Dental CariesNCT02274142
Primary Molars Restorations With Encapsulated or Hand-Mixed Glass Ionomer: Clinical Trial
A study testing Restoration with hand-mixed material, Restoration with Encapsulated material and Encapsulated glass ionomer cement (EQUIA - GC Corp). in people with Dental Caries, run by University of Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
The aim of this RCT is to evaluate the survival of different glass ionomer cement in minimally invasive restorations, with different handling characteristics: hand-mixed versus encapsulated. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 to 10 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Dental Caries
- What is being tested?
- Restoration with hand-mixed material, Restoration with Encapsulated material and Encapsulated glass ionomer cement (EQUIA - GC Corp).
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 145 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- Oct 2014to Oct 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 to 10 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Children who have sought treatment in the School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo;
- Children between 3 and 10 years old without systemic diseases;
- Children presenting at least one dentin caries cavity in primary teeth (occlusal or oclusoproximal) with no signs of pulp involvement.
Who cannot join
- Children whose parents did not agree to participate in the study;
- Children with behavioural issues at the initial exam or who did not assent to participate in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Minimally Invasive Restorations in Primary Molars Using Encapsulated ou Hand-mixed Glass Ionomer Cement: Clinical Trial With 24 Months of Follow-up
The aim of this RCT is to evaluate the survival of different glass ionomer cement in minimally invasive restorations, with different handling characteristics: hand-mixed versus encapsulated.
Read the detailed description
Detailed Description: This study was approved by the research ethics committee of the School of Dentistry (University of São Paulo, Brazil) and written informed consent will be obtained from the parents or legal guardians. The sample size was calculated based on the data obtained in a systematic review, which reported average longevity of 78% after 2 years of follow up (mean survival of occlusal and occlusoproximal surfaces). The minimum difference of 15% in the success rate between the control and treatment groups after 2 years of follow-up, with and α of 5% and power (strength) of 80% using paired test. As more than one tooth per children might be included, we must add a 20% for clustering. Adding 20% for possible losses the final estimate is 116 teeth per group, reaching a final sample of 232 teeth.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children who have sought treatment in the School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo;
- Children between 3 and 10 years old without systemic diseases;
- Children presenting at least one dentin caries cavity in primary teeth (occlusal or oclusoproximal) with no signs of pulp involvement.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Children whose parents did not agree to participate in the study;
- Children with behavioural issues at the initial exam or who did not assent to participate in the study.
Implementation:
All the occlusal and occlusoproximal restorations will be performed by two operators on the dental chair. The operators will be assisted by another dentist, who will be previously trained to mix the GIC according to the manufacturers' protocol. The children will be randomly assigned into two groups: Hand-mixed and encapsulated materials.
Treatment procedure:
The restorative technique will be performed according to the Minimal Intervention Dentistry. No local anaesthesia will be used during treatment. Rotary instruments can be used to open or to expand the cavity opening, removing only enamel. Infected carious dentin will be removed with hand instruments. The use of hand instruments on the dentin surface results in a smear layer and need to be removed by the use of dentine conditioner. The liquid component of the hand-mixed powder-liquid GIC, containing the acid component, will be used and saliva isolation will be done with cotton wool rolls. The cavities will be restored with one of the two GIC brands: Fuji IX (GC Europe, Leuven, BE) and EQUIA (GC Europe, Leuven, BE). A thin layer of petroleum jelly will be rubbed over the index finger and the restoration will be pressed for 20 seconds. The material will include sealing pits and the fissure. After preparing for a balanced occlusion, a new layer of petroleum jelly will be applied to the GIC restoration. The amount of GIC used, element number, cavity dimension and dmft will be recorded. The duration of the restorative procedure will be recorded with a stopwatch. The participating children will be instructed not to eat for one hour after the restoration is placed.
Evaluation:
The success of the restorations will be evaluated after 6 months according to the Frencken and Holmgren criteria for occlusal surfaces, and modified version of Roeleveld et al. (2006) criteria for occlusoproximal surfaces. A restoration will be considered as 'failure' when there is a defect in the filling when secondary caries is observed, when the restoration is not present or when the pulp is inflamed. When the restoration is still present or a slight defect is observed, it will be considered as 'success'. When the tooth is unavailable for evaluation, it will be censored. All evaluations will be carried out by two independent evaluators, who did not restore the cavities, trained and calibrated by a benchmark.
Estimation of cost-effectiveness:
The material cost (GICs) will be estimated per restoration. The average cost per restoration will be estimated. Costs of equipment, autoclave and hand instruments, disposables (hand gloves, face masks, cotton wool rolls), articulating paper and petroleum jelly used for the restorations are equal for both GIC groups and will be excluded. There will be no labour costs for the operators.
