Heart FailurePhase 3CARVIVA-HFNCT01178528
Heart Rate Reduction in Heart Failure
A Phase 3 study testing ivabradine, "Drug:Carvedilol" and "Drug:Ivabradine" and Carvedilol in people with Heart Failure, run by IRCCS San Raffaele at 2 sites in Italy.
Trial summary
Patients with heart failure (HF) have a limited exercise tolerance,few pharmacological interventions have been proven effective in improving exercise capacity. At the presence there i conflicting evidence on the effectiveness of beta-blockers on exercise capacity. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 35 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure
- What is being tested?
- ivabradine, "Drug:Carvedilol" and "Drug:Ivabradine" and Carvedilol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 121 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesItaly
- Study dates
- Sep 2009to Oct 2010
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 35 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- heart failure II-III
- ischemic origin
- stable medications from at least 3 months
- > 3 months from an acute ischemic syndrome or revascularization procedure
- naive on heart rate reducing agents
Who cannot join
- bradycardia
- hypersensitivity or contraindications to study drugs
- exercise tolerance at 6 minute walking test <100 m or >400 m
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Italy2 sites
Centre for Clinical and Basic Research - IRCCS San Raffaele
Roma, Italy, 00100
IRCCS San Raffaele
Roma, Italy, 00100
About this study
Official title: Effect of Ivabradine, Carvedilol or Their Combination in Patients With Heart Failure
Patients with heart failure (HF) have a limited exercise tolerance,few pharmacological interventions have been proven effective in improving exercise capacity. At the presence there i conflicting evidence on the effectiveness of beta-blockers on exercise capacity. Ivabradine has been shown to improve prognosis in patients with ischemic heart disease, left ventricular dysfunction and heart rate > 70 bpm. The association of ivabradine and atenolol has been proven effective in increasing exercise tolerance in patients with ischemic heart disease. Aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of heart rate reduction with ivabradine, carvedilol or their combination in patients with heart failure of ischemic origin.
Read the detailed description
Patients with chronic heart failure of ischemic origin (120) Stable coronary artery disease Acute coronary syndromes > 3 months Revascularization procedures > 3 months Naive on heart rate reducing agents New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II III 6 minute walking test (6MW) tolerance between 200 and 400 m Stable medications for the past 3 months
Treatment Ivabradine up to 7.5 mg b.i.d. Carvedilol up to 25 mg b.i.d. Carvedilol and Ivabradine up to 12.5/5 mg b.i.d.
Efficacy measure Intention to treat Exercise tolerance Quality of life
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Being tested
- ivabradine, "Drug:Carvedilol" and "Drug:Ivabradine", Carvedilol
- Keywords
- heart failure, heart rate, ivabradine, carvedilol
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ivabradineDrug
7.5 mg bd
"Drug:Carvedilol" and "Drug:Ivabradine"Drug
up to 12.5/5 mg bd
CarvedilolDrug
25 mg bd
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ivabradine | Experimental | 7.5 mg bd Receives: Drug: ivabradine |
| Carvedilol | Active comparator | up to 25 mg bd Receives: Drug: Carvedilol |
| "Drug:Carvedilol" and "Drug:Ivabradine" | Experimental | up to 12.5/5 mg bd Receives: Drug: "Drug:Carvedilol" and "Drug:Ivabradine" |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Exercise Tolerance Assessed by 6 Minute Walking Test
Distance measured at 6 minute walking test. The 6 minute walking test was performed according to standardised procedure at baseline, before inclusion (at least 1 week after baseline evaluation), and at the end of the study. Patients who had not done at least two tests in the past underwent two practice 6 minute walking tests at least 3 days apart. Results are expressed in terms of distance walked (metres). The test was supervised by a physical therapist.
Patients were asked to walk at their own maximal pace a 100 m long hospital corridor. At the beginning of the last (6th) minute of the test a standard phrase of encouragement was told. Patients were allowed to stop if signs or symptoms of significant distress occurred (dyspnea, angina), through they were instructed to resume walking as soon as possible.
Measured: 3 months
Maximal Oxygen Consumption
Functional capacity was assessed by means of a cardiopulmonary exercise test with a bicycle ergometer with gas exchange monitoring (Vmax 29 C, SensorMedics). Peak oxygen consumption was defined as the maximal oxygen consumption (MVO2) observed during exercise.
