Carpal Tunnel SyndromeNCT02198521
Staged Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Release: Which Side Hurts More?
An observational study of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Pain, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Title Staged Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Release: Which Side Hurts More? Primary null hypothesis Patients undergoing staged bilateral open Carpal Tunnel Release (CTR) have no difference in overall pain intensity of pain between sides. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Pain
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2014to Sep 2016
- How long will I take part?
- 6 Months
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Bilateral CTS patients undergoing bilateral carpal tunnel release
Who may be able to join
- Age 18 or older
- Idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome
- No prior surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome
Who cannot join
- Pregnant women
- Not fluent in English
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
About this study
Title Staged Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Release: Which Side Hurts More? Primary null hypothesis Patients undergoing staged bilateral open Carpal Tunnel Release (CTR) have no difference in overall pain intensity of pain between sides.
Secondary null hypotheses
Read more
- There is no correlation in overall pain intensity after open CTR surgery and distal sensory latency, distal motor latency, electromyography (EMG), demographics, occupation, avocation, relevant comorbidities, dominance, left vs. right, Pain Self-Efficacy, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity or PROMIS depression when both surgeries are performed within 6 months.
- There is no difference in satisfaction with treatment at the time of suture removal after the first and second open CTR surgery when both are performed within 6 months..
IRB: 2009-p-001-019 ClinicalTrials.gov: Not mandatory, (b/o observational) Authors: Drijkoningen, Braun, Ring Journal: To be discussed Design: Prospective cohort study Background Many hand surgeons note that patients undergoing staged bilateral open carpal tunnel release often experience more pain with the second side. The investigator felt this was an easily testable hypothesis worthy of study.
Subjects
Eligibility:
Inclusion:
- Age 18 or older
- Idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome
- No prior surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome
Exclude:
- Pregnant women
- Not fluent in English
Response Variables:
- 11-point ordinal measure of overall pain intensity during and after surgery measured at the time of suture removal.
- 11-point ordinal measure of satisfaction with treatment
- PROMIS upper extremity
Explanatory Variables:
- Distal Sensory Latency (DSL)
- Distal Motor Latency (DML)
- EMG changes
- Demographics: age, sex, race, occupation, avocation
- Time limit between two surgeries < 6 months
- Relevant comorbidities: Trapeziometacarpal (TMC) arthrosis, ulnar neuropathy, trigger finger
- Involved hand (Dominance, Side)
- First side vs. second side surgery
- PROMIS Pain Interference Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT)
- Pain Self Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-2)
- PROMIS Depression
Methods The investigator and study staff will invite all adult patients (age 18 and older) presenting to the Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service Department at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome planning staged bilateral carpal tunnel release.
Analysis Power analysis An a priori power analysis for matched pairs was performed. To detect the difference between two dependent means an effect size of 0.5 at alpha of 0.05 and 80% power, a total sample size of 34 patients is needed.As the investigator expects to have patients who will be lost to follow-up the investigators will count 10% extra, a total of 38 patients will be needed.
Univariate analysis: Variables will be presented with frequencies and percentages for categorical variables and as mean with standard deviation or median with interquartile range for respectively normal or non-normal distributed continuous variables. Normality of continuous distributed variables will be tested a paired T-Test.
Bivariate and multivariable analysis will be performed and subsequently all variables with a probability < 0.10 in bivariate analysis will be inserted in a backward, stepwise, multivariable linear regression analysis to assess their ability to explain variation in outcome. The 11 point Likert Pain scale score is considered significant when there is a difference of more than 1.4 points (2.8 SD*0.5 effect size)on a scale from 1-10.[9]
- Conditions
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Pain
- Keywords
- Patients undergoing staged bilateral open Carpal Tunnel Release (CTR) have no difference in overall pain intensity of pain between sides.
- Medical subject headings
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall Pain Intensity
The overall pain intensity is measured on an 11-point ordinal measure of overall pain intensity after surgery measured at the time of suture removal.
Measured: 2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframe
Secondary outcomes (9)
Overall Satisfaction
11-point ordinal measure of satisfaction with treatment measured 2 weeks after surgery during suture removal
Measured: 2 weeks after surgery within a 6 month timeframe
Patient Reported Outcome for Upper Extremity Function
PROMIS upper extremity
Measured: 2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframe
Electromyogram Results
EMG DSL and DML
Measured: Before Surgery
Demographics
Age, sex, race, occupation, avocation
Measured: 2 weeks after first surgery
Comorbidities
Relevant comorbidities: TMC Arthrosis, ulnar neuropathy, trigger finger
Measured: 2 weeks after surgery
Hand Dominance and Side of Surgery
Measured: 2 weeks after surgery
Patient Reported Pain Interference
PROMIS Pain Interference (CAT)
Measured: 2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframe
Patient Self Efficacy Questionnaire
PSEQ-2
Measured: 2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframe
Patient Reported Depression
PROMIS Depression
Measured: 2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframe
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2014
- Primary completionSep 2016
- Study completionSep 2016
Why it stopped: The researcher and principal investigator working on this study left the institution.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Carpal Tunnel SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Massachusetts General HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 6 Months
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, David C. Ring, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02198521
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2009P001019 AME 339
- Status last verified
- Feb 2017
- First submitted
- 10 Jun 2014
- Last updated
- 3 Feb 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Feb 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Staged Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Release: Which Side Hurts More?
