SedationNCT00832013
Safe Administration of Propofol for Sedation in Children
A study testing Propofol in people with Sedation, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
Trial summary
Advances in health care require that more children are given sedation to allow doctors to perform investigations or minor procedures. Sedation drugs have traditionally been given orally (swallowed) by children. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 15 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Sedation
- What is being tested?
- Propofol
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCanada
- Study dates
- Jun 2008to Aug 2009
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 15 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- All ASA category 1 and 2 children aged 6-15y for elective upper or lower gastrointestinal endoscopic investigations to be performed under sedation. Stratification by age (<9y, 9-12y, >12y) will be performed to ensure balanced allocation of age groups and allow for identification of age and weight specific effects.
Who cannot join
- Subjects with a history or signs of chronic lung disease;
- Active upper respiratory tract infection;
- Chronic opioid or other sedative drug therapy;
- Anticipated difficult airway, reflux, delayed gastric emptying;
- Other indications for endotracheal intubation;
- Subjects outwith the 5th or 95th centile of weight for age: translates to a minimum weight of 12kg at 3 years and maximum of 79kg at 15y.
- Contra-indications to propofol or lidocaine.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Canada1 site
BC Children's Hospital, Department of Anesthesia
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6H 3V4
About this study
Advances in health care require that more children are given sedation to allow doctors to perform investigations or minor procedures. Sedation drugs have traditionally been given orally (swallowed) by children. However, oral sedation drugs have unpredictable characteristics, such as duration of sedation, which may result in difficulties performing the planned procedure.
Anesthetic drugs are now invariably used for sedation in children. These are given through an IV (skinny plastic tube inserted in to a vein). Propofol (white liquid) is the anesthetic drug most commonly used for sedation at BC Children's Hospital for sedation. Propofol has several advantages, including an accurately controllable depth of sedation (how deeply asleep), minimal effect on the heart and circulation and control of reflexes (e,g coughing) during the procedure. Propofol also promotes rapid recovery with less sickness and an earlier return to normal functioning following the procedure.
Read more
While propofol has many advantages it can cause respiratory depression (reduced breathing rate). This reduction in breathing is more common if propofol is given quickly. When your child is given propofol for their proposed procedure this is performed by a pediatric anesthesiologist who is skilled in supporting breathing should this be required. If your child does not participate in this study they will still receive propofol administered by the anesthesiologist as this is our usual practice. It would be routine to administer the propofol rapidly and then support breathing for a few minutes. This is very safe in the hands of an expert anesthesiologist but can be sometimes more risky in other settings where extensive monitoring and anesthesiologists are not available. This is the setting that propofol is used in many institutions.
Our goal is to determine how quickly propofol can be given without reducing breathing to the point that help with breathing is required.
Read the detailed description
Purpose Advances in minimally invasive radiological and surgical techniques demand that increasing numbers of children are given sedation or anesthesia to facilitate these procedures, frequently performed on an out-patient or day-care basis. Most are performed outside the operating room environment, with intensivists and emergency physicians administering over 55 % of sedation episodes, and only 19% being performed by anesthesiologists in North America. It is well documented that risks of complications during sedation exceed those experienced during the much more controlled environment of general anesthesia, with a twelve-fold increased risk of mortality when sedation is administered outside the operating room.
Sedative agents have traditionally been administered orally to children. However, characteristics of oral sedation drugs, such as unpredictable depth and duration of sedation resulting from variable drug absorption and prolonged duration of drug effect, have resulted in both high failure and complication rates. Recently, intravenous (IV) anesthetic drugs with more accurately titratable and predictable characteristics have gained popularity for a variety of sedation procedures. Propofol is the most commonly used intravenous agent for these procedures in North America.
Hypothesis The maximum safe infusion rate for an induction dose of propofol administered to children for sedation can be reliably predicted. Safety will be optimized by preventing apnoea whilst minimizing the time for induction of sedation and ensuring an adequate depth of sedation is achieved.
