RadiculopathyNCT02403453
RHINE™ Cervical Disc Clinical Study: A Prospective Observational Study for Patients Requiring 1-2 Level C-spine Surgery
An observational study of Radiculopathy and Myelopathy, run by K2M, Inc..
Trial summary
A Prospective, open label, multi-center observational study of patients requiring surgical treatment at one or two (contiguous) cervical spine levels. The primary objectives of the RHINE Cervical Disc study are to: obtain operative data and feedback on surgical instruments and surgical technique; confirm device… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Radiculopathy, Myelopathy, Spondylosis
- What is being tested?
- Rhine Cervical Disc
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 68 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jan 2016to Mar 2023
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients eligible for the study enrollment will be skeletally mature patients undergoing reconstruction of the disc from C3 to C7 following discectomy at one or two contiguous levels for intractable radiculopathy (arm pain and/or a neurological deficit) with or without neck pain, or myelopathy due to abnormality localized to the level of the disc space and at least one of the following conditions confirmed by radiographic imaging (CT, MRI, X-rays): herniated nucleus pulposus, spondylosis (defined by the presence of osteophytes), and/or visible loss of disc height compared to adjacent levels. Patients should have failed at least 6 weeks of non-operative treatment or demonstrated progressive signs or symptoms despite non-operative treatment prior to implantation.
Who may be able to join
- The patient requires reconstruction of the disc from C3 to C7 following discectomy at 1 or 2 (contiguous) levels for intractable radiculopathy (arm pain and/or a neurological deficit) with or without neck pain, or myelopathy due to abnormality localized to the level of the disc space and at least one of the following conditions confirmed by radiographic imaging (CT, MRI, X-rays): herniated nucleus pulposus, spondylosis (defined by the presence of osteophytes), and/or visible loss of disc height compared to adjacent levels.
- The patient has failed at least 6 weeks of non-operative treatment or demonstrated progressive signs or symptoms despite non-operative treatment prior to implantation.
- Self-reports a pre-operative upper extremity (right or left) VAS pain score ≥ 20 (0-100).
- Self-reports pre-operative NDI score ≥ 30% (raw score of ≥ 15/50).
- Willing and able to comply with the protocol requirements including follow-up visit schedule.
- Willing and able to sign a study specific informed consent.
Who cannot join
- More than two cervical levels requiring surgery, or has two levels requiring surgery that are not adjacent.
- Previous surgical intervention at the target level(s)
- Any of the following at the target level(s):
- Significant cervical anatomical deformity, e.g., ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, etc.
- Moderate to advanced spondylosis. Patients who demonstrate advanced degenerative changes characterized by any of the following: bridging osteophytes, marked reduction or absence of motion (< 2 degrees change from flexion to extension), collapse of the intervertebral disc space of greater than 50% of its normal height (compared to adjacent levels)
- Radiographic signs of subluxation > 3.5 mm
Show all 30Show fewer
- Angulation of the disc space more than 11 degrees greater than adjacent segments
- Significant kyphotic deformity (> 5 degrees) at a single level or significant reversal of lordosis (not corrected with extension)
- Fused level adjacent to a level to be treated
- Axial neck pain is the patient's solitary symptom
- Severe pathology of the facet joints of the involved vertebral bodies
- Previous diagnosis of osteopenia or osteomalacia
- Has any of the following risk factors that may be associated with a diagnosis of osteoporosis.
- Spinal metastases
- Extreme obesity (BMI ≥ 40)
- Overt or active bacterial infection, either local or systemic
- Severe insulin dependent diabetes
- Chronic or acute renal failure or prior history of renal disease
- Fever (temp > 38.3° C oral) at the time of surgery
- Documented allergy or intolerance to titanium or polyurethane
- Reported concomitant conditions requiring daily, high-dose oral and/or inhaled steroids.
- Any medical condition that may interfere with the postoperative management program or preclude meaningful patient self-assessments, e.g., advanced emphysema, progressive neurological disease, or Alzheimer's disease
- Any medical condition that may result in patient death prior to study completion, e.g., unstable cardiac disease, active malignancy
- History of an endocrine or metabolic disorder known to affect osteogenesis
- Active immunosuppressive disorder that may predispose patient to infection
- Participating in or planning to participate in another clinical study that might influence the treatment outcomes or ability to comply with the study requirements
- Member of a vulnerable population such as, mentally incompetent, prisoner
- Pregnant, nursing, considering becoming pregnant during the study, or is of childbearing potential and unwilling to use an accepted form of birth control during the study.
