Low Back PainPhase 3NCT01633944
Efficacy Study to Evaluate Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film in Opioid-Naive Subjects
A Phase 3 study testing Buprenorphine in people with Low Back Pain, run by BioDelivery Sciences International at 60 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if buprenorphine hydrochloride (HCl) buccal film is effective in treating opioid-naive subjects, with moderate to severe chronic low back pain (CLBP), who require continuous around-the-clock (ATC) pain relief for an extended period of time. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Back Pain
- What is being tested?
- Buprenorphine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 752 participants
- Where
- 60 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2012to Dec 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of moderate to severe low back pain for ≥6 months
- Treating CLBP with a stable daily maintenance dose of non-opioid analgesic medication up to 10 mg morphine sulfate equivalents (MSE) per day for ≥4 weeks. (Additional as needed [PRN] non-opioid analgesic medications permitted on top of the stable daily maintenance dose of non-opioid analgesic)
- Stable health, as determined by Principal Investigator
- Are female who are practicing abstinence or using a medically acceptable form of contraception or have been post-menopausal, biologically sterile, or surgically sterile for more than 1 year
- Willing and able to comply with all protocol required visits and assessments
Who cannot join
- Current cancer related pain or received chemotherapy with 6 months of screening
- Receiving opioid analgesic medication >10 mg MSE per day within 28 days of screening
- Subjects with a history of other chronic painful conditions
- Reflex sympathetic dystrophy or causalgia, acute spinal cord compression, cauda equina compression, acute nerve root compression, meningitis, or discitis
- Allergy or contraindications to any opioid or acetaminophen
- Surgical procedure for relief of pain with 6 months
Show all 14Show fewer
- Hypokalemia or clinically unstable cardiac disease, including: unstable atrial fibrillation, symptomatic bradycardia, unstable congestive heart failure, or active myocardial ischemia
- QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF) of ≥450 milliseconds on the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG)
- History of long QT syndrome or a family member with this condition
- Moderate to severe hepatic impairment
- Moderate to severe renal impairment
- Current or past history of alcohol abuse
- Positive urine toxicology screen for drug of abuse
- History or abnormalities on physical exam, vital signs, electrocardiogram, or laboratory values
Trial locations and contacts
60 sites in 1 country.
60 sites in 1 country
United States60 sites
Global Research
Anaheim, California, 92804
Atlanta Research Center
Atlanta, Georgia, 30319
FutureSearch Clinical Trials - Austin
Austin, Texas, 78731
Great Lakes Research Group, Inc.
Bay City, Michigan, 48706
Clinical Inquest Center, Ltd.
Beavercreek, Ohio, 45432
The Center for Clinical Trials
Biloxi, Mississippi, 39531
River Birch Research Alliance, LLC
Blue Ridge, Georgia, 30513
Willis-Kinghton Physician Network/River Interventional Pain Specialist
Bossier City, Louisiana, 71111
Catalina Research Institute, LLC
Chino, California, 91710
New Horizons Clinical Research
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242
Clinical Research of West Florida - Clearwater
Clearwater, Florida, 33765
Optimed Research, Ltd.
Columbus, Ohio, 43235
KRK Medical Research
Dallas, Texas, 75230
FutureSearch Trials of Dallas, LP
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Century Clinical Research, Inc.
Daytona Beach, Florida, 32117
Avail Clinical Research, LLC
DeLand, Florida, 32720
Brandywine Clinical Research
Downingtown, Pennsylvania, 19335
Altoona Center for Clinical Research
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, 16635
Synergy Clinical Research Center of Escondido
Escondido, California, 92025
MediSphere Medical Research Center, LLC
Evansville, Indiana, 47714
Plains Medical Clinic, LLC
Fargo, North Dakota, 58104
Florida Health Center
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33312
Prestige Clinical Research
Franklin, Ohio, 45005
Long Island Gastrointestinal Research Group
Great Neck, New York, 11023
PharmQuest, LLC
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27408
Eastern Research, Inc.
Hialeah, Florida, 33013
Advanced Clinical Research of Houston
Houston, Texas, 77062
Clinical Trial Network
Houston, Texas, 77074
Florida Institute of Medical Research
Jacksonville, Florida, 32257
Drug Study Institute
Jupiter, Florida, 33458
Health Awareness, Inc.