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Quality of Life
Quality of life (QoL) was evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) which is a global measurement of QoL, allowing a subjective assessment of the impact of the disease and treatment. Patients are asked to indicate their current state in a line from 0 (worst state) to 10 (best state), with higher values therefore representing a better outcome.
Measured: 3 months
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class
The 1994 NYHA Classification system is a measure of functional status. It was designed for clinical assessment of patients by physicians as NYHA class I, II, III, or IV, on the basis of patient's limitations in physical activities caused by cardiac symptoms.
Class I describes patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) but without resulting limitation of physical activity. There is no objective evidence of CVD.
Class II describes patients with CVD resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. There is objective evidence of minimal CVD.
Class III describes patients with CVD resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. There is objective evidence of moderately severe CVD.
Class IV describes patients with CVD resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. There is objective evidence of severe CVD.
Here we report data on number of patients showing an improvement by at least one NYHA class according to treatment allocation.
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Aug 2010 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2009
- Primary completionJun 2010
- Study completionOct 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 121 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS San Raffaele
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Giuseppe M.C. Rosano, IRCCS San Raffaele
- Investigators
- Maurizio Volterrani, MD, Principal investigator, IRCCS San RaffaeleGiuseppe MC Rosano, MD, PhD, Study chair, IRCCS San RaffaeleCristiana Vitale, MD, PhD, Study director, IRCCS San Raffaele
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01178528
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CTG001-07
- Acronym
- CARVIVA-HF
- Status last verified
- Sep 2014
- First submitted
- 19 Apr 2010
- Last updated
- 30 Sep 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Fasullo S, Cannizzaro S, Maringhini G, Ganci F, Giambanco F, Vitale G, Pinto V, Migliore G, Torres D, Sarullo FM, Paterna S, Di Pasquale P. Comparison of ivabradine versus metoprolol in early phases of reperfused anterior myocardial infarction with impaired left ventricular function: preliminary findings. J Card Fail. 2009 Dec;15(10):856-63. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2009.05.013. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
PubMed 19944362Swedberg K, Komajda M, Bohm M, Borer JS, Ford I, Tavazzi L. Rationale and design of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled outcome trial of ivabradine in chronic heart failure: the Systolic Heart Failure Treatment with the I(f) Inhibitor Ivabradine Trial (SHIFT). Eur J Heart Fail. 2010 Jan;12(1):75-81. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfp154. Epub 2009 Nov 5.
PubMed 19892778
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Sep 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Ivabradine, Carvedilol or Their Combination in Patients With Heart Failure
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01178528
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CARVIVA-HF / CTG001-07
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Keywords
- heart failure, heart rate, ivabradine, carvedilol
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 121 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- IRCCS San RaffaeleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2009
- Primary completion
- Jun 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 10 Aug 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 30 Sep 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Patients with heart failure (HF) have a limited exercise tolerance,few pharmacological interventions have been proven effective in improving exercise capacity. At the presence there i conflicting evidence on the effectiveness of beta-blockers on exercise capacity. Ivabradine has been shown to improve prognosis in patients with ischemic heart disease, left ventricular dysfunction and heart rate > 70 bpm. The association of ivabradine and atenolol has been proven effective in increasing exercise tolerance in patients with ischemic heart disease. Aim of the present study is to evaluate the effect of heart rate reduction with ivabradine, carvedilol or their combination in patients with heart failure of ischemic origin.
Detailed description
Patients with chronic heart failure of ischemic origin (120) Stable coronary artery disease Acute coronary syndromes > 3 months Revascularization procedures > 3 months Naive on heart rate reducing agents New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II III 6 minute walking test (6MW) tolerance between 200 and 400 m Stable medications for the past 3 months
Treatment Ivabradine up to 7.5 mg b.i.d. Carvedilol up to 25 mg b.i.d. Carvedilol and Ivabradine up to 12.5/5 mg b.i.d.
