Ischemic StrokeSWISSNCT00811538
Swiss Intravenous and Intra-arterial Thrombolysis for Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Registry
An observational study of Ischemic Stroke, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
The clinical and radiological data of patients with an acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or intraarterial thrombolysis (IAT) in a Swiss stroke unit are assessed in a Swiss Multicenter Thrombolysis Registry. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Ischemic Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Intravenous Thrombolysis and Intraarterial Thrombolysis
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- How many people
- 1,476 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- Dec 2007to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous or intra-arterial thrombolysis in a Swiss Stroke Unit.
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Intracranial arterial occlusion confirmed by conventional angiography, MRA or CTA
- National Institute of health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥ 4 or isolated aphasia or hemianopia
- Time to treatment < 6 hours
Who cannot join
- Intracranial haemorrhage on CT scn or MRI
- History of intracranial haemorrhage or subarachnoid haemorrhage
- Platelet count < 100'000
- International normalized ration (INR) > 1.5
- Partial thromboplastin time (PTT) > 1.5 times the normal value
- Known hereditary of acquired haemorrhagic diathesis
Show all 18Show fewer
- Pre-existing neurological deficit (mRS>2)
- Previous stroke that might interfere with the neurological assessment (mRS >2)
- Active gastric ulcer
- Major trauma within the preceding 3 months
- Major surgery within the past 4 weeks
- Childbirth within the previous 4 weeks
- Pregnancy
- Uncontrolled hypertension (>185/10 on repeated measures despite antihypertensive medication)
- Severe systemic disease with poor prognosis (e.g. cancer, severe heart failure)
- Intracranial neoplasm
- Combined IVT and IAT
- Combined Intravenous and Ultrasound Thrombolysis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Swiss Intravenous and Intra-arterial Thrombolysis for Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Registry (SWISS)
The clinical and radiological data of patients with an acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or intraarterial thrombolysis (IAT) in a Swiss stroke unit are assessed in a Swiss Multicenter Thrombolysis Registry. Like in clinical routine, a clinical evaluation takes place in a 3-months follow-up. Furthermore quality of life is assessed with a standardized questionnaire. The aim of the registry is to compare the safety and efficacy of IVT and IAT in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The registry also helps to improve in-hospital-management of stroke patients.
Read the detailed description
Background: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) have been shown to be effective treatments for acute stroke in controlled randomized trials and meta-analyses. However, prospective studies comparing IVT and IAT have not been performed, and it is not known which patients benefit more from IVT or IAT. Non-invasive neurovascular imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or computed tomography angiography (CTA) have the potential to improve patient selection for the optimal mode of thrombolytic therapy and provide data of pre-treatment neurovascular findings of patients treated with IVT. IAT series have identified several prognostic factors for favourable or poor outcome predictors such as vessel recanalization, location of the vascular occlusion or NIHSS at admission. Additional studies have shown that recanalization rates in patients with central ves-sel occlusions such as middle cerebral artery (MCA) main stem or MCA main branch or basilar artery (BA) is higher when treated with IAT compared to IVT. Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that IAT might be more efficacious in these patients.
Objective: Prospective observational multicenter registry with the following aims: To compare the safety and efficacy of IAT and IVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke. To improve safety of IAT and IVT by monitoring the in-hospital management.
Methods: Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke who are treated with IVT or IAT within 6 hours of symptom onset in a Swiss stroke unit will be eligible for this registry. Patients are given either intravenous rt-PA or receive IAT such as intra-arterial urokinase, intra-arterial rt-PA or mechanical endovascular recanalization techniques. Patient involvement in the registry shall not influence any treatment decision. Patients will undergo a complete diagnostic work up including a clinical neurological examination using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on admission, laboratory examination, brain and neurovascular imaging, echocardiography, 24-hours ECG to determine stroke etiology using the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria. The treating physician will initiate secondary prevention of stroke as soon as possible. All patients will be examined by CT and CTA or MRI and MRA on day 1 and in any case of clinical deterioration to exclude intracranial haemorrhage and to assess recanalization of the occluded vessel (using the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grading system). Clinical outcome will be evaluated on day 1 and at 3 months using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, modified Rankin Scale score (mRS), Barthel Index (BI), and assessing adverse events and quality of life. The proportion of patients with favourable outcome (mRS 0 to 2) at 3 months after IVT and IAT will serve as the primary outcome measure. In addition, subgroup analyses will be performed stratified by NIHSS, location of vessel occlusion, time to hospital admission and time to treatment. Secondary outcome measures will include quality of life and the proportion of patients with an excellent outcome (mRS 0 or 1) at 3 months, BI 75 to 100 at 3 months, mortality at 3 months, rapid neurological improvement during the first 24 hours, complete or partial recanalization, and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage.
