Necrotizing Soft Tissue InfectionPhase 2INSTINCTNCT02111161
Immunoglobulin for Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections: a Randomised Controlled Trial
A Phase 2 study testing IVIG (Privigen) and Saline 0.9% in people with Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection and Necrotizing Fasciitis, run by Anders Perner at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to estimate the effect of intravenous polyspecific immunoglobulin G (IVIG) compared with placebo (saline) on the patient-reported outcome measure Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) of the SF-36 in patients with necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection, Necrotizing Fasciitis, Gas Gangrene
- What is being tested?
- IVIG (Privigen) and Saline 0.9%
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- Apr 2014to Sep 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI) based on surgical findings
- Age >18 years
- Admitted to or planned to be admitted to the ICU at Rigshospitalet (RH)
Who cannot join
- >48 hour from the primary diagnosis to arrival at RH
- More than one dose of IVIG given within current admission
- Known hypersensitivity to IVIG
- Hyperprolinaemia (obtained from hospital notes)
- Pregnancy or breast feeding
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Denmark1 site
Dept. of Intensive Care 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Danmark, 2100
About this study
The purpose of this study is to estimate the effect of intravenous polyspecific immunoglobulin G (IVIG) compared with placebo (saline) on the patient-reported outcome measure Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) of the SF-36 in patients with necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI).
Read the detailed description
Patients with necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI) receive intravenous polyspecific immunoglobulin G (IVIG) as part of the standard treatment at Rigshospitalet. The current evidence available does not support neither the use of IVIG, nor omitting it, as adjuvant treatment of NSTI. With this trial the investigators will estimate the effects of IVIG on a patient-reported outcome and other important outcomes in patients with NSTI
Design A randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial where patients are randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either IVIG or an equal volume of 0.9% saline.
Location A single centre trial conducted at Dept. of Intensive Care 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet.
Randomisation Randomisation will be stratified according to primary presentation of NSTI on the extremities/head/neck (yes/no) as streptococci mainly affect these anatomical sites. Two randomisation lists, with varying block size, are generated. Two separate boxes contain sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes (SNOSE). Two people independent of the trial will generate the envelopes following the randomisation lists and will document that the envelopes are concordant with the randomisation lists. Staff at trial site will have access to the boxes around the clock, and will draw an envelope containing a patient randomisation- and medicine log document assigned either "Privigen" or "Saline" from one of the two boxes.
Intervention Trial medicine is given when the patient arrives at the ICU and the following two consecutive days. Alternatively, the first dose of trial medicine will be given in the operating theatre.The trial medicine will consist of either IVIG 25 g/day (250 ml) (Privigen, CSL Behring) or an equal volume of 0.9% saline. The dosage of IVIG is 25g/day for three consecutive days for all patients, which is according to the clinical protocol at Rigshospitalet. The treatment will be given according to the clinical protocol for Privigen at Rigshospitalet. The treating clinicians will decide all other interventions.
Blinding The trial medicine will be prepared in the ICU at the time of arrival of the patient and the following two consecutive days by an ICU nurse not otherwise involved in the care of the trial patient and is supervised by another staff member who as well is not involved in the care of the patient. Privigen has a slight yellowish appearance whereas saline is clear. Furthermore, Privigen is produced in bottles of 50 and 100 ml, respectively. A bottle of Privigen will be packed with a bag of saline, containing a corresponding number of millilitres, in a black plastic bag and sealed with a plastic strip. An orange, transparent infusion set (B. Braun, ref. 8700127SP) is inserted into either the Privigen bottle or the bag containing saline, dependent on whether the patient has been allocated to active treatment or placebo. The orange colour masks the fluid colour while allowing air bubbles to be seen. A piece of non-transparent tape will mask the drip chamber making it impossible to see the frothing of Privigen. For each of the three dosages of trial medicine, three bags are prepared, containing 100 ml, 100 ml and 50 ml respectively. The bag will be marked with an etiquette containing the patient number. If unblinding is necessary, this is easily done by looking in the envelope with the same patient number.