Jupiter, Florida, 33458
Clinical Investigations Specialists, Inc.
Kenosha, Wisconsin, 53142
Office of Robert Kaplan, DO
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89119
Adam D. Karns MD
Los Angeles, California, 90036
Drug Studies America
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Georgia Institute for Clinical Research, LLC
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Taylor Research, LLC
Marietta, Georgia, 30060
Clinical Trials Management, LLC
Metairie, Louisiana, 70006
Horizon Research Group, Inc./Alabama Orthopedic Clinic
Mobile, Alabama, 36608
NEMA Research, Inc.
Naples, Florida, 34108
Best Clinical Trials, Inc.
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115
Health Research Institute
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73109
NPC Research
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73109
Compass Research, LLC
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Peninsula Research
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174
International Clinical Research Institute, Inc.
Overland Park, Kansas, 66210
Arizona Research Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85023
Gold Coast Research, L.L.C.
Plantation, Florida, 33317
Progressive Medical Research
Port Orange, Florida, 32127
Health Concepts
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702
Highland Clinical Research
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84124
Innovative Clinical Trials
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
River Cities Clinical Research Center
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71105
Stamford Therapeutics Consortium
Stamford, Connecticut, 06905
Clinical Research of West Florida - Tampa
Tampa, Florida, 33603
MedVadis Research Corp.
Watertown, Massachusetts, 02472
Integrated Clinical Trial Services, Inc.
West Des Moines, Iowa, 50265
Upstate Clinical Research Associates LLC
Williamsville, New York, 14221
The Center for Clinical Research
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103
National Pain Research Institute, LLC
Winter Park, Florida, 32789
About this study
Official title: Phase 3, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Study to Evaluate the Analgesic Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film in Opioid-Naive Subjects With Chronic Lower Back Pain Requiring Opioid Analgesia
The purpose of this study is to determine if buprenorphine hydrochloride (HCl) buccal film is effective in treating opioid-naive subjects, with moderate to severe chronic low back pain (CLBP), who require continuous around-the-clock (ATC) pain relief for an extended period of time.
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Being tested
- Buprenorphine, Placebo
- Keywords
- CLBP, Chronic Low Back Pain, Chronic Pain, Back Pain
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain, Chronic Pain, Back Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BuprenorphineDrug
Also called BELBUCA, Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film, BEMA Buprenorphine, EN3409
Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film at doses ranging from 75-600 mcg twice daily
PlaceboDrug
Also called Placebo Buccal Film, BEMA Placebo
Matching Placebo Buccal Film twice daily
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Twice Daily Dosing Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film | Experimental | Twice Daily Dosing Receives: Drug: Buprenorphine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Average Daily Pain Intensity Scores
Change in pain intensity = average of daily pain scores from the last 7 days prior to Week 12 visit - average of daily pain scores for the last 7 days prior to randomization. Average pain intensity over the last 24 hours was rated on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Secondary outcomes (7)
Number of Participants With Response to Treatment (Responder) Using NRS Scale
Responders are subjects who achieve a relative reduction in pain intensity from the start of open-label titration to Week 12 in double-blind treatment. Average pain intensity over the last 24 hours was rated on an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
Measured: Prior to open-label titration to Week 12 in double-blind treatment
Number of Subjects With Rescue Medication Use
Use of analgesic rescue medication recorded in subject diary.
Measured: Week 1 to Week 12 in double-blind treatment
Time to Optimal Dose of Open-label Study Medication
Overall time to reach the "optimal" dose of study medication required to progress to double-blind treatment.
Measured: Up to 8 weeks in open-label titration
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure in the Double-blind Treatment Phase (up to 12 Weeks)
Treatment failure is defined as study discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or discontinuation due to adverse events in the double-blind treatment phase.
Measured: Baseline to treatment failure or end of double-blind treatment phase (up to 12 weeks)
Patient Global Impression of Change
Subjects assessed their change in activity limitations as they relate to their painful condition since beginning treatment using the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) questionnaire, a 7-point scale ranging from 1 (no change [or condition has got worse]) to 7 (a great deal better, and a considerable improvement that made all the difference)
Measured: Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire
Subjects assess disability due to back pain using the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) consisting of 24 statements of disability. The score of the RMDQ is the total number of items checked, ranging from 0 to 24 with higher scores indicating greater disability.
