Guideline ImplementationNCT00372164
Retrospective Evaluation of ASIPP Guidelines Implementation
An observational study of Guideline Implementation, run by Pain Management Center of Paducah at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
To demonstrate clinically significant improvements in the patients treated following ASIPP guidelines compared to the patients who were treated prior to the establishment of ASIPP guidelines. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Guideline Implementation
- What is being tested?
- American Society of Interventional Pain Physician Guidelines
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 1998to Jul 2005
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: current patients
Who may be able to join
- Evaluate all patients undergoing the following interventional techniques during 1999 and 2000 compared to patients undergoing interventional techniques during 2004 and 2005
- Cervical facet joint nerve blocks
- Thoracic facet joint nerve blocks
- Lumbar facet joint nerve blocks
- Lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injections
- Cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injections
Who cannot join
- Non-availability of appropriate data
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Implementation of American Society of Interventional Pain Physician Guidelines for Interventional Techniques: A Retrospective Evaluation
To demonstrate clinically significant improvements in the patients treated following ASIPP guidelines compared to the patients who were treated prior to the establishment of ASIPP guidelines.
Read the detailed description
We have performed one study in the past showing that the implementation of guidelines improved outcomes by reducing the number of procedures and also the cost. However,, no large scale study has been performed thus far.
- Conditions
- Guideline Implementation
- Being tested
- American Society of Interventional Pain Physician Guidelines
- Keywords
- ASIPP, Guidelines
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
American Society of Interventional Pain Physician GuidelinesProcedure or surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Sep 2006 (estimated)
- Study startJan 1998
- Study completionJul 2005
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Guideline ImplementationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pain Management Center of Paducah
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Laxmaiah Manchikanti, MD, Principal investigator, Ambulatory Surgery Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00372164
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- protocol 14
- Status last verified
- Oct 2015
- First submitted
- 1 Sep 2006
- Last updated
- 21 Oct 2015
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Oct 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Implementation of American Society of Interventional Pain Physician Guidelines for Interventional Techniques: A Retrospective Evaluation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00372164
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- protocol 14
- Conditions
- Guideline Implementation
- Keywords
- ASIPP, Guidelines
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Withdrawn
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Pain Management Center of PaducahUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 1998
- Study completion
- Jul 2005
- First posted
- 6 Sep 2006 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To demonstrate clinically significant improvements in the patients treated following ASIPP guidelines compared to the patients who were treated prior to the establishment of ASIPP guidelines.
Detailed description
We have performed one study in the past showing that the implementation of guidelines improved outcomes by reducing the number of procedures and also the cost. However,, no large scale study has been performed thus far.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- current patients
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Evaluate all patients undergoing the following interventional techniques during 1999 and 2000 compared to patients undergoing interventional techniques during 2004 and 2005
- Cervical facet joint nerve blocks
- Thoracic facet joint nerve blocks
- Lumbar facet joint nerve blocks
- Lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injections
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Non-availability of appropriate data
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| American Society of Interventional Pain Physician Guidelines | Procedure or surgery | – |
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Oct 2015.
Related trials for Guideline Implementation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Improving Implementation of Guideline-Recommended LDL-C Management in High-Risk Cardiovascular Patients
ASCVD
Not yet recruiting
The PIONEER Comparative Effectiveness Study - Project 2
Head Injury Trauma, Traumatic Brain Injury, Mild
Enrolling by invitation
Implementation of Acute Heart Failure Checklist
Acute Heart Failure (AHF), Implementation Research
Enrolling by invitation
RAndomized EHR-based Prescribing to Improve Disease-modifying Therapies for Cardio-Kidney-Metabolic Care (RAPID-CKM)
Chronic Kidney Disease, Type 2 Diabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Guideline Implementation and Quality of Care Evaluation in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF)
HFrEF - Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Guideline Adherence
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Laxmaiah Manchikanti, MD principal investigator
Ambulatory Surgery Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Guideline Implementation, run by Pain Management Center of Paducah at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Oct 2015.