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 429 participants
- Where
- 16 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Mar 1994to Nov 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically or cytologically proven newly diagnosed, stage IIIA (T1-3, N2) non-small cell lung cancer
- Eligible subtypes:
- Adenocarcinoma
- Large cell carcinoma
- Squamous cell carcinoma
- Nonlobar and nondiffuse bronchoalveolar cell carcinoma
- Measurable or evaluable disease on chest x-ray and/or contrast CT scan
- Contrast thoracic CT required to complete staging
- Single primary bronchogenic tumor (no more than 1 parenchymal lung lesion)
- Pleural effusions allowed if 1 of the following conditions is met:
- Negative cytology on thoracentesis if effusions present before mediastinoscopy or exploratory thoracotomy
- Effusion seen on CT scan but not on chest x-ray and deemed too small to tap under CT or ultrasound guidance
- Positive ipsilateral mediastinal node(s) with or without positive ipsilateral hilar nodes
- Mediastinal nodes separate from primary lesion on CT scan or surgical exploration
- Histologic or cytologic proof of N2 disease by thoracotomy, mediastinoscopy, mediastinotomy, Chamberlain procedure, Wang needle, or fine needle aspiration under bronchoscopic or CT guidance
- Nodal biopsy or aspiration waived if all of the following conditions are met:
- Paralyzed left true vocal cord documented by bronchoscopy or indirect laryngoscopy
- Nodes visible in Level 5 region on CT scan
- Distinct primary lesion separate from nodes on CT scan
- All mediastinal nodal involvement mapped (positive or negative)
- No positive nodes in contralateral mediastinum (supraclavicular areas and higher) and neck
- Mediastinoscopy, mediastinotomy, Chamberlain procedure, or thoracotomy required for nodes larger than 1 cm on contrast CT scan
- Surgery waived if nodes negative or no larger than 1 cm on CT scan
- Lymphadenopathy allowed if biopsy proof of a benign cause
- No metastases by contrast CT or MRI scan of the brain, bone scan, CT scan of the lungs to exclude other ipsilateral or contralateral parenchymal lesions, and contrast CT scan of the upper abdomen including entire liver and adrenals
- No hepatomegaly or splenomegaly by physical examination or CT scan unless documentation of a benign cause
- No pericardial effusion
- No superior vena cava syndrome
- No prior diagnosis of lung cancer
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age:
- 18 and over
Performance status:
- Karnofsky 90-100% (70-80% allowed if albumin at least 0.85 times lower limit of normal and weight loss no greater than 10% within 3 months before diagnosis)
Hematopoietic:
- White blood cell count (WBC) at least 4,000/mm^3 OR
- Granulocyte count at least 2,000/mm^3
- Platelet count normal
- Hemoglobin at least 10.0 g/dL (less than 8.5 g/dL allowed if no marrow involvement with tumor)
Hepatic:
- See Performance status
- Bilirubin no greater than 1.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN)*
- Serum glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase (SGOT) and serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT) no greater than 1.5 times ULN* NOTE: * Unless documentation of a benign cause
Renal:
- Creatinine clearance at least 50 mL/min
Cardiovascular:
- No myocardial infarction within the past 3 months
- No active angina
- No unstable arrhythmia
- No congestive heart failure
Pulmonary:
- Forced expiratory volume at one second (FEV1) at least 2.0 liters OR
- Predicted postresection FEV1 at least 800 mL based on quantitative V/Q scan
- Diffusion capacity of lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) at least 50% predicted (corrected for hemoglobin) if pneumonectomy planned or likely after induction chemotherapy
Other:
- No clinically significant hearing loss unless willing to accept the potential of further loss
- No symptomatic peripheral neuropathy
- No peptic ulcer disease under active treatment
- No other medical illness not controllable by appropriate medical therapy
- No other malignancy within the past 5 years except adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or ductal or lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy:
- No concurrent colony-stimulating factors
Chemotherapy:
- No prior chemotherapy for lung cancer
- No concurrent chemotherapy for another condition (such as arthritis)
Endocrine therapy:
- Not specified
Radiotherapy:
- No prior radiotherapy for lung cancer
Surgery:
- See Disease Characteristics
- No prior resection of primary tumor
Trial locations and contacts
16 sites in 2 countries.