Medicine score The trial medicine batch number will be noted on the patient randomisation- and medicine log document by the ICU nurse preparing the trial medicine. The attending physician will prescribe "trial medicine" in the electronic medication file (CIS 3.9.1, Daintel).
Subgroup Analysis Presumed Streptococcal Infection A subgroup analysis will be performed on patients with primary presentation of NSTI on the extremities, neck or head as these are more likely to be streptococcal infections, in which the effects of IVIG may be different.
Data Registration Data will be entered into the electronically, web-based case report form (eCRF) from patient notes by trial personnel. The eCRF is specifically designed for this purpose.
Safety
Patients will be withdrawn from the trial protocol if the following occurs:
- SARs or SUSARs Patients withdrawn from the trial for the above mentioned reasons will receive the standard protocol treatment for NSTI with the exception of IVIG.
During the trial, Sponsor will send yearly reports on the occurrence of SARs to the Danish Health and Medicines Authority and Regional Ethics Committee.
Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reactions Suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions (SUSARs) will be defined as serious adverse reactions not described in the summary of product characteristics (SPC) for Privigen (no serious adverse reactions are described for 0.9% saline). Sponsor will report any SUSARs within 7 days to the Danish Health and Medicines Authority via Eudravigilance Clinical Trials Module, to the Regional Ethics Committee and to CSL Behring. During the trial, investigator will send yearly reports on the occurrence of SUSARs to the Danish Health and Medicines Authority and the Regional Ethics Committees.
Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) will not be recorded as an entity because the majority of ICU patients will experience several SAEs during their critical illness. In addition, most SAEs will be captured in the secondary outcome measures (SOFA scores and bleeding).
Termination of Trial The trial will be terminated prematurely in the case that new, definite information regarding the use of IVIG in patients with NSTI arises.
Sample Size Estimation 50 subjects in each group are needed to detect a difference of 7 points in PCS of SF-36 based on an expected score of 42 (SD 11) in the control group (data from our own follow-up studies), for a power of 80% and a two-tailed significance level of 0.05, and an expected 1-year mortality rate of 20%.
Statistical Methods Analysis will be by intention-to-treat comparing PCS of SF-36 in the two groups after six months by chi-squared test and multiple logistic regression analysis using unadjusted analyses and analyses adjusted for patient variables (SAPS II and SOFA score in the 24 h prior to randomisation).
Patients Included In Final Statistical Analysis Patients who are withdrawn from the trial protocol will be followed up and analysed as the remaining patients. Patients who are transferred to another ICU will be followed up for the primary outcome measure. Patients who are withdrawn will not be replaced by new patients, with the exception of the specific case, where the patient demands deletion of all registered data.
Accountability Procedure for Missing Data Imputation will be used if missingness >5%.
Interim Analysis An interim analysis will not be performed as analyses of a sample size below the planned 100 patients are less meaningful for those outcomes that are of relevance (mortality and SARs).
Monitoring
We will perform Good Clinical Practice (GCP)-monitoring according to a predefined monitoring plan including the following issues:
- Initiation visit
- For all patients: Documented informed consent
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
- Documented delivery or non-delivery in the eCRF of the intervention according to the protocol compared with source data being patients' hospital records
- Termination visit: Primary outcome
Data Handling and Record Keeping Data will be handled according to the National Data Protection Agency, and is protected by the national law "Loven om behandling af personoplysninger" and "Sundhedsloven". All original records (incl. consent forms, eCRFs, and relevant correspondences) will be archived at trial site for 15 years. The clean electronic trial database file will be delivered to the Danish Data Archive and maintained for 15 years and anonymised if requested by the authorities.
Quality Control and Quality Assurance The subinvestigator will be responsible for preparing the research nurses and other trial site personnel before the initiation of the trial. This education will be continuously documented.
Monitoring of the Intervention Groups Day-to-day monitoring of the eCRF will be done by persons delegated to this specific task.