Efficacy measure Intention to treat Exercise tolerance Quality of life
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ivabradine | Experimental | Drug: ivabradine7.5 mg bd |
| Carvedilol | Active comparator | Drug: Carvedilolup to 25 mg bd |
| "Drug:Carvedilol" and "Drug:Ivabradine" | Experimental | Drug: "Drug:Carvedilol" and "Drug:Ivabradine"up to 12.5/5 mg bd |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 35 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- heart failure II-III
- ischemic origin
- stable medications from at least 3 months
- > 3 months from an acute ischemic syndrome or revascularization procedure
- naive on heart rate reducing agents
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- bradycardia
- hypersensitivity or contraindications to study drugs
- exercise tolerance at 6 minute walking test <100 m or >400 m
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ivabradine7.5 mg bd | Drug | Ivabradine |
| "Drug:Carvedilol" and "Drug:Ivabradine"up to 12.5/5 mg bd | Drug | "Drug:Carvedilol" and "Drug:Ivabradine" |
| Carvedilol25 mg bd | Drug | Carvedilol |
Primary outcome
Exercise Tolerance Assessed by 6 Minute Walking Test
Time frame: 3 months
Distance measured at 6 minute walking test. The 6 minute walking test was performed according to standardised procedure at baseline, before inclusion (at least 1 week after baseline evaluation), and at the end of the study. Patients who had not done at least two tests in the past underwent two practice 6 minute walking tests at least 3 days apart. Results are expressed in terms of distance walked (metres). The test was supervised by a physical therapist. Patients were asked to walk at their own maximal pace a 100 m long hospital corridor. At the beginning of the last (6th) minute of the test a standard phrase of encouragement was told. Patients were allowed to stop if signs or symptoms of significant distress occurred (dyspnea, angina), through they were instructed to resume walking as soon as possible.
Maximal Oxygen Consumption
Time frame: 3 months
Functional capacity was assessed by means of a cardiopulmonary exercise test with a bicycle ergometer with gas exchange monitoring (Vmax 29 C, SensorMedics). Peak oxygen consumption was defined as the maximal oxygen consumption (MVO2) observed during exercise.
2 secondary outcomes
Quality of Life
Time frame: 3 months
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Sep 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 19944362Fasullo S, Cannizzaro S, Maringhini G, Ganci F, Giambanco F, Vitale G, Pinto V, Migliore G, Torres D, Sarullo FM, Paterna S, Di Pasquale P. Comparison of ivabradine versus metoprolol in early phases of reperfused anterior myocardial infarction with impaired left ventricular function: preliminary findings. J Card Fail. 2009 Dec;15(10):856-63. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2009.05.013. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
- Background: PubMed 19892778Swedberg K, Komajda M, Bohm M, Borer JS, Ford I, Tavazzi L. Rationale and design of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled outcome trial of ivabradine in chronic heart failure: the Systolic Heart Failure Treatment with the I(f) Inhibitor Ivabradine Trial (SHIFT). Eur J Heart Fail. 2010 Jan;12(1):75-81. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfp154. Epub 2009 Nov 5.
- European Society Cardiology guidelinesLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 3
Maridebart Cafraglutide in Heart Failure With Preserved or Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction and Obesity
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction
Recruiting
Evaluation of the Effects of Sauna Therapy on Congestion and Loop Diuretic Use in Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced or Moderately Reduced Ejection Fraction
Heart Failure
Recruiting
PrEcision Pacing in HFpEF: the PEP-HFpEF Trial
Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure New York Heart Association Class III
Enrolling by invitation
EXCOR Active Driving System for the EXCOR Pediatric VAD IDE Study
Heart Failure, Transplant; Failure, Heart
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Multi-Scale Analysis of Phenotypes in Heart Failure (MAP-HEART)
Heart Failure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Maurizio Volterrani, MD principal investigator
IRCCS San Raffaele
Giuseppe MC Rosano, MD, PhD study chair
IRCCS San Raffaele
Cristiana Vitale, MD, PhD study director
IRCCS San Raffaele
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing ivabradine, "Drug:Carvedilol" and "Drug:Ivabradine" and Carvedilol in people with Heart Failure, run by IRCCS San Raffaele at 2 sites in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Sep 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Exercise Tolerance Assessed by 6 Minute Walking Test (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01178528, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Sep 2014.