Low Back PainNCT01190033
Study Of The Efficacy Of Neurolysis In Functional Recovery From Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
A study testing Neurotome OFF and neurolysis in people with Low Back Pain, run by University of Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. In an initial phase, 100 patients with chronic low back pain will be included in this study. The patients will be recruited through magazines and newspapers to take part in a screening for treatment of low back pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Back Pain
- What is being tested?
- Neurotome OFF and neurolysis
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- Aug 2010to Jul 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- clinical diagnosis of lumbar pain in a patient with age between 20 and 60 years.
- present clinical complaints of low back pain for 3 months or more.
- present pain of moderate to severe intensity: visual analogue scale (VAS) > 4.
Who cannot join
- patients that develop a profile compatible with specific low back pain during treatment.
- patients that request their withdrawal from the study at any time.
- patients that develop an allergy to the medication used.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology of the U.S.P
São Paulo, São Paulo, 05403-010
Alexandre Cristante Fogaça, 30696912, idr_77@hotmail.com
Ivan Dias Rocha
About this study
Official title: STUDY OF THE EFFICACY OF NEUROLYSIS IN FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY FROM CHRONIC NONSPECIFIC LOW BACK PAIN
This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. In an initial phase, 100 patients with chronic low back pain will be included in this study. The patients will be recruited through magazines and newspapers to take part in a screening for treatment of low back pain. This screening will involve the evaluation of data such as history and physical examination to classify the patient in the group of nonspecific low back pain, excluding patients with neurological alterations and the so-called Red-Flags.
Procedures After the initial screening the patients will undergo diagnostic blocks of the medial branch of lumbar vertebrae L2, L3, L4 , L5 and of the first sacral vertebra (S1) with lidocaine and control with distilled water. The patients that present more than 50% of pain improvement, evaluated by the Likert scale after 30 minutes will form the study group, while the patients that do not present pain improvement with lidocaine or that present pain improvement with distilled water will be excluded.
Read more
The medial branch block consists of the insertion of a 90mm, 25-gauge needle through the skin with radioscopic control up to the medial branch topography. Infusion of 1ml of 2% lidocaine should be performed in each medial branch of the abovementioned vertebrae. Control is executed in the same manner yet with infusion of 1ml of distilled water.
Through the use of the diagnostic block we will have 40 patients selected for the second phase of the study. Once defined the study group should be evaluated before the procedure through the Oswestry, Roland Morris, SF-36 and VAS questionnaires.
In the second phase of the study the patients will be randomized. The random division into two groups will be performed through a computerized program of random numbers. The randomization result will be kept in matt sealed envelopes to guarantee secrecy of the allocation. The neurolysis procedure will be carried out in the first group, consisting of 20 patients, and the placebo or sham procedure with the second group, also with 20 patients.
The neurolysis procedure will be carried out under sterile conditions, with the patient lying prone and with the neurotome insertion sites anesthetized with 2ml of 1% lidocaine. The neurotome (Smith \& Nephew - RF) will be used for the procedure. The neurotome is a radiofrequency apparatus mounted on a 10cm electrode type 22 needle with a 5mm exposure tip. The neurotome should be introduced percutaneously in a manner similar to that adopted in the medial branch block through radioscopic control. The temperature of the electrode after its placement in the correct position is then raised to 80 °C for 90 seconds. Two neurotomies should be performed for each facet, one proximally and the other distally, due to double innervation of each facet. In the patients of the placebo group the procedure will be the same only the temperature of the neurotome will not be raised. This will be performed in a blind manner, as before starting the procedure, the surgeon will show the assistant who turns the device on or not the envelope containing the patient's group (placebo or neurotomy), yet the surgeon will not be informed whether the device has been turned on or not, having to perform the procedure in the same manner in both groups.
The patients will then be reevaluated in the first month, 3 months after, 6 months after and 12 months after the procedure. The assessors will not be informed of the group to which the patient belongs, and the same scales performed in the preoperative period will be used here.
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Being tested
- Neurotome OFF, neurolysis
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Neurotome OFFDevice
In this intervention the neurotome will be unconnected.
neurolysisProcedure or surgery
In this procedure the neurotome will be connected
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Neurolysis | Active comparator | In this intervention the neurotome will be connected Receives: Procedure: neurolysis |
| Neurotome OFF | Placebo comparator | neurotome not raised Receives: Device: Neurotome OFF |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain Evaluation
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
Measured: The Patients will be evaluated 1 week before surgery
Pain Evaluation
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
Measured: The Patients will be evaluated one month after surgery
Pain Evaluation
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
Measured: The Patients will be evaluated three months after surgery
Pain Evaluation
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
Measured: The Patients will be evaluated six months after surgery
Pain Evaluation
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
Measured: The Patients will be evaluated one year after surgery
Secondary outcomes (11)
Disability evaluation
The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life.
Measured: The Patients will be evaluated one week before surgery
Medial Block Improvement
likert five-level scale is a scale for evaluation of improvement:
- 0-30% improvement - no improvement
- 30-50% improvement - moderate improvement
- 50-80% improvement - good improvement
- 80-100% improvement - no pain to evaluate the improvement after the medial branch block
Measured: one day after the medial branch block
Health Status
The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale.
Measured: The Patients will be evaluated one week before surgery
Disability evaluation
The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life.
Measured: The Patients will be evaluated one month after surgery
Disability evaluation
The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life.
Measured: The Patients will be evaluated three month after surgery
Disability evaluation
The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life.
Measured: The Patients will be evaluated six month after surgery
Disability evaluation
The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life.
Measured: The Patients will be evaluated one year after surgery
Health Status
The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale.
Measured: The Patients will be evaluated one month after surgery
Health Status
The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale.
