Diabetic NeuropathiesSCSNCT00802022
Effect of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy
A study testing spinal cord stimulation in people with Diabetic Neuropathies, run by Maastricht University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Rationale: Diabetic neuropathy is one of the most common complications of Diabetes Mellitis (DM). Pain is a common symptom of diabetic neuropathy, affecting 11-34% of patients suffering form DM. The current available medication often provides insufficient pain relief and/or has unacceptable side effects. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Neuropathies
- What is being tested?
- spinal cord stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- Jan 2009to Jul 2010
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Moderate-to-severe PDP in the lower limbs
- The pain intended to treat has been present for more than 12 months
- Previous treatment has been unsuccessful (insufficient pain relief and/or unacceptable side-effects) with drugs from the following drug categories:
- Amitriptyline or an other tricyclic antidepressant and/or
- Pregabalin (Lyrica), Gabapentin (Neurontin) or Carbamazepine and/or
- Duloxetine (Cymbalta) and/or
Show all 9Show fewer
- Tramadol or strong opioids Patients were treated with 3 drugs from the above mentioned drug categories and followed the treatment algorithm for painful diabetic polyneuropathy according to Jensen. Each drug is tried for 3 weeks and dose is raised once. By insufficient pain relief and/or unacceptable side-effects, the drug treatment was stopped. Patients reached a steady state in medication use and it is not allowed to change the use of medication during the study.
- Mean pain intensity should be 5 or higher measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS), which will be scored 3 times per day during 4 days according to Jensen.
- Patients age is between 18 and 75 years.
Who cannot join
- The patient has had neuromodulation therapy during the month before the intake
- The patient has ever had neuromodulation
- Neuropathic pain prevalent in the upper limbs (NRS above 3)
- Neuropathy or chronic pain of other origin than diabetes mellitus (NRS above 3)
- Addiction: drugs, alcohol (5E/day) and/or medication
- Drugs: cocaine, heroine, marihuana,
Show all 20Show fewer
- Alcohol: wine, beer, liquor.
- Medication: benzodiazepines, morphine receptor agonists.
- Insufficient cooperation from the patient (little motivation, understanding or communication)
- Blood clotting disorder
- Immune deficiency (HIV-positive, corticosteroids with a dose equivalent to prednisolone 10 mg, immunosuppressive, etc.)
- Peripheral vascular disease, no palpable peripheral pulsations at the feet (inclusion is possible if pulsations are absent, but ankle/brachial index is between 0.7 and 1.2 in both feet)
- Active foot ulceration
- Life expectancy shorter than 1 year
- Pacemaker
- Local infection or other skin disorders at site of incision
- Psychiatric disorders
- Pregnancy
- Severe cardiac or pulmonary failure (NYHA classification II or higher)
- Unstable blood glucose control (change in HbA1c more than 1,0% (absolute value) in three months prior to inclusion)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Netherlands1 site
Maastricht University Hospital
Maastricht, Limburg, 6229 HX
About this study
Official title: Effect of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy (PDP Study) A Pilot Study
Rationale: Diabetic neuropathy is one of the most common complications of Diabetes Mellitis (DM). Pain is a common symptom of diabetic neuropathy, affecting 11-34% of patients suffering form DM. The current available medication often provides insufficient pain relief and/or has unacceptable side effects. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used for over 30 years to treat neuropathic pain. Various small clinical studies have shown a beneficial effect of SCS on pain in PDP.
Objective: This study is a preparation to a RCT to investigate whether SCS is a good indication in patients which suffer from pain with moderate-to-severe PDP in the lower limbs. The main objective of this study is whether SCS leads to sufficient pain relief and to obtain insight into the working mechanism of SCS. The hypothesis is that the effect SCS is most effective in patients without major sensory deficits. Furthermore, practical feasibility of the test procedures described in the study protocol will be examined, including the questionnaires to be filled out by the patient. Also, technical feasibility of SCS will be investigated. Besides the feasibility, the possibility of predicting successful pain relief by SCS by classifying patients according to the Michigan Diabetic Neuropathy Score will be assessed. Furthermore, possible other predictors for successful pain relief by SCS will be defined. Study design: the study is a pilot study in preparation to a RCT to investigate the effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain in moderate-to-severe PDP patients.
