AzTrials
AzTrials

StressNCT01061255

Stress and Clinical Reasoning in Medical Students

A study testing Evaluation of the stress in people with Stress, run by Nantes University Hospital at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Solving a problem in ambulatory setting may contain peripheral stress due to socio-evaluative stressors (patient's expectations about explanations) and task contingent stress due to time pressure, the necessity to take into account patient's mood, to deal with uncertainty of their own data collection and with complex… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Stress
What is being tested?
Evaluation of the stress
How many people
62 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
9 Nov 2009to 12 Apr 2010
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Year 6 medical students who attend a one-month full-time course in an Internal Medicine Department

Who cannot join

  • Student who repeats his year 6 of medicine
  • Student treated with corticoids

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Nantes University Hospital

    Nantes

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Physiological and Psychological Responses to Stress in Year 6 Medical Students Faced to Ambulatory Symptomatic Patients

Solving a problem in ambulatory setting may contain peripheral stress due to socio-evaluative stressors (patient's expectations about explanations) and task contingent stress due to time pressure, the necessity to take into account patient's mood, to deal with uncertainty of their own data collection and with complex clinical situations. In France, excepted for family medicine, undergraduate medical students and residents are currently not trained to perform consultations and are never exposed to ambulatory patients during training. The investigators postulate that this lack of practice may generate a significant state of stress during the first consultations and consequently modify or even impair clinical reasoning.

The primary objective of this study is to compare subjective and physiological levels of acute stress in ambulatory versus hospitalization setting in medical students confronted to a real patient with a diagnostic problem.

Read more

Measures: The French version of the Anxiety Spielberger test is administered just before and after each problem solving session.

Cortisol salivary samples are taken before and after each problem solving session. Salivary cortisol levels have been shown to be correlated to stressful situations and some personality traits but with some difference according to gender.

Cognitive appraisal (threat/challenge) is assessed before and after the tasks by the ratio of primary appraisal to secondary appraisal according to Tomaka et al.

Read the detailed description

Participants and Method:

Year 6 medical students who attend a one-month full-time course in an Internal Medicine Department are eligible.

Since no consultations in the ambulatory setting are currently structured for medical students, the following adjustments have been done within the internal medicine consultation department, with the approval of the department director:

  • the consultation duration has been increased (1 hour instead of 30 minutes)
  • during the first 30 minutes, consultation is performed by the participant
  • during the following 30 minutes, the patient is examined by his/her own physician.
  • The consent of the patient has been obtained by phone (prior to the consultation).
Conditions
Stress
Being tested
Evaluation of the stress
Keywords
Stress, Cortisol, Clinical reasoning, Ambulatory setting, Medical students, Year 6 medical students

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Evaluation of the stressOther

    Medical Students having to solve a medical problem in ambulatory setting (studied group) vs. in hospitalisation setting (control group).

    Measures: The French version of the Anxiety Spielberger test is administered just before and after each problem solving session.

    Cortisol salivary samples are taken before and after each problem solving session. Salivary cortisol levels have been shown to be correlated to stressful situations and some personality traits but with some difference according to gender.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Increase in salivary cortisol and in Spielberger score

    Measured: one hour

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Difference in the cognitive appraisal (challenge or threat)

    Measured: one hour

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Feb 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study start9 Nov 2009
  3. Primary completion12 Apr 2010
  4. Study completion12 Apr 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
62 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01061255
Sponsor's protocol ID
BRD/09/08-M
Status last verified
Sep 2021
First submitted
2 Feb 2010
Last updated
14 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Pottier P, Dejoie T, Hardouin JB, Le Loupp AG, Planchon B, Bonnaud A, Leblanc VR. Effect of stress on clinical reasoning during simulated ambulatory consultations. Med Teach. 2013 Jun;35(6):472-80. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.774336. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

    PubMed 23464842

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Evaluation of the stress in people with Stress, run by Nantes University Hospital at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Increase in salivary cortisol and in Spielberger score (time frame: one hour). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01061255, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in