Behavior ChangesCONDOR PIRGNCT01201473
CONDOR Impact of Dental Practice-Based Research Network
An observational study of Behavior Changes, run by Dental Practice-Based Research Network at 7 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study was to study the use of a Core Questionnaire that included several questions from each PBRN (DPBRN, PEARL, PRECEDENT - collectively know as CONDOR) that had been extracted from questionnaires previously administered as part of their initial research program activities. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 22 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Behavior Changes
- How many people
- 687 participants
- Where
- 7 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Jul 2009to Jan 2010
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 22 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The questionnaire was administered to all DPBRN practitioner-investigators (including both dentists and hygienists) 22 years of age or older.
Who may be able to join
- DPBRN dentists and hygienists who had completed a DPBRN Enrollment questionnaire and for whom DPBRN had a current active address and who were currently licensed to practice
- reported on the Enrollment Questionnaire they were a general dentist, pediatric dentist, or dental hygienist, or reported doing at least some restorative dentistry procedures
- practiced in one of the five DPBRN regions (AL/MS, FL/GA, MN< PDA, or SK)
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
7 sites in 2 countries.
7 sites in 2 countries
United States6 sites
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294-0007
University of Florida College of Dentistry
Gainesville, Florida, 32610
Health Partners Dental Group
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55440-1309
Health Partners Research Foundation
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55440-1524
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research
Portland, Oregon, 97227
Permanente Denrtal Associates
Portland, Oregon, 97232
About this study
Official title: CONDOR Impact of Dental Practice-Based Research Network (PIRG)
The purpose of this study was to study the use of a Core Questionnaire that included several questions from each PBRN (DPBRN, PEARL, PRECEDENT - collectively know as CONDOR) that had been extracted from questionnaires previously administered as part of their initial research program activities. This protocol was the first administration of this core questionnaire with the purpose of assessing dental practice changes that may have occured since the earlier administration of the individual questions with the separate networks.It also collected baseline data for others.
Read the detailed description
The three dental PBRNs had a unique opportunity to measure the impact of research participation on potential changes in practice base of the research protocol. We were able to examine the effect of participation in research in general to the acceptance of research findings from other studies and the effect of association with but not participation in a research network.
- Conditions
- Behavior Changes
- Keywords
- effect of participation, effect of association
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Measure impact of research participation | Not described |
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2009
- Primary completionJan 2010
- Study completionJan 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Behavior ChangesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 687 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Dental Practice-Based Research Network
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), HealthPartners Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Permanente Dental Associates Group, Oregon
- Investigators
- Gregg H Gilbert, DDS, MBA, Study chair, The University of Alabama at Birmingham
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01201473
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 126171
- Other IDs
- U01DE016747
- Acronym
- CONDOR PIRG
- Status last verified
- Jun 2011
- First submitted
- 13 Sep 2010
- Last updated
- 16 Jun 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jun 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- CONDOR Impact of Dental Practice-Based Research Network (PIRG)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01201473
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CONDOR PIRG / 126171
- Conditions
- Behavior Changes
- Keywords
- effect of participation, effect of association
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 687 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Dental Practice-Based Research NetworkResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), HealthPartners Institute, Kaiser Permanente, Permanente Dental Associates Group, Oregon
- Study start
- Jul 2009
- Primary completion
- Jan 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Sep 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study was to study the use of a Core Questionnaire that included several questions from each PBRN (DPBRN, PEARL, PRECEDENT - collectively know as CONDOR) that had been extracted from questionnaires previously administered as part of their initial research program activities. This protocol was the first administration of this core questionnaire with the purpose of assessing dental practice changes that may have occured since the earlier administration of the individual questions with the separate networks.It also collected baseline data for others.
Detailed description
The three dental PBRNs had a unique opportunity to measure the impact of research participation on potential changes in practice base of the research protocol. We were able to examine the effect of participation in research in general to the acceptance of research findings from other studies and the effect of association with but not participation in a research network.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Measure impact of research participation | – | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 22 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The questionnaire was administered to all DPBRN practitioner-investigators (including both dentists and hygienists) 22 years of age or older.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- DPBRN dentists and hygienists who had completed a DPBRN Enrollment questionnaire and for whom DPBRN had a current active address and who were currently licensed to practice
- reported on the Enrollment Questionnaire they were a general dentist, pediatric dentist, or dental hygienist, or reported doing at least some restorative dentistry procedures
- practiced in one of the five DPBRN regions (AL/MS, FL/GA, MN< PDA, or SK)
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Not reported in the source record.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jun 2011.
- Dental Practice-Based Research NetworkLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Behavior Changes
Recruiting
Postpartum Health Trajectories the First Year After Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury and the Impact of a Group-Based Intervention
Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Effects of Brain Stimulation on Food Intake and Behavioral Weight Loss Treatment
Electric Stimulation Therapy, Obesity
Recruiting
Environmental Sustainability-Focused Service-Learning for Nursing Students
Sustainable Consumption Behavior, Sustainability Attitudes
Recruiting
Climate-Responsive Nutrition, WASH, and Heat Counselling for Maternal and Child Health in Sindh, Pakistan
Maternal Nutrition, Child Nutrition
Active, not recruiting
Accountability Support Through Peer-Inspired Relationships and Engagement (ASPIRE) Trial
Alcohol Consumption
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gregg H Gilbert, DDS, MBA study chair
The University of Alabama at Birmingham
7 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Behavior Changes, run by Dental Practice-Based Research Network at 7 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jun 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 7 sites in United States, Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jun 2011.