AzTrials
AzTrials

Dental CariesPhase 2MTA/FSNCT02019563

MTA/FS Pulpotomy for Vital Primary Incisors: A Randomized Controlled Trial

A Phase 2 study testing RCT Group and MTA/FS pulpotomy Group in people with Dental Caries and Dental Pulp Exposure, run by The Hospital for Sick Children at 1 site in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To compare radiographic and clinical outcomes and survival of mineral trioxide aggregate/ferric sulfate (MTA/FS) pulpotomy and root canal therapy (RCT) in carious vital primary maxillary incisors. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Dental Caries, Dental Pulp Exposure
What is being tested?
RCT Group and MTA/FS pulpotomy Group
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
70 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Sep 2010to Sep 2014
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • children with one or more carious primary maxillary incisors where removal of dental caries will likely to produce a vital pulp exposure
  • reside in the GTA at time of inclusion
  • English-speaking

Who cannot join

  • history of spontaneous or lingering stimulated pain, swelling, fistula or sinus tract, tenderness to percussion and pathological mobility
  • incisors with preoperative radiographic evidence of periapical or periradicular radiolucency, a widened periodontal ligament space, physiological resorption, incomplete root formation, internal or external root resorption, pulp canal obliteration or pulp calcifications
  • non-restorable tooth

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • The Hospital for Sick Children

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Mineral Trioxide Aggregate/Ferric Sulfate Pulpotomy for Vital Primary Incisors: A Randomized Controlled Trial

To compare radiographic and clinical outcomes and survival of mineral trioxide aggregate/ferric sulfate (MTA/FS) pulpotomy and root canal therapy (RCT) in carious vital primary maxillary incisors.

Read the detailed description

Dental caries is the most common chronic disease in children. Caries of the primary maxillary incisors is common in young children; often necessitating either extraction or pulp therapy. The premature loss of primary maxillary incisors can adversely affect a child's dental occlusion, ability to properly size food boluses for swallowing, speech articulation, facial esthetics and psychosocial development. Pulp treatment of cariously exposed vital primary incisors may prevent premature tooth loss as well as eliminate pain. Currently, there is a paucity of outcome investigations with regard to pulp therapy in primary incisors.

Being tested
RCT Group, MTA/FS pulpotomy Group
Keywords
pediatrics, dental caries, dental pulp exposure, incisor
Medical subject headings
Dental Caries, Dental Pulp Exposure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RCT GroupProcedure or surgery

    After complete removal of all caries, if a pulp exposure is detected the pulp chamber will be opened and the pulp tissue removed. The canal will be irrigated with water and then filled with non-reinforced ZOE.

  • MTA/FS pulpotomy GroupProcedure or surgery

    After complete removal of all caries, if a pulp exposure is detected the pulp chamber will be opened and vital coronal pulp to a depth of 2mm below free gingival margin will be removed. A solution of ferric sulfate will be applied to the amputated pulp surface and then flushed with water. MTA paste is then used to cover over the exposed amputated pulp surface.

Study groups in NCT02019563
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
MTA/FS pulpotomy GroupExperimentalChildren randomized to this arm will undergo a mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) pulpotomy after hemostasis is achieved using ferric sulfate (FS).
Receives: Procedure: MTA/FS pulpotomy Group
RCT GroupActive comparatorChildren randomized to this group will undergo the root canal therapy (RCT) technique.
Receives: Procedure: RCT Group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Comparison of MTA/FS Pulpotomy Versus RCT Treated Incisors With Acceptable Radiographic Outcome at 12 Months Post-procedure.

    Two disinterested pediatric dentists classified each treated incisor into one of three outcomes: N=incisor without pathologic change; Po=pathologic change present, follow-up recommended; and Px=pathologic change present, extract. Incisors rated N or Po were considered an acceptable radiographic outcome while incisors rated as Px were considered unacceptable.

    Measured: 12 months after the procedure

  2. Comparison of MTA/FS Pulpotomy Versus RCT Treated Incisors With Acceptable Radiographic Outcomes 18 Months Post-procedure.

    Two disinterested pediatric dentists classified each treated incisor into one of three outcomes: N=incisor without pathologic change; Po=pathologic change present, follow-up recommended; and Px=pathologic change present, extract. Incisors rated N or Po were considered an acceptable radiographic outcome while incisors rated as Px were considered unacceptable.

    Measured: 18 months after the procedure

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Comparison of MTA/FS Pulpotomy Versus RCT Treated Incisors With Unacceptable Clinical Outcome at 12 Months Post-procedure.

    Pulp treated incisors presenting with spontaneous pain, tenderness to percussion, fistula/sinus tract, soft tissue swelling and/or pathological tooth mobility were considered unacceptable clinical outcomes. Clinical outcomes between the MTA/FS pulpotomy and RCT groups were compared using Fisher's Exact test.

    Measured: 12 months after the procedure

  2. Comparison of MTA/FS Pulpotomy Versus RCT Treated Incisors With Unacceptable Clinical Outcome at 18 Months Post-procedure.

    Pulp treated incisors presenting with spontaneous pain, tenderness to percussion, fistula/sinus tract, soft tissue swelling and/or pathological tooth mobility were considered unacceptable clinical outcomes.

    Measured: 18 months after the procedure

  3. MTA/FS Pulpotomy and RCT Treated Incisor Survival

    Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for the MTA/FS pulpotomy and RCT treatment groups. One treated incisor was selected by random draw from each subject for survival analysis to preserve independence of observations. The log-rank test was used to statistically compare survival of incisors.

    Measured: 12 and 18 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Dec 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2010
  3. Primary completionMay 2014
  4. Study completionSep 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
70 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02019563
Sponsor's protocol ID
1000019443
Acronym
MTA/FS
Status last verified
Feb 2016
First submitted
18 Dec 2013
Last updated
11 Feb 2016
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing RCT Group and MTA/FS pulpotomy Group in people with Dental Caries and Dental Pulp Exposure, run by The Hospital for Sick Children at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 11 Feb 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Comparison of MTA/FS Pulpotomy Versus RCT Treated Incisors With Acceptable Radiographic Outcome at 12 Months Post-procedure. (time frame: 12 months after the procedure). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Feb 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in