16 sites in 2 countries
United States15 sites
CCOP - Ann Arbor Regional
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48106
CCOP - Cedar Rapids Oncology Project
Cedar Rapids, Iowa, 52403-1206
Ireland Cancer Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106-5065
CCOP - Green Bay
Green Bay, Wisconsin, 54301
Indiana University Cancer Center
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202-5289
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Indianapolis (Roudebush)
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Milwaukee (Zablocki)
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53295
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-6838
CCOP - Missouri Valley Cancer Consortium
Omaha, Nebraska, 68106
Hahnemann University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102-1192
University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213-3489
University of Rochester Cancer Center
Rochester, New York, 14642
CCOP - Toledo Community Hospital Oncology Program
Toledo, Ohio, 43623-3456
CCOP - Carle Cancer Center
Urbana, Illinois, 61801
About this study
Official title: A Phase III Comparison Between Concurrent Chemotherapy Plus Radiotherapy and Concurrent Chemotherapy Plus Radiotherapy Followed by Surgical Resection for Stage IIIA (N2) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining radiation therapy with chemotherapy may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known if chemotherapy plus radiation therapy is more effective with or without surgery for lung cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of combining cisplatin, etoposide, and radiation therapy with or without surgery in treating patients who have stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer.
Read the detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare the progression-free survival, median (2-year) survival, and long-term (5-year) survival in patients with newly diagnosed, stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer treated with radiotherapy concurrently with cisplatin and etoposide with or without surgical resection.
Secondary
- Compare the patterns of local and distant failure in patients treated with these regimens.
- Determine the relationship of tobacco use, alcohol use, and diet with toxicity of these regimens and outcome in both men and women.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified by contralateral mediastinal sampling or biopsy (yes vs no), tumor stage (T1 vs T2 vs T3), and performance status (70-80% vs 90-100%). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive induction with cisplatin IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 8 and etoposide IV over 1 hour on days 1-5. Treatment continues every 4 weeks for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Beginning within 24 hours of the first dose of chemotherapy, patients undergo induction radiotherapy 5 days a week for 5 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients without local progression or distant metastases at 2-4 weeks after completion of course 2 undergo resection approximately 3-5 weeks after completion of course 2. All visible, accessible bronchopulmonary, hilar, and mediastinal lymph nodes are excised. The choice of surgical procedure (thoracotomy, lobectomy, or pneumonectomy with en bloc resection of tumor extending into the parietal pleura, chest wall, pericardium, or diaphragm) is at the discretion of the surgeon. Patients who undergo resection receive 2 additional courses of chemotherapy alone beginning 4-6 weeks postoperatively. Patients with unresectable disease or who are medically unfit for or refuse resection receive 2 additional courses of chemotherapy alone beginning immediately after completion of course 2.
- Arm II: Patients undergo induction chemoradiotherapy as in arm I but do not undergo resection. Patients without local progression or distant metastases within 1 week before anticipated completion of induction radiotherapy receive 2 additional courses of chemotherapy beginning immediately after completion of course 2. Patients without local or distant progression after completion of course 4 undergo boost radiotherapy for 8 days.
Patients are followed every 2 months for 1 year, every 3 months for 2 years, and then every 6 months thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 510 patients will be accrued for this study within 4.9 years.
