AzTrials
AzTrials

Seasonal Affective DisorderPhase 2/3NCT00809523

A Trial of Negative Ion Generation Versus Light-Emitting Diode Phototherapy for Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD)

A Phase 2/3 study testing Negative Ion Generator and Light-emitting Photodiode light treatment device in people with Seasonal Affective Disorder, run by Yale University at 8 sites in 3 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a randomized, controlled clinical trial of inactivated negative ion generation or light-emitting photodiode therapy for Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD, winter depression), for subjects with a DSM IV diagnosis of Major Depression, with Seasonal Pattern, Winter type, to examine efficacy of treatments for this… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Seasonal Affective Disorder
What is being tested?
Negative Ion Generator and Light-emitting Photodiode light treatment device
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
106 participants
Where
8 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
Dec 2008to Apr 2010
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Seasonal Affective Disorder
  • Age 18 to 65

Who cannot join

  • Psychotropic medication treatment
  • History of light treatment for SAD
  • History of mania or psychosis

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 3 countries.

8 sites in 3 countries

Canada4 sites
  • St. John Regional Hospital

    Saint John, New Brunswick, E2l 4L2

  • CAMH/University of Toronto

    Toronto, Ontario, M5T 1R8

  • Sleep and Alertness Inc

    Toronto, Ontario

  • University of British Columbia

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 2A1

Other trials in Canada

United States3 sites
  • McLean Hospital/Harvard

    Belmont, Massachusetts, 02478

  • Yale University School of Medicine

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06504

  • Capital Clinical Research Associates

    Rockville, Maryland, 20852

Other trials in United States

Netherlands1 site
  • University Medical Center Groningen

    Groningen, RB, 9700

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial of Negative Ion Generation Versus Light-Emitting Diode Phototherapy for Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD)

This is a randomized, controlled clinical trial of inactivated negative ion generation or light-emitting photodiode therapy for Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD, winter depression), for subjects with a DSM IV diagnosis of Major Depression, with Seasonal Pattern, Winter type, to examine efficacy of treatments for this condition. The trial has a 1 week baseline phase and a 4 week treatment phase.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing an inactivated negative ion generation (placebo condition) and light-emitting photodiode therapy (active condition), for Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD, winter depression), for subjects with a DSM IV diagnosis of Major Depression, with Seasonal Pattern, Winter type, to examine efficacy of treatments for this condition. Exclusion criteria included any other current treatment for SAD, as well as bipolar disorder, type 1, a chronic psychotic disorder, or a substance use not if full remission for at least one year. The trial has a 1 week baseline phase and subjects were seen weekly during a 4 week treatment phase. The study was double-blind. The study was conducted at 8 sites in the US, Canada and The Netherlands.

Being tested
Negative Ion Generator, Light-emitting Photodiode light treatment device
Keywords
SAD, winter depression
Medical subject headings
Seasonal Affective Disorder

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Negative Ion GeneratorDevice

    Equivalent exposure to inactivated Negative Ion Generator

  • Light-emitting Photodiode light treatment deviceDevice

    Light-emitting Photodiode light treatment device, used for 30 min before 8 am

Study groups in NCT00809523
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Inactivated negative ion generatorExperimentalEquivalent exposure to inactivated Negative Ion Generator
Receives: Device: Negative Ion Generator
LED light treatment deviceExperimentalLight-emitting photodiode light treatment device, used for 30 min before 8 am
Receives: Device: Light-emitting Photodiode light treatment device

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage Change SIGH SAD Depression Rating

    SIGH SAD Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD)version. The items are augmented with additional items to reflect better the atypical depressive symptoms usually seen in SAD, eg, increased sleep, weight, appetite and fatigue. On this scale, higher scores reflect increased depression intensity. The maximum score attainable is 63, and the minimum is 0. A score of less than 9 is regarded as consistent with normal mood, the absence of major depression.

    Calculated: SIGH SAD score at trial end - SIGH SAD score at randomization x 100 / SIGH SAD score at randomization

    Measured: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. SIGH SAD Depression Rating

    SIGH SAD Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD)version. This is a structured interview, which is an interview in which the clinician is provided exact questions to use to inquire about symptoms of depression and explicit standards for rating the intensity of each symptom item. The interview assesses the symptoms which make up the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, which is the standard in the majority of clinical trials in depression. The items are augmented with additional items to reflect better the atypical depressive symptoms usually seen in SAD, eg, increased sleep, weight, appetite and fatigue. On this scale, higher scores reflect increased depression intensity. The maximum score attainable is 63, and the minimum is 0. A score of less than 9 is regarded as consistent with normal mood, the absence of major depression.

    Measured: Weekly

  2. Clinical Global Impression of Severity

    The Clinical Global Impression of Severity is a 7-point scale in which the clinician gives an overall impression of depression severity, with the following anchor points: (1)Normal, not at all ill, (2)Borderline ill, (3) Mildly ill, (4)Moderately ill, (5) Markedly ill, (6)Severely ill, and (7)Among the most severely ill patients. The minimum is therefore 1 and the maximum is 7, which represents very severe depression.

    Measured: Randomization and at 4 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Dec 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2008
  3. Primary completionApr 2010
  4. Study completionApr 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
106 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00809523
Sponsor's protocol ID
0810004322
Status last verified
Jan 2013
First submitted
16 Dec 2008
Last updated
6 Mar 2013
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Negative Ion Generator and Light-emitting Photodiode light treatment device in people with Seasonal Affective Disorder, run by Yale University at 8 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Mar 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in Canada, United States, Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Mar 2013). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage Change SIGH SAD Depression Rating (time frame: 4 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Mar 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in