PainNCT01740193
Comparison of Two Different Pain Management Techniques in Pediatric Patients Undergoing a Hernia Repair
A study testing TAP Block and Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blockade in people with Pain and Inguinal Hernia, run by Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this research study is to find the best way to decrease pain in children right after surgery whom have had their hernia fixed. Right now, there are two different ways surgeons and anesthesia providers try to decrease pain. It is not clear if one way is better than the other. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 months to 10 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain, Inguinal Hernia
- What is being tested?
- TAP Block and Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blockade
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 59 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2012to Dec 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 months to 10 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- The subject is male or female;
- The subject is of any racial and ethnic groups;
- The subject is age 12 months to 10 years (inclusive);
- The subject weighs more than 8.0 kg (inclusive of the eighth kilogram);
- The subject is scheduled for the following: Unilateral herniorrhaphy scheduled on an out-patient basis, and not being performed in conjunction with any other surgical procedures;
- The subject is American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) patient classification I-II
- The subject's legally authorized representative has given written informed consent to participate in the study and when appropriate, the subject has given assent or consent to participate.
Who cannot join
- Additional surgical procedures are being performed concurrently;
- The subject is ASA classification > II;
- The subject has pre-existing allergies to local anesthetics;
- The subject receives midazolam as a premedication;
- The subject has an imminent life threatening condition that impacts the ability to obtain informed consent;
- The subject has any other condition, which in the opinion of the principal investigator, would not be suitable for participation in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Cincinnati Children's Hosptial Medical Center - Liberty Campus
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229
About this study
Official title: Randomized Prospective Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Surgeon Performed IIlioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Blockade With Ultrasound-Guided TAP Blockade in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Unilateral Herniorrhaphy on an Outpatient Basis
The purpose of this research study is to find the best way to decrease pain in children right after surgery whom have had their hernia fixed. Right now, there are two different ways surgeons and anesthesia providers try to decrease pain. It is not clear if one way is better than the other. The method used is often chosen by which one the doctor has more experience using. The Investigator plans to find out if one of the methods is more effective and/or safer than the other method.
The results of this study will help learn how to best control pain in children having surgery for hernia repair.
Read the detailed description
Unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy is a commonly performed surgical procedure in the pediatric population. Multimodal anesthesia consisting of systemic narcotics, surgical wound infiltration with local anesthetic and ilioinguinal and/or iliohypogastric nerve blockade has traditionally been employed to achieve acceptable analgesia. Recently, ultrasound-based studies have demonstrated that blind abdominal wall injections are done with poor accuracy. Ultrasound-guided alternatives, such as the transverses abdominis plane (TAP) block, may improve analgesic efficacy and patient comfort in the post-operative period when compared to blind landmark based nerve blockade. There has been increasing utilization of the TAP block in the adult population due to the described ability to provide effective blockade of the thoracolumbar spinal nerves innervating the abdominal wall. We propose a randomized prospective evaluation of the analgesic efficacy comparing surgeon performed ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric block with ultrasound-guided TAP blockade in healthy ASA I and II pediatric patients undergoing unilateral herniorrhaphy on an outpatient basis.
- Conditions
- Pain, Inguinal Hernia
- Being tested
- TAP Block, Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blockade
- Keywords
- Pain, Regional Anesthesia, ultrasound, transversus abdominis plane, herniorrhaphy, pediatrics
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Hernia, Inguinal
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TAP BlockProcedure or surgery
Also called transversus abdominis plane block
While the terminal branches of T7 to L1 cannot be visualized under ultrasound as they pass between the internal oblique and the transverse abdominis muscles, they are expected to lie within this plane. The three muscular layers of the abdominal wall, however, can be easily identified under ultrasound guidance. A needle is advanced under ultrasound guidance towards the fascial plane that separates the internal oblique and the transversus abdominis muscles, at which point local anesthetic is deposited under direct visualization.
Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blockadeProcedure or surgery
Ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric blockade is performed as an injection after palpation of the anterior superior iliac spine followed be a perceived loss of resistance with insertion of the needle, or may be infiltrated locally following herniorrhaphy exposure as anatomic landmarks can prove to be difficult to locate in the anesthetized pediatric patient.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| TAP Block | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: TAP Block |
| Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blockade | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Procedure: Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blockade |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Efficacy Outcome
Worst FLACC score observed in the post-anesthesia care unit by the research coordinator during the first post-operative hour
Measured: Participants will be followed for the duration of post-anesthesia care unit stay, an expected average of 2 hours
Secondary outcomes (6)
Efficacy Outcome - Length of Recovery Room
time required for the patient to meet discharge criteria
Measured: participants will be followed for the length of the surgical procedure, an expected average of 1.5 hours
Confounding Variable - Electrocautery
whether or not cautery was used as a measure of surgical technique
Measured: participants will be followed for the length of the surgical procedure, an expected average of 1.5 hours
Confounding Variable - Surgical dissection
length of surgical procedure as an indicator of the extent of surgical dissection performed
Measured: participants will be followed for the length of the surgical procedure, an expected average of 1.5 hours
Confounding Variable - Length of time for TAP
length of time required to perform TAP block
Measured: participants will be followed for the length of the surgical procedure, an expected average of 1.5 hours
Efficacy Outcome - Post-operative Calls
Phone calls made to surgeons regarding parental concern of post-operative pain forty-eight hours post-operatively
Measured: participants will be followed for 48 hours after procedure
Outcome Measure - Number of patients with post-operative complications
presence of post-operative complications
Measured: participants will be followed for 48 hours after procedure
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Dec 2012 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2012
- Primary completionJun 2017
- Study completionDec 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 59 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jamie Furstein, CRNA, DNAP, Principal investigator, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01740193
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2011-1778
- Status last verified
- Dec 2018
- First submitted
- 30 Nov 2012
- Last updated
- 19 Dec 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Niraj G, Searle A, Mathews M, Misra V, Baban M, Kiani S, Wong M. Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing open appendicectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Oct;103(4):601-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep175. Epub 2009 Jun 26.
PubMed 19561014Fredrickson M, Seal P, Houghton J. Early experience with the transversus abdominis plane block in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Sep;18(9):891-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02591.x. No abstract available.
PubMed 18768050Aveline C, Le Hetet H, Le Roux A, Vautier P, Cognet F, Vinet E, Tison C, Bonnet F. Comparison between ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane and conventional ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks for day-case open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Mar;106(3):380-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq363. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
PubMed 21177284Fredrickson MJ, Seal P. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for neonatal abdominal surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009 May;37(3):469-72. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0903700303.
PubMed 19499870Groudine SB, Fisher HA, Kaufman RP Jr, Patel MK, Wilkins LJ, Mehta SA, Lumb PD. Intravenous lidocaine speeds the return of bowel function, decreases postoperative pain, and shortens hospital stay in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Anesth Analg. 1998 Feb;86(2):235-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199802000-00003.
PubMed 9459225Hadzic A, New York School of Regional Anesthesia.: Textbook of regional anesthesia and acute pain management. New York: McGraw-Hill, Medical Pub. Division; 2007.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Dec 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Prospective Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Surgeon Performed IIlioinguinal/Iliohypogastric Blockade With Ultrasound-Guided TAP Blockade in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Unilateral Herniorrhaphy on an Outpatient Basis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01740193
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2011-1778
- Conditions
- Pain, Inguinal Hernia
- Keywords
- Pain, Regional Anesthesia, ultrasound, transversus abdominis plane, herniorrhaphy, pediatrics
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 59 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2012
- Primary completion
- Jun 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Dec 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this research study is to find the best way to decrease pain in children right after surgery whom have had their hernia fixed. Right now, there are two different ways surgeons and anesthesia providers try to decrease pain. It is not clear if one way is better than the other. The method used is often chosen by which one the doctor has more experience using. The Investigator plans to find out if one of the methods is more effective and/or safer than the other method.
The results of this study will help learn how to best control pain in children having surgery for hernia repair.