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Being tested
- cisplatin, etoposide, conventional surgery, radiation therapy
- Keywords
- squamous cell lung cancer, large cell lung cancer, stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, adenocarcinoma of the lung, bronchoalveolar cell lung cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Adenocarcinoma of Lung, Adenocarcinoma, Bronchiolo-Alveolar
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
cisplatinDrug
etoposideDrug
conventional surgeryProcedure or surgery
radiation therapyRadiation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| RT + chemotherapy followed by surgery + chemotherapy | Experimental | Induction radiation therapy (RT) + concurrent induction chemotherapy followed by surgery and additional chemotherapy Receives: Drug: cisplatin; Drug: etoposide; Procedure: conventional surgery; Radiation: radiation therapy |
| RT + chemotherapy followed by chemotherapy + RT | Active comparator | Induction RT + concurrent induction chemotherapy followed by additional chemotherapy + RT Receives: Drug: cisplatin; Drug: etoposide; Radiation: radiation therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Median overall survival
Measured: From randomization to date of death or last follow-up. Analysis occurs after patients have been potentially followed for 2.5 years.
Secondary outcomes (2)
Median Progression-free survival
Measured: From randomization to date of death or last follow-up. Analysis occurs after patients have been potentially followed for 2.5 years.
Patterns of local and distant failure
Measured: From randomization to date of failure (local, regional or distant progression). Analysis occurs after patients have been potentially followed for 2.5 years.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Apr 2003 (estimated)
- Study startMar 1994
- Primary completionJun 2004
- Study completionNov 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lung CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 429 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), SWOG Cancer Research Network, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Cancer and Leukemia Group B, North Central Cancer Treatment Group, NCIC Clinical Trials Group
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- David S. Ettinger, MD, Study chair, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns HopkinsKathy S. Albain, MD, Principal investigator, Loyola UniversityDavid H. Johnson, MD, Study chair, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer CenterBruce E. Johnson, MD, Study chair, Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteMark R. Green, MD, Study chair, Medical University of South CarolinaRobert C. Miller, MD, Study chair, Mayo ClinicYvon Cormier, MD, Study chair, L'Hopital Laval
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002550
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RTOG-9309
- Other IDs
- CDR0000063333, CAN-NCIC-BR13, CLB-9592, E-R9309, NCCTG-R9309, NCI-94-C-0043, SWOG-9336, INT-0139
- Status last verified
- Nov 2015
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 1999
- Last updated
- 17 Nov 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Machtay M, Bae K, Movsas B, Paulus R, Gore EM, Komaki R, Albain K, Sause WT, Curran WJ. Higher biologically effective dose of radiotherapy is associated with improved outcomes for locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma treated with chemoradiation: an analysis of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):425-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.004. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
PubMed 20980108Machtay M, Swann S, Komaki R, et al.: What is the meaning of local-regional control after chemoradiation for locally advanced NSCLC? An RTOG analysis. [Abstract] Lung Cancer 50 (Suppl 2): A-O-041, S17, 2005.
Albain KS, Swann RS, Rusch VW, Turrisi AT 3rd, Shepherd FA, Smith C, Chen Y, Livingston RB, Feins RH, Gandara DR, Fry WA, Darling G, Johnson DH, Green MR, Miller RC, Ley J, Sause WT, Cox JD. Radiotherapy plus chemotherapy with or without surgical resection for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009 Aug 1;374(9687):379-86. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60737-6. Epub 2009 Jul 24.
PubMed 19632716Albain KS, Swann RS, Rusch VR, et al.: Phase III study of concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CT/RT) vs CT/RT followed by surgical resection for stage IIIA(pN2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): outcomes update of North American Intergroup 0139 (RTOG 9309). [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 23 (Suppl 16): A-7014, 624s, 2005.
Albain KS, Scott CB, Rusch VR, et al.: Phase III comparison of concurrent chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (CT/RT) and CT/RT followed by surgical resection for stage IIIA(pN2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): initial results from intergroup trial 0139 (RTOG 93-09) . [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 22: A-2497, 2003.
