AzTrials
AzTrials

IntubationNCT00771628

Comparison of Flex-It Stylet to Malleable Stylet for GlideScope Intubation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

A study testing Flex-It Stylet and Standard malleable stylet in people with Intubation, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Patients presenting for elective surgery requiring tracheal intubation will be randomized to one of two different ETT stylets. The primary outcome is time to intubation. The null hypothesis is that there will be no difference. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Intubation
What is being tested?
Flex-It Stylet and Standard malleable stylet
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Jan 2008to Dec 2008
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • * Any adult patient scheduled for elective surgery.
  • ETT is indicated for the procedure in the opinion of the attending anesthesiologist.
  • Any operator who has performed ≥ 10 GlideScope intubations.

Who cannot join

  • Any patient in whom the use of the GlideScope is contraindicated in the opinion of the attending anesthesiologist.
  • * Patient with known cervical spine abnormalities.
  • * Any patients with known or probable difficult airways (this rare occurrence is unlikely to be evenly distributed between the groups and could skew the data).
  • Any patient requiring rapid sequence induction.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • London Health Sciences Center

    London, Ontario

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Patients presenting for elective surgery requiring tracheal intubation will be randomized to one of two different ETT stylets. The primary outcome is time to intubation.

The null hypothesis is that there will be no difference.

The GlideScope video laryngoscope (Verathon) is a widely used intubating device that uses a high-resolution camera embedded into a plastic laryngoscope blade. An LED provides illumination. The GlideScope often provides a good laryngoscopic view, but passing the endotracheal tube (ETT) through the vocal cords is sometimes difficult. Because of the 60 degree anterior curvature of the GlideScope's blade, ETT's must have stylets inserted so that the ETT distal tip can be positioned anteriorly. Various authors have recommended different angles of the ETT to optimally place it into the trachea, including matching the GlideScope's 60 degree angle, or configuring the ETT with a 90 degree bend. Previous studies demonstrated that 90 degree sharp bend was both faster and subjectively easier in a heterogeneous group of intubators. With the introduction of the Flex-It stylet by Parker Medical, the question arises as to the the best configuration of stylet for the ETT. Therefore, this prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial is proposed.

Read the detailed description

Written informed consent will be obtained by one of the study investigators, and a copy will be given to each participant. Written informed consent will also be obtained from the operator of the GlideScope. Envelopes with computer-generated randomized group assignments will be present at each site. The envelopes will be consecutively numbered (i.e. "U1", "U2" for University Hospital, "S1", "S2" for St Joseph's Health Care, etc.). After consent, randomization will occur by selecting the next consecutive envelope. The envelope will contain the data collection form as well as a piece of paper that has the following information:

  • at the top will be the randomization group (A, B) and a text description of the endotracheal tube angle and stylet (i.e. "90 degrees - malleable stylet")
  • in the body of the piece of paper will be a template that shows the exact shape into which the tube must be bent, including where the distal and proximal ends are, the angle of curvature that must be followed, and the location along the length of the tube at which to create this angle. The angle and location will be the same for both males and females.

There are three distinct anesthesia providers involved in the conduct of this study, as follows:

  1. "operator" - person performing the intubation
  2. "timer" - person timing the outcome (one of the co-investigators)
  3. "shaper" - person who ensures that the angle and stylet of the tube matches the group to which the patient was allocated

Because the person intubating must be blind up until the time at which the tube is to be used, the unopened envelope will be taken to a third anesthesia provider, who will prepare the ETT with stylet in an area that is not visible to the person performing the intubation or to the person timing the intubation. The person performing the intubation will specify what size of tube to be prepared. This will most commonly be 7.5 mm internal diameter (ID) for a female and 8.0 ID for males, but the operator is free to use whatever size they feel is appropriate. The tube size selection will take place before unblinding so the group allocation cannot affect the decision of tube size.