Detailed description
Unilateral inguinal herniorrhaphy is a commonly performed surgical procedure in the pediatric population. Multimodal anesthesia consisting of systemic narcotics, surgical wound infiltration with local anesthetic and ilioinguinal and/or iliohypogastric nerve blockade has traditionally been employed to achieve acceptable analgesia. Recently, ultrasound-based studies have demonstrated that blind abdominal wall injections are done with poor accuracy. Ultrasound-guided alternatives, such as the transverses abdominis plane (TAP) block, may improve analgesic efficacy and patient comfort in the post-operative period when compared to blind landmark based nerve blockade. There has been increasing utilization of the TAP block in the adult population due to the described ability to provide effective blockade of the thoracolumbar spinal nerves innervating the abdominal wall. We propose a randomized prospective evaluation of the analgesic efficacy comparing surgeon performed ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric block with ultrasound-guided TAP blockade in healthy ASA I and II pediatric patients undergoing unilateral herniorrhaphy on an outpatient basis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| TAP Block | Active comparator | Procedure: TAP Block |
| Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blockade | Active comparator | Procedure: Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blockade |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 months to 10 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- The subject is male or female;
- The subject is of any racial and ethnic groups;
- The subject is age 12 months to 10 years (inclusive);
- The subject weighs more than 8.0 kg (inclusive of the eighth kilogram);
- The subject is scheduled for the following: Unilateral herniorrhaphy scheduled on an out-patient basis, and not being performed in conjunction with any other surgical procedures;
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Additional surgical procedures are being performed concurrently;
- The subject is ASA classification > II;
- The subject has pre-existing allergies to local anesthetics;
- The subject receives midazolam as a premedication;
- The subject has an imminent life threatening condition that impacts the ability to obtain informed consent;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TAP BlockAlso: transversus abdominis plane blockWhile the terminal branches of T7 to L1 cannot be visualized under ultrasound as they pass between the internal oblique and the transverse abdominis muscles, they are expected to lie within this plane. The three muscular layers of the abdominal wall, however, can be easily identified under ultrasound guidance. A needle is advanced under ultrasound guidance towards the fascial plane that separates the internal oblique and the transversus abdominis muscles, at which point local anesthetic is deposited under direct visualization. | Procedure or surgery | TAP Block |
| Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blockadeIlioinguinal and iliohypogastric blockade is performed as an injection after palpation of the anterior superior iliac spine followed be a perceived loss of resistance with insertion of the needle, or may be infiltrated locally following herniorrhaphy exposure as anatomic landmarks can prove to be difficult to locate in the anesthetized pediatric patient. | Procedure or surgery | Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blockade |
Primary outcome
Efficacy Outcome
Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of post-anesthesia care unit stay, an expected average of 2 hours
Worst FLACC score observed in the post-anesthesia care unit by the research coordinator during the first post-operative hour
6 secondary outcomes
Efficacy Outcome - Length of Recovery Room
Time frame: participants will be followed for the length of the surgical procedure, an expected average of 1.5 hours
Confounding Variable - Electrocautery
Time frame: participants will be followed for the length of the surgical procedure, an expected average of 1.5 hours
Confounding Variable - Surgical dissection
Time frame: participants will be followed for the length of the surgical procedure, an expected average of 1.5 hours
Confounding Variable - Length of time for TAP
Time frame: participants will be followed for the length of the surgical procedure, an expected average of 1.5 hours
Efficacy Outcome - Post-operative Calls
Time frame: participants will be followed for 48 hours after procedure
Outcome Measure - Number of patients with post-operative complications
Time frame: participants will be followed for 48 hours after procedure
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Dec 2018.
- Background: PubMed 19561014Niraj G, Searle A, Mathews M, Misra V, Baban M, Kiani S, Wong M. Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block in patients undergoing open appendicectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2009 Oct;103(4):601-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aep175. Epub 2009 Jun 26.
- Background: PubMed 18768050Fredrickson M, Seal P, Houghton J. Early experience with the transversus abdominis plane block in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008 Sep;18(9):891-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02591.x. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 21177284Aveline C, Le Hetet H, Le Roux A, Vautier P, Cognet F, Vinet E, Tison C, Bonnet F. Comparison between ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane and conventional ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks for day-case open inguinal hernia repair. Br J Anaesth. 2011 Mar;106(3):380-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq363. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
- Background: PubMed 19499870Fredrickson MJ, Seal P. Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for neonatal abdominal surgery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009 May;37(3):469-72. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0903700303.
- Background: PubMed 9459225Groudine SB, Fisher HA, Kaufman RP Jr, Patel MK, Wilkins LJ, Mehta SA, Lumb PD. Intravenous lidocaine speeds the return of bowel function, decreases postoperative pain, and shortens hospital stay in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Anesth Analg. 1998 Feb;86(2):235-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199802000-00003.
- BackgroundHadzic A, New York School of Regional Anesthesia.: Textbook of regional anesthesia and acute pain management. New York: McGraw-Hill, Medical Pub. Division; 2007.
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jamie Furstein, CRNA, DNAP principal investigator
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing TAP Block and Ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric blockade in people with Pain and Inguinal Hernia, run by Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Dec 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Efficacy Outcome (time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of post-anesthesia care unit stay, an expected average of 2 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01740193, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Dec 2018.