- History or suspicion of substance abuse or currently undergoing substance abuse treatment
- In the judgment of the Investigator, patient is not likely to be able to fulfill the requirements of the study.
About this study
Official title: RHINE™ Cervical Disc Clinical Study
A Prospective, open label, multi-center observational study of patients requiring surgical treatment at one or two (contiguous) cervical spine levels. The primary objectives of the RHINE Cervical Disc study are to: obtain operative data and feedback on surgical instruments and surgical technique; confirm device performance in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes; confirm device performance in terms of safety and to collect original data to be compared to published reports of the performance of comparable motion-sparing devices, as well as clinical outcomes of fusion devices.
Read the detailed description
A Prospective, open label, multi-center observational study of patients requiring surgical treatment at one or two (contiguous) cervical spine levels ( C3-C7). The primary objectives of the RHINE Cervical Disc study are to: obtain operative data and feedback on surgical instruments and surgical technique; confirm device performance in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes; confirm device performance in terms of safety and to collect original data to be compared to published reports of the performance of comparable motion-sparing devices, as well as clinical outcomes of fusion devices. Device- and procedure-related adverse events, serious adverse events, and secondary surgeries will be monitored throughout. AEs will be characterized by severity, seriousness and relationship to device. Investigator reports of serious adverse events and any AE trends will be reviewed by a medical monitor.
- Conditions
- Radiculopathy, Myelopathy, Spondylosis, Herniated Nucleus Pulposus
- Being tested
- Rhine Cervical Disc
- Keywords
- Radiculopathy, Myelopathy, Spondylosis, Herniated Nucleus Pulposus, C3-C7, Osteophytes, Neurological deficit
- Medical subject headings
- Radiculopathy, Spinal Cord Diseases, Spondylosis, Osteophyte, Neurologic Manifestations
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Rhine Cervical DiscDevice
RHINE Cervical Disc
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Neck Disability Index (NDI) change from baseline
Evaluation of the change in function will be scored using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) at all time points compared to baseline (pre-operative). NDI is a subject-completed, condition-specific functional status questionnaire with 10 questions. Each question is scored from 0 to 5, summed to a total and multiplied by 2 to get a score from 0 to 100. A 15 point change in NDI score compared with baseline (pre-operative score) will be used as the measure for a clinically significant change.
Measured: Pre-operative, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 60 months
Radiographic Outcomes
Anteroposterior \& Lateral ( or MRI at Pre-operative ) and Flexion and Extension x-rays will be taken at all time points. An independent radiologist will review and assess all radiographs including: range of motion, translation, intervertebral height, device height, device positioning/migration, heterotopic ossification and adjacent segment degeneration.
Measured: Pre-operative, 6-12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 60 months
Number of Patients with Adverse Events (AEs)
AEs will be monitored throughout the study and characterized by seriousness, severity and relationship to the device and procedure, at a minimum.
Measured: Up to 6-12 weeks post-discharge , 6 months, 12 months, 24 months annd 60 months
Secondary outcomes (13)
Pain: Neck, Right Arm, Left Arm, Worst arm Visual analog Scale Change form Baseline
The intensity of neck pain, right arm pain and left arm pain will be evaluated using a 100 mm VAS. The scale is measured from 0 mm (no pain) to 100 mm (extreme pain). The VAS will be scored at all time points and compared to baseline (pre-operative). A change of 15 mm is considered clinically significant.
Measured: Pre-operative, 6-12 weeks post-discharge , 6 months, 12 months, 24 months annd 60 months
Secondary Surgeries (Surgical Interventions)
Secondary surgeries will be described and will be classified as follows:
- Index Level Revision without Implant Removal: a procedure that adjusts or in any way modifies the original implant configuration without removal of the original implant, e.g., adjusting the position of the implant, or adding supplemental fixation.
- Index Level Revision with Implant Removal: a procedure that removes the original implant, with replacement using a new implant or without replacement.
- Adjacent Level Surgery: any surgical procedure at a level adjacent to the treated level(s) that does not remove, modify or add any components to the implant configuration.
- Other Spine Surgery: surgery at spine level that is not an index or adjacent level.
Surgeries unrelated to the spine will not be recorded as secondary surgeries but the adverse effect leading to the surgery will be recorded on an AE form and characterized as an 'inpatient hospitalization.
Measured: Up to 6-12 weeks post-discharge , 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 60 months
Quality of life (SF-36)
SF-36 survey will be used to calculate overall, mental (MCS) and physical (PCS) component scores at all post-op time-points compared to baseline (pre-operative)
Measured: Pre-operative, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months annd 60 months
Functional / Economic Impact - Prolo Scale
It is a 10-point scale consisting of only 2 questions evaluating the functional and economic status of patients. Scores 9-10 are considered excellent , scores less than 4 are considered poor.