Ethics The trial will adhere to the Helsinki Declaration and Danish law. Inclusion will start after approval by the Regional Ethics Committee, the Danish Health and Medicines Authority and the National Data Protection Agency (via the Joint Notification System of The Capital Region of Denmark - Region Hovedstaden) and trial registration at www.clinicaltrials.gov.
- Being tested
- IVIG (Privigen), Saline 0.9%
- Keywords
- Randomised controlled trial (RCT), Immunoglobulin, Patient Reported Outcome, Health-Related Quality of Life, Short Form-36 (SF-36)
- Medical subject headings
- Fasciitis, Necrotizing, Gas Gangrene, Fournier Gangrene
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IVIG (Privigen)Drug
Also called Privigen, Immunoglobulin G
Three doses of 25 g IVIG (250 ml)
Saline 0.9%Drug
Also called NaCl
Three doses of Saline 0.9% (250 ml)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| IVIG (Privigen) | Active comparator | Intravenous polyspecific immunoglobulin G (Privigen). Dosage: 25 g/day (250 ml) for three consecutive days Receives: Drug: IVIG (Privigen) |
| Saline 0.9% | Placebo comparator | 0.9% saline for Intravenous administration. Dosage: 250 ml for three consecutive days. Receives: Drug: Saline 0.9% |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) of Short-Form 36 (SF-36)
Measured: Six months after randomisation
Secondary outcomes (11)
Mortality
Measured: 28, 90 and 180 days
Time to resolution of shock
Maintenance of a systolic blood pressure of at least 90 mmHg without vasopressor support for 24 hours
Measured: During ICU admission (expected average of 8 days)
Severe bleeding
Clinical bleeding and use of 3 units of red blood cells (RBCs) within 24 hours at any time in the ICU
Measured: During ICU admission (expected average of 8 days)
Any bleeding in the ICU
Measured: During ICU admission (expected average of 8 days)
Use of blood products
Total volumes during the ICU admission
Measured: During ICU admission
SOFA scores (AUC), excluding the Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) score
Measured: Day 1-7
Use of renal replcement therapy (RRT), ventilation and vasopressor in the ICU
Measured: During ICU admission (expected average of 8 days)
Days alive off life support in the 90 days after randomisation
Measured: 90 days after randomisation
Days alive and out of hospital in the 180 day follow-up period
Measured: 180 day follow-up period
Amputation, any location
Measured: Within 180 days
Serious Adverse Reactions (SARs) in the ICU
- Allergic reactions
- Haemolytic anaemia
- Aseptic meningitis syndrome
- Thrombus
- Transmittable agents
- Acute kidney injury
Measured: During ICU admission (expected average of 8 days)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2014
- Primary completionSep 2016
- Study completionSep 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Necrotizing Soft Tissue InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Anders Perner
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- CSL Behring
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Anders Perner, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
- Investigators
- Anders Perner, Professor, Principal investigator, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02111161
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RH4131-03
- Acronym
- INSTINCT
- Status last verified
- Sep 2016
- First submitted
- 3 Apr 2014
- Last updated
- 30 Sep 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Bergsten H, Madsen MB, Bergey F, Hyldegaard O, Skrede S, Arnell P, Oppegaard O, Itzek A, Perner A, Svensson M, Norrby-Teglund A; INFECT Study Group. Correlation Between Immunoglobulin Dose Administered and Plasma Neutralization of Streptococcal Superantigens in Patients With Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 23;71(7):1772-1775. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa022.
PubMed 31916575Madsen MB, Hjortrup PB, Hansen MB, Lange T, Norrby-Teglund A, Hyldegaard O, Perner A. Immunoglobulin G for patients with necrotising soft tissue infection (INSTINCT): a randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Nov;43(11):1585-1593. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4786-0. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
PubMed 28421246Madsen MB, Lange T, Hjortrup PB, Perner A. Immunoglobulin for necrotising soft tissue infections (INSTINCT): protocol for a randomised trial. Dan Med J. 2016 Jul;63(7):A5250.