- Conditions
- Dental Caries
- Being tested
- Restoration with hand-mixed material, Restoration with Encapsulated material, Encapsulated glass ionomer cement (EQUIA - GC Corp)., powder-liquid glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX - GC Corp)
- Keywords
- dentinal caries, occlusal, occluso-proximal
- Medical subject headings
- Dental Caries, Bites and Stings
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Restoration with hand-mixed materialProcedure or surgery
Also called Minimally invasive restoration
restoration with hand-mixed glass ionomer cement
Restoration with Encapsulated materialProcedure or surgery
restoration with encapsulated ionomer cement
Encapsulated glass ionomer cement (EQUIA - GC Corp).Device
powder-liquid glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX - GC Corp)Device
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Restorations with Encapsulated material | Experimental | Restorations performed with encapsulated glass ionomer cement (EQUIA - GC Corp). Capsules with glass ionomer will be activated and applied after selective carious tissue removal in primary molars. Receives: Procedure: Restoration with Encapsulated material; Device: Encapsulated glass ionomer cement (EQUIA - GC Corp). |
| Restorations with Hand-Mixed material | Active comparator | Restorations will be performed with hand-mixed glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX - GC Corp) after selective carious tissue removal in primary molars. Receives: Procedure: Restoration with hand-mixed material; Device: powder-liquid glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX - GC Corp) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Restorations survival
The survival of restorations will be evaluated over 24 months according to the Frencken and Holmgren (1999) index for occlusal cavities and Roeleveld (2006) for occlusoproximal cavities.
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Cost-Effectiveness
Cost-effectiveness will be measured according to each restoration performed and the cost of all reinterventions.
Measured: 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2014
- Primary completionOct 2016
- Study completionOct 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Dental CariesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Sao PauloThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 145 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao Paulo
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Daniela Prócida Raggio, University of Sao Paulo
- Investigators
- Daniela Raggio, Professor, Principal investigator, University of Sao Paulo
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02274142
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MICARDEC
- Status last verified
- Mar 2021
- First submitted
- 15 Oct 2014
- Last updated
- 11 Mar 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Oliveira RC, Camargo LB, Novaes TF, Pontes LRA, Olegario IC, Gimenez T, Passaro AL, Tedesco TK, Braga MM, Mendes FM, Raggio DP. Survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated GIC: 24 months RCT. BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jul 23;21(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01710-0.
PubMed 34301217
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Mar 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Minimally Invasive Restorations in Primary Molars Using Encapsulated ou Hand-mixed Glass Ionomer Cement: Clinical Trial With 24 Months of Follow-up
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02274142
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MICARDEC
- Conditions
- Dental Caries
- Keywords
- dentinal caries, occlusal, occluso-proximal
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 145 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Sao PauloUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2014
- Primary completion
- Oct 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Oct 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this RCT is to evaluate the survival of different glass ionomer cement in minimally invasive restorations, with different handling characteristics: hand-mixed versus encapsulated.
Detailed description
Detailed Description: This study was approved by the research ethics committee of the School of Dentistry (University of São Paulo, Brazil) and written informed consent will be obtained from the parents or legal guardians. The sample size was calculated based on the data obtained in a systematic review, which reported average longevity of 78% after 2 years of follow up (mean survival of occlusal and occlusoproximal surfaces). The minimum difference of 15% in the success rate between the control and treatment groups after 2 years of follow-up, with and α of 5% and power (strength) of 80% using paired test. As more than one tooth per children might be included, we must add a 20% for clustering. Adding 20% for possible losses the final estimate is 116 teeth per group, reaching a final sample of 232 teeth.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children who have sought treatment in the School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo;
- Children between 3 and 10 years old without systemic diseases;
- Children presenting at least one dentin caries cavity in primary teeth (occlusal or oclusoproximal) with no signs of pulp involvement.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Children whose parents did not agree to participate in the study;
- Children with behavioural issues at the initial exam or who did not assent to participate in the study.
Implementation:
All the occlusal and occlusoproximal restorations will be performed by two operators on the dental chair. The operators will be assisted by another dentist, who will be previously trained to mix the GIC according to the manufacturers' protocol. The children will be randomly assigned into two groups: Hand-mixed and encapsulated materials.
Treatment procedure:
The restorative technique will be performed according to the Minimal Intervention Dentistry. No local anaesthesia will be used during treatment. Rotary instruments can be used to open or to expand the cavity opening, removing only enamel. Infected carious dentin will be removed with hand instruments. The use of hand instruments on the dentin surface results in a smear layer and need to be removed by the use of dentine conditioner. The liquid component of the hand-mixed powder-liquid GIC, containing the acid component, will be used and saliva isolation will be done with cotton wool rolls. The cavities will be restored with one of the two GIC brands: Fuji IX (GC Europe, Leuven, BE) and EQUIA (GC Europe, Leuven, BE). A thin layer of petroleum jelly will be rubbed over the index finger and the restoration will be pressed for 20 seconds. The material will include sealing pits and the fissure. After preparing for a balanced occlusion, a new layer of petroleum jelly will be applied to the GIC restoration. The amount of GIC used, element number, cavity dimension and dmft will be recorded. The duration of the restorative procedure will be recorded with a stopwatch. The participating children will be instructed not to eat for one hour after the restoration is placed.
