AzTrials
AzTrials

Tetralogy of FallotNCT00112320

Comparison of Two Pulmonary Valve Replacement Methods to Treat Tetralogy of Fallot

A study testing PVR plus RV remodeling and Standard PVR in people with Tetralogy of Fallot and Pulmonary Valve Insufficiency, run by Boston Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Repair of tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), the most common form of cyanotic congenital heart disease, usually involves surgery on the outflow of the right ventricle (RV) and the pulmonary valve in order to relieve obstruction to blood flow from the RV to the lungs. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 10 years and older
What is being tested?
PVR plus RV remodeling and Standard PVR
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
68 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2004to Aug 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 10 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Undergoing PVR to repair TOF at Children's Hospital Boston
  • Pulmonary regurgitation fraction greater than or equal to 25% (measured by CMR) and two or more of the following criteria:
  • RV end-diastolic volume index greater than or equal to 150 ml/m2 (Z score greater than 5)
  • RV end-systolic volume index greater than or equal to 70 ml/m2
  • LV end-diastolic volume index less than or equal to 65 ml/m2
  • RV ejection fraction less than 45%
  • RVOT aneurysm
  • Clinical criteria: exercise intolerance, symptoms and signs of heart failure, and use of cardiac medications

Who cannot join

  • Presence of either severe RV outflow tract obstruction (defined as peak-to-peak systolic gradient of greater than or equal to 60 mm Hg by cardiac catheterization) or severe RV hypertension at systemic or higher level
  • Additional sources of RV volume overload other than PR and tricuspid valve regurgitation
  • Contraindications to CMR

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Department of Cardiology, Children's Hospital Boston

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Randomized Trial of Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Tetralogy of Fallot

Repair of tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), the most common form of cyanotic congenital heart disease, usually involves surgery on the outflow of the right ventricle (RV) and the pulmonary valve in order to relieve obstruction to blood flow from the RV to the lungs. This procedure often leads to regurgitation (leakage) of the pulmonary valve, which puts the burden of handling a larger than normal amount of blood flow on the RV. Over the years, that extra burden leads to enlargement of the RV and to a decrease in its function. Treatment often includes surgical insertion or replacement of a new pulmonary valve. Replacement of the damaged pulmonary valve aims to minimize the leakage and help the RV function better. This study is designed to compare two methods of how the operation (called pulmonary valve replacement [PVR]) is performed. In the first method, a new valve is inserted and only the area of the old valve is operated on; this is the standard PVR. The second method involves inserting the new valve in the same way as the standard method but, in addition, areas of the right ventricular wall that are scarred and not functioning well are removed (PVR plus right ventricular remodeling). This study will evaluate which method is more effective based on the size and function of the RV measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) six months following surgery, as compared to its size and function before the operation.

Read the detailed description

Background:

Surgical repair of TOF often results in chronic pulmonary regurgitation (PR) with associated RV dilatation and dysfunction. Mounting evidence indicates that PR leads to significant long-term morbidity and mortality, including arrhythmias, sudden death, and right heart failure. Using CMR, there is a high prevalence of regional dysfunction and aneurysms in the RV in patients with repaired TOF. Current standard clinical practice in patients with repaired TOF, severe PR, ventricular dysfunction, and/or clinical deterioration is to insert a bioprosthetic pulmonary valve to reduce the volume load on the RV. Although PVR can be achieved with low mortality, research has shown a persistent or worsening RV dysfunction postoperatively, despite a competent pulmonary valve. In patients with left ventricular (LV) aneurysms, surgical remodeling with aneurysm resection has been shown to improve LV mechanics. In view of the potentially deleterious effects of aneurysmal and akinetic wall segments on RV mechanics, researcher have recently modified their PVR surgical technique in selected patients to include surgical remodeling of the RV with resection of the akinetic wall segments. However, no studies have systematically compared the efficacy of PVR plus surgical RV remodeling to PVR alone.

Research Question:

Is there a difference between two surgical strategies-PVR alone (bioprosthetic pulmonary valve insertion and, when present, resection of right ventricular outflow tract [RVOT] aneurysm) versus PVR and surgical RV remodeling (bioprosthetic pulmonary valve insertion and resection of akinetic scarred areas on the anterior RV wall to reduce RV volume)-on RV mechanics and on the incidence of adverse events in patients with repaired TOF and chronic pulmonary regurgitation?

Being tested
PVR plus RV remodeling, Standard PVR
Keywords
Pulmonary Valve Regurgitation, Right Ventricular Dysfunction, Heart Diseases
Medical subject headings
Tetralogy of Fallot, Pulmonary Valve Insufficiency, Ventricular Dysfunction, Right, Heart Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • PVR plus RV remodelingProcedure or surgery

    PVR and surgical RV remodeling, which includes bioprosthetic pulmonary valve insertion and resection of akinetic scarred areas on the anterior RV wall to reduce RV volume

  • Standard PVRProcedure or surgery

    PVR alone, which includes bioprosthetic pulmonary valve insertion and, when present, resection of right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) aneurysm

Study groups in NCT00112320
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Active comparatorStandard PVR
Receives: Procedure: Standard PVR
2ExperimentalPVR plus RV remodeling
Receives: Procedure: PVR plus RV remodeling

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Changes in ventricular mechanics compared with the preoperative ventricular mechanics

    Measured: Measured at 6 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Incidence of one or more postoperative adverse events

    Measured: Measured at 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Jun 2005 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2004
  3. Primary completionAug 2011
  4. Study completionAug 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
68 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00112320
Sponsor's protocol ID
188
Other IDs
P50HL074734, P50HL074734-01
Status last verified
Dec 2012
First submitted
1 Jun 2005
Last updated
4 Dec 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Geva T, Gauvreau K, Powell AJ, Cecchin F, Rhodes J, Geva J, del Nido P. Randomized trial of pulmonary valve replacement with and without right ventricular remodeling surgery. Circulation. 2010 Sep 14;122(11 Suppl):S201-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.951178.

    PubMed 20837914

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing PVR plus RV remodeling and Standard PVR in people with Tetralogy of Fallot and Pulmonary Valve Insufficiency, run by Boston Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Dec 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Changes in ventricular mechanics compared with the preoperative ventricular mechanics (time frame: Measured at 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00112320, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Dec 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in