Sick Sinus SyndromePhase 4NCT00224341
Arrhythmia Restart Prevention and RatE STabilization in Atrial Fibrillation
A Phase 4 study testing Pacemaker Vitatron Selection 9000 and Pacemaker Vitatron T70 in people with Sick Sinus Syndrome and Brady-Tachy Syndrome, run by Vitatron France at 37 sites in France.
Trial summary
The objective of this trial is to show the therapeutic efficacy of the preventive pacing therapies of the Selection 9000 and Vitatron T70 DR pacemakers, dedicated to handle atrial fibrillation (AF). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Sick Sinus Syndrome, Brady-Tachy Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Pacemaker Vitatron Selection 9000 and Pacemaker Vitatron T70
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 360 participants
- Where
- 37 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Nov 2003to Nov 2006
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient with documented atrial fibrillation: at least one episode of paroxysmal AF documented 6 months prior to inclusion, lasting more than one minute
- Patient with a brady-tachy syndrome or a sick sinus syndrome, with a permanent pacing indication
- Atrial lead with a tip-to-ring interval equal to or less than 12 mm
- Patient who agrees with and has signed the informed consent
Who cannot join
- Permanent AF
- AF related to a reversible cause
- One electrical cardioversion 6 months prior to inclusion
- Unstable angina
- Myocardial infarction (MI) less than 3 months
- Planned cardiac surgery or performed in the last 3 months
Show all 12Show fewer
- Congestive heart failure, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class IV
- Life expectancy less than 18 months
- Patient participating in other studies
- Patient not able to follow the FU calendar
- Less than 18 years of age
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
37 sites in 1 country.
37 sites in 1 country
France37 sites, 36 recruiting
- Recruiting
CHG
Abbeville, 80100
Jean-Ernst Poulard, MD, +33 322255200
Jean-Ernst Poulard, MD
- Recruiting
Hopital Privé
Antony, 92160
Didier Gedin, MD, +33 146743700
Didier Gedin, MD
- Recruiting
CH
Auxerre, 89011
François-Xavier Soto, MD, +33 386484658
François-Xavier Soto, MD
- Recruiting
CH
Avignon, 84902
Jean-Paul Faugier, MD, +33 432753141
Jean-Paul Faugier, MD
- Recruiting
Clinique de Bordeaux Cauderan
Bordeaux, 33300
Laurent Gencel, MD
Laurent Gencel, MD
- Recruiting
CHU
Caen, 14033
Patrice Scanu, MD, +33 231063106
Patrice Scanu, MD
- Recruiting
CH
Castres, 81108
Pascal Chavernac, MD, +33 563716328
Pascal Chavernac, MD
- Recruiting
HIA Percy
Clamart, 92141
Christian Plotton, MD, +33 141466241
Christian Plotton, MD
- Completed
CH
Colmar, 68024
- Recruiting
CH René Pleven
Dinan, 22101
Patrick Bazin, MD, +33 296857250
Patrick Bazin, MD
- Recruiting
CH
Dole, 39108
Hugues Zimmermann, MD, +33 384798065
Hugues Zimmermann, MD
- Recruiting
CH
Dunkirk, 59240
Jean-Charles Aisenfarb, MD, +33 328285623
Jean-Charles Aisenfarb, MD
- Recruiting
CH
Évreux, 27000
Bouchaib Deriouich, MD
Bouchaib Deriouich, MD
- Recruiting
CH
Grenoble, 38043
Pascal Defaye, MD, +33 476765507
Pascal Defaye, MD
- Recruiting
CMC Parly II
Le Chesnay, 78150
Patrick Attuel, MD, +33 139637000
Patrick Attuel, MD
- Recruiting
CH
Le Havre, 76083
Isabelle Cheradame, MD, +33 232733155
Isabelle Cheradame, MD
- Recruiting
CH
Limoges, 87042
Christophe D'Ivernois, MD, +33 555056310
Christophe D'Ivernois, MD
- Recruiting
CH Saint Philibert
Lomme, 59160
Pierre Graux, MD, +33 320225058
Pierre Graux, MD
- Recruiting
Clinique de la Casamance
Marseille, 13000
Jacques Faure, MD
Jacques Faure, MD
- Recruiting
Clinique Bouchard
Marseille, 13006
Maxime Guenoun, MD, +33 491159062
Maxime Guenoun, MD
- Recruiting
CHU La Timone
Marseille, 13385
Jean-Claude Deharo, Pr, +33 491386575
Jean-Claude Deharo, Pr
- Recruiting