- Conditions
- Ischemic Stroke
- Being tested
- Intravenous Thrombolysis, Intraarterial Thrombolysis
- Keywords
- ischemic stroke, endovascular treatment, Thrombolysis, outcome
- Medical subject headings
- Ischemic Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intravenous ThrombolysisProcedure or surgery
i.V. thrombolysis with rtPa
Intraarterial ThrombolysisProcedure or surgery
Endovascular treatment with i.a. Urokinase or i.a. rtPA or mechanical recanalization techniques
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 1 (Liv*) | i.v. thrombolysis with rtPA Receives: Procedure: Intravenous Thrombolysis | |
| 2 (L*) | intraarterial thrombolysis Receives: Procedure: Intraarterial Thrombolysis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
overall frequency of favourable clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0 to 2), and unfavourable clinical outcome or death (modified Rankin Scale 3 to 6)
Measured: Day 90
Secondary outcomes (6)
subgroup analyses will be performed stratified by NIHSS score
Measured: Day 90
Excellent functional clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0 or 1) and quality of life (measured by EuroQol and Stroke specific Quality of Life Scale)
Measured: Day 90
All causes of mortality
Measured: Day 90
Proportion of patients with rapid neurological improvement (more than 4 points on the NIHSS) during the first 24 hours after thrombolysis.
Measured: Day 1
Complete or partial recanalization of the occluded artery (TIMI grade 2 or 3) assessed by CTA or MRA.
Measured: Day 1
Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhages up to 24 hours after thrombolysis defined as homogeneous areas of haemorrhage, with or without mass effect or intraventricular extension with neurological deterioration
Measured: Day 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Dec 2008 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2007
- Primary completionMar 2015
- Study completionDec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Ischemic StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 1,476 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Swiss Heart Foundation, University of Zurich, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland, University Hospital, Geneva, University of Lausanne Hospitals, Kantonsspital Aarau, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, Triemli Hospital
- Investigators
- Marcel Arnold, MD Prof., Principal investigator, Dep. of Neurology, Bern University Hospital, SwitzerlandKrassen Nedeltechev, MD Prof., Principal investigator, Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00811538
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 233/07
- Other IDs
- 1446, KEK 233/07
- Acronym
- SWISS
- Status last verified
- Apr 2016
- First submitted
- 18 Dec 2008
- Last updated
- 13 Apr 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Apr 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Swiss Intravenous and Intra-arterial Thrombolysis for Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Registry (SWISS)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00811538
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SWISS / 233/07
- Conditions
- Ischemic Stroke
- Keywords
- ischemic stroke, endovascular treatment, Thrombolysis, outcome
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,476 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Swiss Heart Foundation, University of Zurich, University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland, University Hospital, Geneva, University of Lausanne Hospitals, Kantonsspital Aarau, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen, Triemli Hospital
- Study start
- Dec 2007
- Primary completion
- Mar 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Dec 2008 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The clinical and radiological data of patients with an acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or intraarterial thrombolysis (IAT) in a Swiss stroke unit are assessed in a Swiss Multicenter Thrombolysis Registry. Like in clinical routine, a clinical evaluation takes place in a 3-months follow-up. Furthermore quality of life is assessed with a standardized questionnaire. The aim of the registry is to compare the safety and efficacy of IVT and IAT in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The registry also helps to improve in-hospital-management of stroke patients.
Detailed description
Background: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) have been shown to be effective treatments for acute stroke in controlled randomized trials and meta-analyses. However, prospective studies comparing IVT and IAT have not been performed, and it is not known which patients benefit more from IVT or IAT. Non-invasive neurovascular imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or computed tomography angiography (CTA) have the potential to improve patient selection for the optimal mode of thrombolytic therapy and provide data of pre-treatment neurovascular findings of patients treated with IVT. IAT series have identified several prognostic factors for favourable or poor outcome predictors such as vessel recanalization, location of the vascular occlusion or NIHSS at admission. Additional studies have shown that recanalization rates in patients with central ves-sel occlusions such as middle cerebral artery (MCA) main stem or MCA main branch or basilar artery (BA) is higher when treated with IAT compared to IVT. Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that IAT might be more efficacious in these patients.
