AzTrials
AzTrials

Provoked VestibulodyniaCOMFORTNCT01704456

Integrated Mindfulness-based Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Versus Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Provoked Vestibulodynia

A study testing Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy in people with Provoked Vestibulodynia, run by University of British Columbia at 2 sites in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This randomized trial, nicknamed the COMFORT (Cognitive therapy or Mindfulness FOR Treatment of pvd) study, will compare the effects of an 8-session group Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) to an 8-session group Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) for women with provoked vestibulodynia (PVD). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 19 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Provoked Vestibulodynia
What is being tested?
Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
130 participants
Where
2 sitesCanada
Study dates
Oct 2012to Sep 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 19 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • diagnosis of provoked vestibulodynia (PVD)
  • 19 years of age or older
  • premenopausal
  • fluent in English
  • during the study, women must agree not to change any medications they are taking for PVD.

Who cannot join

  • unprovoked vulvar pain, other pathology causing pain with penetration, or chronic pelvic pain
  • being uncomfortable and unwilling to participate in a group setting.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Canada2 sites
  • British Columbia Centre for Sexual Medicine

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9

  • Department of Gynaecology

    Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 1M9

Other trials in Canada

About this study

This randomized trial, nicknamed the COMFORT (Cognitive therapy or Mindfulness FOR Treatment of pvd) study, will compare the effects of an 8-session group Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) to an 8-session group Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) for women with provoked vestibulodynia (PVD). Women with PVD will be randomly assigned to attend either eight sessions of group MBCT or CBT. Each session is 2.25 hours long and spaced 1 week apart. The purpose of this study is to determine whether the 8-session MBCT intervention for PVD is no worse than an 8-session CBT intervention for decreasing women's pain intensity, sexual distress, catastrophizing and hypervigilance towards pain.

Read the detailed description

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this study is to determine whether an 8-session MBCT intervention for PVD is no worse than an 8-session CBT intervention for improving women's pain intensity and reducing their sexual distress, catastrophizing and hypervigilance towards pain. The investigators will also examine whether pain improvements at follow-up are mediated by changes in self-compassion and mindfulness (in the MBCT arm only) and moderated by pre-treatment credibility, personality, and anxiety sensitivity.

HYPOTHESES:

  1. At follow-up (4 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post-treatment), women in the MBCT arm will experience a greater decline (vs. pre-treatment) in vestibular pain intensity compared to women in the CBT arm.
  2. At follow-up (4 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post-treatment), women in the MBCT arm will experience a greater decline (vs. pre-treatment) in sex-related distress, pain catastrophizing, hypervigilance, and self-reported pain during intercourse/other penetrative sex compared to women in the CBT arm.
  3. The investigators hypothesize that improvements in pain intensity during vestibular touch will be mediated by changes in self-compassion and mindfulness in the MBCT arm only at 6 and 12 months follow-up.
  4. The investigators hypothesize that pre-treatment credibility, personality, and anxiety sensitivity will significantly moderate improvements in pain intensity during vestibular touch at 6 and 12 months follow-up.
  5. The investigators hypothesize improvements in both arms on the "Patient Global Impression of Change Scale" and significantly greater improvements in the MBCT arm relative to the CBT arm at follow-up (4 weeks, 6 months and 12 months post-treatment).
Being tested
Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy, Cognitive Behavioural Therapy
Keywords
provoked vestibulodynia, dyspareunia, vulvodynia, mindfulness, cognitive behavioural therapy
Medical subject headings
Dyspareunia, Vulvodynia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Mindfulness-based Cognitive TherapyBehavioural

    Also called MBCT

    The MBCT intervention will be administered in small group format (8-9 women). Each session will be 2.25 hours in duration and there will be eight, weekly sessions over the course of 2 months. Session content includes education about chronic pain, PVD, stress and sexual response, mindfulness practices, and cognitive techniques to notice thought patterns that contribute to increased pain.

  • Cognitive Behavioural TherapyBehavioural

    Also called CBT

    The CBT intervention will be administered to women in small group format (8-9 women). Each session will be 2.25-hrs in duration and there will be eight, weekly sessions over the course of 2 months. Session content includes education about chronic pain, PVD, stress and sexual response, behavioural techniques such as progressive muscle relaxation, cognitive techniques to challenge unhealthy thinking patterns, and communication skills training.

Study groups in NCT01704456
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT)ExperimentalWomen in the MBCT Group Treatment arm will receive the treatment in small group format (8-9 women). Each session will be 2.25 hours in duration and there will be eight, weekly sessions over the course of 2 months. Session content includes education about chronic pain, PVD, stress and sexual response, mindfulness practices, and cognitive techniques to notice thought patterns that contribute to increased pain.
Receives: Behavioral: Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy
Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)ExperimentalWomen in the CBT Group Treatment arm will receive the treatment in small group format (8-9 women). Each session will be 2.25 hrs in duration and there will be eight, weekly sessions over the course of 2 months. Session content includes education about chronic pain, PVD, stress and sexual response, behavioural techniques such as progressive muscle relaxation, cognitive techniques to challenge unhealthy thinking patterns, and communication skills training.
Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Vulvslgesiometer Pain Rating From Baseline to One Month Post-treatment to 6 Months Post-treatment

    The investigators have selected pain intensity during a controlled examination as the primary endpoint in this study. Specifically, pain intensity at the vulvar vestibule will be assessed using a vulvalgesiometer. The vulvalgesiometer is an instrument that provides a measure of pain/sensitivity that can be standardized across time points. The vulvalgesiometer is calibrated to exert a fixed amount of pressure. In this study, 30 grams of pressure at the 1, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, and 11 o'clock positions (randomly) around the vestibule will be applied using the vulvalgestiometer. Women will also report their pain at each site using a numeric rating scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever).

