Wound InfectionNCT01907542
A Trial Comparing Stapled Versus Monocryl Sutured Skin Closure for Elective Open Colectomy
A study testing stapled skin closure and monocryl skin suture in people with Wound Infection, run by National University Hospital, Singapore at 1 site in Singapore.
Trial summary
Background Stapled skin closure is frequently performed following open colectomies. However, its pain and cosmetic outcomes have been suboptimal. Monocryl sutured skin closure has been shown to be cosmetically superior and does not require removal of the sutures. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Wound Infection
- What is being tested?
- stapled skin closure and monocryl skin suture
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 144 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSingapore
- Study dates
- Jun 2013to Jul 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients who underwent elective open colectomy for various etiologies
Who cannot join
- Emergency laparotomies
- Patient who require the creation of a stoma
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Singapore1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
National University Hospital
Singapore, Singapore, 119074
Frederick H Koh, mbbs, +65-84281117, frederickkohhx@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Stapled Versus Monocryl Sutured Skin Closure for Elective Open Colectomy.
Background Stapled skin closure is frequently performed following open colectomies. However, its pain and cosmetic outcomes have been suboptimal. Monocryl sutured skin closure has been shown to be cosmetically superior and does not require removal of the sutures. But its association with wound infection has been questioned Aims This study aims to compare the outcomes using skin stapler or Monocryl suture in the skin closure following open colectomy. Hypotheses We believe Monocryl suture is associated with reduced pain and better cosmesis. Methodology Inclusion criteria: All patients who underwent elective open colectomy for various etiologies Exclusion criteria: i) Emergency laparotomies ii) Patient who require the creation of a stoma After consenting for the trial, patients will be randomized into either the skin stapler or the Monocryl suture group. Randomization is performed using a computer model. To minimize confounders, the pre-operative preparation and antibiotics regime will be standardized. The closure of the fascia and the skin will also be performed by at least a Registrar. The wounds will then be covered with a thick sterile dressing to blind the patient and the research assistant. The wound will only be reviewed on the POD 3. The patient is scheduled to return on POD 14, POD 30, 3 and 6 months post operatively upon discharge. Some of the variables that will be collected for this study include: 1. Time taken for skin closure 2. Superficial surgical site infection 3. Pain score 4. Cosmesis We aim to enrol 72 participants in each group. Importance/Impact to Medicine This study will validate the role of Monocryl suture as an effective method for skin closure following open colectomy. We believe Monocryl sutured closure can potentially change the practice of surgeons worldwide for the benefits of the patients.
Read the detailed description
Methodology All consecutive patients who are scheduled to undergo elective open laparotomy for colecotomies for cancer/diverticular disease would be invited to participate in the study through written consent. These patients would be randomized into 2 arms, stapler skin closure (n= 72) and continuous absorbable skin closure (n= 72). Patients involved in the study would have their skin closure done by an adequately trained surgeon.
Inclusion criteria
- Patients having a preoperative diagnosis requiring abdominal surgery through a single incision, open laparotomy technique, determined preoperatively by the attending surgeon.
- Age 21 and above, able to understand the information regarding the study.
- Agreeable for randomization and signed consent form.
- All elective open colonic resections above the level of the peritoneal reflection.
Exclusion criteria
- Patients with known allergy to products.
- Pregnant women or breast-feeding mothers.
- No signed consent form.
- Patients who undergo a Low Anterior Resection or with distal resection margins lower than mid rectum.
- Patients who require a stoma to be fashioned.
- Patients with previous midline laparotomy.
Randomization If a patient fulfils the selection criteria above, the surgical team must explain the nature of the study and provide the patient with a Patient Information Sheet and Consent Form. The patient must sign both the Patient Information Sheet and Consent Form. A copy of the Patient Information Sheet is to be given to the patient and both signed copies of the Patient Information Sheet and Consent Form must be returned to the Principal Investigator for filing.
Randomization is performed using a computer model generator and the skin closure technique would be eluded to the surgeons at time of closure. The operating surgeon would contact the designated research assistant who will reveal the allocation.
Pre-operative preparation All patients participating in this trial would have to comply to be kept Nil By Mouth from 12midnight the day before surgery. Bowel preparation as per preference by the individual surgeon.
Preparation of Wound Closure Instruments and products required for both techniques of closure should be prepared by the operating theatre nurses prior to the operation. The stapling device used would be PROXIMATE PLUS MD Skin Staple®. Absorbable 4-0 Monocryl® with 1/2-circle curved needle sutures would be used for the skin closure. Both products are from Ethicon, Johnson \& Johnson and routinely used for this hospital.
Surgical Technique
Surgery should be performed in this consistent manner:
- Prophylactic antibiotics will be given to all patients as per hospital protocol.
