Urinary IncontinenceNCT02446808
Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring During Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
A study testing Intraoperative nerve monitoring in people with Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction, run by ProPep Surgical, LLC at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of intraoperative nerve monitoring during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy surgery improves post-surgery urinary continence and erectile function. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 70 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Urinary Incontinence, Erectile Dysfunction
- What is being tested?
- Intraoperative nerve monitoring
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2015to Dec 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 70 years
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male subjects 40-70 years of age diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the prostate;
- Subjects scheduled for robotic assisted radical prostatectomy for removal of localized prostate cancer;
- Subjects, who, in the opinion of the clinical Investigator, are able to understand this clinical investigation, cooperate with the investigational procedures and are willing to return for all the required post-treatment follow-up visits
Who cannot join
- Subjects with pre-operative urinary incontinence defined as use of pads or adult diapers;
- Subjects with previous pelvic or abdominal radiation therapy;
- Subjects with current or previous malignancy other than prostate or non-melanoma skin cancer;
- Subjects who have previously had a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) or cryotherapy;
- Subjects with a prostate volume of >80mL
- Subjects with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 34;
Show all 15Show fewer
- Subjects with current or suspected urinary tract or bladder infection(s);
- Subjects with reported unstable cardiovascular disease (e.g., unstable angina, myocardial infarction within past 6 months, cardiac failure or life-threatening arrhythmia, congestive heart failure) or symptomatic postural hypotension within 6 months before screening;
- Subjects with a history of diabetes;
- Subjects with drug, alcohol, or substance abuse reported within the last three years (subject reported);
- Subjects with a life expectancy less than study duration;
- Subjects with systemic autoimmune disorder;
- Subjects with any significant psychological disturbance that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could impair the consent process or ability to complete self-assessment questionnaires.
- Subjects with known sensitivity to any device or products required for the RALP surgery; and
- Subjects with any other condition that would contraindicate participation, as determined by the Investigator.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Indiana University School of Medicine
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
About this study
Official title: Clinical Assessment of Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring During Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of intraoperative nerve monitoring during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy surgery improves post-surgery urinary continence and erectile function.
Read the detailed description
Study Design:
This is a single surgeon, single institution prospective post-market study of patients undergoing a robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) with intraoperative nerve monitoring of pelvic nerves using the ProPep Nerve Monitoring System. The treatment group will consist of 80 subjects (with 69 anticipated to be evaluable) undergoing RALP with intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM). This will be compared to a consecutive group of contemporary control cohort patients who have underwent RALP without nerve monitoring by the same single surgeon.
Baseline Evaluations and Data Collection:
Pre-operative baseline evaluations and data collection will be used to determine eligibility for enrollment and to document subject clinical status prior to surgical procedure. This information is recorded on the Screening case report forms (CRF).
The following data will be collected at screening/baseline:
- Medical History including Gleason score at biopsy, and clinical stage (cT, TNM 2002);
- Physical examination;
- Demographic information;
- Current symptoms;
- Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP) Questionnaire;
- SHIM Questionnaire;
- Use of any drugs for erectile dysfunction ;
- Confirmation of inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Surgical Procedure The surgical procedure should be completed according to site-specific standards. The following is a general overview of the surgical procedure for this study. The daVinci Surgical System must be used. Additional instrumentation necessary to perform the procedure is determined by the surgeon.
The Pep Electrode Introducer facilitates the introduction of the needle electrodes into the pelvis. The electrodes are initially placed in the levator muscle near the apex of the prostate in the area of the nerve bundles prior to the pedicle dissection to identify the perineal branches of the pudendal nerve. Prior to posterior dissection of the apex of the prostate, the needle electrodes are removed from the levator muscle and moved to the external urethral sphincter to identify the deep (muscular) branch of the perineal nerves. Action potentials are measured by the Pep Monitor.
Signals are induced in the nerve(s) of interest by stimulating the tissue surrounding the nerve(s) along the presumed nerve pathway with a low level electrical current. The low level current is delivered through the conventional bipolar instrument used during robotic surgery and when delivered close to a nerve it triggers and action potential in the nerve that is displayed on the Pep Monitor. The Pep Control Switch is used to switch the bipolar instrument between cautery mode and stimulation mode. The closer the bipolar instrument is to the nerve being located, the larger the amplitude of the action potential displayed by the Pep Monitor.
Nerves will be identified with the device prior to pedicle and apical dissection to establish nerve location. Nerve monitoring may be used through the course of dissections to confirm nerve location. Post-dissection readings will be collected after specimen removal to confirm the integrity of the preserved nerve tissue at the end of the case.