Measured: Pre-operative, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months annd 60 months
Neurological function
Neurological function will be assessed pre-operatively and all post-op visits, unscheduled visits to assess an Adverse Event, by evaluating:
- Reflexes (0-4)
- Signs of myelopathy (Hoffman's, Babinski, Ankle Clonus)
- Sensory (light touch, pin prick; impaired/normal)
- Motor strength (0-5)
Maintenance or improvement in neurological function for this study is defined as: No clinically significant worsening at any post-operative time point that is permanent (compared to baseline or best neurological result post-operatively)
Measured: Pre-operative, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months annd 60 months
Global Assessment
Subject's self-reported assessment of improvement in their neck/arm problem since treatment. Scored on a 4-pt scale (much better, better, unchanged, worse) at 6, 12, 24 and 60 months.
Measured: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 60 months
Patient satisfaction
This will be based on subject's self-reported response to whether he/she is satisfied with the outcome of his/her neck surgery, scored on a 4-pt scale (strongly agrees, agrees, disagrees, strongly disagrees) at 6, 12, 24 and 60 months.
Measured: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 60 months
Patient treatment success (PTS)
Patients should have met all the of the following criteria:
- ≥ 15 point improvement in NDI compared to baseline (pre-operative),
- No new or increased permanent, clinically significant neurological deficit compared to baseline (pre-operative),
- No device-related surgical intervention (specifically, intra-operative serious device-related AEs (implant or instrument) or conversion to fusion, or device-related secondary surgery at index level).
Measured: 24 months
Use of NSAIDS and other pain Medications.
Will document duration of prescribed post-operative use of NSAIDS (≤2 weeks, >2 weeks), and use (frequency and potency) of medications to manage c-spine condition at each follow-up interval compared with pre-operative level of management.
Measured: Pre-operative, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months annd 60 months
Estimated blood loss
The amount of blood loss over the entire length of the surgery, documented on the Anesthesia Record, will be captured.
Measured: During Operation
Surgery time
The length of surgical procedure from the initial incision to final closure will be captured from the Anesthesia Record.
Measured: During Operation
Length of hospital stay
The length of hospital stay from date of admission to date of discharge will be calculated.
Measured: At discharge, estimated average of 3-6 days after surgery
Surgeon satisfaction with instruments and surgical technique
4-pt scale (very satisfied, satisfied, somewhat unsatisfied, very unsatisfied)
Measured: At discharge, estimated average of 3-6 days after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2016
- Primary completionMar 2023
- Study completionMar 2023
Why it stopped: Stryker has made the decision to remove the Rhine Cervical Disc Replacement from their product portfolio. Stryker is not aware of any safety or effectiveness concerns and this decision is not related to poor patient outcomes or known device failures.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for RadiculopathyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- K2M, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Stryker Nordic
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02403453
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CA-009
- Status last verified
- Oct 2023
- First submitted
- 19 Mar 2015
- Last updated
- 25 Oct 2023
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
MacDermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, McAlpine C, Goldsmith CH. Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 May;39(5):400-17. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2930.
PubMed 19521015Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980 Aug;66(8):271-3. No abstract available.
PubMed 6450426Hagg O, Fritzell P, Oden A, Nordwall A; Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Simplifying outcome measurement: evaluation of instruments for measuring outcome after fusion surgery for chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jun 1;27(11):1213-22. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200206010-00014.
PubMed 12045520Mehren C, Suchomel P, Grochulla F, Barsa P, Sourkova P, Hradil J, Korge A, Mayer HM. Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 15;31(24):2802-6. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000245852.70594.d5.
PubMed 17108833McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Devine J, Williams E, Yu-Yahiro J. Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003 Aug;16(4):384-9. doi: 10.1097/00024720-200308000-00010.
PubMed 12902954Beaurain J, Bernard P, Dufour T, Fuentes JM, Hovorka I, Huppert J, Steib JP, Vital JM, Aubourg L, Vila T. Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C) with up to 2 years of follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2009 Jun;18(6):841-50. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1017-6. Epub 2009 May 12.
PubMed 19434431Geisler FH, Blumenthal SL, Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Regan JJ, Johnson JP, Mullin B. Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charite intervertebral disc. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004 Sep;1(2):143-54. doi: 10.3171/spi.2004.1.2.0143.
