Autogenous Bone GraftsPhase 4NCT01037335
Effect of Local Administration of Morphine for Analgesia After Iliac Bone Graft Harvest
A Phase 4 study testing morphine in people with Autogenous Bone Grafts, run by The Cleveland Clinic.
Trial summary
The goal of the current study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of low-dose morphine administered to the site of bone graft harvesting in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. In addition to short-term analgesic effects, the incidence of chronic donor site pain was evaluated 1,3,6 m after surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Autogenous Bone Grafts
- What is being tested?
- morphine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Apr 2009to Mar 2017
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- Patients on opioids
- Neuropathic disease
- Chronic conditions
About this study
Official title: Local Administration of Morphine for Analgesia After Iliac Bone Graft Harvest
The goal of the current study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of low-dose morphine administered to the site of bone graft harvesting in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. In addition to short-term analgesic effects, the incidence of chronic donor site pain was evaluated 1,3,6 m after surgery.
Read the detailed description
The protocol is approved by the Institutional Review Board at Gülhane Military Medical Academy Haydarpaşa Training Hospital (Istanbul, Turkey) and written informed consent will be obtained from each patient. Sixty adult patients scheduled to undergo elective upper extremity bone fractures using autogenous bone grafts will be enrolled in this prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Patients were eligible for participation if they were greater than 18 yr of age, they weighed more than 40 kg, they were American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II, and they could operate a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device and had no allergies to morphine.
All surgical procedures will be performed using a partial thickness posterior iliac crest bone graft harvested through a lateral oblique incision just cephalad to the crest. Anesthesia was induced with 2 mg/kg propofol and 5 mg/kg fentanyl and maintained with sevoflurane in 50% oxygen in air. After the graft was harvested and hemostasis will be achieved, patients will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups using a computer- generated random number table. Group 1 (control group) was given 10 ml normal saline (NS) infiltrated into the harvest site, and 1 ml NS was administered intramuscularly. Group 2 (intramuscular morphine) was given 10 ml NS infiltrated into the harvest site and 5 mg morphine (1 ml) intramuscularly. Group 3 (donor site morphine) was given 5 mg morphine (10 ml) infiltrated into the harvest site and 1 ml NS intramuscularly. All intramuscular injections were administered in the deltoid muscle at the same time as harvest site infiltration. The study medications were prepared by the pharmacy and administered by the surgeon and anesthesiologist, who were blinded to their contents. In the recovery room, patients were connected to a PCA pump (Abbott PCA Plus, Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL) containing 1 mg/ml morphine. The initial settings were an incremental dose of 1.5 ml, a lockout interval of 8 min, and a 4-h limit of 30 ml. The incremental dose was increased to 2.0 ml and the 4-h limit was increased to 45 ml if analgesia was inadequate after 1 h. If analgesia was inadequate after an additional hour, the incremental dose was further increased to 2.5 ml. Patients were asked to quantify their pain from both the donor and the upper extremity surgery incision sites on a verbal analog pain scale of 0-10, with 0 representing no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain. Pain assessments were made by a blinded research nurse observer 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h after completion of surgery. In addition, PCA morphine use was recorded at these six time intervals. Analgesic duration was defined as the time from local administration of study drug to the first requirement of PCA morphine. At 1m, 3 m and 6 m yr after surgery, patients will be interviewed by telephone by a blinded investigator, and a detailed questionnaire similar to that reported in a previous study on donor site pain will be completed. The presence and subjective characteristics of any residual donor site pain, including its quality, severity, and frequency, as well as provoking factors and treatment received, will be recorded.
- Conditions
- Autogenous Bone Grafts
- Being tested
- morphine
- Keywords
- bone graft, pain, chronic
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
morphineDrug
Group 1 (control group) was given 10 ml normal saline (NS) infiltrated into the harvest site, and 1 ml NS was administered intramuscularly. Group 2 (intramuscular morphine) was given 10 ml NS infiltrated into the harvest site and 5 mg morphine (1 ml) intramuscularly. Group 3 (donor site morphine) was given 5 mg morphine (10 ml) infiltrated into the harvest site and 1 ml NS intramuscularly.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| control group | Placebo comparator | 10 ml normal saline (NS) infiltrated into the harvest site, and 1 ml NS was administered intramuscularly. Receives: Drug: morphine |
| intramuscular morphine | Active comparator | 10 ml NS infiltrated into the harvest site and 5 mg morphine (1 ml) intramuscularly Receives: Drug: morphine |
| donor site morphine | Active comparator | 5 mg morphine (10 ml) infiltrated into the harvest site and 1 ml NS intramuscularly. Receives: Drug: morphine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
pain after procedure
Measured: first 24 hrs
Secondary outcomes (1)
chronic pain formation
Measured: 1,3 and 6m
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2009
- Primary completionMar 2017
- Study completionMar 2017
Why it stopped: No participants enrolled
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Autogenous Bone GraftsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The Cleveland ClinicThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The Cleveland Clinic
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- alparslan turan, md, Study director, cleveland Clinic, outcomes research
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01037335
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GATA 1 123
- Status last verified
- Apr 2017
- First submitted
- 22 Dec 2009
- Last updated
- 13 Apr 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Apr 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Local Administration of Morphine for Analgesia After Iliac Bone Graft Harvest
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01037335
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GATA 1 123
- Conditions
- Autogenous Bone Grafts
- Keywords
- bone graft, pain, chronic
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: No participants enrolled
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The Cleveland ClinicUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital
- Study start
- Apr 2009 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Dec 2009 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of the current study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of low-dose morphine administered to the site of bone graft harvesting in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. In addition to short-term analgesic effects, the incidence of chronic donor site pain was evaluated 1,3,6 m after surgery.