During the procedure and through hospital discharge the following data points will be collected:
- Type of nerve sparing - none, partial, and bilateral;
- Prostate size;
- Estimated blood loss and transfusion(s);
- Method of dissection (transperitoneal anterior, posterior, extraperitoneal, or lymph node dissection);
- Gleason score at radical prostatectomy;
- Pathological stage (nT);
- Positive surgical margin rate (PSM);
- Total robotic and surgical time;
- Total time for device deployment;
- Hospital admission / discharge dates; and
- Adverse events.
Postoperative care will be according to the site-specific standard of care.
Follow-up Evaluation and Data Collections:
Subjects will be followed post-operatively at catheter removal (typically 1 week), 1 month (±2 weeks), 3 months (±3 weeks), 6 months (±1 month), and 12 months (±1 month) following the procedure. Data will be collected on the appropriate follow-up Case Report Forms (CRFs). The CRFs for each of the follow-up data collection points will be supplied to the subjects upon their discharge from the hospital following their procedure. Research assistant will call subjects the week prior to the due date to remind subjects to fill in and mail back (via pre-addressed, stamped envelopes supplied with CRFs) appropriate CRF. Site specific standard of care will be followed post-operatively.
The following data and testing will be completed at each follow-up visit:
- Current symptoms;
- Modified EPIC-CP Questionnaire (question 3 and 4);
- SHIM Questionnaire;
- Use of any drugs for erectile dysfunction; and
- Adverse events (AE).
Contemporary Control Cohort:
As the procedures for the prospective cohort are standard of care at the investigators institution, the investigator will have all of the same measures for the contemporary control cohort that he has for the for the prospective cohort. Each prospective subject will be matched to two selected subjects in the contemporary control cohort by biopsy Gleason score (6 vs. 7 vs. 8-10), nerve-sparing status (yes/no), type of nerve sparing (unilateral or bilateral) and age (within 5 years). The contemporary control cohort will draw from consecutive patients who have undergone RALP in the previous two years (2012-2014) that did not have IONM. The investigator will not record AEs for this contemporary control cohort as the investigator is only interested in collecting AEs data potentially related to the use of the IONM.
- Conditions
- Urinary Incontinence, Erectile Dysfunction
- Being tested
- Intraoperative nerve monitoring
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Incontinence, Erectile Dysfunction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intraoperative nerve monitoringDevice
Intraoperative nerve monitoring (electromyography) is used to identify the location of somatic pelvic nerves critical to urinary continence control and erectile function in real time during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intraoperative nerve monitoring | Experimental | Patients for which intraoperative nerve monitoring (electromyography) is used to identify the location of somatic pelvic nerves critical to urinary continence control and erectile function in real time during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy surgery Receives: Device: Intraoperative nerve monitoring |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Return of urinary continence following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
The proportion of subjects who have urinary continence following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) at 6 months postoperatively.
Measured: 6 month
Secondary outcomes (2)
Return of erectile function following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
The proportion of subjects who return to pre-operative baseline (RTB) category (i.e. normal, mild, moderate, or severe erectile dysfunction) of erectile function following RALP with IONM of pelvic nerves. The change in SHIM score over time from baseline to 12 months.
Measured: catheter removal which typically occurs at 1 week, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month
Time to urinary continence
Assess time to continence defined as using 0 pads per day following RALP with IONM of pelvic nerves for 12 month post-operatively.
Measured: catheter removal which typically occurs at 1 week, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 May 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2015
- Primary completionJun 2018 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2018 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Urinary IncontinenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- ProPep Surgical, LLC
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Indiana University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02446808
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ProPep B-016-001
- Status last verified
- Apr 2018
- First submitted
- 11 May 2015
- Last updated
- 10 Apr 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Apr 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical Assessment of Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring During Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02446808
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ProPep B-016-001
- Conditions
- Urinary Incontinence, Erectile Dysfunction
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- ProPep Surgical, LLCIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Indiana University
- Study start
- Jun 2015
- Primary completion
- Jun 2018 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2018 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 May 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of intraoperative nerve monitoring during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy surgery improves post-surgery urinary continence and erectile function.
Detailed description
Study Design:
This is a single surgeon, single institution prospective post-market study of patients undergoing a robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) with intraoperative nerve monitoring of pelvic nerves using the ProPep Nerve Monitoring System. The treatment group will consist of 80 subjects (with 69 anticipated to be evaluable) undergoing RALP with intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM). This will be compared to a consecutive group of contemporary control cohort patients who have underwent RALP without nerve monitoring by the same single surgeon.
Baseline Evaluations and Data Collection:
Pre-operative baseline evaluations and data collection will be used to determine eligibility for enrollment and to document subject clinical status prior to surgical procedure. This information is recorded on the Screening case report forms (CRF).
The following data will be collected at screening/baseline:
- Medical History including Gleason score at biopsy, and clinical stage (cT, TNM 2002);
- Physical examination;
- Demographic information;
- Current symptoms;
- Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC-CP) Questionnaire;
- SHIM Questionnaire;
- Use of any drugs for erectile dysfunction ;
- Confirmation of inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Surgical Procedure The surgical procedure should be completed according to site-specific standards. The following is a general overview of the surgical procedure for this study. The daVinci Surgical System must be used. Additional instrumentation necessary to perform the procedure is determined by the surgeon.
