Pain During LabourPhase 3NCT00611221
Massage Therapy Study: Massage Therapy and Labour Outcomes
A Phase 3 study testing Massage in people with Pain During Labour, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
OBJECTIVE: To measure the benefits of massage, administered by a registered massage therapist, to pain management for women in active labour. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SETTING: BC Women's Hospital, a tertiary level maternity teaching hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 35 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain During Labour
- What is being tested?
- Massage
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 77 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Jan 2008to May 2009
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 35 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Healthy primiparous women
- Nulliparous
- Singleton gestation
- Cephalic presentation
- Term gestation (37-41 completed weeks of pregnancy)
- Maternal age between 18 and 35 years of age
- In spontaneous labour, defined for our purposes as painful contractions which have resulted in cervical change, i.e. cervix is 1 cm dilated or more with effacement at 25% (0.5 cm) or more on admission to the labour unit
- Able to speak and read English or speak a language for which there is a nursing interpreter available
Who cannot join
- Pre-existing medical conditions including but not limited to: insulin dependent diabetes, renal, cardiac, or thyroid conditions, hypertension, epilepsy, psychosis, use of illicit street drugs
- Conditions arising during pregnancy which require non-routine surveillance and/or intervention including but not limited to gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, 2nd or 3rd trimester hemorrhage, intrauterine growth restriction, presence of a fetal congenital anomaly, history of preterm prelabour rupture of membranes
- Statement by women on admission that she has been in labour for more than 24 hours
- Cervical dilatation 10 cm (full dilatation) on admission to the labour ward
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Massage Therapy and Labour Outcomes; A Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVE: To measure the benefits of massage, administered by a registered massage therapist, to pain management for women in active labour.
DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial.
Read more
SETTING: BC Women's Hospital, a tertiary level maternity teaching hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
PARTICIPANTS: Healthy first time mothers experiencing an uncomplicated pregnancy who present to the hospital in labour. Seventy women will be enrolled in each trial arm.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome is time to use of epidural analgesia measured as cervical dilatation at the time of epidural insertion. Secondary outcomes include use of epidural and narcotic analgesia, and measures of intensity and characteristics of pain.
DATA ANALYSIS: Study outcomes will be compared among women randomized to receive a maximum of five hours of massage during labour administered by a registered massage therapist versus usual care. Analysis will be by intention to treat. Prognostics factors not balanced between trial arms (massage and usual care) will be controlled for in a multivariate analysis.
Read the detailed description
Goal and Objectives:
The overall purpose of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness of massage therapy provided by registered massage therapists in managing pain among women in active labour.
Specific Aims:
Our specific aim is to randomly assign women admitted to hospital in active labour to receive a maximum of five hours massage by a regulated massage therapist or usual care in order to study the effect of massage therapy on pain relief, labour management and patient outcomes.
Research Questions:
We will compare among healthy, nulliparous women experiencing health pregnancies with access to massage therapy after admission to hospital in active labour vs. women receiving usual care:
- the severity and quality of pain from contractions
- among women carrying a fetus in the occiput posterior position, the severity of back pain
- length of first and second stage of labour
- need for use of entonox, sterile water injections, intravenous or intramuscular narcotics, and epidural analgesia
- stage of labour (cervical dilatation) among those women who receive epidural analgesia
- position of occiput at the onset of second stage
- mode of delivery: spontaneous vaginal, assisted (vacuum/forceps), and caesarean section
- time to first breastfeeding after delivery
Hypotheses:
We hypothesize that healthy women who receive massage therapy during active labour will:
- at a given cervical dilatation, experience less severe pain with contractions
- if carrying a fetus in the occiput posterior position, at a given cervical dilatation, will report less severe back pain
- experience a shorter first and second stage of labour
- be more likely to request entenox
- be more likely to request sterile water injections
- be more likely to request intravenous or intramuscular narcotics
- be less likely to request epidural analgesia
- if requesting epidural analgesia, to request it at a later stage (greater cervical dilatation) in labour
- The fetal occiput will be more likely to be anterior vs. posterior at the onset of second stage of labour
- be less likely to deliver by caesarean section
- undertake their first breastfeeding more quickly after delivery
Design:
We propose a randomized two-arm unblinded controlled trial. The treatment condition is massage therapy during the active phase of labour by a registered massage therapist. The control condition is usual care. The primary outcome is cervical dilatation at request for epidural analgesia.
