Low Back PainSubQNCT01776749
Subcutaneous Stimulation as Add on Therapy to SCS toTreat Low Back Pain in FBSS
A study testing SubQ in people with Low Back Pain and Failed Back Surgery Syndrome, run by SubQ at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Aim of the study Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a clinical entity consisting of chronic leg and /or back pain due to radicular nerve damage. The effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in the pain management of patients with FBSS is proven. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Back Pain, Failed Back Surgery Syndrome, Neuropathic Pain
- What is being tested?
- SubQ
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 9 Nov 2011to 11 Jul 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age between 18 and 75 years.
- Chronic pain secondary to FBSS. Pain radiating in lumbar segments L4 and/or L5 and/or S1 for at least 6 months following at least one anatomically successful surgery.
- Pain intensity in leg(s) and low back of 5 or higher for leg and back measured separately on a weighted visual analogue scale (VAS).
- Previous treatment has been unsuccessful (insufficient pain relief and/or unacceptable side-effects).
- Willing to provide informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Presence of any other clinically significant or disabling chronic pain condition
- Expected inability of the patient to properly operate the neurostimulation system
- History of coagulation disorders, lupus erythematosus, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis or morbus Bechterew
- Current use of medication affecting coagulation which cannot be temporarily stopped
- Evidence of an active disruptive psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact the perception of pain, compliance to intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome as determined by the investigator
- The patient has ever had SCS
Show all 14Show fewer
- Addiction: drugs, alcohol (>5 U / day) and/or medication
- Insufficient cooperation from the patient (little motivation, understanding or communication)
- Immune deficiency (HIV-positive, corticosteroids with a dose equivalent to
- prednisolone 10 mg, immunosuppressives, etc.)
- Life expectancy < 1 year
- Pacemaker
- Local infection or other skin disorders at site of incision
- Existing or planned pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Netherlands1 site
Albert Schweitzer hospital
Dordrecht, South Holland, 3300 AK
About this study
Official title: Subcutaneous Stimulation as Add on Therapy to Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) to Treat Low Back Pain in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) (SubQ Study)
Aim of the study Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a clinical entity consisting of chronic leg and /or back pain due to radicular nerve damage. The effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in the pain management of patients with FBSS is proven. Patients mostly have dominant leg pain, however a significant percentage of FBSS patients has a more pronounced back pain and are commonly excluded from SCS as it is often inadequate in relieving both the back and leg pain components. Recently some reports showed the benefit of subcutaneous stimulation (SubQ) for low back pain in patients with FBSS. This has been confirmed by a feasibility study performed by our group. The aim of the randomized controlled study is to evaluate the effect of SubQ on low back pain in FBSS patients for whom SCS gives an inadequate back pain relief.
Hypothesis We hypothesize that SubQ in addition to SCS in FBSS patients with leg and low back pain is more effective in treating low back pain (i.e. >50% pain reduction) than SCS alone.
Read the detailed description
Aim of the study FBSS is a clinical entity consisting of chronic leg and /or back pain due to radicular nerve damage. The effectiveness of SCS in the pain management of patients with FBSS is proven. Patients mostly have dominant leg pain, however a significant percentage of FBSS patients has a more pronounced back pain and are commonly excluded from SCS as it is often inadequate in relieving both the back and leg pain components. Recently some reports showed the benefit of subcutaneous stimulation (SubQ) for low back pain in patients with FBSS. This has been confirmed by a feasibility study performed by our group. The aim of the randomized controlled study is to evaluate the effect of SubQ on low back pain in FBSS patients for whom SCS gives an inadequate back pain relief.
Hypothesis We hypothesize that SubQ in addition to SCS in FBSS patients with leg and low back pain is more effective in treating low back pain (i.e. >50% pain reduction) than SCS alone.
Study design and duration of the study The study is a randomized controlled trial. Patients with FBSS with additional chronic back pain and an intensity of 5 or more for leg and back pain separately on the visual analogue scale are eligible for the study. About ninety patients will receive a SCS system targeting to relief leg and back pain. The study group consists of patients having a pain reduction of ≥50% in the leg after SCS trial stimulation. If, after trial stimulation, there is less than 50% back pain relief compared with initial values, patients will receive one or two Quad leads subcutaneously at the time of implantation of the pulse generator.
This group, a total of 56 patients,will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio in which group 1 (n=28) receives SCS plus non-activated SubQ(SubQ OFF) and group 2 (n=28) receives SCS plus activated SubQ (SubQ ON) (phase 1), for a period of 3 months.