PubMed 15346999
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Oct 2023. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- RHINE™ Cervical Disc Clinical Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02403453
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CA-009
- Conditions
- Radiculopathy, Myelopathy, Spondylosis, Herniated Nucleus Pulposus
- Keywords
- Radiculopathy, Myelopathy, Spondylosis, Herniated Nucleus Pulposus, C3-C7, Osteophytes, Neurological deficit
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Stryker has made the decision to remove the Rhine Cervical Disc Replacement from their product portfolio. Stryker is not aware of any safety or effectiveness concerns and this decision is not related to poor patient outcomes or known device failures.
- Enrolment
- 68 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- K2M, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Stryker Nordic
- Study start
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Mar 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A Prospective, open label, multi-center observational study of patients requiring surgical treatment at one or two (contiguous) cervical spine levels. The primary objectives of the RHINE Cervical Disc study are to: obtain operative data and feedback on surgical instruments and surgical technique; confirm device performance in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes; confirm device performance in terms of safety and to collect original data to be compared to published reports of the performance of comparable motion-sparing devices, as well as clinical outcomes of fusion devices.
Detailed description
A Prospective, open label, multi-center observational study of patients requiring surgical treatment at one or two (contiguous) cervical spine levels ( C3-C7). The primary objectives of the RHINE Cervical Disc study are to: obtain operative data and feedback on surgical instruments and surgical technique; confirm device performance in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes; confirm device performance in terms of safety and to collect original data to be compared to published reports of the performance of comparable motion-sparing devices, as well as clinical outcomes of fusion devices. Device- and procedure-related adverse events, serious adverse events, and secondary surgeries will be monitored throughout. AEs will be characterized by severity, seriousness and relationship to device. Investigator reports of serious adverse events and any AE trends will be reviewed by a medical monitor.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients eligible for the study enrollment will be skeletally mature patients undergoing reconstruction of the disc from C3 to C7 following discectomy at one or two contiguous levels for intractable radiculopathy (arm pain and/or a neurological deficit) with or without neck pain, or myelopathy due to abnormality localized to the level of the disc space and at least one of the following conditions confirmed by radiographic imaging (CT, MRI, X-rays): herniated nucleus pulposus, spondylosis (defined by the presence of osteophytes), and/or visible loss of disc height compared to adjacent levels. Patients should have failed at least 6 weeks of non-operative treatment or demonstrated progressive signs or symptoms despite non-operative treatment prior to implantation.
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- The patient requires reconstruction of the disc from C3 to C7 following discectomy at 1 or 2 (contiguous) levels for intractable radiculopathy (arm pain and/or a neurological deficit) with or without neck pain, or myelopathy due to abnormality localized to the level of the disc space and at least one of the following conditions confirmed by radiographic imaging (CT, MRI, X-rays): herniated nucleus pulposus, spondylosis (defined by the presence of osteophytes), and/or visible loss of disc height compared to adjacent levels.
- The patient has failed at least 6 weeks of non-operative treatment or demonstrated progressive signs or symptoms despite non-operative treatment prior to implantation.
- Self-reports a pre-operative upper extremity (right or left) VAS pain score ≥ 20 (0-100).
- Self-reports pre-operative NDI score ≥ 30% (raw score of ≥ 15/50).
- Willing and able to comply with the protocol requirements including follow-up visit schedule.
Key exclusion criteria (30 listed)
- More than two cervical levels requiring surgery, or has two levels requiring surgery that are not adjacent.
- Previous surgical intervention at the target level(s)
- Any of the following at the target level(s):
- Significant cervical anatomical deformity, e.g., ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, etc.
- Moderate to advanced spondylosis. Patients who demonstrate advanced degenerative changes characterized by any of the following: bridging osteophytes, marked reduction or absence of motion (< 2 degrees change from flexion to extension), collapse of the intervertebral disc space of greater than 50% of its normal height (compared to adjacent levels)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rhine Cervical DiscRHINE Cervical Disc | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Neck Disability Index (NDI) change from baseline
Time frame: Pre-operative, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 60 months
Evaluation of the change in function will be scored using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) at all time points compared to baseline (pre-operative). NDI is a subject-completed, condition-specific functional status questionnaire with 10 questions. Each question is scored from 0 to 5, summed to a total and multiplied by 2 to get a score from 0 to 100. A 15 point change in NDI score compared with baseline (pre-operative score) will be used as the measure for a clinically significant change.
Radiographic Outcomes
Time frame: Pre-operative, 6-12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 60 months
Anteroposterior \& Lateral ( or MRI at Pre-operative ) and Flexion and Extension x-rays will be taken at all time points. An independent radiologist will review and assess all radiographs including: range of motion, translation, intervertebral height, device height, device positioning/migration, heterotopic ossification and adjacent segment degeneration.