Study sample:
Our study sample will be drawn from healthy nulliparous women experiencing healthy pregnancies presenting for intrapartum care at BC Women's Hospital.
Study Setting:
The study will take place at BC Women's Hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. BC Women's is an academic teaching hospital. It provides primary care to women who are residents of the City of Vancouver, regional referral care to residents of the Lower Mainland or southwest corner of the province, and tertiary referral care for the entire province. Approximately 7500 take place at this hospital annually; about 7000 are to women who reside in Vancouver. All women for whom delivery is not imminent are triaged in a large assessment room adjacent to the delivery suite prior to being admitted for intrapartum care. Women in labour have one-to-one care in a private labour room. They may have whomever else they want in the room to support them.
Recruitment:
Women will be approached for participation in the study by a registered, experienced obstetrical nurse on admission to the assessment area of the hospital. At present, this service is provided by the Maternal/fetal Medicine Division of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, for a fee.
Randomization:
Randomization will take place immediately after obtaining written consent. A statistical software package (SPSS - Statistical Program for the Social Sciences) will be utilized to randomly assign sequential numbers to one of the two treatment arms. Cards will be numbered sequentially and labelled with the treatment allocation. These cards will be placed in opaque envelopes in a box which will be kept in a locked cupboard to which the recruitment nurse holds the key. Envelopes will be opened in sequential order for each study participant after written informed consent has been obtained. A log book will be maintained by the recruitment nurse detailing the patients approached, their decision to participate or not, randomization number, and allocation.
Protocol:
Immediately after randomization, the recruitment nurse will contact the massage therapist on call by means of a cell phone. Massage therapists named in this application have agreed to be on call for the study for periods in total that cover 7 days per week. The massage therapist will leave immediately to come and provide massage therapy. The massage therapist will receive a brief report from the women's labour and delivery nurse as to what nature of the woman's labour to that point. She will then explain to the women what she would suggest for specific massage techniques and will begin as soon as the woman is ready. It should be noted that women may continue to use other non-invasive pain management modalities as they wish. This is a pragmatic trial in that massage therapy is seen as one additional choice that women will have access to in addition to the repertoire of choices that are routinely available.
Study Outcomes:
Our primary outcome is timing of epidural analgesia with respect to cervical dilatation. This outcome is chosen because 67% of nulliparous women at this institution have epidural analgesia and because of the association of epidural use with intrapartum interventions. In the current study we would like to be able to detect a mean decrease in cervical dilation at the time of request for epidural as small as 1 cm. In order to find a decrease of 1 cm in cervical dilation, which is a clinically important difference, we would need 42 study subjects per group with 80% power and a type I error set at p =.05, one sided. Since we learned from our previous study that 61% of women meeting study inclusion criteria receive an epidural prior to 10 cm dilatation, we know that we will have to recruit 70 women per study arm to have 42 people in each arm who receive an epidural.
- Conditions
- Pain During Labour
- Being tested
- Massage
- Keywords
- massage, labour
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MassageProcedure or surgery
Massage therapy by an RMT during labour
MassageProcedure or surgery
Massage by anyone else, eg. husband, nurse, doula
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Massage therapy by a regulated massage therapist Receives: Procedure: Massage |
| 2 | Active comparator | Massage by anyone else, eg. husband, nurse, doula Receives: Procedure: Massage |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The primary outcome is time to use of epidural analgesia measured as cervical dilatation at the time of epidural insertion.
Measured: During labour
Secondary outcomes (1)
Secondary outcomes include use of epidural and narcotic analgesia and measures of intensity and characteristics of pain.
