AzTrials
AzTrials

Carpal Tunnel SyndromePhase 4NCT01751347

Bupivacaine Versus Lidocaine Local Anesthesia

A Phase 4 study testing Bupivacaine and Lidocaine in people with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Trigger Finger, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The use of local anesthetics has become an important aspect of pain management in surgical settings and is currently recommended in pain management guidelines. Elective outpatient hand surgeries, such as carpal tunnel or trigger finger release, cause minimum tissue disruption and are short in duration. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Trigger Finger
What is being tested?
Bupivacaine and Lidocaine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
135 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Feb 2013to Dec 2015
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 18 - 90 year old
  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Consent to participate
  • Carpal tunnel release surgery or Trigger finger release surgery
  • Single procedure

Who cannot join

  • Unable to consent
  • Do not consent to participate
  • Known Lidocaine or Bupivacaine allergy
  • Known Epinephrine allergy or contra indication
  • Known Codeine allergy
  • Pregnant
  • More than one procedure is being performed at the same setting

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • Vancouver General Hospital

    Vancouver, British Columbia

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Bupivacaine Versus Lidocaine Local Anesthesia in Elective Outpatient Hand Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The use of local anesthetics has become an important aspect of pain management in surgical settings and is currently recommended in pain management guidelines.

Elective outpatient hand surgeries, such as carpal tunnel or trigger finger release, cause minimum tissue disruption and are short in duration. As a result, these local anesthetic agents are a major component in post-operative pain control. The most commonly used local anesthetic agents are Lidocaine and Bupivacaine. Lidocaine acts faster (within 2-5 minutes of injection) and for this reason is often favored in outpatient setting for pre-incisional injection. However its effects only last up to 2 hours, without epinephrine, and 3 hours, with epinephrine. On the other hand, Bupivacaine, has a slower onset of action (about 5-10 minutes after injection) but its effects last much longer, for about 4-8 hours. The delay in onset of action makes it a less popular option as a primary source of local anesthesia in outpatient hand surgery.

Read more

Given the longer duration of anesthesia offered by Bupivacaine, the investigators believe that by giving it pre-operatively in elective outpatient hand surgeries will offer more effective post operative pain control compared to using Lidocaine only. There is limited published data confirming the effectiveness of use of pre-operative Bupivicaine in improved postoperative pain control and decreased consumption of narcotics. Therefore, the aim in this study is to compare the postoperative pain experienced by patients undergoing either elective carpal tunnel release or trigger finger release as well as their use of pain medications when the incision site is infiltrated preemptively with Lidocaine versus Bupivacaine.

The investigators believe that adequate post surgical pain control is essential for patients' full functional recovery. Poorly controlled post surgical pain increases incidence of surgery related complications and thus increased health care costs. It can also reduce patients' mobility, delay their return to full function,. If poorly controlled, post surgical pain may progress to chronic pain and rarely complex regional pain syndromes may ensue.

Read the detailed description

Subjects will be randomized to receive either 10ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine with 1:200,000 Epinephrine or 10 ml of 1% Lidocaine with 1:100,000 Epinephrine.

In the case of a single digit surgery such as the trigger finger release, the dose will be adjusted to 5ml of 0.5% Bupivacaine with 1:200,000 Epinephrine or 5ml of 1% Lidocaine with 1:100,000 Epinephrine.

An additional 5ml of study drug will be prepared in a separate syringe and administered when needed.

Being tested
Bupivacaine, Lidocaine
Keywords
Local anesthetics, Elective hand surgeries
Medical subject headings
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Trigger Finger Disorder

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01751347
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
LidocaineActive comparatorSubjects randomized to this treatment arm will receive lidocaine during their elective hand surgery.
Receives: Drug: Lidocaine
BupivacaineExperimentalSubjects randomized to this treatment arm will receive bupivacaine during their elective hand surgery.
Receives: Drug: Bupivacaine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. amount of oral analgesic used post procedure

    Total amount of oral analgesic a subject uses from the day of surgery to 2 weeks post surgery.

    Measured: up to 2 weeks post surgery

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Post operative pain

    Pain (subject reported pain scores) experienced at injection, during surgical procedure and post operative pain experienced by subject up to 2 weeks post surgery.

    Measured: up to 2 weeks post surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Dec 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2013
  3. Primary completionDec 2015
  4. Study completionDec 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider
Enrolment
135 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01751347
Sponsor's protocol ID
H12-03477
Status last verified
Dec 2015
First submitted
13 Dec 2012
Last updated
14 Dec 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Bupivacaine and Lidocaine in people with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Trigger Finger, run by University of British Columbia at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Dec 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

amount of oral analgesic used post procedure (time frame: up to 2 weeks post surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Dec 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in