Measured: The Patients will be evaluated three month after surgery
Health Status
The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale.
Measured: The Patients will be evaluated six month after surgery
Health Status
The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale.
Measured: The Patients will be evaluated one year after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Aug 2010 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2010
- Primary completionJul 2012
- Study completionJul 2013 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Sao PauloThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alexandre F. Cristante, University of Sao Paulo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01190033
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RIZT2010
- Other IDs
- iot 803
- Status last verified
- Mar 2013
- First submitted
- 5 Aug 2010
- Last updated
- 26 Mar 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Mar 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- STUDY OF THE EFFICACY OF NEUROLYSIS IN FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY FROM CHRONIC NONSPECIFIC LOW BACK PAIN
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01190033
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RIZT2010
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao PauloUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2010
- Primary completion
- Jul 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2013 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Aug 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. In an initial phase, 100 patients with chronic low back pain will be included in this study. The patients will be recruited through magazines and newspapers to take part in a screening for treatment of low back pain. This screening will involve the evaluation of data such as history and physical examination to classify the patient in the group of nonspecific low back pain, excluding patients with neurological alterations and the so-called Red-Flags.
Procedures After the initial screening the patients will undergo diagnostic blocks of the medial branch of lumbar vertebrae L2, L3, L4 , L5 and of the first sacral vertebra (S1) with lidocaine and control with distilled water. The patients that present more than 50% of pain improvement, evaluated by the Likert scale after 30 minutes will form the study group, while the patients that do not present pain improvement with lidocaine or that present pain improvement with distilled water will be excluded.
The medial branch block consists of the insertion of a 90mm, 25-gauge needle through the skin with radioscopic control up to the medial branch topography. Infusion of 1ml of 2% lidocaine should be performed in each medial branch of the abovementioned vertebrae. Control is executed in the same manner yet with infusion of 1ml of distilled water.
Through the use of the diagnostic block we will have 40 patients selected for the second phase of the study. Once defined the study group should be evaluated before the procedure through the Oswestry, Roland Morris, SF-36 and VAS questionnaires.
In the second phase of the study the patients will be randomized. The random division into two groups will be performed through a computerized program of random numbers. The randomization result will be kept in matt sealed envelopes to guarantee secrecy of the allocation. The neurolysis procedure will be carried out in the first group, consisting of 20 patients, and the placebo or sham procedure with the second group, also with 20 patients.
The neurolysis procedure will be carried out under sterile conditions, with the patient lying prone and with the neurotome insertion sites anesthetized with 2ml of 1% lidocaine. The neurotome (Smith \& Nephew - RF) will be used for the procedure. The neurotome is a radiofrequency apparatus mounted on a 10cm electrode type 22 needle with a 5mm exposure tip. The neurotome should be introduced percutaneously in a manner similar to that adopted in the medial branch block through radioscopic control. The temperature of the electrode after its placement in the correct position is then raised to 80 °C for 90 seconds. Two neurotomies should be performed for each facet, one proximally and the other distally, due to double innervation of each facet. In the patients of the placebo group the procedure will be the same only the temperature of the neurotome will not be raised. This will be performed in a blind manner, as before starting the procedure, the surgeon will show the assistant who turns the device on or not the envelope containing the patient's group (placebo or neurotomy), yet the surgeon will not be informed whether the device has been turned on or not, having to perform the procedure in the same manner in both groups.
The patients will then be reevaluated in the first month, 3 months after, 6 months after and 12 months after the procedure. The assessors will not be informed of the group to which the patient belongs, and the same scales performed in the preoperative period will be used here.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Neurolysis | Active comparator | Procedure: neurolysisIn this intervention the neurotome will be connected |
| Neurotome OFF | Placebo comparator | Device: Neurotome OFFneurotome not raised |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- clinical diagnosis of lumbar pain in a patient with age between 20 and 60 years.
- present clinical complaints of low back pain for 3 months or more.
- present pain of moderate to severe intensity: visual analogue scale (VAS) > 4.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- patients that develop a profile compatible with specific low back pain during treatment.
- patients that request their withdrawal from the study at any time.
- patients that develop an allergy to the medication used.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Neurotome OFFIn this intervention the neurotome will be unconnected. | Device | Neurotome OFF |
| neurolysisIn this procedure the neurotome will be connected | Procedure or surgery | Neurolysis |
Primary outcome
Pain Evaluation
Time frame: The Patients will be evaluated 1 week before surgery
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
Pain Evaluation
Time frame: The Patients will be evaluated one month after surgery
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
Pain Evaluation
Time frame: The Patients will be evaluated three months after surgery
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
Pain Evaluation
Time frame: The Patients will be evaluated six months after surgery
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
Pain Evaluation
Time frame: The Patients will be evaluated one year after surgery
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
11 secondary outcomes
Disability evaluation
Time frame: The Patients will be evaluated one week before surgery
Medial Block Improvement
Time frame: one day after the medial branch block
Health Status
Time frame: The Patients will be evaluated one week before surgery
Disability evaluation
Time frame: The Patients will be evaluated one month after surgery
Disability evaluation
Time frame: The Patients will be evaluated three month after surgery
Disability evaluation
Time frame: The Patients will be evaluated six month after surgery
Disability evaluation
Time frame: The Patients will be evaluated one year after surgery
Health Status
Time frame: The Patients will be evaluated one month after surgery
Health Status
Time frame: The Patients will be evaluated three month after surgery
Health Status
Time frame: The Patients will be evaluated six month after surgery
Health Status
Time frame: The Patients will be evaluated one year after surgery
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Mar 2013.
Related trials for Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Neurotome OFF and neurolysis in people with Low Back Pain, run by University of Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Mar 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain Evaluation (time frame: The Patients will be evaluated 1 week before surgery). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Mar 2013.