Measured: During labour
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Feb 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2008
- Primary completionMay 2009
- Study completionMay 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Pain During LabourStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of British ColumbiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 77 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of British Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Massage Therapy Foundation, Holistic Health Research
- Investigators
- Patricia Janssen, Ph.D, Principal investigator, University of British Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00611221
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H07-00528
- Other IDs
- CW07-0090
- Status last verified
- Apr 2011
- First submitted
- 28 Jan 2008
- Last updated
- 27 Apr 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Apr 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Massage Therapy and Labour Outcomes; A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00611221
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H07-00528
- Conditions
- Pain During Labour
- Keywords
- massage, labour
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 77 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of British ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Massage Therapy Foundation, Holistic Health Research
- Study start
- Jan 2008
- Primary completion
- May 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Feb 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
OBJECTIVE: To measure the benefits of massage, administered by a registered massage therapist, to pain management for women in active labour.
DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: BC Women's Hospital, a tertiary level maternity teaching hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
PARTICIPANTS: Healthy first time mothers experiencing an uncomplicated pregnancy who present to the hospital in labour. Seventy women will be enrolled in each trial arm.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome is time to use of epidural analgesia measured as cervical dilatation at the time of epidural insertion. Secondary outcomes include use of epidural and narcotic analgesia, and measures of intensity and characteristics of pain.
DATA ANALYSIS: Study outcomes will be compared among women randomized to receive a maximum of five hours of massage during labour administered by a registered massage therapist versus usual care. Analysis will be by intention to treat. Prognostics factors not balanced between trial arms (massage and usual care) will be controlled for in a multivariate analysis.
Detailed description
Goal and Objectives:
The overall purpose of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness of massage therapy provided by registered massage therapists in managing pain among women in active labour.
Specific Aims:
Our specific aim is to randomly assign women admitted to hospital in active labour to receive a maximum of five hours massage by a regulated massage therapist or usual care in order to study the effect of massage therapy on pain relief, labour management and patient outcomes.
Research Questions:
We will compare among healthy, nulliparous women experiencing health pregnancies with access to massage therapy after admission to hospital in active labour vs. women receiving usual care:
- the severity and quality of pain from contractions
- among women carrying a fetus in the occiput posterior position, the severity of back pain
- length of first and second stage of labour
- need for use of entonox, sterile water injections, intravenous or intramuscular narcotics, and epidural analgesia
- stage of labour (cervical dilatation) among those women who receive epidural analgesia
- position of occiput at the onset of second stage
- mode of delivery: spontaneous vaginal, assisted (vacuum/forceps), and caesarean section
- time to first breastfeeding after delivery
Hypotheses:
We hypothesize that healthy women who receive massage therapy during active labour will:
- at a given cervical dilatation, experience less severe pain with contractions
- if carrying a fetus in the occiput posterior position, at a given cervical dilatation, will report less severe back pain
- experience a shorter first and second stage of labour
- be more likely to request entenox
- be more likely to request sterile water injections
- be more likely to request intravenous or intramuscular narcotics
- be less likely to request epidural analgesia
- if requesting epidural analgesia, to request it at a later stage (greater cervical dilatation) in labour
- The fetal occiput will be more likely to be anterior vs. posterior at the onset of second stage of labour
- be less likely to deliver by caesarean section
- undertake their first breastfeeding more quickly after delivery
Design:
We propose a randomized two-arm unblinded controlled trial. The treatment condition is massage therapy during the active phase of labour by a registered massage therapist. The control condition is usual care. The primary outcome is cervical dilatation at request for epidural analgesia.
Study sample:
Our study sample will be drawn from healthy nulliparous women experiencing healthy pregnancies presenting for intrapartum care at BC Women's Hospital.
Study Setting:
The study will take place at BC Women's Hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. BC Women's is an academic teaching hospital. It provides primary care to women who are residents of the City of Vancouver, regional referral care to residents of the Lower Mainland or southwest corner of the province, and tertiary referral care for the entire province. Approximately 7500 take place at this hospital annually; about 7000 are to women who reside in Vancouver. All women for whom delivery is not imminent are triaged in a large assessment room adjacent to the delivery suite prior to being admitted for intrapartum care. Women in labour have one-to-one care in a private labour room. They may have whomever else they want in the room to support them.
Recruitment:
Women will be approached for participation in the study by a registered, experienced obstetrical nurse on admission to the assessment area of the hospital. At present, this service is provided by the Maternal/fetal Medicine Division of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, for a fee.
