AzTrials
AzTrials

AgingNCT01673958

Stair Descending vs. Stair Ascending Exercise

A study testing Exercise in people with Aging and Heart Failure, run by European University Cyprus at 1 site in Cyprus.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of the present project is to compare the acute and chronic effect of stair descending versus stair ascending exercise on muscle damage and performance in elderly males with chronic heart failure. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 to 70 years, men only
Conditions the study is for
Aging, Heart Failure, Sarcopenia
What is being tested?
Exercise
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
12 participants
Where
1 siteCyprus
Study dates
Feb 2012to Apr 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 to 70 years
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • chronic heart failure (New York Heart Association class I-II)
  • subject provides written informed consent
  • personal physician of the participants provides written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • smoker
  • consumed any nutritional supplement the last 3 months
  • performed intense eccentric exercise the last 6 months
  • non Caucasian

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Cyprus1 site
  • European University Cyprus

    Nicosia, 1516

Other trials in Cyprus

About this study

Official title: The Effect of Stair Descending and Stair Ascending Exercise on Muscle Strength and Performance: the SmartEscalator Device

The aim of the present project is to compare the acute and chronic effect of stair descending versus stair ascending exercise on muscle damage and performance in elderly males with chronic heart failure.

Read the detailed description

Study design:

Twelve elderly males with chronic heart failure, New York Heart Association class I-II, will participate in this study. Participants will be allocated into two equally-sized groups: a stair descending group (n = 6) and a stair ascending group (n = 6). At the beginning of the study, the volunteers will perform an acute bout of stair descending or stair ascending exercise on an automatic escalator (4 sets of 3 min each, speed will be set at 45 steps∙min-1). Step height will be 20.5 mm. Before and at day 2 post exercise, physiologic measurements will be performed and blood samples will be collected. Then, participants will carry out six weeks of stair descending or ascending training consisting of three exercise sessions per week (the first two weeks the speed will be set at 45 steps∙min-1, the next two weeks at 50 steps∙min-1 and the last two weeks at 55 steps∙min-1 for both groups). Afterward, they will repeat the acute stair descending or ascending protocol, as carried out at the beginning of the study, and the same physiologic measurements will be performed and blood samples will be collected.

Measurements:

Isometric (at 90 knee flexion), concentric and eccentric peak torque at 60o∙s-1of quadriceps femoris, pain-free range of motion, delayed onset muscle soreness and creatine kinase will be measured.

Being tested
Exercise
Keywords
Eccentric exercise, Aging, Heart failure, Muscle strength loss, Sarcopenia
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure, Sarcopenia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ExerciseOther

    Comparison between stair descending and stair ascending training

Study groups in NCT01673958
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Stair descending groupExperimentalStair descending exercise. Participants will carry out six weeks of stair descending training consisting of three exercise sessions per week.
Receives: Other: Exercise
Stair ascending groupExperimentalStair ascending exercise. Participants will carry out six weeks of stair descending training consisting of three exercise sessions per week.
Receives: Other: Exercise

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Muscle strength (torque)

    An isokinetic dynamometer (Cybex, Ronkonkoma, NY) will be used for the measurement of isometric, eccentric and concentric knee extensor peak torque at 90° knee flexion. The average of the three best maximal voluntary contractions with their dominant leg will be recorded. In order to ensure that the subjects provide their maximal effort, the measurements will be repeated if the difference between the lower and the higher torque value exceeded 10%. There will be two minutes rest between isometric efforts.

    Measured: Change from baseline in muscle strength at day 2 post exercise at the first and sixth week of training

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Pain free range of motion (degrees)

    The assessment of pain-free ROM will be performed manually using the the isokinetic dynamometer. The investigator will move the calf at a very low angular velocity from 0 knee extension to the position where the subject will feel any discomfort.

    Measured: Before and at day 2 post exercise at the first and sixth week of training

  2. Creatine kinase, CK (activity IU)

    CK activity will be measured as a general indicator of muscle damage.It will be measured in a Cobas Integra Plus 400 chemistry analyzer.

    Measured: Before and at day 2 post exercise at the first and sixth week of training

  3. Delayed onset muscle soreness, DOMS (scale 1-10)

    Each participant will assess delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) during squat movement (90o knee flexion) and perceived soreness will be rated on a scale ranging from 1 (normal) to 10 (very sore).

    Measured: Before and at day 2 post exercise at the first and sixth week of training

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Aug 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2012
  3. Primary completionApr 2012
  4. Study completionApr 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
12 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01673958
Sponsor's protocol ID
EUC-011
Status last verified
Aug 2012
First submitted
22 Aug 2012
Last updated
28 Aug 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Paschalis V, Nikolaidis MG, Theodorou AA, Panayiotou G, Fatouros IG, Koutedakis Y, Jamurtas AZ. A weekly bout of eccentric exercise is sufficient to induce health-promoting effects. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Jan;43(1):64-73. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181e91d90.

    PubMed 20508540

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Exercise in people with Aging and Heart Failure, run by European University Cyprus at 1 site in Cyprus.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Cyprus. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Muscle strength (torque) (time frame: Change from baseline in muscle strength at day 2 post exercise at the first and sixth week of training). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01673958, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2012.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in