Turrisi AT, Scott CB, Rusch VR, et al.: Randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy to 61 Gy [no S] versus chemoradiotherapy to 45 Gy followed by surgery [S] using cisplatin etoposide in stage IIIa non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): intergroup trial 0139, RTOG (9309). [Abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57 (2 Suppl): S125-6, 2003.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Nov 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase III Comparison Between Concurrent Chemotherapy Plus Radiotherapy and Concurrent Chemotherapy Plus Radiotherapy Followed by Surgical Resection for Stage IIIA (N2) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00002550
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RTOG-9309
- Conditions
- Lung Cancer
- Keywords
- squamous cell lung cancer, large cell lung cancer, stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer, adenocarcinoma of the lung, bronchoalveolar cell lung cancer
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 429 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Radiation Therapy Oncology GroupResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI), SWOG Cancer Research Network, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Cancer and Leukemia Group B, North Central Cancer Treatment Group, NCIC Clinical Trials Group
- Study start
- Mar 1994
- Primary completion
- Jun 2004 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Apr 2003 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy use different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Combining radiation therapy with chemotherapy may kill more tumor cells. It is not yet known if chemotherapy plus radiation therapy is more effective with or without surgery for lung cancer.
PURPOSE: Randomized phase III trial to compare the effectiveness of combining cisplatin, etoposide, and radiation therapy with or without surgery in treating patients who have stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
- Compare the progression-free survival, median (2-year) survival, and long-term (5-year) survival in patients with newly diagnosed, stage IIIA (N2) non-small cell lung cancer treated with radiotherapy concurrently with cisplatin and etoposide with or without surgical resection.
Secondary
- Compare the patterns of local and distant failure in patients treated with these regimens.
- Determine the relationship of tobacco use, alcohol use, and diet with toxicity of these regimens and outcome in both men and women.
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified by contralateral mediastinal sampling or biopsy (yes vs no), tumor stage (T1 vs T2 vs T3), and performance status (70-80% vs 90-100%). Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I: Patients receive induction with cisplatin IV over 1 hour on days 1 and 8 and etoposide IV over 1 hour on days 1-5. Treatment continues every 4 weeks for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Beginning within 24 hours of the first dose of chemotherapy, patients undergo induction radiotherapy 5 days a week for 5 weeks in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients without local progression or distant metastases at 2-4 weeks after completion of course 2 undergo resection approximately 3-5 weeks after completion of course 2. All visible, accessible bronchopulmonary, hilar, and mediastinal lymph nodes are excised. The choice of surgical procedure (thoracotomy, lobectomy, or pneumonectomy with en bloc resection of tumor extending into the parietal pleura, chest wall, pericardium, or diaphragm) is at the discretion of the surgeon. Patients who undergo resection receive 2 additional courses of chemotherapy alone beginning 4-6 weeks postoperatively. Patients with unresectable disease or who are medically unfit for or refuse resection receive 2 additional courses of chemotherapy alone beginning immediately after completion of course 2.
- Arm II: Patients undergo induction chemoradiotherapy as in arm I but do not undergo resection. Patients without local progression or distant metastases within 1 week before anticipated completion of induction radiotherapy receive 2 additional courses of chemotherapy beginning immediately after completion of course 2. Patients without local or distant progression after completion of course 4 undergo boost radiotherapy for 8 days.
Patients are followed every 2 months for 1 year, every 3 months for 2 years, and then every 6 months thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 510 patients will be accrued for this study within 4.9 years.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| RT + chemotherapy followed by surgery + chemotherapy | Experimental | Drug: cisplatin, Drug: etoposide, Procedure: conventional surgery, Radiation: radiation therapyInduction radiation therapy (RT) + concurrent induction chemotherapy followed by surgery and additional chemotherapy |
| RT + chemotherapy followed by chemotherapy + RT | Active comparator | Drug: cisplatin, Drug: etoposide, Radiation: radiation therapyInduction RT + concurrent induction chemotherapy followed by additional chemotherapy + RT |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| cisplatin | Drug | RT + chemotherapy followed by chemotherapy + RT, RT + chemotherapy followed by surgery + chemotherapy |
| etoposide | Drug | RT + chemotherapy followed by chemotherapy + RT, RT + chemotherapy followed by surgery + chemotherapy |
| conventional surgery | Procedure or surgery | RT + chemotherapy followed by surgery + chemotherapy |
| radiation therapy | Radiation | RT + chemotherapy followed by chemotherapy + RT, RT + chemotherapy followed by surgery + chemotherapy |
Primary outcome
Median overall survival
Time frame: From randomization to date of death or last follow-up. Analysis occurs after patients have been potentially followed for 2.5 years.
