AzTrials
AzTrials

Shock, CardiogenicPhase 4NCT00420030

Abciximab in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Cardiogenic Shock

A Phase 4 study testing Abciximab in people with Shock, Cardiogenic, run by Charles University, Czech Republic at 1 site in Czechia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Outcome of patients with myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock is very poor. Although early mechanical revascularization has been demonstrated superior to conservative medical treatment, mortality range remains about 45-60%. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Shock, Cardiogenic
What is being tested?
Abciximab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteCzechia
Study dates
Sep 2006to Jun 2009
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Acute myocardial infarction (ST elevation, ST depression or bundle branch block on ECG) with indication to urgent coronary angiography
  • Signs of cardiogenic shock including incompletely developed shock (at least one of the following must be present):
  • Hypotension (BP < 90mmHg) and HR > 90/min
  • Organ hypoperfusion-cold wett sweating skin and HR>90/min
  • Need of catecholamine support to maintain BP> 90/min
  • Klip II-III + systolic BP below 120 mmHg
  • Informed consent signed either by patient or his/her relative in case of diminished consciousness.

Who cannot join

  • Contraindications for the use of abciximab, either:
  • Hypersensitiveness to Reopro components
  • Active internal bleeding
  • History of stroke in last 2 years
  • Previous history (in last 2 month) of intracranial or intraspinal surgical intervention
  • Atrio-venous malformation or aneurysm
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Known haemorrhagic diathesis or severe uncontrolled hypertension
  • History of thrombocytopenia
  • Therapy with oral anticoagulants (warfarin)
  • Cardiogenic shock caused by severe mitral regurgitation, rupture of free left ventricle wall or interventricular septum.
  • Pre-randomization heparin dose > 10 000 U during last 6 hours.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Czechia1 site
  • Cardiocenter, University Hospital Vinohrady

    Prague, 100 34

Other trials in Czechia

About this study

Official title: Routine Upfront Abciximab Versus Standard Peri-Procedural Therapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Cardiogenic Shock PRAGUE-7 Trial.

Outcome of patients with myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock is very poor. Although early mechanical revascularization has been demonstrated superior to conservative medical treatment, mortality range remains about 45-60%. Some medical registries have showed further therapeutic benefit by administration of glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors during PCI in patients with cardiogenic shock. However, there is no randomized study that supports this therapeutic strategy in these high risk patients.

Hypothesis:

Read more

GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors improve angiographic (TIMI-flow), echocardiographic (LV function) and clinical (combined end-point) outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock.

Study design:

Open "pseudorandomized" multicenter, phase IV clinical trial.

Anticipated findings:

The investigators anticipate to document better angiographic, echocardiographic and clinical outcome after upfront abciximab administration in comparison to standard periprocedural therapy in patients undergoing PCI for cardiogenic shock. This would be the first randomized clinical trial that could support this therapeutic strategy.

Read the detailed description

Routine upfront abciximab versus standard peri-procedural therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock PRAGUE-7 Trial.

Hypothesis:

GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors improve angiographic (TIMI-flow), echocardiographic (LV function) and clinical (combined end-point) outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction complicated with cardiogenic shock.

Study design:

Open "pseudorandomized" multicenter, phase IV clinical trial. The reason for "pseudorandomization" (i.e. randomization by even or odd date, when the PCI is performed) is ethical: it saves time, what is critical in this clinical setting. It does not delay treatment at all, while classical randomization in cardiogenic shock may sometimes delay treatment by up to 15 minutes and this is the main reason why randomized trials on shock are rarely able to enroll patients.

Groups:

Group A - Upfront administration of abciximab bolus followed by 12-hours abciximab infusion + standard therapy Group B - Standard peri-procedural therapy with possibility of abciximab administration according the interventional cardiologist. Expected rate of peri-procedural abciximab administration in this group is 20% of patients.

Allowed and excluded concomitant medication see bellow in the table

Group A Group B

Before PCI Aspirin according to physician All treatment according to Clopidogrel according to physician physician Heparin bolus 70IU/kg of body weigh Abciximab bolus 0,25 mg/kg of body weigh

During PCI Abciximab 12-hours infusion 0,125microgram/kg/min Abciximab according to Other treatment according to physician physician

Excluded Thrombolysis, Eptifibatide, Tirofiban Thrombolysis, Eptifibatide, treatment Tirofiban

Proposed sample size:

80 patients (40 patients in each group). This number of patient permit to complete the study within <2 years. Because of this and because of incidence of cardiogenic shock the study sample size is not supported statistically.

Objectives:

Primary: Thirty-day clinical combined outcome : death / reinfarction / stroke / new renal failure.

