AzTrials
AzTrials

Internal Carotid StenosisPhase 3EMOCARNCT01415648

Medico-economic Evaluation of Preoperative Cerebral Oximetry Monitoring During Carotid Endarterectomy

A Phase 3 study testing cerebral oximetry monitoring using INVOS™ and hemodynamic optimisation and standard cerebral monitoring and hemodynamic optimisation in people with Internal Carotid Stenosis, run by Nantes University Hospital at 19 sites in France.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

In France, in 2007, 17 000 patients underwent carotid endarterectomy. The risk of having an ipsilateral postoperative stroke after carotid endarterectomy remains at 1-1.5%. There is no consensus concerning the best cerebral monitoring and hemodynamic optimisation during carotid cross-clamping. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Internal Carotid Stenosis
What is being tested?
cerebral oximetry monitoring using INVOS™ and hemodynamic optimisation and standard cerebral monitoring and hemodynamic optimisation
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
879 participants
Where
19 sitesFrance
Study dates
Apr 2011to Apr 2016
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients (male-female) over 18 y.o.
  • Presenting an internal carotid stenosis requiring surgery
  • Mini Mental State Examination >24 during preoperative examination
  • Informed written consentExclusion Criteria:

Who cannot join

  • Severe renal failure or requiring dialysis
  • Liver failure or cirrhosis (Child class ≥ B) or prothrombin activity<50%
  • Heart failure (NYHA ≥ III), left ventricular ejection fraction < 40%, acute coronary syndrome,
  • Associated surgery
  • Pregnancy
  • Contraindication to MRI
  • History of allergy to modified gelatine or starch
  • History of allergy to adhesive part of electrode

Trial locations and contacts

19 sites in 1 country.

19 sites in 1 country

France19 sites
  • Besancon University Hospital "Hôpital Jean Minjoz"

    Besançon

  • Bordeaux University Hospital "Haut Lévêque"

    Bordeaux

  • Bordeaux University Hospital "Hôpital Pellegrin"

    Bordeaux

  • Brest University Hospital "La Cavale Blanche"

    Brest

  • Caen University Hospital "Côte de Nacre"

    Caen

  • Dijon University Hospital "Le Bocage"

    Dijon

  • Le Mans Hospital

    Le Mans

  • Hospital de Marie Lannelongue Plessis Robinson

    Le Plessis-Robinson

  • Lyon University Hospital "Hôpital Edouard Herriot"

    Lyon

  • Marseille University Hospital "Hôpital de la Timone"

    Marseille

  • Nantes University Hospital

    Nantes, 44000

  • "Nouvelles Cliniques Nantaises"

    Nantes

  • Nice University Hospital "Saint-Roch"

    Nice

  • "Groupe Hospitalier Saint-Joseph"

    Paris

  • "Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou"

    Paris

  • Reims University Hospital "Robert Debré"

    Reims

  • Rennes University Hospital "Pontchaillou"

    Rennes

  • Strasbourg University Hospital

    Strasbourg

  • Toulouse University Hospital

    Toulouse

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Medico-economic Evaluation of Preoperative Cerebral Oximetry Monitoring During Carotid Endarterectomy.

In France, in 2007, 17 000 patients underwent carotid endarterectomy. The risk of having an ipsilateral postoperative stroke after carotid endarterectomy remains at 1-1.5%. There is no consensus concerning the best cerebral monitoring and hemodynamic optimisation during carotid cross-clamping.

The objective of this prospective, multicentric, double-blinded and randomized study is to evaluate the interest of continuous cerebral oximetry monitoring by INVOS™ cerebral oximeter to direct the hemodynamic optimisation during carotid endarterectomy and reduce the new-onset of postoperative radiological (MRI) ischemic lesions. A cost/effectiveness analysis will be conducted to estimate the impact of this monitoring versus standard care on direct and indirect postoperative costs during 120 days.

A substudy will evaluate the effect of this monitoring on neurocognitive outcome and on a serum marker of brain injury, protein S-100B

Read the detailed description

After consent, patients will be randomized in two groups: one group with continuous per operative cerebral oximetry monitoring associated with hemodynamic optimisation algorithm (excluding norepinephrine) if cerebral oximetry decrease more than 15% under the preoperative baseline; the second group is continuously monitored with cerebral oximeter but this latter is blinded to the medical team, the alarm switch off , and patients are managed with the standard care of the centre.

All patients have a preoperative and a postoperative diffusion cerebral MRI to detect new onset of cerebral ischemic lesion. The amount and the volume of cerebral ischemic lesions will be scored to compare groups.

Quality of life as well as direct (medical and nonmedical) and indirect costs were collected using questionnaires during the 120 postoperative days.

