Heart FailureNCT00271544
Attain Model 4196 Left Ventricular (LV) Lead
A study testing Pacing Lead in people with Heart Failure, run by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure at 24 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Heart failure is a progressive disease that decreases the pumping action of the heart. This may cause a backup of fluid in the heart and may result in heart beat changes. When there are changes in the heart beat sometimes an implantable heart device is used to control the rate and rhythm of the heart beat. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure
- What is being tested?
- Pacing Lead
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 190 participants
- Where
- 24 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Feb 2007to Dec 2008
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- QRS greater than or equal to 120 milliseconds (The QRS interval is a measurement of how the electrical signal involved in a heart beat travels, or is conducted, through the ventricles. A wide QRS (more than 120) suggests that there is a conduction problem, or block, in the ventricles.)
- Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (EF) less than or equal to 35 percent (Ejection Fraction is a measurement of how well the left ventricle pumps blood out to the rest of the body. The higher the EF the more blood the ventricle is pumping.)
- Subject has moderate to severe heart failure despite medications
Who cannot join
- Subjects with a previous lead in the left ventricle or previous implant attempt within 30 days of implant or ongoing complications from a previous unsuccessful attempt
- Subjects with chest pain or who have had a heart attack within the past month before enrollment in the study
- Subjects that have had certain surgeries on their heart within the past three months
- Subjects with chronic (permanent) fast heart beats in the upper chambers of the heart (atrial arrhythmias)
Trial locations and contacts
24 sites in 2 countries.
24 sites in 2 countries
United States19 sites
Study site
Anchorage, Alaska
Study site
Baton Rouge, Louisiana
Study site
Burlington, Vermont
Study site
Dallas, Texas
Study site
Davenport, Iowa
Study site
Detroit, Michigan
Study site
Fort Worth, Texas
Study site
Kansas City, Missouri
Study site
Kingsport, Tennessee
Study site
Lexington, Kentucky
Study site
Long Beach, California
Study site
Mayfield Heights, Ohio
Study site
Memphis, Tennessee
Study site
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Study site
Palo Alto, California
Study site
Phoenix, Arizona
Study site
Raleigh, North Carolina
Study site
Spartanburg, South Carolina
Study site
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania
Canada5 sites
Study site
Calgary, Alberta
Study site
Edmonton, Alberta
Study site
Montreal, Quebec
Study site
Sainte-Foy, Quebec
Study site
Toronto, Ontario
About this study
Heart failure is a progressive disease that decreases the pumping action of the heart. This may cause a backup of fluid in the heart and may result in heart beat changes. When there are changes in the heart beat sometimes an implantable heart device is used to control the rate and rhythm of the heart beat. In certain heart failure cases, when the two lower chambers of the heart no longer beat in a coordinated manner, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be prescribed. CRT is similar to a pacemaker. It is placed (implanted) under the skin of the upper chest. CRT is delivered as tiny electrical pulses to the right and left ventricles through three or four leads (flexible insulated wires) that are inserted through the veins to the heart. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new lead for delivering energy to the left ventricle (bottom left chamber of the heart).
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Being tested
- Pacing Lead
- Keywords
- heart failure, cardiac pacing, left ventricular lead, cardiac resynchronization therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Pacing LeadDevice
implant and follow-up of study device
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 4196 Lead | Experimental | Non-randomized study. Receives: Device: Pacing Lead |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Safety (Subjects Without a Model 4196 Lead Related Complication)
A subject who was free of a Model 4196 lead related complication by one month visit.
Measured: One Month
Efficacy (Pacing Voltage Thresholds of Distal Tip Electrode)
Model 4196 lead distal tip electrode mean pacing voltage threshold (at 0.5 milliseconds [ms])
Measured: One Month
Efficacy (Pacing Voltage Threshold of Proximal Ring Electrode)
Model 4196 lead proximal ring electrode mean pacing voltage threshold (at 0.5 milliseconds [ms])
Measured: Three Months
Secondary outcomes (16)
Subjects Successfully Implanted With Model 4196 Lead
A successful implant occurs when the Model 4196 lead is implanted in the left ventricle of the heart and functions appropriately.
Measured: Implant
Subjects Successfully Implanted After Cannulation
A successful implant occurs when the coronary sinus (CS) is successfully cannulated and a left ventricular lead is implanted in the left ventricle of the heart and functions appropriately.
Measured: Implant
All Left Ventricular Leads
All left ventricular leads successfully implanted
Measured: Implant
All Medtronic Left Ventricular Leads (Attain Family)
All Medtronic left ventricular leads (Lead Model Numbers included 4193, 4194, 4195 and 4196) successfully implanted
Measured: Implant
Cannulation Time
Cannulation time was defined as the time from insertion of the first CS cannulation catheter to the first CS cannulation.
Measured: Implant
Fluoroscopy Time
Fluoroscopy time was defined as the total time the fluoroscope was imaging.
Measured: Implant
Model 4196 Lead Placement Time
Model 4196 lead placement time was defined as the time from insertion of the successfully placed lead to the time when it was placed in the first acceptable pacing location.
Measured: Implant
Total Implant Time
Total implant time was defined as time from initial incision to final closure.