CH
Martigues, 136995
André Ebagosti, MD, +33 442432540
André Ebagosti, MD
- Recruiting
CH
Metz, 57000
Michel Boursier, MD, +33 387553231
Michel Boursier, MD
- Recruiting
CHU
Montpellier, 34295
Jean-Marc Davy, Pr, +33 467336164
Jean-Marc Davy, Pr
- Recruiting
CH
Mulhouse, 68051
Jacques Levy, MD, +33 389647120
Jacques Levy, MD
- Recruiting
Clinique Ambroise Paré
Neuilly-sur-Seine, 92200
Olivier Thomas, MD, +33 146418965
Olivier Thomas, MD
- Recruiting
Hopital Cardiologique du Haut Leveque
Pessac, 33604
Jacques Clementy, Pr, +33 557656471
Jacques Clementy, Pr
- Recruiting
Hopital Privé Claude Galien
Quincy-sous-Sénart, 91480
Dominique Bleinc, MD, +33 169399132
Dominique Bleinc, MD
- Recruiting
Polyclinique Saint Laurent
Rennes, 35000
Jean-Michel Baisset, MD
Jean-Michel Baisset, MD
- Recruiting
CHU
Rennes, 35033
Philippe Mabo, Pr, +33 299282527
Philippe Mabo, Pr
- Recruiting
CHU
Rouen, 76035
Frédéric Anselme, MD, +33 232888111
Frédéric Anselme, MD
- Recruiting
CHU
Saint-Etienne, 42055
Antoine Da Costa, MD, +33 477828340
Antoine Da Costa, MD
- Recruiting
Institut Arnalt Tzanck
Saint-Laurent-du-Var, 06721
Claude Mariottini, MD, ++33 4 92 27 37 27
Claude Mariottini, MD
- Recruiting
CMCO
Schiltigheim, 67303
François Philippot, MD, +33 3 88628318
François Philippot, MD
- Recruiting
CH
Thionville, 57100
Jean-Yves Thisse, MD, +33 382558300
Jean-Yves Thisse, MD
- Recruiting
CH Toulon
Toulon, 83056
Isabelle Canavy, MD, +33 494616069
Isabelle Canavy, MD
- Recruiting
CH
Valenciennes, 59322
Benaissa Agraou, MD, +33 327143041
Benaissa Agraou, MD
About this study
The objective of this trial is to show the therapeutic efficacy of the preventive pacing therapies of the Selection 9000 and Vitatron T70 DR pacemakers, dedicated to handle atrial fibrillation (AF). Two new algorithms (post-AF response and ventricular rate stabilization [VRS]) will be assessed in a combined pathway, compared to a control group. The efficacy of the overall available therapies to prevent AF and its symptoms will then be assessed also.
Read the detailed description
Due to anti-arrhythmic pharmacological drugs failure to suppress atrial fibrillation (AF), interest towards preventive pacing treatments is increasing. The importance of this option in the panoply of the preventive tools is fully justified, only by considering the insufficiency, the complexity, or the poor reproducibility of the other non-pharmaceutical approaches.
Preventive pacing therapies rely on their potential effect on different onset modalities emphasized by previous studies, and more generally by stabilizing atrial tissue when potential triggers are appearing.
On top of that, cardiac stimulator can deliver these therapies when identifying these triggers but also can offer incomparable diagnostic tools, in terms of sensitivity, specificity and continuity in the monitoring.
Four preventive pacing therapies have already been evaluated, the objective of this study is to show the clinical benefit brought by the new features of the Selection 9000 / Vitatron T70 DR.
- Conditions
- Sick Sinus Syndrome, Brady-Tachy Syndrome
- Being tested
- Pacemaker Vitatron Selection 9000, Pacemaker Vitatron T70
- Keywords
- Pacemaker, Atrial Fibrillation, Prevention pacing, Algorithms, Sick sinus syndrome + Atrial Fibrillation
- Medical subject headings
- Sick Sinus Syndrome, Atrial Fibrillation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pacemaker Vitatron Selection 9000Device
Pacemaker Vitatron T70Device
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Show clinical benefit of post-AF response and VRS algorithms, when combined versus compared with a control group: In a conventional dual chamber (DDD) configuration
In a configuration including all the preventive pacing therapies of the device
The primary endpoint is the atrial fibrillation burden.