A substudy including 200 patients will be conducted to compare the two groups concerning postoperative protein S-100B level and a composite score of neurocognitive tests (measured pre- and postoperatively) The trial will be conducted according to GCP

Being tested
cerebral oximetry monitoring using INVOS™ and hemodynamic optimisation, standard cerebral monitoring and hemodynamic optimisation
Keywords
with surgical indication, Cerebral oximetry, carotid endarterectomy, MRI, ischemic lesion, cost/effectiveness analysis, Neurocognitive Outcome, protein S-100B

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • cerebral oximetry monitoring using INVOS™ and hemodynamic optimisationOther

    Also called INVOS™

    continuous per operative cerebral oximetry monitoring associated with hemodynamic optimisation algorithm (excluding norepinephrine) if cerebral oximetry decrease more than 15% under the preoperative baseline

  • standard cerebral monitoring and hemodynamic optimisationOther

    the patient is continously monitored with cerebral oximeter but this latter is blinded to the medical team, the alarm switch off , and patients are managed with the standard care of the centre.

Study groups in NCT01415648
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
open NIRSExperimentalcontinuous per operative cerebral oximetry monitoring (using INVOS™ cerebral oximeter) associated with hemodynamic optimisation algorithm (excluding norepinephrine) if cerebral oximetry decrease more than 15% under the preoperative baseline
Receives: Other: cerebral oximetry monitoring using INVOS™ and hemodynamic optimisation
Blinded NIRSSham comparatorContinuously monitored with cerebral oximeter but this latter is blinded to the medical team, the alarm switch off , and patients are managed with the standard care of the centre
Receives: Other: standard cerebral monitoring and hemodynamic optimisation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The number of new cerebral ischemic lesions

    The number of new cerebral ischemic lesions observed on postoperative diffusion MRI

    Measured: Up to 3 days post-operative

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio comparing the group monitored by cerebral oximeter and the standard care group

    Measured: 4 months post-operative

  2. Hospitalization length of stay

    Measured: 4 months post-operative

  3. Percentage of patient with Neurologic and neurocognitive postoperative disorders

    • Percentage of patient with Spatiotemporal disorientation
    • Percentage of patient with aphasia
    • Percentage of patient with Facial paralysis
    • Percentage of patient with Limb sensory or motor deficit
    • Percentage of patient with Seizure
    • Percentage of patient with Balance disorder

    Measured: 4 months post-operative

  4. Percentage of patient with Cardiovascular postoperative disorders

    • Percentage of patient with myocardial infaction
    • Percentage of patient with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
    • Percentage of patient with acute left ventricle failure
    • Percentage of patient with Uncontrolled high blood pressure

    Measured: 4 months post-operative

  5. Percentage of patient with Surgical events

    • Percentage of patient with surgical site infection
    • Percentage of patient with haematoma evacuation

    Measured: 4 months post-operative

  6. Postoperative quality of life (SF36, EQ5D tests)

    SF36 score for quality of life assessment :

    • Physical quality score [Time Frame: Through study completion, 4 month postoperatively] Items from the SF36 (Short Form 36) survey
    • Mental quality score [Time Frame: Through study completion, 4 month postoperatively] Items from the SF36 (Short Form 36) survey

    EQ5D3L test for quality of life assessment :

    • Quality of life evaluated by the EQ 5D 3L questionnaire [Time Frame: 4 months postoperatively]
    • Quality of life, as evaluated by the use EQ 5D 3L auto-questionnaire

    Measured: 4 months post-operative

  7. Incidence of death 4 month postoperatively

    Measured: 4 months post-operative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Aug 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2011
  3. Primary completionDec 2015
  4. Study completionApr 2016

Why it stopped: Recruitment time expired.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
879 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01415648
Sponsor's protocol ID
STIC/10/02
Other IDs
2010-A01167-32
Acronym
EMOCAR
Status last verified
Nov 2023
First submitted
11 Jul 2011
Last updated
29 Nov 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Le Teurnier Y, Rozec B, Degryse C, Levy F, Miliani Y, Godet G, Daccache G, Truc C, Steinmetz E, Ouattara A, Cholley B, Malinovsky JM, Portier D, Dupont G, Liutkus D, Viard P, Pere M, Daumas-Duport B, Magras PA, Vourc'h M; EMOCAR Study Group. Optimization of cerebral oxygenation based on regional cerebral oxygen saturation monitoring during carotid endarterectomy: a Phase III multicenter, double-blind randomized controlled trial. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2024 Aug;43(4):101388. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2024.101388. Epub 2024 May 4.

    PubMed 38710323

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing cerebral oximetry monitoring using INVOS™ and hemodynamic optimisation and standard cerebral monitoring and hemodynamic optimisation in people with Internal Carotid Stenosis, run by Nantes University Hospital at 19 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Nov 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 19 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Recruitment time expired.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The number of new cerebral ischemic lesions (time frame: Up to 3 days post-operative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01415648, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Nov 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in