Number of Patients with Adverse Events (AEs)
Time frame: Up to 6-12 weeks post-discharge , 6 months, 12 months, 24 months annd 60 months
AEs will be monitored throughout the study and characterized by seriousness, severity and relationship to the device and procedure, at a minimum.
13 secondary outcomes
Pain: Neck, Right Arm, Left Arm, Worst arm Visual analog Scale Change form Baseline
Time frame: Pre-operative, 6-12 weeks post-discharge , 6 months, 12 months, 24 months annd 60 months
Secondary Surgeries (Surgical Interventions)
Time frame: Up to 6-12 weeks post-discharge , 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 60 months
Quality of life (SF-36)
Time frame: Pre-operative, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months annd 60 months
Functional / Economic Impact - Prolo Scale
Time frame: Pre-operative, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months annd 60 months
Neurological function
Time frame: Pre-operative, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months annd 60 months
Global Assessment
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 60 months
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 60 months
Patient treatment success (PTS)
Time frame: 24 months
Use of NSAIDS and other pain Medications.
Time frame: Pre-operative, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months annd 60 months
Estimated blood loss
Time frame: During Operation
Surgery time
Time frame: During Operation
Length of hospital stay
Time frame: At discharge, estimated average of 3-6 days after surgery
Surgeon satisfaction with instruments and surgical technique
Time frame: At discharge, estimated average of 3-6 days after surgery
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Stryker has made the decision to remove the Rhine Cervical Disc Replacement from their product portfolio. Stryker is not aware of any safety or effectiveness concerns and this decision is not related to poor patient outcomes or known device failures.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Oct 2023.
- Background: PubMed 19521015MacDermid JC, Walton DM, Avery S, Blanchard A, Etruw E, McAlpine C, Goldsmith CH. Measurement properties of the neck disability index: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 May;39(5):400-17. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.2930.
- Background: PubMed 6450426Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O'Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980 Aug;66(8):271-3. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 12045520Hagg O, Fritzell P, Oden A, Nordwall A; Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Simplifying outcome measurement: evaluation of instruments for measuring outcome after fusion surgery for chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jun 1;27(11):1213-22. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200206010-00014.
- Background: PubMed 17108833Mehren C, Suchomel P, Grochulla F, Barsa P, Sourkova P, Hradil J, Korge A, Mayer HM. Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 15;31(24):2802-6. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000245852.70594.d5.
- Background: PubMed 12902954McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Devine J, Williams E, Yu-Yahiro J. Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003 Aug;16(4):384-9. doi: 10.1097/00024720-200308000-00010.
- Background: PubMed 19434431Beaurain J, Bernard P, Dufour T, Fuentes JM, Hovorka I, Huppert J, Steib JP, Vital JM, Aubourg L, Vila T. Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C) with up to 2 years of follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2009 Jun;18(6):841-50. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-1017-6. Epub 2009 May 12.
- Background: PubMed 15346999Geisler FH, Blumenthal SL, Guyer RD, McAfee PC, Regan JJ, Johnson JP, Mullin B. Neurological complications of lumbar artificial disc replacement and comparison of clinical results with those related to lumbar arthrodesis in the literature: results of a multicenter, prospective, randomized investigational device exemption study of Charite intervertebral disc. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004 Sep;1(2):143-54. doi: 10.3171/spi.2004.1.2.0143.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Radiculopathy
Not yet recruiting
Selective Nerve Root Block Versus Sham to Reduce Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation
Lumbar Disc Herniation, Lumbar Radiculopathy
Not yet recruiting
Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Radiculopathy
Cervical Disc Herniation, Cervical Foraminal Stenosis
Recruiting
Comparative Effect Between Mulligan Leg Raise and Spinal Mobilization With Limb Movement in Lumbar Radiculopathy
Lumbar Radiculopathy
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy and Safety of VER-01 in the Treatment of Participants With Chronic Painful Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
RecruitingObservational study
Cervical Spinal Cord Signal Abnormalities in Patients With Cervical Radicular Pain
Cervical Radiculopathy, Cervical Myelomalacia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Radiculopathy and Myelopathy, run by K2M, Inc..
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 30 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Oct 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Stryker has made the decision to remove the Rhine Cervical Disc Replacement from their product portfolio. Stryker is not aware of any safety or effectiveness concerns and this decision is not related to poor patient outcomes or known device failures.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Neck Disability Index (NDI) change from baseline (time frame: Pre-operative, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months and 60 months). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02403453, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Oct 2023.