Secondary outcomes (7)
Assess the effect of post-AF response and VRS, when combined versus compared with a control group, in a conventional DDD configuration and another configuration which includes all PPT, on: Number (Nb) of hospitalizations
Nb of cardioversions
Symptom score
Restarts
Daily incidence of AF
Mean sinus rhythm duration
Assess clinical benefit of the overall AF therapies, as compared with the first four algorithms of the previous device (one continuous overdrive +3 triggered overdrive), on the same outcomes as above and AF burden
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2003
- Study completionNov 2006
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (29)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sick Sinus SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Enrolment
- 360 participants
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Vitatron France
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Patrick Attuel, MD, Principal investigator, CNOM
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00224341
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ARREST-AF
- Status last verified
- Sep 2005
- First submitted
- 20 Sep 2005
- Last updated
- 18 Oct 2006
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Fauchier L, Briand F, Soto FX, Quennelle F, Levy J, Darmon JP, Lellouche D, Lavergne T, Poret P, Pelade C, Babuty D. Management of atrial tachyarrhythmias: benefits of pacemaker diagnostics. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003 Jan;26(1P2):233-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00023.x.
PubMed 12687819Camm AJ on behalf of the AFTherapy Study Group. The Atrial Fibrillation Therapy Study. Présentation orale au cours du Congrès de l'ESC à Stockholm, Septembre 2001.
Fuster V, Ryden LE, Asinger RW, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Frye RL, Halperin JL, Kay GN, Klein WW, Levy S, McNamara RL, Prystowsky EN, Wann LS, Wyse DG; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association; European Society of Cardiology; North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences (Committee to develop guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation) developed in collaboration with the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J. 2001 Oct;22(20):1852-923. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2001.2983. No abstract available.
PubMed 11601835Tse HF, Lau CP, Ayers GM. Incidence and modes of onset of early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation after successful internal cardioversion, and its prevention by intravenous sotalol. Heart. 1999 Sep;82(3):319-24. doi: 10.1136/hrt.82.3.319.
PubMed 10455082Falk RH. Management of atrial fibrillation--radical reform or modest modification? N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 5;347(23):1883-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe020137. No abstract available.
PubMed 12466514Van Gelder IC, Hagens VE, Bosker HA, Kingma JH, Kamp O, Kingma T, Said SA, Darmanata JI, Timmermans AJ, Tijssen JG, Crijns HJ; Rate Control versus Electrical Cardioversion for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Study Group. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 5;347(23):1834-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021375.
PubMed 12466507Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP, Domanski MJ, Rosenberg Y, Schron EB, Kellen JC, Greene HL, Mickel MC, Dalquist JE, Corley SD; Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Investigators. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 5;347(23):1825-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021328.
PubMed 12466506Hohnloser SH, Kuck KH, Lilienthal J. Rhythm or rate control in atrial fibrillation--Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation (PIAF): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2000 Nov 25;356(9244):1789-94. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03230-x.
PubMed 11117910Hohnloser SH, Kuck KH. Randomized trial of rhythm or rate control in atrial fibrillation: the Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation Trial (PIAF). Eur Heart J. 2001 May;22(10):801-2. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2001.2596. No abstract available.
PubMed 11350085Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC, Takahashi A, Hocini M, Quiniou G, Garrigue S, Le Mouroux A, Le Metayer P, Clementy J. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med. 1998 Sep 3;339(10):659-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199809033391003.
PubMed 9725923Defaye P, Dournaux F, Mouton E. Prevalence of supraventricular arrhythmias from the automated analysis of data stored in the DDD pacemakers of 617 patients: the AIDA study. The AIDA Multicenter Study Group. Automatic Interpretation for Diagnosis Assistance. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Jan;21(1 Pt 2):250-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb01098.x.
PubMed 9474682Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, Thomsen PE, Thuesen L, Mortensen PT, Vesterlund T, Pedersen AK. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet. 1997 Oct 25;350(9086):1210-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)03425-9.
PubMed 9652562Connolly SJ, Kerr CR, Gent M, Roberts RS, Yusuf S, Gillis AM, Sami MH, Talajic M, Tang AS, Klein GJ, Lau C, Newman DM. Effects of physiologic pacing versus ventricular pacing on the risk of stroke and death due to cardiovascular causes. Canadian Trial of Physiologic Pacing Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 11;342(19):1385-91. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005113421902.