After the controlled phase of the study, all 56 patients will receive maximal effective SCS and SubQ for the rest of the study duration (phase 2).
Total duration of the study for a patient is12 months. Estimated duration of the study is 18 months.
Comparisons will be made after 3 months between no SubQ OFF and SubQ ON. After 6 and 12 months (phase 2) patients will be compared with their baseline values to explore long term effects of SCS and SubQ.
Type and number of patients The study will include FBSS patients with leg and low back pain, failing to relief back pain with SCS. For the controlled part of the study 56 patients are needed based on a power calculation in which a difference between the two treatments is postulated of about 40%. To assure this about 90 patients will be included in the study.
Inclusion criteria Male/female > 18 and < 75 years Chronic neuropathic pain secondary to FBSS Pain radiating in lumbar segments L4 and/or L5 and/or S1 for at least 6 months Pain intensity assessed by VAS ≥ 5 scored separately for leg and back Willing to provide informed consent Exclusion criteria Presence of any other clinically significant or disabling chronic pain condition Expected inability of patients to properly operate the neurostimulation system History of coagulation disorders, lupus erythematosus, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis or morbus Bechterew Active malignancy Current use of medicines affecting coagulation which cannot be temporarily stopped Evidence of an active disruptive psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact the perception of pain, compliance to intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome as determined by the investigator Life expectancy of less than 1 year Existing or planned pregnancy Study therapy test therapy: Adequate subcutaneous stimulation with perceived paresthesias in the painful area in the back reference therapy: SCS plus non-activated SubQ (SubQ OFF) Parameters for evaluation of effectiveness primary outcome: The proportion of patients with SCS plus activated SubQ and SCS without activated SubQ having 50% or more pain relief(responder rate) in back after 3 months of stimulation, assessed with the VAS.
secondary outcomes:
Effect of SCS plus activated SubQ and SCS without activated SubQ after 3, 6 and 12 months on:
Mean reduction in pain intensity for leg and back pain separately, assessed by the VAS Responder rate of SCS on leg pain assessed by the VAS Responder rate of SubQ on back pain assessed by the VAS(after 6 and 12 months) Quality of life assessed by Short Form 36 (SF-36) Quality of life as assessed by EuroQuol (EQ-5D) Function assessed by the Oswestry disability index Patient satisfaction assessed by the Global Impression of Change (GPIC) Pain assessed by the McGill questionnaire Concomitant drug treatment for relief of pain Concomitant need for physical therapy or other non-drug treatment. Employment status Frequency and nature of adverse events
And in addition after 12 months of stimulation, on:
Cost-utility Preferred stimulation settings
- Being tested
- SubQ
- Keywords
- low back pain, failed back surgery syndrome, spinal cord stimulation, subcutaneous stimulation, peripheral nerve field stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain, Failed Back Surgery Syndrome, Neuralgia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
SubQDevice
Also called The octad lead (3877)SubQ leads (3888), (Prime Advanced 37702 or Restore Advanced 37713), all Medtronic
Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) and subcutaneous (SubQ) stimulation SCS trial stimulation: Implantation of the Octad lead in the epidural space. The lead implantation in the epidural space is performed under local anesthesia using a standard percutaneous technique. A key element to the technical success of an SCS procedure is the accurate placement of the lead, which results in paresthesia covering the patients' painful areas. This depends on the patients' feedback during intra-operative testing. Therefore, it is important that the patient is awake and fully cooperative during the trial stimulation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| no SubQ | No intervention | No subcutaneous leads due to adequate low back stimulation by only SCS. Patient not randomised |
| SubQ ON | Active comparator | Subcutaneous stimulation on Receives: Device: SubQ |
| SubQ OFF | Sham comparator | subcutaneous leads implanted, but no stimulation Receives: Device: SubQ |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
responder rate
The proportion of patients with SCS plus activated SubQ and SCS without activated SubQ having 50% or more pain relief(responder rate) in back after 3 months of stimulation, assessed with the VAS
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Study start9 Nov 2011
- Primary completion20 Dec 2014
- Study completion11 Jul 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- SubQ
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Radboud University Medical Center, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Maastricht University Medical Center, Rijnstate Hospital, Rijnland Hospital, Medtronic, Sint Maartenskliniek, Diakonessenhuis locatie Zeist
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Kris CP Vissers, MD,PhD,FIPP, Study chair, Radboud University Medical CenterEric-Jan JA van Gorp, MD, Principal investigator, Albert Schweitzer Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01776749
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL324.091.10
- Acronym
- SubQ
