AzTrials
AzTrials

Complications; Cesarean SectionPhase 4OBDUCNCT01509521

The Oxygenation of the Brain During Caesarean Section

A Phase 4 study testing Ephedrine and Phenylephrine in people with Complications; Cesarean Section, run by Naestved Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of phenylephrine versus ephedrine on organ perfusion, in women undergoing caesarean section receiving spinal anaesthesia. The organ perfusion is estimated by measuring the maternal cerebral oxygenation by NIRS(Near-infrared spectroscopy)and the foetal heartrate. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 50 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Complications; Cesarean Section
What is being tested?
Ephedrine and Phenylephrine
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
24 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
Feb 2012to Aug 2012
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 50 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy pregnant women
  • Over 18 years old
  • ASA 1-2
  • Undergoing elective caesarean section
  • Height over 160 cm or under 180 cm

Who cannot join

  • Allergic reactions to ephedrine or phenylephrine
  • High blood levels of bilirubin
  • HELPP syndrome
  • Preeclampsia (pregnancy-induced hypertension)
  • Non singleton pregnancies

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Naestved Hospital

    Næstved, 4700

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: The Oxygenation of the Brain During Caesarean Section. A Comparison of Ephedrine Versus Phenylephrine

The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of phenylephrine versus ephedrine on organ perfusion, in women undergoing caesarean section receiving spinal anaesthesia. The organ perfusion is estimated by measuring the maternal cerebral oxygenation by NIRS(Near-infrared spectroscopy)and the foetal heartrate.

Being tested
Ephedrine, Phenylephrine
Keywords
Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared, Fetal heartrate, Ephedrine, Phenylephrine

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EphedrineDrug

    Also called Efedrin, Ephedrine hydrochloride

    An infusion with a maximum of 3 mg/minute for maximum 60 minutes or if sideeffects develope.

  • PhenylephrineDrug

    Also called Phenylephrine Hydrochloride, Metaoxedrin

    An infusion of maximum 4 mg/hour for maximum 60 minutes.

Study groups in NCT01509521
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
EphedrineActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Ephedrine
PhenylephrineActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Phenylephrine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Frontal lobe cerebral oxygenation

    Determine the frontal lobe cerebral oxygantion by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS),from before induction of spinal anaesthesia to end of surgery.

    Measured: Participants will be followed for the time in the operation theatre of the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 hour

  2. Foetal heartrate

    From before induction of spinal anaesthesia to 15 min after delivery

    Measured: Participants will be followed for the time in the operation theatre of the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 hour

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Mean arterial pressure

    The mean arterial pressure is measures from before induction of spinal anaesthesia to end of surgery.

    Measured: Participants will be followed for the time in the operation theatre of the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 hour

  2. Cardiac output

    The cardiac output is measures from before induction of spinal anaesthesia to end of surgery.

    Measured: Participants will be followed for the time in the operation theatre of the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 hour

  3. Umbilical cord pH and Base excess

    The umbilical cord blood analysis for evaluation of the newborn's acid-base status is taken immediately after delivery. It is the most objective way of assessing the fetal metabolic condition at birth.

    Measured: Blood analysis taken immediately after the the clamping of the umbilical cord, an average of 20 minutes.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jan 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2012
  3. Primary completionJul 2012
  4. Study completionAug 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
24 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01509521
Sponsor's protocol ID
2011-006103-35
Other IDs
SJ-271
Acronym
OBDUC
Status last verified
Aug 2012
First submitted
8 Jan 2012
Last updated
7 Aug 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Chooi C, Cox JJ, Lumb RS, Middleton P, Chemali M, Emmett RS, Simmons SW, Cyna AM. Techniques for preventing hypotension during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 1;7(7):CD002251. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002251.pub4.

    PubMed 32619039
  • Foss VT, Christensen R, Rokamp KZ, Nissen P, Secher NH, Nielsen HB. Effect of phenylephrine vs. ephedrine on frontal lobe oxygenation during caesarean section with spinal anesthesia: an open label randomized controlled trial. Front Physiol. 2014 Mar 3;5:81. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2014.00081. eCollection 2014.

    PubMed 24624090

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Ephedrine and Phenylephrine in people with Complications; Cesarean Section, run by Naestved Hospital at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Aug 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Frontal lobe cerebral oxygenation (time frame: Participants will be followed for the time in the operation theatre of the hospital stay, an expected average of 1 hour). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01509521, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Aug 2012; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in