Detailed description
The protocol is approved by the Institutional Review Board at Gülhane Military Medical Academy Haydarpaşa Training Hospital (Istanbul, Turkey) and written informed consent will be obtained from each patient. Sixty adult patients scheduled to undergo elective upper extremity bone fractures using autogenous bone grafts will be enrolled in this prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Patients were eligible for participation if they were greater than 18 yr of age, they weighed more than 40 kg, they were American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II, and they could operate a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device and had no allergies to morphine.
All surgical procedures will be performed using a partial thickness posterior iliac crest bone graft harvested through a lateral oblique incision just cephalad to the crest. Anesthesia was induced with 2 mg/kg propofol and 5 mg/kg fentanyl and maintained with sevoflurane in 50% oxygen in air. After the graft was harvested and hemostasis will be achieved, patients will be randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups using a computer- generated random number table. Group 1 (control group) was given 10 ml normal saline (NS) infiltrated into the harvest site, and 1 ml NS was administered intramuscularly. Group 2 (intramuscular morphine) was given 10 ml NS infiltrated into the harvest site and 5 mg morphine (1 ml) intramuscularly. Group 3 (donor site morphine) was given 5 mg morphine (10 ml) infiltrated into the harvest site and 1 ml NS intramuscularly. All intramuscular injections were administered in the deltoid muscle at the same time as harvest site infiltration. The study medications were prepared by the pharmacy and administered by the surgeon and anesthesiologist, who were blinded to their contents. In the recovery room, patients were connected to a PCA pump (Abbott PCA Plus, Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, IL) containing 1 mg/ml morphine. The initial settings were an incremental dose of 1.5 ml, a lockout interval of 8 min, and a 4-h limit of 30 ml. The incremental dose was increased to 2.0 ml and the 4-h limit was increased to 45 ml if analgesia was inadequate after 1 h. If analgesia was inadequate after an additional hour, the incremental dose was further increased to 2.5 ml. Patients were asked to quantify their pain from both the donor and the upper extremity surgery incision sites on a verbal analog pain scale of 0-10, with 0 representing no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain. Pain assessments were made by a blinded research nurse observer 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h after completion of surgery. In addition, PCA morphine use was recorded at these six time intervals. Analgesic duration was defined as the time from local administration of study drug to the first requirement of PCA morphine. At 1m, 3 m and 6 m yr after surgery, patients will be interviewed by telephone by a blinded investigator, and a detailed questionnaire similar to that reported in a previous study on donor site pain will be completed. The presence and subjective characteristics of any residual donor site pain, including its quality, severity, and frequency, as well as provoking factors and treatment received, will be recorded.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| control group | Placebo comparator | Drug: morphine10 ml normal saline (NS) infiltrated into the harvest site, and 1 ml NS was administered intramuscularly. |
| intramuscular morphine | Active comparator | Drug: morphine10 ml NS infiltrated into the harvest site and 5 mg morphine (1 ml) intramuscularly |
| donor site morphine | Active comparator | Drug: morphine5 mg morphine (10 ml) infiltrated into the harvest site and 1 ml NS intramuscularly. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients on opioids
- Neuropathic disease
- Chronic conditions
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| morphineGroup 1 (control group) was given 10 ml normal saline (NS) infiltrated into the harvest site, and 1 ml NS was administered intramuscularly. Group 2 (intramuscular morphine) was given 10 ml NS infiltrated into the harvest site and 5 mg morphine (1 ml) intramuscularly. Group 3 (donor site morphine) was given 5 mg morphine (10 ml) infiltrated into the harvest site and 1 ml NS intramuscularly. | Drug | control group, donor site morphine, intramuscular morphine |
Primary outcome
pain after procedure
Time frame: first 24 hrs
1 secondary outcome
chronic pain formation
Time frame: 1,3 and 6m
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Apr 2017.
Related trials for Autogenous Bone Grafts
Active, not recruiting
L-PRF Block vs Composite Graft for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation
Alveolar Ridge Resorption After Extraction, Alveolar Bone Loss
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Ascorbic Acid-Loaded I-PRF With Partially Demineralized Dentin Graft on Alveolar Ridge Preservation
Alveolar Ridge Preservation Post-Extraction Bone Healing Dental Implant Site Development Tooth Loss, Alveolar Bone Regeneration Following Odontectomy
Not yet recruiting
Autogenous and Xenograft Bone Mix in Alveolar Ridge Reconstruction
Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Deficiency
Not yet recruiting
Shell Technique for Implant Site Development
Ridge Augmentation, Ridge Deficiency
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Autogenous Mesenchymal Stem Cell Culture-Derived Signalling Molecules as Enhancers of Bone Formation in Bone Grafting
Bone Loss, Osteoclastic, Bone Loss, Alveolar
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
alparslan turan, md study director
cleveland Clinic, outcomes research
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing morphine in people with Autogenous Bone Grafts, run by The Cleveland Clinic.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
pain after procedure (time frame: first 24 hrs). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Apr 2017.