AzTrials
AzTrials

Spinal PunctureNCT00775112

Randomized Evaluation of a Positioning Pillow for Lumbar Puncture in Paediatric Hematology-Oncology

A study testing pillow in people with Spinal Puncture, run by Centre Leon Berard at 2 sites in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

We have developed a positioning cushion for LP which allows the child to be relaxed in an adequate position, and to maintain this position throughout LP. This study was aimed at evaluating the benefit of the device on the technical quality of LPs, on pain, anxiety, post LP syndrome, and on the satisfaction of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Spinal Puncture
What is being tested?
pillow
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
124 participants
Where
2 sitesFrance
Study dates
Jul 2004to Sep 2006
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Children aged 2 to 18 years undergoing an LP

Who cannot join

  • Children who had already participated or used the LP pillow
  • medical condition (orthopaedic anomaly) contraindicating the use of the LP pillow
  • Parents refusal

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

France2 sites
  • Hopital Debrousse

    Lyon, 69005

  • centre Leon Berard

    Lyon, 69008

Other trials in France

About this study

We have developed a positioning cushion for LP which allows the child to be relaxed in an adequate position, and to maintain this position throughout LP. This study was aimed at evaluating the benefit of the device on the technical quality of LPs, on pain, anxiety, post LP syndrome, and on the satisfaction of children, their parents and caregivers.

The study was a two-centre, open, randomized trial, with two parallel groups. Children aged 2 to 18 years undergoing a LP were eligible, if not included in the study before. Those who had used the cushion before, with a medical reason preventing the use of the cushion, those refusing or whose parents refused could not be included. Randomization was stratified by centre.

Four cushion sizes were available for the age ranges: 2-6 years, 6-10 years, 10-15 and 15-18 years. The primary outcome was the rate of success, defined as a LP reaching its objective at the first attempt, without hemorrhage (visible hemorrhage or RBC > 50/mm3 in the CSF sample). Secondary outcomes included: the child's pain using a visual analogic scale (VAS), parents and caregiver perception of the child's pain (VAS); the children, parents, caregiver and physician performing the LP satisfaction; children cooperation using the "Le Baron Scale", and the occurrence of a post LP syndrome.

Read the detailed description

Our study was an open, randomized, controlled trial, with two parallel groups assigned to "LP pillow" or "no intervention" conducted in patients undergoing LP.

Participants Children aged 2 to 18 years undergoing an LP were eligible for inclusion. Children who had already participated or used the LP pillow, who had a medical condition (orthopaedic anomaly) contraindicating the use of the LP pillow or whose parents refused consent were excluded.

A permuted-block algorithm was used for randomization, with participants stratified according to centre. Concealed allocation was achieved by a phone call to the coordination centre after eligibility check and baseline data collection.

Intervention The LP pillow was made of polyethylene microcellular foam, coated with rubber to facilitate decontamination. It was placed on the thighs of the child sitting with the trunk leaning forward. This position ensures maximum lumbar flexion whereas resting the trunk on the pillow allows relaxation of paravertebral muscles. The axis of the body and the spinal column were maintained perfectly symmetrical in the sagittal plane (see illustration Fig 1).

The pillow included side supports for the head; the face remained uncovered so that the child could breathe and speak comfortably; this also facilitated nitrous oxide administration. Props supporting the patient's arms maintained the cervical column in a neutral position. An opening allowed touching the child's hands and forearms. Splints at the bottom side immobilized the child's thighs to ensure effective stabilization.

Four sizes were available corresponding approximately to the following age ranges: 2-6 years, 6-10 years, 10-15 and 15-18 years. Two sets were available for the study, one per centre.

Outcomes Primary outcome was the technical quality of the LP, classified as success or failure. A successful LP is defined as one that achieves its purpose (sampling and/or treatment) at the first attempt, without visible haemorrhage and with RBC < 50/mm3 in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sample (biochemical analysis).

Secondary outcomes included: child's pain, evaluated by self-administered visual analogical scales (VAS) for children over 6 years of age; parents' and caregivers' perception of the child's pain; satisfaction of the children, parents, caregivers and physician performing the LP assessed using verbal scoring; child cooperation rated with the "LeBaron Scale" (Lebaron 1984). Other outcomes included the number of attending persons (parents and/ or caregivers); duration of positioning and procedure; incidence, symptoms and duration of post-LP syndrome assessed 48 hours after LP by phone interview.

Data collection included anaesthetic, sedative and analgesic drugs used; needle size (19G, 20G, 22G); general status of the child evaluated with Karnofsky or Lansky score (Lansky 1985); platelet count; number of previous LP; date of and satisfaction with the last LP (verbal scale), practitioner experience in performing LP, presence of the parents, aim of the LP: diagnosis, therapeutic monitoring, treatment injection; amount of CSF removed (drops).

The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Lyon A - Hôtel-Dieu on June 8th 2004, and was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. All parents gave written informed consent before participation of their child. Children were asked to give written consent when fully able to understand the proposed procedure.

Data were managed using CLININFO S.A. (France) software and services for clinical trial data management and quality control.

Sample size and statistical analysis The protocol initially included a total of 80 children. The sample size calculation was based on a rate of success of 70% in the control group and 95% in the pillow group, with 80%-power and 0.05 two-sided significance level (N Query® software). Based on the rate of success in the control group after inclusion of the 40th child, the sample size was re-estimated and increased to 124 children (62 per group) and the inclusion period was extended from 12 to 24 months. Comparisons between groups were performed using non parametric methods, i.e. the Wilcoxon rank test or the Fisher's exact test, depending on the nature of the variable. A logistic regression model was fitted to the platelet count and the number of LP prior to entering the study. An exploratory subgroup analysis was performed in children over 6 years of age. Comparisons with p-value less than 0.05 were considered significant. The STATA 9.2 (SatatCorp 2005. Stata Statistical Software: Release 9.0 College Station, TX: Satat Corporation) software was used to perform statistical analyses.

Conditions
Spinal Puncture
Being tested
pillow
Keywords
supportive care, lumbar puncture, childhood disease, pediatric hemato-oncology

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • pillowDevice

    use of pillow for lumbar punctures

Study groups in NCT00775112
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Experimentalwith pillow
Receives: Device: pillow
2No interventionwithout pillow

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. technical quality of the LP, classified as success or failure.

    Measured: immediate

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. child's pain

    Measured: immediate

  2. satisfaction of the children, parents, caregivers and physician performing the LP assessed using verbal scoring;

    Measured: immediate

  3. number of attending persons

    Measured: immediate

  4. symptoms and duration of post-LP syndrome assessed 48 hours after LP

    Measured: 48 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Oct 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2004
  3. Primary completionSep 2006

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
124 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00775112
Sponsor's protocol ID
Lumbar puncture pillow
Status last verified
Oct 2008
First submitted
16 Oct 2008
Last updated
17 Oct 2008
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Marec-Berard P, Bissery A, Kebaili K, Schell M, Aubert F, Gaillard S, Rabilloud M, Kassai B, Cornu C. A positioning pillow to improve lumbar puncture success rate in paediatric haematology-oncology patients: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2009 Jan 15;9:21. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-9-21.

    PubMed 19146666

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing pillow in people with Spinal Puncture, run by Centre Leon Berard at 2 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Oct 2008. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

technical quality of the LP, classified as success or failure. (time frame: immediate). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00775112, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Oct 2008.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in