Justification Propofol is an intravenous (IV) anesthetic agent used for induction and maintenance of anesthesia in both adults and children. Propofol has several characteristics favouring its use, including an accurately titratable depth of anesthesia, cardiovascular stability, suppression of upper airway reflexes, rapid recovery with reduced post-operative nausea and vomiting and overall earlier return to pre-anesthetic functional state. At lower doses, propofol may also be used to maintain a level of sedation for radiological imaging or endoscopic investigations.
While propofol provides many advantages it does cause significant respiratory depression. Adverse respiratory events have been reported to be similar in both adults and children. Propofol induced respiratory depression may lead to hypoxemia requiring the provision of supplemental oxygen by mask and/or manual positive pressure ventilation.8 Artificial ventilation requires significant expertise and if poorly managed may result in gastric insufflation, pulmonary aspiration or hypoxia, all of which can lead to devastating complications such as permanent brain injury or death. The maximum dose or rate of administration of propofol that causes respiratory depression in children has yet to be accurately defined. Age specific effects have also not been reported.
Objectives
Primary aim:
•Develop a safe dosing schedule for propofol administration in children that will ensure spontaneous ventilation is maintained in at least 95% of subjects.
Secondary aim:
•Model the effects of propofol induction administered by intravenous infusion to facilitate the prediction of dosing schedules for different doses, different end-points in different clinical scenarios.
Research Method Prospective randomized study. Subjects will be randomly assigned to receive a predetermined infusion rate for propofol during induction of sedation.
Statistical Analysis A graphical representation of each data point with crossovers will be produced. Data will be analysed on a per protocol basis using the pooled-adjacent-violators algorithm to estimate the maximal infusion rate whilst preserving spontaneous ventilation. We will apply the boot-strap methods implemented by Pace to compute 95 % confidence limits. The effect of age, will be assessed by performing separate analyses in the age-strata.
To model the ventilatory effects of propofol, we will develop a mathematical model of human respiratory control. We will base this on the respiratory model proposed by Ursino (Ursino Model)19-21 which is a three compartment model comprising the lung, brain and tissues for gas exchange. We will enhance the model to include ventilatory regulation, along with pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models of propofol including a respiratory effect site. The identification of suitable parameters for the model will include non-linear fitting of the clinical data (age, weight, BSA, ventilatory volumes, CO2 excretion, respiratory rate, and entropy).
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Propofol 1 % at a dose of 4mg/kg will be administered intravenously via a standard Medex Protégé® 3010 (Medex-A Furon. Healthcare Company, Duluth, GA, USA) infusion pump at a constant rate determined by the randomization schedule. Fresh gas flow will be maintained at 6 l/min throughout the induction procedure with the FiO2 increased to 0.5. Full cardiovascular, respiratory and EEG monitoring will continue during induction of anesthesia.
Once the loading dose of propofol has been delivered the propofol infusion will be maintained at a rate of 200mcg/kg/min or as determined by the attending anesthesiologist whilst the end-point respiratory responses are observed. Receives: Drug: Propofol |
| 2 | Active comparator | Same procedure as above. These subjects will be stratified by age and randomized, using the Biased Coin Design (BCD) principle to determine the infusion rate of propofol for delivery of the induction dose. Receives: Drug: Propofol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Positive result: Spontaneous ventilation continues following administration of the full loading dose of propofol by infusion.
Measured: Before and during surgery
Secondary outcomes (1)
Negative result: Apnoea occurs (no breath for 20 seconds or oxygen saturation less than 90%) before the complete dose is administered or within 4 minutes of the end of the dose.