- Status last verified
- Jan 2020
- First submitted
- 23 Jan 2013
- Last updated
- 7 Jan 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
van Heteren EPZ, van Roosendaal BWP, van Gorp EJAA, Bronkhorst EM, Kallewaard JW, Wegener JT, Burger K, Teernstra OPM, Buschman HPJ, Hamm-Faber TE, Vissers KCP. Spinal Cord Stimulation With Additional Peripheral Nerve/Field Stimulation Versus Spinal Cord Stimulation Alone on Back Pain and Quality of Life in Patients With Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome. Neuromodulation. 2023 Apr;26(3):658-665. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2021.11.010. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
PubMed 35088732
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Jan 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Subcutaneous Stimulation as Add on Therapy to Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) to Treat Low Back Pain in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) (SubQ Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01776749
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SubQ / NL324.091.10
- Keywords
- low back pain, failed back surgery syndrome, spinal cord stimulation, subcutaneous stimulation, peripheral nerve field stimulation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- SubQUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Radboud University Medical Center, Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Maastricht University Medical Center, Rijnstate Hospital, Rijnland Hospital, Medtronic, Sint Maartenskliniek, Diakonessenhuis locatie Zeist
- Study start
- 9 Nov 2011 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Dec 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 Jul 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Aim of the study Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) is a clinical entity consisting of chronic leg and /or back pain due to radicular nerve damage. The effectiveness of Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) in the pain management of patients with FBSS is proven. Patients mostly have dominant leg pain, however a significant percentage of FBSS patients has a more pronounced back pain and are commonly excluded from SCS as it is often inadequate in relieving both the back and leg pain components. Recently some reports showed the benefit of subcutaneous stimulation (SubQ) for low back pain in patients with FBSS. This has been confirmed by a feasibility study performed by our group. The aim of the randomized controlled study is to evaluate the effect of SubQ on low back pain in FBSS patients for whom SCS gives an inadequate back pain relief.
Hypothesis We hypothesize that SubQ in addition to SCS in FBSS patients with leg and low back pain is more effective in treating low back pain (i.e. >50% pain reduction) than SCS alone.
Detailed description
Aim of the study FBSS is a clinical entity consisting of chronic leg and /or back pain due to radicular nerve damage. The effectiveness of SCS in the pain management of patients with FBSS is proven. Patients mostly have dominant leg pain, however a significant percentage of FBSS patients has a more pronounced back pain and are commonly excluded from SCS as it is often inadequate in relieving both the back and leg pain components. Recently some reports showed the benefit of subcutaneous stimulation (SubQ) for low back pain in patients with FBSS. This has been confirmed by a feasibility study performed by our group. The aim of the randomized controlled study is to evaluate the effect of SubQ on low back pain in FBSS patients for whom SCS gives an inadequate back pain relief.
Hypothesis We hypothesize that SubQ in addition to SCS in FBSS patients with leg and low back pain is more effective in treating low back pain (i.e. >50% pain reduction) than SCS alone.
Study design and duration of the study The study is a randomized controlled trial. Patients with FBSS with additional chronic back pain and an intensity of 5 or more for leg and back pain separately on the visual analogue scale are eligible for the study. About ninety patients will receive a SCS system targeting to relief leg and back pain. The study group consists of patients having a pain reduction of ≥50% in the leg after SCS trial stimulation. If, after trial stimulation, there is less than 50% back pain relief compared with initial values, patients will receive one or two Quad leads subcutaneously at the time of implantation of the pulse generator.
This group, a total of 56 patients,will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio in which group 1 (n=28) receives SCS plus non-activated SubQ(SubQ OFF) and group 2 (n=28) receives SCS plus activated SubQ (SubQ ON) (phase 1), for a period of 3 months.
After the controlled phase of the study, all 56 patients will receive maximal effective SCS and SubQ for the rest of the study duration (phase 2).
Total duration of the study for a patient is12 months. Estimated duration of the study is 18 months.
Comparisons will be made after 3 months between no SubQ OFF and SubQ ON. After 6 and 12 months (phase 2) patients will be compared with their baseline values to explore long term effects of SCS and SubQ.
Type and number of patients The study will include FBSS patients with leg and low back pain, failing to relief back pain with SCS. For the controlled part of the study 56 patients are needed based on a power calculation in which a difference between the two treatments is postulated of about 40%. To assure this about 90 patients will be included in the study.