- Clean and draped with chlorhexidine and Povidone
- Manner of skin incision, dissection, entry into the abdominal cavity and ensuing procedure of the abdominal surgery are left to the operating surgeon.
- Peritoneal cavity to be irrigated with warm water prior to closure.
- Abdominal fascia is to be closed using mass closure technique with continuous 1-0 PDS.
- The wound with closed fascia must then be lavaged adequately with chlorhexidine solution.
- According to randomization skin closure is then performed using either skin staples or Monocryl® in the following way:
- For staple skin closure, staples should be placed 1.0cm apart apposing the entire length of the wound.
- For continuous absorbable suture skin closure, 4-0 Monocryl® should be used, with an initial anchor stitch. Subsequently stitches should be made within the dermis layer of the skin, not catching any subcutaenous fat during the process.
- local anaethesia will be used after the completion of closure.
For both techniques, complete apposition throughout the entire length of the wound should be achieved, checked by the registrar and another assistant. No drain can be placed in the subcutaneous fat layer of the wound.
Time for wound closure is defined as the time the stapler or stitch contacts the patient's skin till the time the last staple is fired or the final cut is made for the suture technique. Time for wound closure will be recorded.
All surgical wounds would then be dressed with a Opsite dressing and then masked with 2 layers of sterile gauze adequately covering the entire length of the wound until POD 3.
All patients should receive PCA morphine for post operative analgesia. additional oral paracetamol can be administered if PCA morphine does not adequately control pain.
Post-operative Assessment The post-operative assessment of the wound will be carried out by an independent assessor, single trained wound nurse, according to the data entry form.
This dressing would not be removed till POD3 for wound inspection and the dressing should be changed by the ward nurses immediately with the same type of dressing before the patient can view the wound.
Staples would be removed on POD10-14 if uncomplicated.
If any participant in the study cohort were to require any form of re-operation within the study period, he/she would be excluded from the analysis to minimise confounders for the study's outcomes.
Wound assessment includes:
- Superficial Surgical Site Infection (SSI) (within POD30)
- Rates of wound dehiscence (within POD30)
- Need for re-intervention due to Superficial SSI/dehiscence (within POD30, within 6/12 post-op)
- Pain
- Amount and duration of (opoid) analgesia required
- Visual analog scale (POD1, 3, 14, 30)
- SF-8 4 week recall questionaire (POD 30)
- Comesis a. Patient scar assessment scale (POD14, POD30, 3/12, 6/12)
Pain assessment would be conducted in a double blinded manner on POD1 and 3 where both the assessor (research assistant) and the patient would not know the patient's allocation. After the staples are removed on POD10 and wound dressing removed on POD3, patients would know of their allocation while the assessor would still not be, thus, the pain assessment on POD14 and POD 30 would be single blinded.
Superficial SSI shall be defined as infection occuring within 30 days after the operation and infection involves only skin or subcutaneous tissue of the incision and at least one of the following:
- Purulent drainage, with or without laboratory confirmation, from the superficial incision.
- Organisms isolated from an aseptically obtained culture of fluid or tissue from the superficial incision.
- At least one of the following signs or symptoms of infection: pain or tenderness, localized swelling, redness, or heat and superficial incision is deliberately opened by surgeon, unless incision is culture-negative.
Upon discharge, the study participant is scheduled to return for at least two visits - the first visit at POD 14, POD 30, 3 months and 6 months post operatively. The patient's wound will be assessed by the same independent assessor at each visit.