Randomization:
Randomization will take place immediately after obtaining written consent. A statistical software package (SPSS - Statistical Program for the Social Sciences) will be utilized to randomly assign sequential numbers to one of the two treatment arms. Cards will be numbered sequentially and labelled with the treatment allocation. These cards will be placed in opaque envelopes in a box which will be kept in a locked cupboard to which the recruitment nurse holds the key. Envelopes will be opened in sequential order for each study participant after written informed consent has been obtained. A log book will be maintained by the recruitment nurse detailing the patients approached, their decision to participate or not, randomization number, and allocation.
Protocol:
Immediately after randomization, the recruitment nurse will contact the massage therapist on call by means of a cell phone. Massage therapists named in this application have agreed to be on call for the study for periods in total that cover 7 days per week. The massage therapist will leave immediately to come and provide massage therapy. The massage therapist will receive a brief report from the women's labour and delivery nurse as to what nature of the woman's labour to that point. She will then explain to the women what she would suggest for specific massage techniques and will begin as soon as the woman is ready. It should be noted that women may continue to use other non-invasive pain management modalities as they wish. This is a pragmatic trial in that massage therapy is seen as one additional choice that women will have access to in addition to the repertoire of choices that are routinely available.
Study Outcomes:
Our primary outcome is timing of epidural analgesia with respect to cervical dilatation. This outcome is chosen because 67% of nulliparous women at this institution have epidural analgesia and because of the association of epidural use with intrapartum interventions. In the current study we would like to be able to detect a mean decrease in cervical dilation at the time of request for epidural as small as 1 cm. In order to find a decrease of 1 cm in cervical dilation, which is a clinically important difference, we would need 42 study subjects per group with 80% power and a type I error set at p =.05, one sided. Since we learned from our previous study that 61% of women meeting study inclusion criteria receive an epidural prior to 10 cm dilatation, we know that we will have to recruit 70 women per study arm to have 42 people in each arm who receive an epidural.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Procedure: MassageMassage therapy by a regulated massage therapist |
| 2 | Active comparator | Procedure: MassageMassage by anyone else, eg. husband, nurse, doula |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 35 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Healthy primiparous women
- Nulliparous
- Singleton gestation
- Cephalic presentation
- Term gestation (37-41 completed weeks of pregnancy)
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Pre-existing medical conditions including but not limited to: insulin dependent diabetes, renal, cardiac, or thyroid conditions, hypertension, epilepsy, psychosis, use of illicit street drugs
- Conditions arising during pregnancy which require non-routine surveillance and/or intervention including but not limited to gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, 2nd or 3rd trimester hemorrhage, intrauterine growth restriction, presence of a fetal congenital anomaly, history of preterm prelabour rupture of membranes
- Statement by women on admission that she has been in labour for more than 24 hours
- Cervical dilatation 10 cm (full dilatation) on admission to the labour ward
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MassageMassage therapy by an RMT during labour | Procedure or surgery | 1 |
| MassageMassage by anyone else, eg. husband, nurse, doula | Procedure or surgery | 2 |
Primary outcome
The primary outcome is time to use of epidural analgesia measured as cervical dilatation at the time of epidural insertion.
Time frame: During labour
1 secondary outcome
Secondary outcomes include use of epidural and narcotic analgesia and measures of intensity and characteristics of pain.
Time frame: During labour
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Apr 2011.
Related trials for Pain During Labour
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Development of Variable Volume Automated Mandatory Boluses for Patient-controlled Epidural Analgesia During Labour
Labor Pain, Breakthrough Pain
Recruiting
Dexmedetomidine as an Adjuvant During Dural Puncture Epidural
Total Dose of Bupivacaine Administered During Labor
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Comparison of Regimens MPIB, CIPCEA, PCEA
Breakthrough Pain
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Continuous Remote Vital Sign Monitoring During Labour Analgesia With Remifentanil
Labor Pain
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Reiki Intervention During Labor on Pain, Fear, and Birth Experience
Labour
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Patricia Janssen, Ph.D principal investigator
University of British Columbia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Massage in people with Pain During Labour, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The primary outcome is time to use of epidural analgesia measured as cervical dilatation at the time of epidural insertion. (time frame: During labour). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2011.