AzTrials
AzTrials

Pain During LabourPhase 3NCT00611221

Massage Therapy Study: Massage Therapy and Labour Outcomes

A Phase 3 study testing Massage in people with Pain During Labour, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

OBJECTIVE: To measure the benefits of massage, administered by a registered massage therapist, to pain management for women in active labour. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SETTING: BC Women's Hospital, a tertiary level maternity teaching hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 35 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Pain During Labour
What is being tested?
Massage
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
77 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Jan 2008to May 2009
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 35 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy primiparous women
  • Nulliparous
  • Singleton gestation
  • Cephalic presentation
  • Term gestation (37-41 completed weeks of pregnancy)
  • Maternal age between 18 and 35 years of age
  • In spontaneous labour, defined for our purposes as painful contractions which have resulted in cervical change, i.e. cervix is 1 cm dilated or more with effacement at 25% (0.5 cm) or more on admission to the labour unit
  • Able to speak and read English or speak a language for which there is a nursing interpreter available

Who cannot join

  • Pre-existing medical conditions including but not limited to: insulin dependent diabetes, renal, cardiac, or thyroid conditions, hypertension, epilepsy, psychosis, use of illicit street drugs
  • Conditions arising during pregnancy which require non-routine surveillance and/or intervention including but not limited to gestational diabetes, gestational hypertension, 2nd or 3rd trimester hemorrhage, intrauterine growth restriction, presence of a fetal congenital anomaly, history of preterm prelabour rupture of membranes
  • Statement by women on admission that she has been in labour for more than 24 hours
  • Cervical dilatation 10 cm (full dilatation) on admission to the labour ward

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • BC Women's Hospital

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3N1

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Massage Therapy and Labour Outcomes; A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE: To measure the benefits of massage, administered by a registered massage therapist, to pain management for women in active labour.

DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial.

Read more

SETTING: BC Women's Hospital, a tertiary level maternity teaching hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS: Healthy first time mothers experiencing an uncomplicated pregnancy who present to the hospital in labour. Seventy women will be enrolled in each trial arm.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome is time to use of epidural analgesia measured as cervical dilatation at the time of epidural insertion. Secondary outcomes include use of epidural and narcotic analgesia, and measures of intensity and characteristics of pain.

DATA ANALYSIS: Study outcomes will be compared among women randomized to receive a maximum of five hours of massage during labour administered by a registered massage therapist versus usual care. Analysis will be by intention to treat. Prognostics factors not balanced between trial arms (massage and usual care) will be controlled for in a multivariate analysis.

Read the detailed description

Goal and Objectives:

The overall purpose of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness of massage therapy provided by registered massage therapists in managing pain among women in active labour.

Specific Aims:

Our specific aim is to randomly assign women admitted to hospital in active labour to receive a maximum of five hours massage by a regulated massage therapist or usual care in order to study the effect of massage therapy on pain relief, labour management and patient outcomes.

Research Questions:

We will compare among healthy, nulliparous women experiencing health pregnancies with access to massage therapy after admission to hospital in active labour vs. women receiving usual care:

  • the severity and quality of pain from contractions
  • among women carrying a fetus in the occiput posterior position, the severity of back pain
  • length of first and second stage of labour
  • need for use of entonox, sterile water injections, intravenous or intramuscular narcotics, and epidural analgesia
  • stage of labour (cervical dilatation) among those women who receive epidural analgesia
  • position of occiput at the onset of second stage
  • mode of delivery: spontaneous vaginal, assisted (vacuum/forceps), and caesarean section
  • time to first breastfeeding after delivery

Hypotheses:

We hypothesize that healthy women who receive massage therapy during active labour will:

  • at a given cervical dilatation, experience less severe pain with contractions
  • if carrying a fetus in the occiput posterior position, at a given cervical dilatation, will report less severe back pain
  • experience a shorter first and second stage of labour
  • be more likely to request entenox
  • be more likely to request sterile water injections
  • be more likely to request intravenous or intramuscular narcotics
  • be less likely to request epidural analgesia
  • if requesting epidural analgesia, to request it at a later stage (greater cervical dilatation) in labour
  • The fetal occiput will be more likely to be anterior vs. posterior at the onset of second stage of labour
  • be less likely to deliver by caesarean section
  • undertake their first breastfeeding more quickly after delivery

Design:

We propose a randomized two-arm unblinded controlled trial. The treatment condition is massage therapy during the active phase of labour by a registered massage therapist. The control condition is usual care. The primary outcome is cervical dilatation at request for epidural analgesia.