- Conditions
- Wound Infection
- Being tested
- stapled skin closure, monocryl skin suture
- Medical subject headings
- Wound Infection
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
stapled skin closureProcedure or surgery
as above
monocryl skin sutureProcedure or surgery
as above
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Monocryl suture skin closure | Active comparator | Monocryl skin suture Receives: Procedure: monocryl skin suture |
| Stapled skin closure | Active comparator | stapled skin closure Receives: Procedure: stapled skin closure |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Superficial surgical site infection
Measured: up till 6months post-op
Secondary outcomes (3)
1. Time taken for skin closure
Measured: up till 6months post-op
2. Pain score
Measured: up till 6months post op
3. Cosmesis
Measured: up till 6months post op
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2013
- Primary completionJul 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Wound InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by National University Hospital, SingaporeThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 144 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National University Hospital, Singapore
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, E Kesavan, National University Hospital, Singapore
- Investigators
- Frederick H Koh, MBBS, Study chair, NUHS SurgeryWai-Kit Cheong, FRCS, Principal investigator, NUHS SurgeryBettina Lieske, FRCS, Principal investigator, NUHS SurgeryKer-Kan Tan, FRCS, Principal investigator, NUHS Surgery
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01907542
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2012/00544
- Status last verified
- Jul 2013
- First submitted
- 14 Jun 2013
- Last updated
- 25 Jul 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jul 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Stapled Versus Monocryl Sutured Skin Closure for Elective Open Colectomy.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01907542
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2012/00544
- Conditions
- Wound Infection
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 144 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- National University Hospital, SingaporeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2013
- Primary completion
- Jul 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background Stapled skin closure is frequently performed following open colectomies. However, its pain and cosmetic outcomes have been suboptimal. Monocryl sutured skin closure has been shown to be cosmetically superior and does not require removal of the sutures. But its association with wound infection has been questioned Aims This study aims to compare the outcomes using skin stapler or Monocryl suture in the skin closure following open colectomy. Hypotheses We believe Monocryl suture is associated with reduced pain and better cosmesis. Methodology Inclusion criteria: All patients who underwent elective open colectomy for various etiologies Exclusion criteria: i) Emergency laparotomies ii) Patient who require the creation of a stoma After consenting for the trial, patients will be randomized into either the skin stapler or the Monocryl suture group. Randomization is performed using a computer model. To minimize confounders, the pre-operative preparation and antibiotics regime will be standardized. The closure of the fascia and the skin will also be performed by at least a Registrar. The wounds will then be covered with a thick sterile dressing to blind the patient and the research assistant. The wound will only be reviewed on the POD 3. The patient is scheduled to return on POD 14, POD 30, 3 and 6 months post operatively upon discharge. Some of the variables that will be collected for this study include: 1. Time taken for skin closure 2. Superficial surgical site infection 3. Pain score 4. Cosmesis We aim to enrol 72 participants in each group. Importance/Impact to Medicine This study will validate the role of Monocryl suture as an effective method for skin closure following open colectomy. We believe Monocryl sutured closure can potentially change the practice of surgeons worldwide for the benefits of the patients.
Detailed description
Methodology All consecutive patients who are scheduled to undergo elective open laparotomy for colecotomies for cancer/diverticular disease would be invited to participate in the study through written consent. These patients would be randomized into 2 arms, stapler skin closure (n= 72) and continuous absorbable skin closure (n= 72). Patients involved in the study would have their skin closure done by an adequately trained surgeon.
Inclusion criteria
- Patients having a preoperative diagnosis requiring abdominal surgery through a single incision, open laparotomy technique, determined preoperatively by the attending surgeon.
- Age 21 and above, able to understand the information regarding the study.
- Agreeable for randomization and signed consent form.
- All elective open colonic resections above the level of the peritoneal reflection.
Exclusion criteria
- Patients with known allergy to products.
- Pregnant women or breast-feeding mothers.
- No signed consent form.
- Patients who undergo a Low Anterior Resection or with distal resection margins lower than mid rectum.
- Patients who require a stoma to be fashioned.
- Patients with previous midline laparotomy.
Randomization If a patient fulfils the selection criteria above, the surgical team must explain the nature of the study and provide the patient with a Patient Information Sheet and Consent Form. The patient must sign both the Patient Information Sheet and Consent Form. A copy of the Patient Information Sheet is to be given to the patient and both signed copies of the Patient Information Sheet and Consent Form must be returned to the Principal Investigator for filing.
Randomization is performed using a computer model generator and the skin closure technique would be eluded to the surgeons at time of closure. The operating surgeon would contact the designated research assistant who will reveal the allocation.
Pre-operative preparation All patients participating in this trial would have to comply to be kept Nil By Mouth from 12midnight the day before surgery. Bowel preparation as per preference by the individual surgeon.
Preparation of Wound Closure Instruments and products required for both techniques of closure should be prepared by the operating theatre nurses prior to the operation. The stapling device used would be PROXIMATE PLUS MD Skin Staple®. Absorbable 4-0 Monocryl® with 1/2-circle curved needle sutures would be used for the skin closure. Both products are from Ethicon, Johnson \& Johnson and routinely used for this hospital.
Surgical Technique
Surgery should be performed in this consistent manner:
- Prophylactic antibiotics will be given to all patients as per hospital protocol.
- Clean and draped with chlorhexidine and Povidone
- Manner of skin incision, dissection, entry into the abdominal cavity and ensuing procedure of the abdominal surgery are left to the operating surgeon.
- Peritoneal cavity to be irrigated with warm water prior to closure.
- Abdominal fascia is to be closed using mass closure technique with continuous 1-0 PDS.
- The wound with closed fascia must then be lavaged adequately with chlorhexidine solution.
- According to randomization skin closure is then performed using either skin staples or Monocryl® in the following way:
- For staple skin closure, staples should be placed 1.0cm apart apposing the entire length of the wound.
- For continuous absorbable suture skin closure, 4-0 Monocryl® should be used, with an initial anchor stitch. Subsequently stitches should be made within the dermis layer of the skin, not catching any subcutaenous fat during the process.