Read more
Study population: patients suffering from moderate-to-severe PDP in the lower limbs as diagnosed by clinical symptoms and supported by the Michigan Diabetic Neuropathy Score.
Intervention: patients will receive 2 weeks of trial stimulation and best (drug) treatment as usual.
Main study parameters/endpoints: Main study parameter is the pain score as measured by a numeric rating scale (NRS) according to Jensen and a Patient Global Impression of Change for pain measured on a 7-point Likert scale.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: SCS related risks include: lead migration (14%), lead breakage (7%), implanted pulse generator migration (1%), loss of therapeutic effect, lost or unpleasant paresthesias (12%), infection or wound breakdown (10%), Pain at IPG incision site (12%), IPG pocket fluid collection (5%).
- Conditions
- Diabetic Neuropathies
- Being tested
- spinal cord stimulation
- Keywords
- diabetic neuropathies, electric stimulation therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetic Neuropathies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
spinal cord stimulationDevice
Also called Medtronic leads and neurostimulator (CE mark 0123)
The intervention is spinal cord stimulation and will be used for 2 weeks trial stimulation. After clinical successful pain relief (50% of more pain reduction)a definite spinal cord system will be implanted.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain intensity measured on a weighted NRS according to Jensen and a PGIC for pain measured on a 7-point Likert scale.
Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks after trial stimulation, 3, 6 and 12 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
The practical- and technical feasibility of the procedures, predicting successful pain relief by SCS by classifying patients according to the MDNS. Define possible other predictors for successful pain relief.
Measured: Baseline, 2 weeks after trial stimulation, 3, 6 and 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Dec 2008 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2009
- Primary completionJul 2010
- Study completionJul 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetic NeuropathiesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Maastricht University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Maastricht University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Maarten van Kleef, prof. dr., Principal investigator, Maastricht University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00802022
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MEC 08-2-118
- Acronym
- SCS
- Status last verified
- Jul 2010
- First submitted
- 3 Dec 2008
- Last updated
- 8 Jul 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Tesfaye S, Watt J, Benbow SJ, Pang KA, Miles J, MacFarlane IA. Electrical spinal-cord stimulation for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Lancet. 1996 Dec 21-28;348(9043):1698-701. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)02467-1.
PubMed 8973433de Vos CC, Rajan V, Steenbergen W, van der Aa HE, Buschman HP. Effect and safety of spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic pain caused by diabetic neuropathy. J Diabetes Complications. 2009 Jan-Feb;23(1):40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2007.08.002. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
PubMed 18413161van Beek M, Geurts JW, Slangen R, Schaper NC, Faber CG, Joosten EA, Dirksen CD, van Dongen RT, van Kuijk SMJ, van Kleef M. Severity of Neuropathy Is Associated With Long-term Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcome in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Five-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Two-Center Clinical Trial. Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(1):32-38. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0983. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
PubMed 29109298
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jul 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Spinal Cord Stimulation in Painful Diabetic Polyneuropathy (PDP Study) A Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00802022
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SCS / MEC 08-2-118
- Conditions
- Diabetic Neuropathies
- Keywords
- diabetic neuropathies, electric stimulation therapy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Maastricht University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2009
- Primary completion
- Jul 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Dec 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Rationale: Diabetic neuropathy is one of the most common complications of Diabetes Mellitis (DM). Pain is a common symptom of diabetic neuropathy, affecting 11-34% of patients suffering form DM. The current available medication often provides insufficient pain relief and/or has unacceptable side effects. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used for over 30 years to treat neuropathic pain. Various small clinical studies have shown a beneficial effect of SCS on pain in PDP.
Objective: This study is a preparation to a RCT to investigate whether SCS is a good indication in patients which suffer from pain with moderate-to-severe PDP in the lower limbs. The main objective of this study is whether SCS leads to sufficient pain relief and to obtain insight into the working mechanism of SCS. The hypothesis is that the effect SCS is most effective in patients without major sensory deficits. Furthermore, practical feasibility of the test procedures described in the study protocol will be examined, including the questionnaires to be filled out by the patient. Also, technical feasibility of SCS will be investigated. Besides the feasibility, the possibility of predicting successful pain relief by SCS by classifying patients according to the Michigan Diabetic Neuropathy Score will be assessed. Furthermore, possible other predictors for successful pain relief by SCS will be defined. Study design: the study is a pilot study in preparation to a RCT to investigate the effect of spinal cord stimulation on pain in moderate-to-severe PDP patients.
