AzTrials
AzTrials

Ischemic StrokeSWISSNCT00811538

Swiss Intravenous and Intra-arterial Thrombolysis for Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Registry

An observational study of Ischemic Stroke, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The clinical and radiological data of patients with an acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or intraarterial thrombolysis (IAT) in a Swiss stroke unit are assessed in a Swiss Multicenter Thrombolysis Registry. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Ischemic Stroke
What is being tested?
Intravenous Thrombolysis and Intraarterial Thrombolysis
How many people
1,476 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
Dec 2007to Dec 2015
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous or intra-arterial thrombolysis in a Swiss Stroke Unit.

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Intracranial arterial occlusion confirmed by conventional angiography, MRA or CTA
  • National Institute of health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≥ 4 or isolated aphasia or hemianopia
  • Time to treatment < 6 hours

Who cannot join

  • Intracranial haemorrhage on CT scn or MRI
  • History of intracranial haemorrhage or subarachnoid haemorrhage
  • Platelet count < 100'000
  • International normalized ration (INR) > 1.5
  • Partial thromboplastin time (PTT) > 1.5 times the normal value
  • Known hereditary of acquired haemorrhagic diathesis
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Pre-existing neurological deficit (mRS>2)
  • Previous stroke that might interfere with the neurological assessment (mRS >2)
  • Active gastric ulcer
  • Major trauma within the preceding 3 months
  • Major surgery within the past 4 weeks
  • Childbirth within the previous 4 weeks
  • Pregnancy
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (>185/10 on repeated measures despite antihypertensive medication)
  • Severe systemic disease with poor prognosis (e.g. cancer, severe heart failure)
  • Intracranial neoplasm
  • Combined IVT and IAT
  • Combined Intravenous and Ultrasound Thrombolysis

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • Dep. of Neurology, Bern University Hospital

    Bern, 3010

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Swiss Intravenous and Intra-arterial Thrombolysis for Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Registry (SWISS)

The clinical and radiological data of patients with an acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) or intraarterial thrombolysis (IAT) in a Swiss stroke unit are assessed in a Swiss Multicenter Thrombolysis Registry. Like in clinical routine, a clinical evaluation takes place in a 3-months follow-up. Furthermore quality of life is assessed with a standardized questionnaire. The aim of the registry is to compare the safety and efficacy of IVT and IAT in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The registry also helps to improve in-hospital-management of stroke patients.

Read the detailed description

Background: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) have been shown to be effective treatments for acute stroke in controlled randomized trials and meta-analyses. However, prospective studies comparing IVT and IAT have not been performed, and it is not known which patients benefit more from IVT or IAT. Non-invasive neurovascular imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or computed tomography angiography (CTA) have the potential to improve patient selection for the optimal mode of thrombolytic therapy and provide data of pre-treatment neurovascular findings of patients treated with IVT. IAT series have identified several prognostic factors for favourable or poor outcome predictors such as vessel recanalization, location of the vascular occlusion or NIHSS at admission. Additional studies have shown that recanalization rates in patients with central ves-sel occlusions such as middle cerebral artery (MCA) main stem or MCA main branch or basilar artery (BA) is higher when treated with IAT compared to IVT. Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that IAT might be more efficacious in these patients.

Objective: Prospective observational multicenter registry with the following aims: To compare the safety and efficacy of IAT and IVT in patients with acute ischemic stroke. To improve safety of IAT and IVT by monitoring the in-hospital management.

Methods: Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke who are treated with IVT or IAT within 6 hours of symptom onset in a Swiss stroke unit will be eligible for this registry. Patients are given either intravenous rt-PA or receive IAT such as intra-arterial urokinase, intra-arterial rt-PA or mechanical endovascular recanalization techniques. Patient involvement in the registry shall not influence any treatment decision. Patients will undergo a complete diagnostic work up including a clinical neurological examination using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on admission, laboratory examination, brain and neurovascular imaging, echocardiography, 24-hours ECG to determine stroke etiology using the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria. The treating physician will initiate secondary prevention of stroke as soon as possible. All patients will be examined by CT and CTA or MRI and MRA on day 1 and in any case of clinical deterioration to exclude intracranial haemorrhage and to assess recanalization of the occluded vessel (using the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grading system). Clinical outcome will be evaluated on day 1 and at 3 months using the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, modified Rankin Scale score (mRS), Barthel Index (BI), and assessing adverse events and quality of life. The proportion of patients with favourable outcome (mRS 0 to 2) at 3 months after IVT and IAT will serve as the primary outcome measure. In addition, subgroup analyses will be performed stratified by NIHSS, location of vessel occlusion, time to hospital admission and time to treatment. Secondary outcome measures will include quality of life and the proportion of patients with an excellent outcome (mRS 0 or 1) at 3 months, BI 75 to 100 at 3 months, mortality at 3 months, rapid neurological improvement during the first 24 hours, complete or partial recanalization, and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage.

Conditions
Ischemic Stroke
Being tested
Intravenous Thrombolysis, Intraarterial Thrombolysis
Keywords
ischemic stroke, endovascular treatment, Thrombolysis, outcome
Medical subject headings
Ischemic Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Intravenous ThrombolysisProcedure or surgery

    i.V. thrombolysis with rtPa

  • Intraarterial ThrombolysisProcedure or surgery

    Endovascular treatment with i.a. Urokinase or i.a. rtPA or mechanical recanalization techniques

Study groups in NCT00811538
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1 1 (Liv*)i.v. thrombolysis with rtPA
Receives: Procedure: Intravenous Thrombolysis
2 (L*)intraarterial thrombolysis
Receives: Procedure: Intraarterial Thrombolysis

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. overall frequency of favourable clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0 to 2), and unfavourable clinical outcome or death (modified Rankin Scale 3 to 6)

    Measured: Day 90

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. subgroup analyses will be performed stratified by NIHSS score

    Measured: Day 90

  2. Excellent functional clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0 or 1) and quality of life (measured by EuroQol and Stroke specific Quality of Life Scale)

    Measured: Day 90

  3. All causes of mortality

    Measured: Day 90

  4. Proportion of patients with rapid neurological improvement (more than 4 points on the NIHSS) during the first 24 hours after thrombolysis.

    Measured: Day 1

  5. Complete or partial recanalization of the occluded artery (TIMI grade 2 or 3) assessed by CTA or MRA.

    Measured: Day 1

  6. Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhages up to 24 hours after thrombolysis defined as homogeneous areas of haemorrhage, with or without mass effect or intraventricular extension with neurological deterioration

    Measured: Day 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Dec 2008 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2007
  3. Primary completionMar 2015
  4. Study completionDec 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,476 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00811538
Sponsor's protocol ID
233/07
Other IDs
1446, KEK 233/07
Acronym
SWISS
Status last verified
Apr 2016
First submitted
18 Dec 2008
Last updated
13 Apr 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Ischemic Stroke, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Apr 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

overall frequency of favourable clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale 0 to 2), and unfavourable clinical outcome or death (modified Rankin Scale 3 to 6) (time frame: Day 90). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Apr 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in