Study sample:

Our study sample will be drawn from healthy nulliparous women experiencing healthy pregnancies presenting for intrapartum care at BC Women's Hospital.

Study Setting:

The study will take place at BC Women's Hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. BC Women's is an academic teaching hospital. It provides primary care to women who are residents of the City of Vancouver, regional referral care to residents of the Lower Mainland or southwest corner of the province, and tertiary referral care for the entire province. Approximately 7500 take place at this hospital annually; about 7000 are to women who reside in Vancouver. All women for whom delivery is not imminent are triaged in a large assessment room adjacent to the delivery suite prior to being admitted for intrapartum care. Women in labour have one-to-one care in a private labour room. They may have whomever else they want in the room to support them.

Recruitment:

Women will be approached for participation in the study by a registered, experienced obstetrical nurse on admission to the assessment area of the hospital. At present, this service is provided by the Maternal/fetal Medicine Division of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, for a fee.

Randomization:

Randomization will take place immediately after obtaining written consent. A statistical software package (SPSS - Statistical Program for the Social Sciences) will be utilized to randomly assign sequential numbers to one of the two treatment arms. Cards will be numbered sequentially and labelled with the treatment allocation. These cards will be placed in opaque envelopes in a box which will be kept in a locked cupboard to which the recruitment nurse holds the key. Envelopes will be opened in sequential order for each study participant after written informed consent has been obtained. A log book will be maintained by the recruitment nurse detailing the patients approached, their decision to participate or not, randomization number, and allocation.

Protocol:

Immediately after randomization, the recruitment nurse will contact the massage therapist on call by means of a cell phone. Massage therapists named in this application have agreed to be on call for the study for periods in total that cover 7 days per week. The massage therapist will leave immediately to come and provide massage therapy. The massage therapist will receive a brief report from the women's labour and delivery nurse as to what nature of the woman's labour to that point. She will then explain to the women what she would suggest for specific massage techniques and will begin as soon as the woman is ready. It should be noted that women may continue to use other non-invasive pain management modalities as they wish. This is a pragmatic trial in that massage therapy is seen as one additional choice that women will have access to in addition to the repertoire of choices that are routinely available.

Study Outcomes:

Our primary outcome is timing of epidural analgesia with respect to cervical dilatation. This outcome is chosen because 67% of nulliparous women at this institution have epidural analgesia and because of the association of epidural use with intrapartum interventions. In the current study we would like to be able to detect a mean decrease in cervical dilation at the time of request for epidural as small as 1 cm. In order to find a decrease of 1 cm in cervical dilation, which is a clinically important difference, we would need 42 study subjects per group with 80% power and a type I error set at p =.05, one sided. Since we learned from our previous study that 61% of women meeting study inclusion criteria receive an epidural prior to 10 cm dilatation, we know that we will have to recruit 70 women per study arm to have 42 people in each arm who receive an epidural.

Being tested
Massage
Keywords
massage, labour

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • MassageProcedure or surgery

    Massage therapy by an RMT during labour

  • MassageProcedure or surgery

    Massage by anyone else, eg. husband, nurse, doula

Study groups in NCT00611221
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Active comparatorMassage therapy by a regulated massage therapist
Receives: Procedure: Massage
2Active comparatorMassage by anyone else, eg. husband, nurse, doula
Receives: Procedure: Massage

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The primary outcome is time to use of epidural analgesia measured as cervical dilatation at the time of epidural insertion.

    Measured: During labour

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Secondary outcomes include use of epidural and narcotic analgesia and measures of intensity and characteristics of pain.

    Measured: During labour

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Feb 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2008
  3. Primary completionMay 2009
  4. Study completionMay 2009

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
77 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00611221
Sponsor's protocol ID
H07-00528
Other IDs
CW07-0090
Status last verified
Apr 2011
First submitted
28 Jan 2008
Last updated
27 Apr 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Massage in people with Pain During Labour, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The primary outcome is time to use of epidural analgesia measured as cervical dilatation at the time of epidural insertion. (time frame: During labour). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in