2 secondary outcomes
Median Progression-free survival
Time frame: From randomization to date of death or last follow-up. Analysis occurs after patients have been potentially followed for 2.5 years.
Patterns of local and distant failure
Time frame: From randomization to date of failure (local, regional or distant progression). Analysis occurs after patients have been potentially followed for 2.5 years.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Nov 2015.
- Background: PubMed 20980108Machtay M, Bae K, Movsas B, Paulus R, Gore EM, Komaki R, Albain K, Sause WT, Curran WJ. Higher biologically effective dose of radiotherapy is associated with improved outcomes for locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma treated with chemoradiation: an analysis of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):425-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.004. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
- BackgroundMachtay M, Swann S, Komaki R, et al.: What is the meaning of local-regional control after chemoradiation for locally advanced NSCLC? An RTOG analysis. [Abstract] Lung Cancer 50 (Suppl 2): A-O-041, S17, 2005.
- Results publication: PubMed 19632716Albain KS, Swann RS, Rusch VW, Turrisi AT 3rd, Shepherd FA, Smith C, Chen Y, Livingston RB, Feins RH, Gandara DR, Fry WA, Darling G, Johnson DH, Green MR, Miller RC, Ley J, Sause WT, Cox JD. Radiotherapy plus chemotherapy with or without surgical resection for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009 Aug 1;374(9687):379-86. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60737-6. Epub 2009 Jul 24.
- Results publicationAlbain KS, Swann RS, Rusch VR, et al.: Phase III study of concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CT/RT) vs CT/RT followed by surgical resection for stage IIIA(pN2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): outcomes update of North American Intergroup 0139 (RTOG 9309). [Abstract] J Clin Oncol 23 (Suppl 16): A-7014, 624s, 2005.
- Results publicationAlbain KS, Scott CB, Rusch VR, et al.: Phase III comparison of concurrent chemotherapy plus radiotherapy (CT/RT) and CT/RT followed by surgical resection for stage IIIA(pN2) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): initial results from intergroup trial 0139 (RTOG 93-09) . [Abstract] Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 22: A-2497, 2003.
- Results publicationTurrisi AT, Scott CB, Rusch VR, et al.: Randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy to 61 Gy [no S] versus chemoradiotherapy to 45 Gy followed by surgery [S] using cisplatin etoposide in stage IIIa non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): intergroup trial 0139, RTOG (9309). [Abstract] Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57 (2 Suppl): S125-6, 2003.
Related trials for Lung Cancer
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Testing the Safety of Dapagliflozin Prior to Surgery for the Treatment of Patients With Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma
Lung Adenocarcinoma, Stage IA1 Lung Cancer American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) v8
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Screening for Hematology Branch Protocols
Hematologic Disease and Disorders, Donors
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation for NCI Surgery Branch Clinical Research Protocols
Synovial Cell Cancer, Melanoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046054/SGN-PDL1V Versus Docetaxel in Adult Participants With Previously-Treated Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Non-small Cell Carcinoma, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Clinical Genetics Branch Eligibility Screening Survey
Melanoma, Li-Fraumeni Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
David S. Ettinger, MD study chair
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Kathy S. Albain, MD principal investigator
Loyola University
David H. Johnson, MD study chair
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center
16 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing cisplatin, etoposide and conventional surgery in people with Lung Cancer, run by Radiation Therapy Oncology Group at 16 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Nov 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 16 sites in United States, South Africa. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Median overall survival (time frame: From randomization to date of death or last follow-up. Analysis occurs after patients have been potentially followed for 2.5 years.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00002550, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Nov 2015.