AzTrials
AzTrials

Inguinal HerniaNCT01494272

Analgesia in Children Using Caudal Epidural Ropivacaine

An observational study of Inguinal Hernia and Circumcision, run by Loma Linda University at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Caudal epidural analgesia (caudal block)is used in standard pediatric anesthesia practice. It has been shown to be effective in managing postoperative pain in children undergoing abdominal and infraumbilical surgery (Tobias et al 1994). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 months to 2 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Inguinal Hernia, Circumcision
How many people
90 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2012to May 2015
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 months to 2 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Study population: Children under 2 years of age having an elective inguinal herniorrhaphy or orchiopexy.

Who may be able to join

  • Age 2 months to 2 years
  • Weight 25kg or less
  • ASA class 1, 2, 3
  • Elective inguinal herniorrhaphy or orchiopexy

Who cannot join

  • Contraindications to caudal epidural analgesia
  • parent's refusal
  • skeletal or spinal cord anomaly
  • coagulopathy
  • infection at the insertion site
  • ongoing bacteremia
  • allergy to ropivacaine

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Loma Linda University Medical Center

    Loma Linda, California, 92354

  • Loma Linda University Outpatient Surgery Center

    Loma Linda, California, 92354

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Preemptive Analgesia in Children Using Caudal Epidural Ropivacaine: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blinded, Controlled Study

Caudal epidural analgesia (caudal block)is used in standard pediatric anesthesia practice. It has been shown to be effective in managing postoperative pain in children undergoing abdominal and infraumbilical surgery (Tobias et al 1994). Furthermore, studies have shown that children receiving caudal blocks have secondary benefits such as lower narcotic and anesthetic requirements, more rapid awakening from general anesthesia, decreased time to discharge home, and fewer pain-related behaviors postoperatively (Conroy et al 1993, Tobias et al 1995, Tobias 1996).

This proposed study involves the use of a caudal block in children undergoing elective inguinal herniorrhaphy or orchiopexy to evaluate the role of preemptive analgesia in pediatric pain management. We hypothesize that by inhibiting peripheral pain receptors with a caudal block before the onset of a painful stimulus, we can decrease central nervous system sensitization and reduce postoperative analgesic requirements

Keywords
caudal epidural analgesia, elective circumcision, elective inguinal herniorrhaphy
Medical subject headings
Hernia, Inguinal

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01494272
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group CB (Caudal Before-study group)This group will receive caudal ropivacaine and epinephrine after induction of general anesthesia prior to surgical incision
Caudal After (CA)-control groupThis group will receive caudal ropivacaine with epinephrine after completion of surgery but before emergence from anesthesia
Local Infiltration After (LIA) control groupThis group will receive local infiltration of ropivacaine around the surgery site at the conclusion of surgery but before emergence from anesthesia

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Usage of pain medications

    Measured: over 24 hours

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Pain scores

    Measured: At various intervals for first 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Dec 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2012
  3. Primary completionApr 2014
  4. Study completionMay 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
90 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01494272
Sponsor's protocol ID
5110235
Status last verified
Nov 2015
First submitted
15 Dec 2011
Last updated
25 Nov 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Inguinal Hernia and Circumcision, run by Loma Linda University at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Nov 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Usage of pain medications (time frame: over 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Nov 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in