Measured: Before and during surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jan 2009 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2008
- Primary completionMar 2009
- Study completionAug 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for SedationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of British ColumbiaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of British Columbia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society
- Investigators
- Mark Ansermino, MD, Principal investigator, University of British ColumbiaJon McCormack, Study director, University of British ColumbiaEleanor Reimer, Study director, University of British ColumbiaGuy Dumont, Study director, University of British ColumbiaPrasad Shrawane, Study director, University of British ColumbiaRollin Brant, Study director, University of British Columbia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00832013
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H07-02846
- Status last verified
- Aug 2009
- First submitted
- 27 Jan 2009
- Last updated
- 18 Aug 2009
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Aug 2009. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Safe Administration of Propofol for Sedation in Children
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT00832013
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H07-02846
- Conditions
- Sedation
- Keywords
- Propofol, sedation, pediatric, Induction of sedation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of British ColumbiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society
- Study start
- Jun 2008
- Primary completion
- Mar 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Jan 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Advances in health care require that more children are given sedation to allow doctors to perform investigations or minor procedures. Sedation drugs have traditionally been given orally (swallowed) by children. However, oral sedation drugs have unpredictable characteristics, such as duration of sedation, which may result in difficulties performing the planned procedure.
Anesthetic drugs are now invariably used for sedation in children. These are given through an IV (skinny plastic tube inserted in to a vein). Propofol (white liquid) is the anesthetic drug most commonly used for sedation at BC Children's Hospital for sedation. Propofol has several advantages, including an accurately controllable depth of sedation (how deeply asleep), minimal effect on the heart and circulation and control of reflexes (e,g coughing) during the procedure. Propofol also promotes rapid recovery with less sickness and an earlier return to normal functioning following the procedure.
While propofol has many advantages it can cause respiratory depression (reduced breathing rate). This reduction in breathing is more common if propofol is given quickly. When your child is given propofol for their proposed procedure this is performed by a pediatric anesthesiologist who is skilled in supporting breathing should this be required. If your child does not participate in this study they will still receive propofol administered by the anesthesiologist as this is our usual practice. It would be routine to administer the propofol rapidly and then support breathing for a few minutes. This is very safe in the hands of an expert anesthesiologist but can be sometimes more risky in other settings where extensive monitoring and anesthesiologists are not available. This is the setting that propofol is used in many institutions.
Our goal is to determine how quickly propofol can be given without reducing breathing to the point that help with breathing is required.
Detailed description
Purpose Advances in minimally invasive radiological and surgical techniques demand that increasing numbers of children are given sedation or anesthesia to facilitate these procedures, frequently performed on an out-patient or day-care basis. Most are performed outside the operating room environment, with intensivists and emergency physicians administering over 55 % of sedation episodes, and only 19% being performed by anesthesiologists in North America. It is well documented that risks of complications during sedation exceed those experienced during the much more controlled environment of general anesthesia, with a twelve-fold increased risk of mortality when sedation is administered outside the operating room.
Sedative agents have traditionally been administered orally to children. However, characteristics of oral sedation drugs, such as unpredictable depth and duration of sedation resulting from variable drug absorption and prolonged duration of drug effect, have resulted in both high failure and complication rates. Recently, intravenous (IV) anesthetic drugs with more accurately titratable and predictable characteristics have gained popularity for a variety of sedation procedures. Propofol is the most commonly used intravenous agent for these procedures in North America.
Hypothesis The maximum safe infusion rate for an induction dose of propofol administered to children for sedation can be reliably predicted. Safety will be optimized by preventing apnoea whilst minimizing the time for induction of sedation and ensuring an adequate depth of sedation is achieved.
Justification Propofol is an intravenous (IV) anesthetic agent used for induction and maintenance of anesthesia in both adults and children. Propofol has several characteristics favouring its use, including an accurately titratable depth of anesthesia, cardiovascular stability, suppression of upper airway reflexes, rapid recovery with reduced post-operative nausea and vomiting and overall earlier return to pre-anesthetic functional state. At lower doses, propofol may also be used to maintain a level of sedation for radiological imaging or endoscopic investigations.
While propofol provides many advantages it does cause significant respiratory depression. Adverse respiratory events have been reported to be similar in both adults and children. Propofol induced respiratory depression may lead to hypoxemia requiring the provision of supplemental oxygen by mask and/or manual positive pressure ventilation.8 Artificial ventilation requires significant expertise and if poorly managed may result in gastric insufflation, pulmonary aspiration or hypoxia, all of which can lead to devastating complications such as permanent brain injury or death. The maximum dose or rate of administration of propofol that causes respiratory depression in children has yet to be accurately defined. Age specific effects have also not been reported.