PubMed 27399982
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Sep 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Immunoglobulin for Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections: a Randomised Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02111161
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INSTINCT / RH4131-03
- Keywords
- Randomised controlled trial (RCT), Immunoglobulin, Patient Reported Outcome, Health-Related Quality of Life, Short Form-36 (SF-36)
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Anders PernerUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- CSL Behring
- Study start
- Apr 2014
- Primary completion
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Apr 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to estimate the effect of intravenous polyspecific immunoglobulin G (IVIG) compared with placebo (saline) on the patient-reported outcome measure Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) of the SF-36 in patients with necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI).
Detailed description
Patients with necrotizing soft tissue infections (NSTI) receive intravenous polyspecific immunoglobulin G (IVIG) as part of the standard treatment at Rigshospitalet. The current evidence available does not support neither the use of IVIG, nor omitting it, as adjuvant treatment of NSTI. With this trial the investigators will estimate the effects of IVIG on a patient-reported outcome and other important outcomes in patients with NSTI
Design A randomized, double-blinded, clinical trial where patients are randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either IVIG or an equal volume of 0.9% saline.
Location A single centre trial conducted at Dept. of Intensive Care 4131, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet.
Randomisation Randomisation will be stratified according to primary presentation of NSTI on the extremities/head/neck (yes/no) as streptococci mainly affect these anatomical sites. Two randomisation lists, with varying block size, are generated. Two separate boxes contain sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes (SNOSE). Two people independent of the trial will generate the envelopes following the randomisation lists and will document that the envelopes are concordant with the randomisation lists. Staff at trial site will have access to the boxes around the clock, and will draw an envelope containing a patient randomisation- and medicine log document assigned either "Privigen" or "Saline" from one of the two boxes.
Intervention Trial medicine is given when the patient arrives at the ICU and the following two consecutive days. Alternatively, the first dose of trial medicine will be given in the operating theatre.The trial medicine will consist of either IVIG 25 g/day (250 ml) (Privigen, CSL Behring) or an equal volume of 0.9% saline. The dosage of IVIG is 25g/day for three consecutive days for all patients, which is according to the clinical protocol at Rigshospitalet. The treatment will be given according to the clinical protocol for Privigen at Rigshospitalet. The treating clinicians will decide all other interventions.
Blinding The trial medicine will be prepared in the ICU at the time of arrival of the patient and the following two consecutive days by an ICU nurse not otherwise involved in the care of the trial patient and is supervised by another staff member who as well is not involved in the care of the patient. Privigen has a slight yellowish appearance whereas saline is clear. Furthermore, Privigen is produced in bottles of 50 and 100 ml, respectively. A bottle of Privigen will be packed with a bag of saline, containing a corresponding number of millilitres, in a black plastic bag and sealed with a plastic strip. An orange, transparent infusion set (B. Braun, ref. 8700127SP) is inserted into either the Privigen bottle or the bag containing saline, dependent on whether the patient has been allocated to active treatment or placebo. The orange colour masks the fluid colour while allowing air bubbles to be seen. A piece of non-transparent tape will mask the drip chamber making it impossible to see the frothing of Privigen. For each of the three dosages of trial medicine, three bags are prepared, containing 100 ml, 100 ml and 50 ml respectively. The bag will be marked with an etiquette containing the patient number. If unblinding is necessary, this is easily done by looking in the envelope with the same patient number.
Medicine score The trial medicine batch number will be noted on the patient randomisation- and medicine log document by the ICU nurse preparing the trial medicine. The attending physician will prescribe "trial medicine" in the electronic medication file (CIS 3.9.1, Daintel).
Subgroup Analysis Presumed Streptococcal Infection A subgroup analysis will be performed on patients with primary presentation of NSTI on the extremities, neck or head as these are more likely to be streptococcal infections, in which the effects of IVIG may be different.