PubMed 10805823Gillis AM, Connolly SJ, Lacombe P, Philippon F, Dubuc M, Kerr CR, Yee R, Rose MS, Newman D, Kavanagh KM, Gardner MJ, Kus T, Wyse DG. Randomized crossover comparison of DDDR versus VDD pacing after atrioventricular junction ablation for prevention of atrial fibrillation. The atrial pacing peri-ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PA (3)) study investigators. Circulation. 2000 Aug 15;102(7):736-41. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.7.736.
PubMed 10942740Edvardson N. Efficacy of preventive pacing therapies in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation - IV International meeting - Atrial Fibrillation 2001 : 161-164.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Oct 2006. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Arrhythmia Restart Prevention and RatE STabilization in Atrial Fibrillation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00224341
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ARREST-AF
- Conditions
- Sick Sinus Syndrome, Brady-Tachy Syndrome
- Keywords
- Pacemaker, Atrial Fibrillation, Prevention pacing, Algorithms, Sick sinus syndrome + Atrial Fibrillation
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 360 participants
- Lead sponsor
- Vitatron FranceIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2003
- Study completion
- Nov 2006
- First posted
- 22 Sep 2005 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The objective of this trial is to show the therapeutic efficacy of the preventive pacing therapies of the Selection 9000 and Vitatron T70 DR pacemakers, dedicated to handle atrial fibrillation (AF). Two new algorithms (post-AF response and ventricular rate stabilization [VRS]) will be assessed in a combined pathway, compared to a control group. The efficacy of the overall available therapies to prevent AF and its symptoms will then be assessed also.
Detailed description
Due to anti-arrhythmic pharmacological drugs failure to suppress atrial fibrillation (AF), interest towards preventive pacing treatments is increasing. The importance of this option in the panoply of the preventive tools is fully justified, only by considering the insufficiency, the complexity, or the poor reproducibility of the other non-pharmaceutical approaches.
Preventive pacing therapies rely on their potential effect on different onset modalities emphasized by previous studies, and more generally by stabilizing atrial tissue when potential triggers are appearing.
On top of that, cardiac stimulator can deliver these therapies when identifying these triggers but also can offer incomparable diagnostic tools, in terms of sensitivity, specificity and continuity in the monitoring.
Four preventive pacing therapies have already been evaluated, the objective of this study is to show the clinical benefit brought by the new features of the Selection 9000 / Vitatron T70 DR.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patient with documented atrial fibrillation: at least one episode of paroxysmal AF documented 6 months prior to inclusion, lasting more than one minute
- Patient with a brady-tachy syndrome or a sick sinus syndrome, with a permanent pacing indication
- Atrial lead with a tip-to-ring interval equal to or less than 12 mm
- Patient who agrees with and has signed the informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Permanent AF
- AF related to a reversible cause
- One electrical cardioversion 6 months prior to inclusion
- Unstable angina
- Myocardial infarction (MI) less than 3 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pacemaker Vitatron Selection 9000 | Device | – |
| Pacemaker Vitatron T70 | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Show clinical benefit of post-AF response and VRS algorithms, when combined versus compared with a control group: In a conventional dual chamber (DDD) configuration
In a configuration including all the preventive pacing therapies of the device
The primary endpoint is the atrial fibrillation burden.
7 secondary outcomes
Assess the effect of post-AF response and VRS, when combined versus compared with a control group, in a conventional DDD configuration and another configuration which includes all PPT, on: Number (Nb) of hospitalizations
Nb of cardioversions
Symptom score
Restarts
Daily incidence of AF
Mean sinus rhythm duration
Assess clinical benefit of the overall AF therapies, as compared with the first four algorithms of the previous device (one continuous overdrive +3 triggered overdrive), on the same outcomes as above and AF burden
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Oct 2006.
- Background: PubMed 12687819Fauchier L, Briand F, Soto FX, Quennelle F, Levy J, Darmon JP, Lellouche D, Lavergne T, Poret P, Pelade C, Babuty D. Management of atrial tachyarrhythmias: benefits of pacemaker diagnostics. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003 Jan;26(1P2):233-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00023.x.
