AzTrials
AzTrials

Respiratory Muscle StrengthNCT01436318

Respiratory Muscle Strength and Function in Healthy Kids

An observational study of Respiratory Muscle Strength, run by University of Florida at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Respiratory muscle strength training (RMST) is a potential treatment option that has been shown to increase strength and ventilatory function in critically ill patients, patients on ventilators and patients with mild neuromuscular weakness. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 16 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Respiratory Muscle Strength
How many people
7 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Apr 2011to Sep 2014
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 16 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Study population: Healthy Children

Who may be able to join

  • Male or female subjects 4-16 years of age.
  • Healthy subjects

Who cannot join

  • Have primary pulmonary disease
  • Have primary neuromuscular disease
  • Have a connective tissue or autoimmune disease
  • Have had a respiratory infection with in 15 days prior to study date
  • Have acute aminoglycosides antibiotic therapy with in 15 days prior to study date
  • Have acute corticosteroids with in 15 days prior to study date
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Have a need to use an inhaler routinely
  • Have hepatic failure
  • Have hematologic failure
  • Have participated in other studies related to medications or exercise
  • Have used tobacco products
  • Have other precautions

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of Florida

    Gainesville, Florida, 32610

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Respiratory Muscle Strength and Function in Healthy Children

Respiratory muscle strength training (RMST) is a potential treatment option that has been shown to increase strength and ventilatory function in critically ill patients, patients on ventilators and patients with mild neuromuscular weakness. Currently researchers are examining the role of inspiratory muscle strength training (IMST) in pressure performance of ventilator dependent children with Pompe disease. However, normal pressure-flow-timing responses of lung function are not well-characterized in healthy children. The purpose of this study is to measure RMST-induced changes in respiratory function in healthy children. Children will undergo one session of lung function and strength testing. By studying healthy children's respiratory function, this study will also help to develop more efficient respiratory muscle training exercise prescriptions for children with neuromuscular weakness and impaired respiratory function.

Read the detailed description

The goals of this study are to collect and evaluate respiratory muscle strength training (RMST) induced changes in ventilatory function in healthy children. Children will undergo one session of pulmonary function and strength testing to quantify rate of inspiratory and expiratory pressure development and to determine whether inspiratory and expiratory pressure correlate to maximal respiratory pressures and forced pulmonary function tests. Currently normal pressure-flow-timing responses are not well-characterized in healthy children. The purpose of this study is to help develop more efficient RMST exercise prescriptions for ill children on ventilators and with neuromuscular weakness.

Participants in the study will refrain from caffeine products and exercise on the day of respiratory testing. In conjunction with respiratory testing, baseline and exertional blood pressure, heart and respiratory rate, and pulse oximetry will be monitored. Participants will complete tidal flow-volume assessments and forced expiratory maneuvers according to the AMerican Thoracic Society guidelines. Participants will undergo 5 sets of 10 maximal-effort breaths against standardized resistances (one set each at 0, 5, 10, 15, and 20 cm H20). Following each set, subjects will rate the load magnitude and their feelings of breathing discomfort using a 0-10 visual analog scale. Participants will also perform maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressure maneuvers. All tests will be separated by at least 2-3 minutes of rest.

Keywords
Healthy Kids, Respiratory, Volunteers

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01436318
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Respiratory FunctionChildren will undergo one session of pulmonary function and strength testing

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pulmonary Function Testing

    Subjects will complete tidal flow-volume assessments and forced expiratory maneuvers.

    Measured: Day 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Sep 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2011
  3. Primary completionAug 2014
  4. Study completionSep 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Ecologic or community
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
7 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01436318
Sponsor's protocol ID
HK 176-2011
Status last verified
Sep 2018
First submitted
16 Sep 2011
Last updated
13 Sep 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society. ATS/ERS Statement on respiratory muscle testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Aug 15;166(4):518-624. doi: 10.1164/rccm.166.4.518. No abstract available.

    PubMed 12186831
  • Ramonatxo M, Amsalem FA, Mercier JG, Jean R, Prefaut CG. Ventilatory control during exercise in children with mild or moderate asthma. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1989 Feb;21(1):11-7. doi: 10.1249/00005768-198902000-00003.

    PubMed 2494415
  • Villafranca C, Borzone G, Leiva A, Lisboa C. Effect of inspiratory muscle training with an intermediate load on inspiratory power output in COPD. Eur Respir J. 1998 Jan;11(1):28-33. doi: 10.1183/09031936.98.11010028.

    PubMed 9543266
  • Tzelepis GE, Vega DL, Cohen ME, Fulambarker AM, Patel KK, McCool FD. Pressure-flow specificity of inspiratory muscle training. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1994 Aug;77(2):795-801. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1994.77.2.795.

    PubMed 8002530
  • Tzelepis GE, Kasas V, McCool FD. Inspiratory muscle adaptations following pressure or flow training in humans. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1999 May;79(6):467-71. doi: 10.1007/s004210050538.

    PubMed 10344453
  • Coast JR, Jensen RA, Cassidy SS, Ramanathan M, Johnson RL Jr. Cardiac output and O2 consumption during inspiratory threshold loaded breathing. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1988 Apr;64(4):1624-8. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1988.64.4.1624.

    PubMed 3378996
  • Romer LM, McConnell AK. Specificity and reversibility of inspiratory muscle training. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Feb;35(2):237-44. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000048642.58419.1E.

    PubMed 12569211
  • Otis AB. Pressure-flow relationships and power output of breathing. Respir Physiol. 1977 Jun;30(1-2):7-14. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(77)90017-2.

    PubMed 877452
  • Mognoni P, Saibene F, Sant'Ambrogio G, Agostoni E. Dynamics of the maximal contraction of the respiratory muscles. Respir Physiol. 1968 Mar;4(2):193-202. doi: 10.1016/0034-5687(68)90051-0. No abstract available.

    PubMed 5689337
  • Read DJ, Freedman S, Kafer ER. Pressures developed by loaded inspiratory muscles in conscious and anesthetized man. J Appl Physiol. 1974 Aug;37(2):207-18. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1974.37.2.207. No abstract available.

    PubMed 4853759
  • Pengelly LD, Alderson AM, Milic-Emili J. Mechanics of the diaphragm. J Appl Physiol. 1971 Jun;30(6):797-805. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1971.30.6.797. No abstract available.

    PubMed 5580797
  • Ameredes BT, Zhan WZ, Prakash YS, Vandenboom R, Sieck GC. Power fatigue of the rat diaphragm muscle. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2000 Dec;89(6):2215-9. doi: 10.1152/jappl.2000.89.6.2215.

    PubMed 11090570
  • Goldman MD, Grassino A, Mead J, Sears TA. Mechanics of the human diaphragm during voluntary contraction: dynamics. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1978 Jun;44(6):840-8. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1978.44.6.840.

    PubMed 670007
  • Fitting JW, Easton PA, Grassino AE. Velocity of shortening of inspiratory muscles and inspiratory flow. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1986 Feb;60(2):670-7. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1986.60.2.670.

    PubMed 3081483
  • Komarow HD, Myles IA, Uzzaman A, Metcalfe DD. Impulse oscillometry in the evaluation of diseases of the airways in children. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011 Mar;106(3):191-9. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2010.11.011. Epub 2011 Jan 6.

    PubMed 21354020

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Respiratory Muscle Strength, run by University of Florida at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pulmonary Function Testing (time frame: Day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01436318, which also lists 22 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Sep 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in