- local anaethesia will be used after the completion of closure.
For both techniques, complete apposition throughout the entire length of the wound should be achieved, checked by the registrar and another assistant. No drain can be placed in the subcutaneous fat layer of the wound.
Time for wound closure is defined as the time the stapler or stitch contacts the patient's skin till the time the last staple is fired or the final cut is made for the suture technique. Time for wound closure will be recorded.
All surgical wounds would then be dressed with a Opsite dressing and then masked with 2 layers of sterile gauze adequately covering the entire length of the wound until POD 3.
All patients should receive PCA morphine for post operative analgesia. additional oral paracetamol can be administered if PCA morphine does not adequately control pain.
Post-operative Assessment The post-operative assessment of the wound will be carried out by an independent assessor, single trained wound nurse, according to the data entry form.
This dressing would not be removed till POD3 for wound inspection and the dressing should be changed by the ward nurses immediately with the same type of dressing before the patient can view the wound.
Staples would be removed on POD10-14 if uncomplicated.
If any participant in the study cohort were to require any form of re-operation within the study period, he/she would be excluded from the analysis to minimise confounders for the study's outcomes.
Wound assessment includes:
- Superficial Surgical Site Infection (SSI) (within POD30)
- Rates of wound dehiscence (within POD30)
- Need for re-intervention due to Superficial SSI/dehiscence (within POD30, within 6/12 post-op)
- Pain
- Amount and duration of (opoid) analgesia required
- Visual analog scale (POD1, 3, 14, 30)
- SF-8 4 week recall questionaire (POD 30)
- Comesis a. Patient scar assessment scale (POD14, POD30, 3/12, 6/12)
Pain assessment would be conducted in a double blinded manner on POD1 and 3 where both the assessor (research assistant) and the patient would not know the patient's allocation. After the staples are removed on POD10 and wound dressing removed on POD3, patients would know of their allocation while the assessor would still not be, thus, the pain assessment on POD14 and POD 30 would be single blinded.
Superficial SSI shall be defined as infection occuring within 30 days after the operation and infection involves only skin or subcutaneous tissue of the incision and at least one of the following:
- Purulent drainage, with or without laboratory confirmation, from the superficial incision.
- Organisms isolated from an aseptically obtained culture of fluid or tissue from the superficial incision.
- At least one of the following signs or symptoms of infection: pain or tenderness, localized swelling, redness, or heat and superficial incision is deliberately opened by surgeon, unless incision is culture-negative.
Upon discharge, the study participant is scheduled to return for at least two visits - the first visit at POD 14, POD 30, 3 months and 6 months post operatively. The patient's wound will be assessed by the same independent assessor at each visit.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Monocryl suture skin closure | Active comparator | Procedure: monocryl skin sutureMonocryl skin suture |
| Stapled skin closure | Active comparator | Procedure: stapled skin closurestapled skin closure |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All patients who underwent elective open colectomy for various etiologies
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Emergency laparotomies
- Patient who require the creation of a stoma
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| stapled skin closureas above | Procedure or surgery | Stapled skin closure |
| monocryl skin sutureas above | Procedure or surgery | Monocryl suture skin closure |
Primary outcome
Superficial surgical site infection
Time frame: up till 6months post-op
3 secondary outcomes
1. Time taken for skin closure
Time frame: up till 6months post-op
2. Pain score
Time frame: up till 6months post op
3. Cosmesis
Time frame: up till 6months post op
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jul 2013.
Related trials for Wound Infection
Not yet recruiting
The Mepilex Cesarean Delivery Trial / MEPIDEL
Surgical Site Infection
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of Amicidin-β Topical Solution for Patients With a Contaminated or Infected Surgical or Traumatic Wound or Cutaneous Abscess
Surgical Wound Infection, Traumatic Wound Infection
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Arterial Stiffness During Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Abdominal Wall Wounds
Postoperative Abdominal Wall Wound Complications, Surgical Wound Infection
Not yet recruiting
Povidone-Iodine and Ozonated Distilled Water Irrigation in the Management of Maxillofacial Space Infections
Infection, Surgical Site
Not yet recruiting
Suture Choice for Ostomy Creation
Ostomy - Ileostomy or Colostomy, Stoma Complications
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Frederick H Koh, MBBS study chair
NUHS Surgery
Wai-Kit Cheong, FRCS principal investigator
NUHS Surgery
Bettina Lieske, FRCS principal investigator
NUHS Surgery
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing stapled skin closure and monocryl skin suture in people with Wound Infection, run by National University Hospital, Singapore at 1 site in Singapore.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jul 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Frederick H Koh, MBBS (+65-84281117, frederickkohhx@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Superficial surgical site infection (time frame: up till 6months post-op). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jul 2013; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 4 Nov 2026.