Data Registration Data will be entered into the electronically, web-based case report form (eCRF) from patient notes by trial personnel. The eCRF is specifically designed for this purpose.
Safety
Patients will be withdrawn from the trial protocol if the following occurs:
- SARs or SUSARs Patients withdrawn from the trial for the above mentioned reasons will receive the standard protocol treatment for NSTI with the exception of IVIG.
During the trial, Sponsor will send yearly reports on the occurrence of SARs to the Danish Health and Medicines Authority and Regional Ethics Committee.
Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reactions Suspected unexpected serious adverse reactions (SUSARs) will be defined as serious adverse reactions not described in the summary of product characteristics (SPC) for Privigen (no serious adverse reactions are described for 0.9% saline). Sponsor will report any SUSARs within 7 days to the Danish Health and Medicines Authority via Eudravigilance Clinical Trials Module, to the Regional Ethics Committee and to CSL Behring. During the trial, investigator will send yearly reports on the occurrence of SUSARs to the Danish Health and Medicines Authority and the Regional Ethics Committees.
Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) will not be recorded as an entity because the majority of ICU patients will experience several SAEs during their critical illness. In addition, most SAEs will be captured in the secondary outcome measures (SOFA scores and bleeding).
Termination of Trial The trial will be terminated prematurely in the case that new, definite information regarding the use of IVIG in patients with NSTI arises.
Sample Size Estimation 50 subjects in each group are needed to detect a difference of 7 points in PCS of SF-36 based on an expected score of 42 (SD 11) in the control group (data from our own follow-up studies), for a power of 80% and a two-tailed significance level of 0.05, and an expected 1-year mortality rate of 20%.
Statistical Methods Analysis will be by intention-to-treat comparing PCS of SF-36 in the two groups after six months by chi-squared test and multiple logistic regression analysis using unadjusted analyses and analyses adjusted for patient variables (SAPS II and SOFA score in the 24 h prior to randomisation).
Patients Included In Final Statistical Analysis Patients who are withdrawn from the trial protocol will be followed up and analysed as the remaining patients. Patients who are transferred to another ICU will be followed up for the primary outcome measure. Patients who are withdrawn will not be replaced by new patients, with the exception of the specific case, where the patient demands deletion of all registered data.
Accountability Procedure for Missing Data Imputation will be used if missingness >5%.
Interim Analysis An interim analysis will not be performed as analyses of a sample size below the planned 100 patients are less meaningful for those outcomes that are of relevance (mortality and SARs).
Monitoring
We will perform Good Clinical Practice (GCP)-monitoring according to a predefined monitoring plan including the following issues:
- Initiation visit
- For all patients: Documented informed consent
- Inclusion and exclusion criteria
- Documented delivery or non-delivery in the eCRF of the intervention according to the protocol compared with source data being patients' hospital records
- Termination visit: Primary outcome
Data Handling and Record Keeping Data will be handled according to the National Data Protection Agency, and is protected by the national law "Loven om behandling af personoplysninger" and "Sundhedsloven". All original records (incl. consent forms, eCRFs, and relevant correspondences) will be archived at trial site for 15 years. The clean electronic trial database file will be delivered to the Danish Data Archive and maintained for 15 years and anonymised if requested by the authorities.
Quality Control and Quality Assurance The subinvestigator will be responsible for preparing the research nurses and other trial site personnel before the initiation of the trial. This education will be continuously documented.
Monitoring of the Intervention Groups Day-to-day monitoring of the eCRF will be done by persons delegated to this specific task.