Measured: Implant
Assessment of Lead Handling Characteristics
Lead handling characteristics assessed as "acceptable" by physicians
Measured: Implant
Electrical Performance - Tip Electrode: Sensing
Model 4196 lead tip electrode R-wave amplitude
Measured: 12-month
Electrical Performance - Tip Electrode: LV Voltage Threshold
Model 4196 lead tip electrode LV voltage threshold
Measured: 12-month
Electrical Performance -Tip Electrode: Pacing Impedance
Model 4196 lead tip electrode pacing impedance
Measured: 12-month
Electrical Performance -Ring Electrode: Sensing
Model 4196 lead ring electrode R-wave amplitude
Measured: Implant
Electrical Performance - Ring Electrode: LV Voltage Threshold
Model 4196 lead ring electrode LV voltage threshold
Measured: 12-month
Electrical Performance -Ring Electrode: Pacing Impedance
Model 4196 lead ring electrode pacing impedance
Measured: 12-Month
Summarize All Adverse Events
All adverse events were collected for this trial such as, but not limited to, the following: Atrial Fibrillation, Chest Pain, Pneumonia, Cold/Flu
Measured: Up to 18 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Jan 2006 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2007
- Primary completionAug 2007
- Study completionDec 2008
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 190 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Investigators
- Brian Ramza, MD, PHD, Principal investigator, St. Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City MO
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00271544
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 241
- Status last verified
- Sep 2009
- First submitted
- 28 Dec 2005
- Last updated
- 28 Sep 2009
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Sep 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Attain Model 4196 Left Ventricular (LV) Lead
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00271544
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 241
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Keywords
- heart failure, cardiac pacing, left ventricular lead, cardiac resynchronization therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 190 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart FailureIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2007
- Primary completion
- Aug 2007 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2008 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Jan 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 25 Aug 2009
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Heart failure is a progressive disease that decreases the pumping action of the heart. This may cause a backup of fluid in the heart and may result in heart beat changes. When there are changes in the heart beat sometimes an implantable heart device is used to control the rate and rhythm of the heart beat. In certain heart failure cases, when the two lower chambers of the heart no longer beat in a coordinated manner, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may be prescribed. CRT is similar to a pacemaker. It is placed (implanted) under the skin of the upper chest. CRT is delivered as tiny electrical pulses to the right and left ventricles through three or four leads (flexible insulated wires) that are inserted through the veins to the heart. The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new lead for delivering energy to the left ventricle (bottom left chamber of the heart).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 4196 Lead | Experimental | Device: Pacing LeadNon-randomized study. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- QRS greater than or equal to 120 milliseconds (The QRS interval is a measurement of how the electrical signal involved in a heart beat travels, or is conducted, through the ventricles. A wide QRS (more than 120) suggests that there is a conduction problem, or block, in the ventricles.)
- Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (EF) less than or equal to 35 percent (Ejection Fraction is a measurement of how well the left ventricle pumps blood out to the rest of the body. The higher the EF the more blood the ventricle is pumping.)
- Subject has moderate to severe heart failure despite medications
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Subjects with a previous lead in the left ventricle or previous implant attempt within 30 days of implant or ongoing complications from a previous unsuccessful attempt
- Subjects with chest pain or who have had a heart attack within the past month before enrollment in the study
- Subjects that have had certain surgeries on their heart within the past three months
- Subjects with chronic (permanent) fast heart beats in the upper chambers of the heart (atrial arrhythmias)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Pacing Leadimplant and follow-up of study device | Device | 4196 Lead |
Primary outcome
Safety (Subjects Without a Model 4196 Lead Related Complication)
Time frame: One Month
A subject who was free of a Model 4196 lead related complication by one month visit.
Efficacy (Pacing Voltage Thresholds of Distal Tip Electrode)
Time frame: One Month
Model 4196 lead distal tip electrode mean pacing voltage threshold (at 0.5 milliseconds [ms])
Efficacy (Pacing Voltage Threshold of Proximal Ring Electrode)
Time frame: Three Months
Model 4196 lead proximal ring electrode mean pacing voltage threshold (at 0.5 milliseconds [ms])
16 secondary outcomes
Subjects Successfully Implanted With Model 4196 Lead
Time frame: Implant
Subjects Successfully Implanted After Cannulation
Time frame: Implant
All Left Ventricular Leads
Time frame: Implant
All Medtronic Left Ventricular Leads (Attain Family)
Time frame: Implant
Cannulation Time
Time frame: Implant
Fluoroscopy Time
Time frame: Implant
Model 4196 Lead Placement Time
Time frame: Implant
Total Implant Time
Time frame: Implant
Assessment of Lead Handling Characteristics
Time frame: Implant
Electrical Performance - Tip Electrode: Sensing
Time frame: 12-month
Electrical Performance - Tip Electrode: LV Voltage Threshold
Time frame: 12-month
Electrical Performance -Tip Electrode: Pacing Impedance
Time frame: 12-month
Electrical Performance -Ring Electrode: Sensing
Time frame: Implant
Electrical Performance - Ring Electrode: LV Voltage Threshold
Time frame: 12-month
Electrical Performance -Ring Electrode: Pacing Impedance
Time frame: 12-Month
Summarize All Adverse Events
Time frame: Up to 18 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Sep 2009.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 3
Maridebart Cafraglutide in Heart Failure With Preserved or Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction and Obesity
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction
Recruiting
Evaluation of the Effects of Sauna Therapy on Congestion and Loop Diuretic Use in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced or Moderately Reduced Ejection Fraction
Heart Failure
Recruiting
PrEcision Pacing in HFpEF: the PEP-HFpEF Trial
Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure New York Heart Association Class III
Enrolling by invitation
EXCOR Active Driving System for the EXCOR Pediatric VAD IDE Study
Heart Failure, Transplant; Failure, Heart
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Multi-Scale Analysis of Phenotypes in Heart Failure (MAP-HEART)
Heart Failure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Brian Ramza, MD, PHD principal investigator
St. Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City MO
24 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Pacing Lead in people with Heart Failure, run by Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure at 24 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 24 sites in United States, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 25 Aug 2009). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Safety (Subjects Without a Model 4196 Lead Related Complication) (time frame: One Month). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2009.