(Death = death from any cause, reinfarction = recurrent ischemic symptoms with new increase in CK-MB, stroke = any new neurologic deficit lasting > 24 hours, new renal failure = increase in creatinine to > 300 micromol/l)

Secondary: 1) Combined end-point death / reinfarction / stroke / TIMI-flow <3 / EF <30% on day 30. 2) Left ventricular EF assessed by echocardiography on the day 30 (in deceased pts. EF assumed to be 0%) 3) Rate of major bleeding complication 4) Myocardial blush score after PCI 5) TIMI-flow after PCI

Statistical analysis:

Thirty-day clinical outcome as well as other categorical characteristics of patients in the two groups will be compared by Fisher´s exact test. Group differences in continuous factors will be compared by by Student´t-test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

Cardiac catheterization, PCI and abciximab:

Patients in both groups will undergo coronary angiography by femoral access using 5F or 6F sheath and catheters. All patients will receive standard antithrombotic and anticoagulant treatment either during transport or directly at the catheterization laboratory. Patients randomized into group A will receive bolus of abciximab given as a bolus dose of 0,25mg per kg of body weight immediately after randomization (either in CCU, emergency dept. or upon arrival to cath-lab), followed by an infusion of 0,125microgram/kg/min (maximum 10microgram/min) for 12 hours.

  • PCI - will be performed immediately after coronary angiography if technically feasible. PCI will be performed at infarct related artery (IRA). Intracoronary stent - will be implanted if possible. Type, length and size of the stent will be choose according decision of invasive cardiologist
  • Abciximab - will be given to all patients randomized into group A as mentioned above. Periprocedural abciximab bolus (0,25mg/kg) followed by 12-hours abciximab infusion (0,250 microgram/kg/min) will be given selectively to patients randomized into group B according to the decision of invasive cardiologist - we expect that GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor (abciximab) will be given to cca 10-20% of patients in this group (what is our current routine for the use of GPIIb/IIIa blockers in this setting).

Angiographic data will be stored on CD. Independent invasive cardiologist blind to clinical data and blind to the randomization of the patient, will assess TIMI flow of IRA before and after PCI (grade 0-3), myocardial blush score before and after PCI in the area of IRA (grade 0-3) and TIMI frame count after PCI.

Echocardiography:

Complete echocardiographic examination will be performed 24hours, on the day 7 and day 30 after PCI. Vivid7 ultrasound systems will be used. Data will be stored in digital form if possible (otherwise storage on S-VHS will be used). Independent observer will assess:

  • end-systolic and enddiastolic diameter of left ventricle (parasternal view)
  • ejection fraction measured using Simson´s method
  • regional left ventricle function

Ethical consideration:

The approval of local ethical committee is required as for any other research protocol.

Anticipated finding:

We anticipate to document better angiographic, echocardiographic and clinical outcome after upfront abciximab administration in comparison to standard periprocedural therapy in patients undergoing PCI for cardiogenic shock. This would be the first randomized clinical trial that could support this therapeutic strategy.

Being tested
Abciximab
Keywords
upfront abciximab, PCI, cardiogenic shock
Medical subject headings
Shock, Cardiogenic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AbciximabDrug

    Also called Reopro

    Abciximab - IIb/IIIa GP inhibitor, dosage - bolus + continuous infusion

Study groups in NCT00420030
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Active comparatorArm 1 - routine upfront administration of Reopro (Abciximab)
Receives: Drug: Abciximab
2OtherReopro (Abciximab) only if needed - according to physician
Receives: Drug: Abciximab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Combined end-point death/reinfarction/stroke/TIMI-flow <3/EF <30% on day 30.

    Measured: 30 days

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Left ventricular EF assessed by echocardiography on the day 30 (in deceased pts. EF assumed to be 0%)

    Measured: 30 days

  2. Rate of major bleeding complication

    Measured: 30 days

  3. Myocardial blush score after PCI

    Measured: immediately after PCI

  4. TIMI-flow after PCI

    Measured: immediatelly after PCI

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Jan 2007 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2006
  3. Primary completionJun 2009
  4. Study completionJun 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00420030
Sponsor's protocol ID
Charles University, Prague
Other IDs
MSM 0021620817
Status last verified
Jun 2009
First submitted
8 Jan 2007
Last updated
23 Jun 2009
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Tousek P, Rokyta R, Tesarova J, Pudil R, Belohlavek J, Stasek J, Rohac F, Widimsky P. Routine upfront abciximab versus standard periprocedural therapy in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock: The PRAGUE-7 Study. An open randomized multicentre study. Acute Card Care. 2011 Sep;13(3):116-22. doi: 10.3109/17482941.2011.567282. Epub 2011 Apr 28.

    PubMed 21526919

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Abciximab in people with Shock, Cardiogenic, run by Charles University, Czech Republic at 1 site in Czechia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jun 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Combined end-point death/reinfarction/stroke/TIMI-flow <3/EF <30% on day 30. (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00420030, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jun 2009.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in