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02198521
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2009P001019 AME 339
- Conditions
- Carpal Tunnel Syndrome, Pain
- Keywords
- Patients undergoing staged bilateral open Carpal Tunnel Release (CTR) have no difference in overall pain intensity of pain between sides.
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: The researcher and principal investigator working on this study left the institution.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Massachusetts General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2014
- Primary completion
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2016
- First posted
- 23 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Title Staged Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Release: Which Side Hurts More? Primary null hypothesis Patients undergoing staged bilateral open Carpal Tunnel Release (CTR) have no difference in overall pain intensity of pain between sides.
Secondary null hypotheses
- There is no correlation in overall pain intensity after open CTR surgery and distal sensory latency, distal motor latency, electromyography (EMG), demographics, occupation, avocation, relevant comorbidities, dominance, left vs. right, Pain Self-Efficacy, Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity or PROMIS depression when both surgeries are performed within 6 months.
- There is no difference in satisfaction with treatment at the time of suture removal after the first and second open CTR surgery when both are performed within 6 months..
IRB: 2009-p-001-019 ClinicalTrials.gov: Not mandatory, (b/o observational) Authors: Drijkoningen, Braun, Ring Journal: To be discussed Design: Prospective cohort study Background Many hand surgeons note that patients undergoing staged bilateral open carpal tunnel release often experience more pain with the second side. The investigator felt this was an easily testable hypothesis worthy of study.
Subjects
Eligibility:
Inclusion:
- Age 18 or older
- Idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome
- No prior surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome
Exclude:
- Pregnant women
- Not fluent in English
Response Variables:
- 11-point ordinal measure of overall pain intensity during and after surgery measured at the time of suture removal.
- 11-point ordinal measure of satisfaction with treatment
- PROMIS upper extremity
Explanatory Variables:
- Distal Sensory Latency (DSL)
- Distal Motor Latency (DML)
- EMG changes
- Demographics: age, sex, race, occupation, avocation
- Time limit between two surgeries < 6 months
- Relevant comorbidities: Trapeziometacarpal (TMC) arthrosis, ulnar neuropathy, trigger finger
- Involved hand (Dominance, Side)
- First side vs. second side surgery
- PROMIS Pain Interference Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT)
- Pain Self Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-2)
- PROMIS Depression
Methods The investigator and study staff will invite all adult patients (age 18 and older) presenting to the Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service Department at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome planning staged bilateral carpal tunnel release.
Analysis Power analysis An a priori power analysis for matched pairs was performed. To detect the difference between two dependent means an effect size of 0.5 at alpha of 0.05 and 80% power, a total sample size of 34 patients is needed.As the investigator expects to have patients who will be lost to follow-up the investigators will count 10% extra, a total of 38 patients will be needed.
Univariate analysis: Variables will be presented with frequencies and percentages for categorical variables and as mean with standard deviation or median with interquartile range for respectively normal or non-normal distributed continuous variables. Normality of continuous distributed variables will be tested a paired T-Test.
Bivariate and multivariable analysis will be performed and subsequently all variables with a probability < 0.10 in bivariate analysis will be inserted in a backward, stepwise, multivariable linear regression analysis to assess their ability to explain variation in outcome. The 11 point Likert Pain scale score is considered significant when there is a difference of more than 1.4 points (2.8 SD*0.5 effect size)on a scale from 1-10.[9]
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 6 Months
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Bilateral Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) | – | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Bilateral CTS patients undergoing bilateral carpal tunnel release
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age 18 or older
- Idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome
- No prior surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Pregnant women
- Not fluent in English
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Overall Pain Intensity
Time frame: 2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframe
The overall pain intensity is measured on an 11-point ordinal measure of overall pain intensity after surgery measured at the time of suture removal.
9 secondary outcomes
Overall Satisfaction
Time frame: 2 weeks after surgery within a 6 month timeframe
Patient Reported Outcome for Upper Extremity Function
Time frame: 2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframe
Electromyogram Results
Time frame: Before Surgery
Demographics
Time frame: 2 weeks after first surgery
Comorbidities
Time frame: 2 weeks after surgery
Hand Dominance and Side of Surgery
Time frame: 2 weeks after surgery
Patient Reported Pain Interference
Time frame: 2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframe
Patient Self Efficacy Questionnaire
Time frame: 2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframe
Patient Reported Depression
Time frame: 2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframe
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Feb 2017.
Related trials for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Recruiting
Hand Function Outcome After the Application of Transfer Energy Capacitive and Resistive on Post-burn Patients Presented With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) Post-burn
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Progressive Gamified Motor Rehabilitation After Carpal Tunnel Release
Carpal Tunnel Surgery
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Symptom Recovery Time After the Phalen Test in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of Sensorimotor Proprioceptive Stimulation Combined With Conventional Physical Therapy on Symptoms, Sensory Function, Proprioception, and Hand Function in Patients With Mild-to-Moderate Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpel Tunnel Syndrome
Recruiting
Effect of Night-time and Full-time Splinting for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Pain, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall Pain Intensity (time frame: 2 weeks after surgery within 6 month timeframe). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Feb 2017.