Inclusion criteria Male/female > 18 and < 75 years Chronic neuropathic pain secondary to FBSS Pain radiating in lumbar segments L4 and/or L5 and/or S1 for at least 6 months Pain intensity assessed by VAS ≥ 5 scored separately for leg and back Willing to provide informed consent Exclusion criteria Presence of any other clinically significant or disabling chronic pain condition Expected inability of patients to properly operate the neurostimulation system History of coagulation disorders, lupus erythematosus, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis or morbus Bechterew Active malignancy Current use of medicines affecting coagulation which cannot be temporarily stopped Evidence of an active disruptive psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact the perception of pain, compliance to intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome as determined by the investigator Life expectancy of less than 1 year Existing or planned pregnancy Study therapy test therapy: Adequate subcutaneous stimulation with perceived paresthesias in the painful area in the back reference therapy: SCS plus non-activated SubQ (SubQ OFF) Parameters for evaluation of effectiveness primary outcome: The proportion of patients with SCS plus activated SubQ and SCS without activated SubQ having 50% or more pain relief(responder rate) in back after 3 months of stimulation, assessed with the VAS.
secondary outcomes:
Effect of SCS plus activated SubQ and SCS without activated SubQ after 3, 6 and 12 months on:
Mean reduction in pain intensity for leg and back pain separately, assessed by the VAS Responder rate of SCS on leg pain assessed by the VAS Responder rate of SubQ on back pain assessed by the VAS(after 6 and 12 months) Quality of life assessed by Short Form 36 (SF-36) Quality of life as assessed by EuroQuol (EQ-5D) Function assessed by the Oswestry disability index Patient satisfaction assessed by the Global Impression of Change (GPIC) Pain assessed by the McGill questionnaire Concomitant drug treatment for relief of pain Concomitant need for physical therapy or other non-drug treatment. Employment status Frequency and nature of adverse events
And in addition after 12 months of stimulation, on:
Cost-utility Preferred stimulation settings
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| no SubQ | No intervention | –No subcutaneous leads due to adequate low back stimulation by only SCS. Patient not randomised |
| SubQ ON | Active comparator | Device: SubQSubcutaneous stimulation on |
| SubQ OFF | Sham comparator | Device: SubQsubcutaneous leads implanted, but no stimulation |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age between 18 and 75 years.
- Chronic pain secondary to FBSS. Pain radiating in lumbar segments L4 and/or L5 and/or S1 for at least 6 months following at least one anatomically successful surgery.
- Pain intensity in leg(s) and low back of 5 or higher for leg and back measured separately on a weighted visual analogue scale (VAS).
- Previous treatment has been unsuccessful (insufficient pain relief and/or unacceptable side-effects).
- Willing to provide informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Presence of any other clinically significant or disabling chronic pain condition
- Expected inability of the patient to properly operate the neurostimulation system
- History of coagulation disorders, lupus erythematosus, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis or morbus Bechterew
- Current use of medication affecting coagulation which cannot be temporarily stopped
- Evidence of an active disruptive psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact the perception of pain, compliance to intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome as determined by the investigator
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| SubQAlso: The octad lead (3877)SubQ leads (3888), (Prime Advanced 37702 or Restore Advanced 37713), all MedtronicSpinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) and subcutaneous (SubQ) stimulation SCS trial stimulation: Implantation of the Octad lead in the epidural space. The lead implantation in the epidural space is performed under local anesthesia using a standard percutaneous technique. A key element to the technical success of an SCS procedure is the accurate placement of the lead, which results in paresthesia covering the patients' painful areas. This depends on the patients' feedback during intra-operative testing. Therefore, it is important that the patient is awake and fully cooperative during the trial stimulation. | Device | SubQ OFF, SubQ ON |
Primary outcome
responder rate
Time frame: 3 months
The proportion of patients with SCS plus activated SubQ and SCS without activated SubQ having 50% or more pain relief(responder rate) in back after 3 months of stimulation, assessed with the VAS
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Jan 2020.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35088732van Heteren EPZ, van Roosendaal BWP, van Gorp EJAA, Bronkhorst EM, Kallewaard JW, Wegener JT, Burger K, Teernstra OPM, Buschman HPJ, Hamm-Faber TE, Vissers KCP. Spinal Cord Stimulation With Additional Peripheral Nerve/Field Stimulation Versus Spinal Cord Stimulation Alone on Back Pain and Quality of Life in Patients With Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome. Neuromodulation. 2023 Apr;26(3):658-665. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2021.11.010. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
Related trials for Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kris CP Vissers, MD,PhD,FIPP study chair
Radboud University Medical Center
Eric-Jan JA van Gorp, MD principal investigator
Albert Schweitzer Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing SubQ in people with Low Back Pain and Failed Back Surgery Syndrome, run by SubQ at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
responder rate (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01776749, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Jan 2020.