Objectives
Primary aim:
•Develop a safe dosing schedule for propofol administration in children that will ensure spontaneous ventilation is maintained in at least 95% of subjects.
Secondary aim:
•Model the effects of propofol induction administered by intravenous infusion to facilitate the prediction of dosing schedules for different doses, different end-points in different clinical scenarios.
Research Method Prospective randomized study. Subjects will be randomly assigned to receive a predetermined infusion rate for propofol during induction of sedation.
Statistical Analysis A graphical representation of each data point with crossovers will be produced. Data will be analysed on a per protocol basis using the pooled-adjacent-violators algorithm to estimate the maximal infusion rate whilst preserving spontaneous ventilation. We will apply the boot-strap methods implemented by Pace to compute 95 % confidence limits. The effect of age, will be assessed by performing separate analyses in the age-strata.
To model the ventilatory effects of propofol, we will develop a mathematical model of human respiratory control. We will base this on the respiratory model proposed by Ursino (Ursino Model)19-21 which is a three compartment model comprising the lung, brain and tissues for gas exchange. We will enhance the model to include ventilatory regulation, along with pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic models of propofol including a respiratory effect site. The identification of suitable parameters for the model will include non-linear fitting of the clinical data (age, weight, BSA, ventilatory volumes, CO2 excretion, respiratory rate, and entropy).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active comparator | Drug: PropofolPropofol 1 % at a dose of 4mg/kg will be administered intravenously via a standard Medex Protégé® 3010 (Medex-A Furon. Healthcare Company, Duluth, GA, USA) infusion pump at a constant rate determined by the randomization schedule. Fresh gas flow will be maintained at 6 l/min throughout the induction procedure with the FiO2 increased to 0.5. Full cardiovascular, respiratory and EEG monitoring will continue during induction of anesthesia. Once the loading dose of propofol has been delivered the propofol infusion will be maintained at a rate of 200mcg/kg/min or as determined by the attending anesthesiologist whilst the end-point respiratory responses are observed. |
| 2 | Active comparator | Drug: PropofolSame procedure as above. These subjects will be stratified by age and randomized, using the Biased Coin Design (BCD) principle to determine the infusion rate of propofol for delivery of the induction dose. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 15 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All ASA category 1 and 2 children aged 6-15y for elective upper or lower gastrointestinal endoscopic investigations to be performed under sedation. Stratification by age (<9y, 9-12y, >12y) will be performed to ensure balanced allocation of age groups and allow for identification of age and weight specific effects.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Subjects with a history or signs of chronic lung disease;
- Active upper respiratory tract infection;
- Chronic opioid or other sedative drug therapy;
- Anticipated difficult airway, reflux, delayed gastric emptying;
- Other indications for endotracheal intubation;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PropofolSee detailed description | Drug | 1 |
| PropofolSee detailed description | Drug | 2 |
Primary outcome
Positive result: Spontaneous ventilation continues following administration of the full loading dose of propofol by infusion.
Time frame: Before and during surgery
1 secondary outcome
Negative result: Apnoea occurs (no breath for 20 seconds or oxygen saturation less than 90%) before the complete dose is administered or within 4 minutes of the end of the dose.
Time frame: Before and during surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Aug 2009.
Related trials for Sedation
Not yet recruiting
Bispectral Index-Guided Propofol Sedation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Deep Sedation, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Changes to Prostate Procedures
Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Weighted Blankets for Agitation in Adults in the Intensive Care Unit
Psychomotor Agitation, Critical Illness
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
The Danish Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Study
Out-Of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest, Post-Cardiac Arrest Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Media Use, Anxiety, Sedation, and Recovery in Children Having Upper GI Endoscopy
Anesthesia, Anxiety
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mark Ansermino, MD principal investigator
University of British Columbia
Jon McCormack study director
University of British Columbia
Eleanor Reimer study director
University of British Columbia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Propofol in people with Sedation, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Aug 2009. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Positive result: Spontaneous ventilation continues following administration of the full loading dose of propofol by infusion. (time frame: Before and during surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Aug 2009.