AzTrials
AzTrials

MacrosomiaIOLEMMTNCT02315820

Induction of Labor Versus Expectant Management of Large for Gestational Age/Macrosomic Babies at Term. A Multi-center Trial

A study testing Induction of labor group (Group I) in people with Macrosomia and Induction of Labor, run by The Baruch Padeh Medical Center, Poriya.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The equipoise whether to Induce pregnant women with suspected large for gestational babies or suspected macrosomia babies at term pregnancy is not solved yet. Only 2 relatively small studies were conducted to answer this clinically important question. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Induction of labor group (Group I)
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
474 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2015to Jul 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Singleton,
  • live fetus,
  • Vx presentation,
  • EFW 3800-4500 grams,
  • eligible for vaginal delivery,
  • signed the informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Pr. CS,
  • Diabetes,
  • fetal major malformations,
  • maternal/fetal illness or condition requiring IOL.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet.

About this study

Official title: Induction of Labor Versus Expectant Management of Large for Gestational Age/Macrosomic Babies at Term. A Multi-center Randomized Trial

The equipoise whether to Induce pregnant women with suspected large for gestational babies or suspected macrosomia babies at term pregnancy is not solved yet. Only 2 relatively small studies were conducted to answer this clinically important question.

The investigators will conduct a randomized controlled, multi-center study large enough to confirm or refute our assumption that induction of labor at term reduces the shoulder dystocia prevalence significantly compared to expectant management.

Read the detailed description

Background: Macrosomia at term is associated with increased maternal and neonatal morbidity, including a higher rate of shoulder dystocia and cesarean section (CS). Induction of labor (IOL) has been suggested as a means to prevent further fetal weight gain and therefore to reduce possible neonatal and maternal complications which are related to fetal weight.

Working hypothesis and aims: The aims of this study are: 1) to determine whether or not IOL improves maternal and neonatal outcome in large for gestational age babies, 2) to determine maternal satisfaction from the labor and delivery process in both study groups. Our working hypothesis is that IOL will reduce the shoulder dystocia and CS rate of LGA\macrosomic babies at term.

Methods: Patient from 38+0 - 40+3 gestational weeks estimated fetal weight 3800 - 4500 gr will prospectively and randomly allocated into two groups: IOL (group I) and expectant management (group II). Women with diabetes, a previous cesarean delivery, or other contraindications for vaginal delivery or candidates for IOL for other reasons will be excluded from the study. Outcome variables will include shoulder dystocia, brachial plexus injury, bone fractures, cephalhematoma, intraventricular hemorrhage, cesarean delivery and other neonatal and maternal variables.

Expected results: IOL will reduce the shoulder dystocia and CS rate of LGA\macrosomic babies at term.

Importance: This randomized, prospective multicenter study addresses a prevalent clinical question which does not have an accurate answer in the medical literature. Current guidelines rely on small numbered patients, and are over 15 years old studies.

Probable implications to Medicine: This study will establish the right management for LAG\macrosomic babies at term, IOL or expectant management for spontaneous labor.

Being tested
Induction of labor group (Group I)
Keywords
Macrosomia, Induction of labor, Expectant management, Shoulder dystocia
Medical subject headings
Shoulder Dystocia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Induction of labor group (Group I)Procedure or surgery

    Women at 38-40+3 weeks with estimated fetal weight 3800-4500 will be offered ripening and IOL.

Study groups in NCT02315820
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Induction of Labor (IOL)ExperimentalGroup I, Induction of Labor group (IOL). Women will be admitted for induction at 38-40+3 weeks when estimated fetal weight 3800-4500 gram.
Receives: Procedure: Induction of labor group (Group I)
ExpectantNo interventionGroup II. Will be expectantly managed until 40+6 weeks, or an induction indication will appear.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Rate of shoulder dystocia

    Measured: 3 years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Neonatal morbidity composite outcome and maternal morbidity composite outcome.

    For each study group a neonatal and maternal composite outcome will be presented. The neonatal composite outcome will include: Fetal death (before the onset of labor, during delivery, unknown), Neonatal death, Birth weight (grams), Apgar score 1 min, Apgar score 5 min, Cord PH, Shoulder dystocia, Erb palsy, 3rd/4th-degree lacerations, Intubation, CPAP or high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) for ventilation. Neonatal encephalopathy, Seizures, Sepsis, Pneumonia, Meconium aspiration syndrome, Birth fractures, IVH, Hyperbilirubinemia requiring phototherapy or exchange transfusion. Hypoglycemia (gl<40) requiring IV therapy. Admission to NICU, Neonatal hospital stay. The maternal morbidity composite outcome will include: Chorioamnionitis PPH Maternal febrile morbidity requiring antibiotics administration. Anemia requiring blood transfusion.

    Measured: 3 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Dec 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2015
  3. Primary completionDec 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
474 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02315820
Sponsor's protocol ID
POR-0085-14
Acronym
IOLEMMT
Status last verified
Dec 2014
First submitted
7 Dec 2014
Last updated
12 Dec 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Boulvain M, Thornton JG. Induction of labour at or near term for suspected fetal macrosomia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 8;3(3):CD000938. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000938.pub3.

    PubMed 36884238

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Induction of labor group (Group I) in people with Macrosomia and Induction of Labor, run by The Baruch Padeh Medical Center, Poriya.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Dec 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Yuri Perlitz, MD (+972-50-6267439, yperlitz@poria.health.gov.il), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Rate of shoulder dystocia (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02315820, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Dec 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in