The tubes will all be cut at the 27 cm marking. "Group A" ETT's will be shaped with the aid of a standard malleable stylet (Rusch 14 Fr) that has been lubricated with single-use water-soluble lubricant. "Group B" ETT's will be instrumented with the Flex-It Stylet, with identical lubricant. The prepared tube will then be concealed under a standard green OR towel and brought to the operating room (OR). This tube will be placed close to the patient's head so that it is readily accessible.

Data Collection

In the OR, the GlideScope will be turned on at least 60 seconds before use so that the lens can warm-up to prevent fogging. The patient will be cared for in the usual fashion with respect to monitoring and induction of general anesthesia. To ensure adequate pre-oxygenation, the patient's end-tidal oxygen must be ≥ 70%. Muscle relaxation will be used, and the agent used is at the discretion of the operator. After induction of anesthesia, bag-mask ventilation will be used in the usual fashion until the operator decides to proceed to laryngoscopy with the GlideScope. The operator will remain blinded to the group allocation until after the laryngoscopic view has been obtained with the GlideScope, where upon he will be handed the endotracheal tube.

The timer (who cannot see the tube under the green towel) will watch the operator until the GlideScope is inserted into the patient's mouth, start the timer, and then turn 180º to face the anesthetic monitor. The timer will not be able to see the ETT, stylet, or curvature because he will be facing the monitor screen.

Timing will continue until end-tidal CO2 of at least 30 mmHg is seen on the anesthesia monitor, at which point the data collection form will be filled out, and the study protocol will be finished. (The time to intubation will be recorded to the nearest tenth of a second.) If the operator fails to intubate within 3 attempts or 150 seconds, the intubation will be noted as a failure, and the ultimately successful means of securing the airway will be recorded.

The definition of an "attempt" for the purposes of this clinical trial are as follows:

  1. anytime the GlideScope blade is removed from the patients mouth and then re-inserted
  2. anytime the endotracheal tube is re-shaped (regardless of whether or not the GlideScope is actually removed from the patient's mouth
  3. if substantial adjustments are made to the patient's position (such as head position, neck flexion, or neck extension). Small movements that would occur in the normal process of intubation would not count as "substantial".

If oxygen desaturation (as recorded by pulse oximetry) below 95% occurs, then the patient will be ventilated in the usual fashion to ensure oxygenation, and re-attempting intubation using the GlideScope may proceed, but the timing will continue, and the same limits to successful intubation (within 3 attempts or total of 150s) will apply. Between attempts, the tube may be re-shaped by the operator if the operator feels that another curvature would be preferred.

Conditions
Intubation
Being tested
Flex-It Stylet, Standard malleable stylet
Keywords
Intubation, Flex-It, stylet, GlideScope

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Flex-It StyletDevice

    Patients will be intubated using the GlideScope with an ETT fitted with a Flex-It stylet.

  • Standard malleable styletDevice

    Patients will be intubated using the GlideScope with an ETT fitted with a standard malleable stylet.

Study groups in NCT00771628
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Flex-It StyletExperimentalPatients will be intubated using the GlideScope with an ETT fitted with a Flex-It stylet.
Receives: Device: Flex-It Stylet
2 MalleableActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Device: Standard malleable stylet

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to Intubation

    Measured: Prospective 10-150 seconds

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Ease of Intubation Visual Analog Scale

    Measured: Prospective

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Oct 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2008
  3. Primary completionDec 2008
  4. Study completionDec 2008

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
80 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00771628
Sponsor's protocol ID
R-08-111
Other IDs
13949
Status last verified
Jul 2009
First submitted
10 Oct 2008
Last updated
14 Jul 2009
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Turkstra TP, Jones PM, Ower KM, Gros ML. The Flex-It stylet is less effective than a malleable stylet for orotracheal intubation using the GlideScope. Anesth Analg. 2009 Dec;109(6):1856-9. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181bc116a.

    PubMed 19923515

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Flex-It Stylet and Standard malleable stylet in people with Intubation, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to Intubation (time frame: Prospective 10-150 seconds). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00771628, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2009.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in