Ethics The trial will adhere to the Helsinki Declaration and Danish law. Inclusion will start after approval by the Regional Ethics Committee, the Danish Health and Medicines Authority and the National Data Protection Agency (via the Joint Notification System of The Capital Region of Denmark - Region Hovedstaden) and trial registration at www.clinicaltrials.gov.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| IVIG (Privigen) | Active comparator | Drug: IVIG (Privigen)Intravenous polyspecific immunoglobulin G (Privigen). Dosage: 25 g/day (250 ml) for three consecutive days |
| Saline 0.9% | Placebo comparator | Drug: Saline 0.9%0.9% saline for Intravenous administration. Dosage: 250 ml for three consecutive days. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Necrotizing soft tissue infection (NSTI) based on surgical findings
- Age >18 years
- Admitted to or planned to be admitted to the ICU at Rigshospitalet (RH)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- >48 hour from the primary diagnosis to arrival at RH
- More than one dose of IVIG given within current admission
- Known hypersensitivity to IVIG
- Hyperprolinaemia (obtained from hospital notes)
- Pregnancy or breast feeding
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IVIG (Privigen)Also: Privigen, Immunoglobulin GThree doses of 25 g IVIG (250 ml) | Drug | IVIG (Privigen) |
| Saline 0.9%Also: NaClThree doses of Saline 0.9% (250 ml) | Drug | Saline 0.9% |
Primary outcome
Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) of Short-Form 36 (SF-36)
Time frame: Six months after randomisation
11 secondary outcomes
Mortality
Time frame: 28, 90 and 180 days
Time to resolution of shock
Time frame: During ICU admission (expected average of 8 days)
Severe bleeding
Time frame: During ICU admission (expected average of 8 days)
Any bleeding in the ICU
Time frame: During ICU admission (expected average of 8 days)
Use of blood products
Time frame: During ICU admission
SOFA scores (AUC), excluding the Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) score
Time frame: Day 1-7
Use of renal replcement therapy (RRT), ventilation and vasopressor in the ICU
Time frame: During ICU admission (expected average of 8 days)
Days alive off life support in the 90 days after randomisation
Time frame: 90 days after randomisation
Days alive and out of hospital in the 180 day follow-up period
Time frame: 180 day follow-up period
Amputation, any location
Time frame: Within 180 days
Serious Adverse Reactions (SARs) in the ICU
Time frame: During ICU admission (expected average of 8 days)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Sep 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31916575Bergsten H, Madsen MB, Bergey F, Hyldegaard O, Skrede S, Arnell P, Oppegaard O, Itzek A, Perner A, Svensson M, Norrby-Teglund A; INFECT Study Group. Correlation Between Immunoglobulin Dose Administered and Plasma Neutralization of Streptococcal Superantigens in Patients With Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 23;71(7):1772-1775. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa022.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28421246Madsen MB, Hjortrup PB, Hansen MB, Lange T, Norrby-Teglund A, Hyldegaard O, Perner A. Immunoglobulin G for patients with necrotising soft tissue infection (INSTINCT): a randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled trial. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Nov;43(11):1585-1593. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4786-0. Epub 2017 Apr 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27399982Madsen MB, Lange T, Hjortrup PB, Perner A. Immunoglobulin for necrotising soft tissue infections (INSTINCT): protocol for a randomised trial. Dan Med J. 2016 Jul;63(7):A5250.
Related trials for Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection
RecruitingObservational study
Real-Time Diagnosis of Life-Threatening Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections (NSTI) Using Indocyanine Green (ICG) Kinetic Modeling
Necrotizing Fascitis
Recruiting
Irrigating vs Traditional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy to Treat Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections
Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infections
Recruiting
The Management of Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection Wounds With Cytal® Wound Matrix and MicroMatrix®
Necrotizing Fascitis, Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Urinary Bladder Matrix (UBM) Registry
Tissue Repair, Soft Tissue Reconstruction
RecruitingPhase 4
Adjunctive Hyperbaric Oxygen Treatment for Patients With Necrotizing Soft-Tissue Infection (HOT-NSTI Trial).
Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anders Perner, Professor principal investigator
Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing IVIG (Privigen) and Saline 0.9% in people with Necrotizing Soft Tissue Infection and Necrotizing Fasciitis, run by Anders Perner at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) of Short-Form 36 (SF-36) (time frame: Six months after randomisation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02111161, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Sep 2016.