    Measured: Pre-treatment, one month post-treatment and 6 months post-treatment.

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Self-reported Pain During Penetration

    The investigators will measure self-report of pain during attempted or completed intercourse (or dildo entry for non-heterosexual women). Numeric Rating Scale that asked participants to rate the "intensity of pain during vaginal penetration attempts with sexual intercourse or penetration over the past 4 weeks" This question was rated on a 0 to 10 scale from no pain (0) to worst possible pain (10).

    Measured: Pre-treatment,one month post-treatment, and 6 months follow-up.

  2. Sexual Function

    The investigators will examine women's self-reported sexual function by administering the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) is a 19-item self-report questionnaire which assesses sexual function in women. It covers six sexual domains: lubrication, arousal, desire, pain, orgasm and satisfaction. Scores range from 7.2 - 36 where increase in sexual dysfunction is represented by lower scores.

    Subscales:

    Desire- 2, 3 [Subscale scores Range: 1.2 - 6] Arousal- 5,6,7,8 [Subscale Scores Range: 1.2 - 6] Lubrication- 9,10,11,12 [Subscale Scores Range: 1.2 - 6] Orgasm- 13, 14, 15 [Subscale Scores Range: 1.2 - 6] Satisfaction- 1, 16, 17 [Subscale Scores Range: 1.2 - 6] Pain- 18, 19, 20 [Subscale Scores Range: 1.2 - 6] Extra item: (4) have you been sexually active in past 4 weeks? (yes/no) [Scores Range 0 (no) - 1 (yes)]

    Note: Ranges applicable only if question 4 was answered "yes".

    Measured: Pre-treatment, one month post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.

  3. Sexual Distress

    The investigators will examine women's self-reported sexual distress by administering the Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised. This is a 12-item self-report questionnaire assessing for sexuality related personal distress. Scores on the scale range from 0 - 48, where higher scores represent higher levels of distress.

    Measured: Pre-treatment, one month post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.

  4. Pain Catastrophizing

    The investigators will examine women's self-reported pain catastrophizing by administering the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) is a self-report questionnaire that asks participants to think about past painful experiences, or a specific experience of pain, and to indicate the degree to which they have any of the presented thoughts or feelings when they are experiencing pain. Each one of the 13-items is rated on a Likert scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time), where a higher total score indicates higher pain catastrophizing.

    Subscales: Rumination- (4 items) 8, 9, 10, and 11 [Scores Range: 0 - 16] Magnification- (3 items) 6, 7, and 13 [Scores Range: 0 - 12] Helplessness- (6 items) 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 12 [Scores Range: 0 - 24] Sum of all items [Overall Range: 0 - 52]

    Measured: Pre-treatment, one month post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment..

  5. Pain Hypervigilance

    The investigators will examine women's self-reported hypervigilance about pain by administering the Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire. The Pain Vigilance and Awareness Questionnaire (PVAQ) is a 16 item self-report measure to assess the awareness, vigilance, preoccupation and observation of pain. Sum total score [Scores Range: 0 - 80].

    Measured: Pre-treatment, one month post-treatment, and 6 months post treatment.

  6. Chronic Pain Acceptance, Activities Engagement

    The investigators will examine women's self-reported pain acceptance, activities engagement, by administering the CPAQ chronic pain acceptance questionnaire. The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) measures the degree of acceptance of pain by chronic pain patients. It consists of 20 items measuring two domains, Activities Engagement and Pain Willingness. Total score range is from 0 - 120, with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain acceptance.

    Subscales:

    Activities engagement (11 items)- Q 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15, 19 [Scores Range: 0 - 66] Pain willingness (9 items)- Q 4, 7, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 20 [Scores Range: 0 - 54]

    Measured: Pre-treatment, one month post-treatment, and 6 months post-treatment.

  7. Chronic Pain Acceptance, CPAQ Pain Willingness

    The investigators will examine women's self-reported pain acceptance, activities engagement, by administering the CPAQ chronic pain acceptance questionnaire. The Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ) measures the degree of acceptance of pain by chronic pain patients. It consists of 20 items measuring two domains: Activities Engagement and Pain Willingness. Total score range is from 0 - 120, with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain acceptance.

    Subscales:

    Activities engagement (11 items)- Q 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12, 15, 19 [Scores Range: 0 - 66] Pain willingness (9 items)- Q 4, 7, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 20 [Scores Range: 0 - 54]

    Measured: Pre-treatment, one month post-treatment, and 6 months post treatment.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Oct 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2012
  3. Primary completionSep 2016
  4. Study completionSep 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
130 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01704456
Sponsor's protocol ID
H12-02358
Acronym
COMFORT
Status last verified
Feb 2020
First submitted
22 Aug 2012
Last updated
10 Mar 2020
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Brotto LA, Zdaniuk B, Rietchel L, Basson R, Bergeron S. Moderators of Improvement From Mindfulness-Based vs Traditional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for the Treatment of Provoked Vestibulodynia. J Sex Med. 2020 Nov;17(11):2247-2259. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.07.080. Epub 2020 Aug 22.

    PubMed 32843320

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy in people with Provoked Vestibulodynia, run by University of British Columbia at 2 sites in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Mar 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Vulvslgesiometer Pain Rating From Baseline to One Month Post-treatment to 6 Months Post-treatment (time frame: Pre-treatment, one month post-treatment and 6 months post-treatment.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01704456, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2020.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in