AzTrials
AzTrials

Endotracheal IntubationNCT00966524

Learning and Retention of Tracheal Intubation by Medical Students: Comparison of Standard Intubation Teaching Against Video-guided Intubation Teaching.

A study testing Endotracheal intubation in people with Endotracheal Intubation, run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Purpose: This study is designed to assess the impact of teaching tracheal intubation using video-guided feedback on the ability to perform and maintain this clinical skill by medical students. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Endotracheal Intubation
What is being tested?
Endotracheal intubation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
18 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Jan 2010to Jun 2010
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Limited experience with tracheal intubation (less than 5 intubations under supervision)
  • Pre-graduate medical students in their 2 clinical yea

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (Hôpital Notre-Dame)

    Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Purpose: This study is designed to assess the impact of teaching tracheal intubation using video-guided feedback on the ability to perform and maintain this clinical skill by medical students.

Hypothesis: We hypothesise that, for novices, video-guided feedback provided during tracheal intubation will improve learning and retention of this clinical skill compared to standard teaching using direct visualization feedback.

Read the detailed description

Introduction:

Competency in laryngoscopic tracheal intubation is a key skill to be developed during the training of medical students. Teaching this technical skill remains a challenge due to the fact that the laryngeal view is limited to one person at a time. Therefore, the feedback given during the procedure by the instructor to the student becomes limited, delayed and thus less efficient. This lack of efficiency could explain the poor success rates of tracheal intubations performed by medical students during the initial learning phase. Over the last ten years, new intubation devices incorporating optic fibers have been commercialized. These new technologies combined to video systems are now increasingly used for teaching purposes. Recent literature tends to show that this new approach could ease the learning process and increase the medical student's satisfaction towards the teaching of tracheal intubation.

Maintaining this knowledge and clinical skill can also be challenging especially for physicians who are not exposed to the intubation technique on a regular basis. Since tracheal intubation is a potentially lifesaving procedure, retention of this competency is crucial.

This study is designed to assess the impact of teaching tracheal intubation using video-guided feedback and the short and mid-term retention of the competency in a population of pregraduate medical students (clinical years 3 and 4).

Methods:

-Initial phase:

Medical students enrolled in this study will initially receive standardised training using a short video explaining the tracheal intubation technique. Then, they will be asked to intubate on mannequins for a short period of time (15 minutes).

A total of 18 medical students will be randomly assigned to the following groups:

  • Group V: to perform video-guided intubations on six patients under the supervision of an anaesthesiologist.
  • Group S: to perform tracheal intubation on six patients under the supervision of an anaesthesiologist using standard teaching technique (direct visualization).

Patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia including neuromuscular blockade as part of their anaesthetic management will be considered for this study. Standard monitoring for general anaesthesia will be used. Immediately after induction of general anaesthesia, the anaesthesiologist will confirm the patient's intubation grade. Patients having an intubation grade higher than 2 on the Cormack-Lehane scale, will be excluded.

-Short-term phase (within a week from the initial phase):

Novices will be asked to perform ten tracheal intubations under the supervision of an anaesthesiologist but without any specific feedback.

-Mid-term phase (6 weeks after the initial/short-term phase):

Novices will be asked to perform ten tracheal intubations six weeks after the initial/short term phase under the supervision of an anaesthesiologist without any specific feedback. If the medical student fails to intubate the patient, the anaesthesiologist will perform the technique.

Images from all intubations will be captured on videotape for subsequent review. These images will be used to detect mucosa lacerations, oesophageal intubation, number of attempts and total time required to perform tracheal intubation.

Lastly, a questionnaire will be completed by all medical students to assess their satisfaction towards the teaching technique and their ability to perform tracheal intubation.

Being tested
Endotracheal intubation
Keywords
Endotracheal intubation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Endotracheal intubationProcedure or surgery

    Pregraduates medical students will be randomized to perform endotracheal intubation with video-guided feedback (experimental arm) or endotracheal intubation using direct visualization feedback (standard technique).

Study groups in NCT00966524
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
VideoExperimentalTeaching tracheal intubation to medical students using video-guided feedback during the procedure.
Receives: Procedure: Endotracheal intubation
StandardActive comparatorTeaching tracheal intubation to medical students using direct visualization feedback during the procedure.
Receives: Procedure: Endotracheal intubation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Ease to intubate (time and number of attempts required to perform intubation) and retention of the competency (short and mid-term)

    Measured: Within a week and at 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Medical students' satisfaction towards the teaching technique and their ability to perform tracheal intubation.

    Measured: At 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Aug 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2010
  3. Primary completionApr 2010
  4. Study completionJun 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
18 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00966524
Sponsor's protocol ID
FG 2010-001
Status last verified
Jun 2010
First submitted
25 Aug 2009
Last updated
11 Jun 2010
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Endotracheal intubation in people with Endotracheal Intubation, run by Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM) at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Jun 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Ease to intubate (time and number of attempts required to perform intubation) and retention of the competency (short and mid-term) (time frame: Within a week and at 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Jun 2010.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in