Evaluation:
The success of the restorations will be evaluated after 6 months according to the Frencken and Holmgren criteria for occlusal surfaces, and modified version of Roeleveld et al. (2006) criteria for occlusoproximal surfaces. A restoration will be considered as 'failure' when there is a defect in the filling when secondary caries is observed, when the restoration is not present or when the pulp is inflamed. When the restoration is still present or a slight defect is observed, it will be considered as 'success'. When the tooth is unavailable for evaluation, it will be censored. All evaluations will be carried out by two independent evaluators, who did not restore the cavities, trained and calibrated by a benchmark.
Estimation of cost-effectiveness:
The material cost (GICs) will be estimated per restoration. The average cost per restoration will be estimated. Costs of equipment, autoclave and hand instruments, disposables (hand gloves, face masks, cotton wool rolls), articulating paper and petroleum jelly used for the restorations are equal for both GIC groups and will be excluded. There will be no labour costs for the operators.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Restorations with Encapsulated material | Experimental | Procedure: Restoration with Encapsulated material, Device: Encapsulated glass ionomer cement (EQUIA - GC Corp).Restorations performed with encapsulated glass ionomer cement (EQUIA - GC Corp). Capsules with glass ionomer will be activated and applied after selective carious tissue removal in primary molars. |
| Restorations with Hand-Mixed material | Active comparator | Procedure: Restoration with hand-mixed material, Device: powder-liquid glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX - GC Corp)Restorations will be performed with hand-mixed glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX - GC Corp) after selective carious tissue removal in primary molars. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 to 10 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Children who have sought treatment in the School of Dentistry, University of Sao Paulo;
- Children between 3 and 10 years old without systemic diseases;
- Children presenting at least one dentin caries cavity in primary teeth (occlusal or oclusoproximal) with no signs of pulp involvement.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Children whose parents did not agree to participate in the study;
- Children with behavioural issues at the initial exam or who did not assent to participate in the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Restoration with hand-mixed materialAlso: Minimally invasive restorationrestoration with hand-mixed glass ionomer cement | Procedure or surgery | Restorations with Hand-Mixed material |
| Restoration with Encapsulated materialrestoration with encapsulated ionomer cement | Procedure or surgery | Restorations with Encapsulated material |
| Encapsulated glass ionomer cement (EQUIA - GC Corp). | Device | Restorations with Encapsulated material |
| powder-liquid glass ionomer cement (Fuji IX - GC Corp) | Device | Restorations with Hand-Mixed material |
Primary outcome
Restorations survival
Time frame: 24 months
The survival of restorations will be evaluated over 24 months according to the Frencken and Holmgren (1999) index for occlusal cavities and Roeleveld (2006) for occlusoproximal cavities.
1 secondary outcome
Cost-Effectiveness
Time frame: 24 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Mar 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34301217Oliveira RC, Camargo LB, Novaes TF, Pontes LRA, Olegario IC, Gimenez T, Passaro AL, Tedesco TK, Braga MM, Mendes FM, Raggio DP. Survival rate of primary molar restorations is not influenced by hand mixed or encapsulated GIC: 24 months RCT. BMC Oral Health. 2021 Jul 23;21(1):371. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01710-0.
Related trials for Dental Caries
Active, not recruiting
Clinical Evaluation of a New Dual-cure Universal Adhesive
Class I Dental Restorations, Class II Dental Restorations
Not yet recruiting
Safety of Intraosseous Anaesthesia in Children With Haemophilia
Haemophilia A, Haemophilia B
Not yet recruiting
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Silver Diamine Fluoride Versus Light-Cured Silver Diamine Fluoride in Carious Primary Molars
Dental Caries
Not yet recruiting
Clinical Performance of CAD/CAM Hard Hybrid Ceramic Inlays Versus Resin Composite Inlays in Vital Molars With Extensive Occluso-Proximal Cavities
Dental Caries, Cavity, Dental
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Xylitol- Versus Erythritol-Sweetened Mints on Plaque ATP-Bioluminescence Readings
Dental Caries, Dental Plaque
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Daniela Raggio, Professor principal investigator
University of Sao Paulo
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Restoration with hand-mixed material, Restoration with Encapsulated material and Encapsulated glass ionomer cement (EQUIA - GC Corp). in people with Dental Caries, run by University of Sao Paulo at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Mar 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Restorations survival (time frame: 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02274142, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Mar 2021.