- BackgroundCamm AJ on behalf of the AFTherapy Study Group. The Atrial Fibrillation Therapy Study. Présentation orale au cours du Congrès de l'ESC à Stockholm, Septembre 2001.
- Background: PubMed 11601835Fuster V, Ryden LE, Asinger RW, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Frye RL, Halperin JL, Kay GN, Klein WW, Levy S, McNamara RL, Prystowsky EN, Wann LS, Wyse DG; American College of Cardiology; American Heart Association; European Society of Cardiology; North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines and Policy Conferences (Committee to develop guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation) developed in collaboration with the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. Eur Heart J. 2001 Oct;22(20):1852-923. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2001.2983. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 10455082Tse HF, Lau CP, Ayers GM. Incidence and modes of onset of early reinitiation of atrial fibrillation after successful internal cardioversion, and its prevention by intravenous sotalol. Heart. 1999 Sep;82(3):319-24. doi: 10.1136/hrt.82.3.319.
- Background: PubMed 12466514Falk RH. Management of atrial fibrillation--radical reform or modest modification? N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 5;347(23):1883-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe020137. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 12466507Van Gelder IC, Hagens VE, Bosker HA, Kingma JH, Kamp O, Kingma T, Said SA, Darmanata JI, Timmermans AJ, Tijssen JG, Crijns HJ; Rate Control versus Electrical Cardioversion for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Study Group. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 5;347(23):1834-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021375.
- Background: PubMed 12466506Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP, Domanski MJ, Rosenberg Y, Schron EB, Kellen JC, Greene HL, Mickel MC, Dalquist JE, Corley SD; Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Investigators. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2002 Dec 5;347(23):1825-33. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021328.
- Background: PubMed 11117910Hohnloser SH, Kuck KH, Lilienthal J. Rhythm or rate control in atrial fibrillation--Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation (PIAF): a randomised trial. Lancet. 2000 Nov 25;356(9244):1789-94. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)03230-x.
- Background: PubMed 11350085Hohnloser SH, Kuck KH. Randomized trial of rhythm or rate control in atrial fibrillation: the Pharmacological Intervention in Atrial Fibrillation Trial (PIAF). Eur Heart J. 2001 May;22(10):801-2. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2001.2596. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 9725923Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC, Takahashi A, Hocini M, Quiniou G, Garrigue S, Le Mouroux A, Le Metayer P, Clementy J. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med. 1998 Sep 3;339(10):659-66. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199809033391003.
- Background: PubMed 9474682Defaye P, Dournaux F, Mouton E. Prevalence of supraventricular arrhythmias from the automated analysis of data stored in the DDD pacemakers of 617 patients: the AIDA study. The AIDA Multicenter Study Group. Automatic Interpretation for Diagnosis Assistance. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Jan;21(1 Pt 2):250-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb01098.x.
- Background: PubMed 9652562Andersen HR, Nielsen JC, Thomsen PE, Thuesen L, Mortensen PT, Vesterlund T, Pedersen AK. Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet. 1997 Oct 25;350(9086):1210-6. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)03425-9.
Related trials for Sick Sinus Syndrome
Recruiting
Multimodality Location Prediction Accuracy of Leadless Pacemaker Positioning
Sinus Pause, Sinus Sick Syndrome
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Safety, Performance, and Clinical Benefit of Pacing the Left Bundle Branch Area - Post-Market Clinical Follow-up
Bradycardia, Atrioventricular Block
Not yet recruiting
Belgo-Luxembourg Leadless PM Registry
Bradyarrhythmias, AV Block Complete
Recruiting
LEAP 2 Chronic EFS
Cardiac Pacemaker, Cardiac Rhythm Disorder
RecruitingObservational study
Biospecimen Repository for Cardiac Arrhythmias at the Cleveland Clinic
Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Patrick Attuel, MD principal investigator
CNOM
37 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Pacemaker Vitatron Selection 9000 and Pacemaker Vitatron T70 in people with Sick Sinus Syndrome and Brady-Tachy Syndrome, run by Vitatron France at 37 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Oct 2006. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 37 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Christèle Pelade, Engineer (01 53 98 83 00, christele.pelade@vitatron.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Show clinical benefit of post-AF response and VRS algorithms, when combined versus compared with a control group: In a conventional dual chamber (DDD) configuration. The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00224341, which also lists 29 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Oct 2006.