Study population: patients suffering from moderate-to-severe PDP in the lower limbs as diagnosed by clinical symptoms and supported by the Michigan Diabetic Neuropathy Score.
Intervention: patients will receive 2 weeks of trial stimulation and best (drug) treatment as usual.
Main study parameters/endpoints: Main study parameter is the pain score as measured by a numeric rating scale (NRS) according to Jensen and a Patient Global Impression of Change for pain measured on a 7-point Likert scale.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: SCS related risks include: lead migration (14%), lead breakage (7%), implanted pulse generator migration (1%), loss of therapeutic effect, lost or unpleasant paresthesias (12%), infection or wound breakdown (10%), Pain at IPG incision site (12%), IPG pocket fluid collection (5%).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Moderate-to-severe PDP in the lower limbs
- Mean pain intensity should be 5 or higher measured on a numeric rating scale (NRS), which will be scored 3 times per day during 4 days according to Jensen.
- Patients age is between 18 and 75 years.
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- The patient has had neuromodulation therapy during the month before the intake
- The patient has ever had neuromodulation
- Neuropathic pain prevalent in the upper limbs (NRS above 3)
- Neuropathy or chronic pain of other origin than diabetes mellitus (NRS above 3)
- Addiction: drugs, alcohol (5E/day) and/or medication
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| spinal cord stimulationAlso: Medtronic leads and neurostimulator (CE mark 0123)The intervention is spinal cord stimulation and will be used for 2 weeks trial stimulation. After clinical successful pain relief (50% of more pain reduction)a definite spinal cord system will be implanted. | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Pain intensity measured on a weighted NRS according to Jensen and a PGIC for pain measured on a 7-point Likert scale.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks after trial stimulation, 3, 6 and 12 months
1 secondary outcome
The practical- and technical feasibility of the procedures, predicting successful pain relief by SCS by classifying patients according to the MDNS. Define possible other predictors for successful pain relief.
Time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks after trial stimulation, 3, 6 and 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jul 2010.
- Background: PubMed 8973433Tesfaye S, Watt J, Benbow SJ, Pang KA, Miles J, MacFarlane IA. Electrical spinal-cord stimulation for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Lancet. 1996 Dec 21-28;348(9043):1698-701. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)02467-1.
- Background: PubMed 18413161de Vos CC, Rajan V, Steenbergen W, van der Aa HE, Buschman HP. Effect and safety of spinal cord stimulation for treatment of chronic pain caused by diabetic neuropathy. J Diabetes Complications. 2009 Jan-Feb;23(1):40-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2007.08.002. Epub 2008 Apr 16.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29109298van Beek M, Geurts JW, Slangen R, Schaper NC, Faber CG, Joosten EA, Dirksen CD, van Dongen RT, van Kuijk SMJ, van Kleef M. Severity of Neuropathy Is Associated With Long-term Spinal Cord Stimulation Outcome in Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Five-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Two-Center Clinical Trial. Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(1):32-38. doi: 10.2337/dc17-0983. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
Related trials for Diabetic Neuropathies
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Active, not recruiting
Wearable Insoles for Recurrent Diabetic Ulcer Prevention
Diabetes, Peripheral Neuropathy
Recruiting
Effect of 4-7-8 Breathing Technique on Pain and Anxiety During Electromyography in Diabetic Neuropathy
Diabetic Neuropathies, Diabetes Mellitus (Type 2)
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of Personalized Nutritional Intervention on Wound Healing of Cutaneous Ulcers in Diabetics
Foot, Diabetic
Active, not recruiting
Comparative Effects Of Sensory Reweighting And Proprioceptive Facilitation Training On Balance And Fall Risk In Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Maarten van Kleef, prof. dr. principal investigator
Maastricht University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing spinal cord stimulation in people with Diabetic Neuropathies, run by Maastricht University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jul 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain intensity measured on a weighted NRS according to Jensen and a PGIC for pain measured on a 7-point Likert scale. (time frame: Baseline, 2 weeks after trial stimulation, 3, 6 and 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00802022, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jul 2010.