AzTrials
AzTrials

Quality of Health CareNCT00793065

Evaluating the Effects of EHRs, P4P and Medical Home Redesign in the Hudson Valley

An observational study of Quality of Health Care and Electronic Health Records, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators will conduct a longitudinal cohort study with concurrent controls. The investigators will include all primary care physicians in the Hudson Valley including family practitioners, internists, and pediatricians. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Electronic health record (EHR) and Medical Home redesign
How many people
438 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2008to Dec 2012
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: All primary care physicians (i.e. general internists, pediatricians and family practice physicians) in the Hudson Valley who are members of the Taconic Independent Practice Association (IPA).

Who may be able to join

  • Primary care physicians working in the offices practices in the Hudson Valley, and who are members of the Taconic IPA.

Who cannot join

  • Physicians who opt out from the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Weill Cornell Medical College

    New York, New York, 10021

Other trials in United States

About this study

The investigators will conduct a longitudinal cohort study with concurrent controls. The investigators will include all primary care physicians in the Hudson Valley including family practitioners, internists, and pediatricians. The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of implementing electronic health records (EHRs), pay-for-performance incentives for physicians (P4P), and Medical Home redesign on health care quality, cost and patient experience in the Hudson Valley.

Read the detailed description

The Hudson Valley is implementing several innovative programs to potentially improve quality and reduce the cost of health care delivered. First the Taconic Health Information Network and Communities Regional Health Information Organization (THINC RHIO) is facilitating diffusion of EHRs in office practices in the Hudson Valley. Second, THINC RHIO is also offering a strategic approach to pay-for-performance. Third, an additional component of the THINC P4P project will be an added financial incentive for private practice physicians who implement and reach Level II of Physician Practice Connections® - Patient Centered Medical Home (PCMH)™, NCQA's new national recognition system for physician practices. Our study will seek to determine the effect of each of these initiatives on health care quality and cost of care in the Hudson Valley. We will also measure the patient experience before and after implementation of the Medical Home.

Being tested
Electronic health record (EHR), Medical Home redesign
Keywords
electronic health records, health information technology, physician incentives, quality of health care

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Electronic health record (EHR)Other

    Computer-based system that allows physicians to access and manage patient records electronically.

  • Medical Home redesignOther

    Implementation of NCQA Level III Medical Home

Study groups in NCT00793065
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1Physicians that are using paper-based medical charts and who are not receiving Medical Home redesign incentives.
2Physicians that are using Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and who are not undergoing Medical Home redesign.
Receives: Other: Electronic health record (EHR)
3Physicians that are using Electronic Health Records (EHRs) and undergoing Medical Home redesign.
Receives: Other: Electronic health record (EHR); Other: Medical Home redesign

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. health care quality (as determined by previously selected and approved quality indicators)

    Measured: 5 years

  2. health care utilization

    Measured: 5 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Nov 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2008
  3. Primary completionDec 2012
  4. Study completionDec 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
438 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00793065
Sponsor's protocol ID
0508190240
Status last verified
Feb 2017
First submitted
14 Nov 2008
Last updated
23 Feb 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Kern LM, Edwards A, Kaushal R. The Patient-Centered Medical Home and Associations With Health Care Quality and Utilization: A 5-Year Cohort Study. Ann Intern Med. 2016 Mar 15;164(6):395-405. doi: 10.7326/M14-2633. Epub 2016 Feb 16.

    PubMed 26882534
  • Kaushal R, Edwards A, Kern LM; HITEC Investigators. Association between electronic health records and health care utilization. Appl Clin Inform. 2015 Jan 28;6(1):42-55. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-10-RA-0089. eCollection 2015.

    PubMed 25848412
  • Kern LM, Edwards A, Kaushal R. The patient-centered medical home, electronic health records, and quality of care. Ann Intern Med. 2014 Jun 3;160(11):741-9. doi: 10.7326/M13-1798.

    PubMed 24887615

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Quality of Health Care and Electronic Health Records, run by Weill Medical College of Cornell University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

health care quality (as determined by previously selected and approved quality indicators) (time frame: 5 years). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00793065, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in