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Medical Outcomes Score Sleep Subscale
Medical Outcomes Score (MOS) Sleep Scale uses 12 items to measure 6 dimensions of sleep (sleep disturbance, somnolence, sleep adequacy, snoring, awaken short of breath or headache, and quantity of sleep/optimal sleep) and an overall sleep problems index score. The scores of the dimensions (except quantity of sleep/optimal sleep) and of the sleep problem index range on a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores reflecting more of the attribute implied by the name (eg, greater sleep disturbance, greater adequacy of sleep).
Measured: Baseline, Week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2012
- Primary completionDec 2013
- Study completionDec 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 752 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- BioDelivery Sciences International
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- M. Todd Kirby, PhD, Study director, Endo USA Inc., a Keenova Therapeutics Company
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01633944
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EN3409-308
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 2 Jul 2012
- Last updated
- 27 Feb 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Feb 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase 3, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Study to Evaluate the Analgesic Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film in Opioid-Naive Subjects With Chronic Lower Back Pain Requiring Opioid Analgesia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01633944
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EN3409-308
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Keywords
- CLBP, Chronic Low Back Pain, Chronic Pain, Back Pain
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 752 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- BioDelivery Sciences InternationalIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Aug 2012
- Primary completion
- Dec 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Jul 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 3 Feb 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine if buprenorphine hydrochloride (HCl) buccal film is effective in treating opioid-naive subjects, with moderate to severe chronic low back pain (CLBP), who require continuous around-the-clock (ATC) pain relief for an extended period of time.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboTwice Daily Dosing |
| Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film | Experimental | Drug: BuprenorphineTwice Daily Dosing |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Diagnosis of moderate to severe low back pain for ≥6 months
- Treating CLBP with a stable daily maintenance dose of non-opioid analgesic medication up to 10 mg morphine sulfate equivalents (MSE) per day for ≥4 weeks. (Additional as needed [PRN] non-opioid analgesic medications permitted on top of the stable daily maintenance dose of non-opioid analgesic)
- Stable health, as determined by Principal Investigator
- Are female who are practicing abstinence or using a medically acceptable form of contraception or have been post-menopausal, biologically sterile, or surgically sterile for more than 1 year
- Willing and able to comply with all protocol required visits and assessments
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Current cancer related pain or received chemotherapy with 6 months of screening
- Receiving opioid analgesic medication >10 mg MSE per day within 28 days of screening
- Subjects with a history of other chronic painful conditions
- Reflex sympathetic dystrophy or causalgia, acute spinal cord compression, cauda equina compression, acute nerve root compression, meningitis, or discitis
- Allergy or contraindications to any opioid or acetaminophen
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BuprenorphineAlso: BELBUCA, Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film, BEMA Buprenorphine, EN3409Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film at doses ranging from 75-600 mcg twice daily | Drug | Buprenorphine HCl Buccal Film |
| PlaceboAlso: Placebo Buccal Film, BEMA PlaceboMatching Placebo Buccal Film twice daily | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Average Daily Pain Intensity Scores
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change in pain intensity = average of daily pain scores from the last 7 days prior to Week 12 visit - average of daily pain scores for the last 7 days prior to randomization. Average pain intensity over the last 24 hours was rated on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
7 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Response to Treatment (Responder) Using NRS Scale
Time frame: Prior to open-label titration to Week 12 in double-blind treatment
Number of Subjects With Rescue Medication Use
Time frame: Week 1 to Week 12 in double-blind treatment
Time to Optimal Dose of Open-label Study Medication
Time frame: Up to 8 weeks in open-label titration
Percentage of Participants With Treatment Failure in the Double-blind Treatment Phase (up to 12 Weeks)
Time frame: Baseline to treatment failure or end of double-blind treatment phase (up to 12 weeks)
Patient Global Impression of Change
Time frame: Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Medical Outcomes Score Sleep Subscale
Time frame: Baseline, Week 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Feb 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
M. Todd Kirby, PhD study director
Endo USA Inc., a Keenova Therapeutics Company
60 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Buprenorphine in people with Low Back Pain, run by BioDelivery Sciences International at 60 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 60 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Feb 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Average Daily Pain Intensity Scores (time frame: Baseline, Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2017.