Objective: Prospective observational multicenter registry with the following aims: To compare the safety and efficacy of IAT and IVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke. To improve safety of IAT and IVT by monitoring the in-hospital management.
Methods: Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke who are treated with IVT or IAT within 6 hours of symptom onset in a Swiss stroke unit will be eligible for this registry. Patients are given either intravenous rt-PA or receive IAT such as intra-arterial urokinase, intra-arterial rt-PA or mechanical endovascular recanalization techniques. Patient involvement in the registry shall not influence any treatment decision. Patients will undergo a complete diagnostic work up including a clinical neurological examination using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on admission, laboratory examination, brain and neurovascular imaging, echocardiography, 24-hours ECG to determine stroke etiology using the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria. The treating physician will initiate secondary prevention of stroke as soon as possible. All patients will be examined by CT and CTA or MRI and MRA on day 1 and in any case of clinical deterioration to exclude intracranial haemorrhage and to assess recanalization of the occluded vessel (using the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grading system). Clinical outcome will be evaluated on day 1 and at 3 months using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, modified Rankin Scale score (mRS), Barthel Index (BI), and assessing adverse events and quality of life. The proportion of patients with favourable outcome (mRS 0 to 2) at 3 months after IVT and IAT will serve as the primary outcome measure. In addition, subgroup analyses will be performed stratified by NIHSS, location of vessel occlusion, time to hospital admission and time to treatment. Secondary outcome measures will include quality of life and the proportion of patients with an excellent outcome (mRS 0 or 1) at 3 months, BI 75 to 100 at 3 months, mortality at 3 months, rapid neurological improvement during the first 24 hours, complete or partial recanalization, and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 1 (Liv*) | – | Procedure: Intravenous Thrombolysisi.v. thrombolysis with rtPA |
| 2 (L*) | – | Procedure: Intraarterial Thrombolysisintraarterial thrombolysis |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous or intra-arterial thrombolysis in a Swiss Stroke Unit.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Intracranial arterial occlusion confirmed by conventional angiography, MRA or CTA
- National Institute of health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥ 4 or isolated aphasia or hemianopia
- Time to treatment < 6 hours
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Intracranial haemorrhage on CT scn or MRI
- History of intracranial haemorrhage or subarachnoid haemorrhage
- Platelet count < 100'000
- International normalized ration (INR) > 1.5
- Partial thromboplastin time (PTT) > 1.5 times the normal value
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intravenous Thrombolysisi.V. thrombolysis with rtPa | Procedure or surgery | 1 1 (Liv*) |
| Intraarterial ThrombolysisEndovascular treatment with i.a. Urokinase or i.a. rtPA or mechanical recanalization techniques | Procedure or surgery | 2 (L*) |
Primary outcome
overall frequency of favourable clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0 to 2), and unfavourable clinical outcome or death (modified Rankin Scale 3 to 6)
Time frame: Day 90
6 secondary outcomes
subgroup analyses will be performed stratified by NIHSS score
Time frame: Day 90
Excellent functional clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0 or 1) and quality of life (measured by EuroQol and Stroke specific Quality of Life Scale)
Time frame: Day 90
All causes of mortality
Time frame: Day 90
Proportion of patients with rapid neurological improvement (more than 4 points on the NIHSS) during the first 24 hours after thrombolysis.
Time frame: Day 1
Complete or partial recanalization of the occluded artery (TIMI grade 2 or 3) assessed by CTA or MRA.
Time frame: Day 1
Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhages up to 24 hours after thrombolysis defined as homogeneous areas of haemorrhage, with or without mass effect or intraventricular extension with neurological deterioration
Time frame: Day 1
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Apr 2016.
Related trials for Ischemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Active, not recruiting
Improving Visual Field Deficits With Noninvasive Brain Stimulation
Visual Field Defect, Peripheral, Stroke
Recruiting
Biomarkers of Paired VNS
Stroke, Ischemic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Marcel Arnold, MD Prof. principal investigator
Dep. of Neurology, Bern University Hospital, Switzerland
Krassen Nedeltechev, MD Prof. principal investigator
Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Ischemic Stroke, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
overall frequency of favourable clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0 to 2), and unfavourable clinical outcome or death (modified Rankin Scale 3 to 6) (time frame: Day 90). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Apr 2016.