AzTrials
AzTrials

Oxygenation IndexNCT02026739

The Optimal Intraoperative Supplemental Oxygen Administration During Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

A study testing low supplemental oxygen concentration and high supplemental oxygen concentration (conventional) in people with Oxygenation Index, run by Tan, Lijie at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study hypothesized that a relative low oxygen concentration (40%) supplemental would be advantageous to protect the pulmonary function of patients, comparied with conventional high oxygen concentration (80%). Therefore we raise this prospective randomized controlled research. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Oxygenation Index
What is being tested?
low supplemental oxygen concentration and high supplemental oxygen concentration (conventional)
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Sep 2013to Jul 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Clinical Staged T1-3N0M0 esophageal cancer patients or: patients who were restaged as T1-3N0M0 esophageal cancer after neo-adjuvant therapy.
  • Patients underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy(Thoracolaparoscopic McKeown procedure).

Who cannot join

  • Patients with previous thoracic surgery history.
  • Patients with severe Co-morbidity.
  • Pulmonary function is abnormal in the examination before surgery.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Division of Thoracic Surgery & Anesthesiology, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200032

    Hao Wang, MD, wang.hao@zs-hospital.sh.cn

    Fang Fang, MD, fang.fang@zs-hospital.sh.cn

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: The Impact of Different Intraoperative Supplemental Oxygen Administration on the Pulmonary Function Following Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

The study hypothesized that a relative low oxygen concentration (40%) supplemental would be advantageous to protect the pulmonary function of patients, comparied with conventional high oxygen concentration (80%). Therefore we raise this prospective randomized controlled research.

Read the detailed description

Patients underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy in Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University will be enrolled and be randomizedly assigned to low oxygen concentration (40%) supplemental or high oxygen concentration(80%) supplemental group. Intra-operative and post-operative pressure of Oxygen in Arterial Blood will be examined, and the surgical outcome will be recorded in the two groups.

Being tested
low supplemental oxygen concentration, high supplemental oxygen concentration (conventional)
Keywords
minimally invasive esophagectomy; pulmonary function

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • low supplemental oxygen concentrationProcedure or surgery

    low supplemental oxygen concentration would be used during the surgery

  • high supplemental oxygen concentration (conventional)Procedure or surgery

    high supplemental oxygen concentration would be used during the surgery

Study groups in NCT02026739
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
low supplemental oxygen concentrationExperimentalThe group in which low supplemental oxygen concentration of 40% will be performed during minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Receives: Procedure: low supplemental oxygen concentration
high supplemental oxygen concentration (conventional)Active comparatorThe group in which high supplemental oxygen concentration (onventional) of 80% will be performed during minimally invasive esophagectomy.
Receives: Procedure: high supplemental oxygen concentration (conventional)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The change of oxygenation index

    The change of oxygenation index is an important index to indicate the pulmonary function of patients.

    Measured: Change from Baseline at post-operative Day1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Jan 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2013
  3. Primary completionJun 2014 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2014 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02026739
Sponsor's protocol ID
ZSHTA2013001
Status last verified
Dec 2013
First submitted
31 Oct 2013
Last updated
3 Jan 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing low supplemental oxygen concentration and high supplemental oxygen concentration (conventional) in people with Oxygenation Index, run by Tan, Lijie at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Jan 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Hao Wang, MD (+86-21-64041990 ext. 2914, wang.hao@zs-hospital.sh.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The change of oxygenation index (time frame: Change from Baseline at post-operative Day1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Jan 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in