The Pep Electrode Introducer facilitates the introduction of the needle electrodes into the pelvis. The electrodes are initially placed in the levator muscle near the apex of the prostate in the area of the nerve bundles prior to the pedicle dissection to identify the perineal branches of the pudendal nerve. Prior to posterior dissection of the apex of the prostate, the needle electrodes are removed from the levator muscle and moved to the external urethral sphincter to identify the deep (muscular) branch of the perineal nerves. Action potentials are measured by the Pep Monitor.
Signals are induced in the nerve(s) of interest by stimulating the tissue surrounding the nerve(s) along the presumed nerve pathway with a low level electrical current. The low level current is delivered through the conventional bipolar instrument used during robotic surgery and when delivered close to a nerve it triggers and action potential in the nerve that is displayed on the Pep Monitor. The Pep Control Switch is used to switch the bipolar instrument between cautery mode and stimulation mode. The closer the bipolar instrument is to the nerve being located, the larger the amplitude of the action potential displayed by the Pep Monitor.
Nerves will be identified with the device prior to pedicle and apical dissection to establish nerve location. Nerve monitoring may be used through the course of dissections to confirm nerve location. Post-dissection readings will be collected after specimen removal to confirm the integrity of the preserved nerve tissue at the end of the case.
During the procedure and through hospital discharge the following data points will be collected:
- Type of nerve sparing - none, partial, and bilateral;
- Prostate size;
- Estimated blood loss and transfusion(s);
- Method of dissection (transperitoneal anterior, posterior, extraperitoneal, or lymph node dissection);
- Gleason score at radical prostatectomy;
- Pathological stage (nT);
- Positive surgical margin rate (PSM);
- Total robotic and surgical time;
- Total time for device deployment;
- Hospital admission / discharge dates; and
- Adverse events.
Postoperative care will be according to the site-specific standard of care.
Follow-up Evaluation and Data Collections:
Subjects will be followed post-operatively at catheter removal (typically 1 week), 1 month (±2 weeks), 3 months (±3 weeks), 6 months (±1 month), and 12 months (±1 month) following the procedure. Data will be collected on the appropriate follow-up Case Report Forms (CRFs). The CRFs for each of the follow-up data collection points will be supplied to the subjects upon their discharge from the hospital following their procedure. Research assistant will call subjects the week prior to the due date to remind subjects to fill in and mail back (via pre-addressed, stamped envelopes supplied with CRFs) appropriate CRF. Site specific standard of care will be followed post-operatively.
The following data and testing will be completed at each follow-up visit:
- Current symptoms;
- Modified EPIC-CP Questionnaire (question 3 and 4);
- SHIM Questionnaire;
- Use of any drugs for erectile dysfunction; and
- Adverse events (AE).
Contemporary Control Cohort:
As the procedures for the prospective cohort are standard of care at the investigators institution, the investigator will have all of the same measures for the contemporary control cohort that he has for the for the prospective cohort. Each prospective subject will be matched to two selected subjects in the contemporary control cohort by biopsy Gleason score (6 vs. 7 vs. 8-10), nerve-sparing status (yes/no), type of nerve sparing (unilateral or bilateral) and age (within 5 years). The contemporary control cohort will draw from consecutive patients who have undergone RALP in the previous two years (2012-2014) that did not have IONM. The investigator will not record AEs for this contemporary control cohort as the investigator is only interested in collecting AEs data potentially related to the use of the IONM.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intraoperative nerve monitoring | Experimental | Device: Intraoperative nerve monitoringPatients for which intraoperative nerve monitoring (electromyography) is used to identify the location of somatic pelvic nerves critical to urinary continence control and erectile function in real time during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy surgery |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 70 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Male subjects 40-70 years of age diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the prostate;
- Subjects scheduled for robotic assisted radical prostatectomy for removal of localized prostate cancer;
- Subjects, who, in the opinion of the clinical Investigator, are able to understand this clinical investigation, cooperate with the investigational procedures and are willing to return for all the required post-treatment follow-up visits
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Subjects with pre-operative urinary incontinence defined as use of pads or adult diapers;
- Subjects with previous pelvic or abdominal radiation therapy;
- Subjects with current or previous malignancy other than prostate or non-melanoma skin cancer;
- Subjects who have previously had a transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) or cryotherapy;
- Subjects with a prostate volume of >80mL
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intraoperative nerve monitoringIntraoperative nerve monitoring (electromyography) is used to identify the location of somatic pelvic nerves critical to urinary continence control and erectile function in real time during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy surgery | Device | Intraoperative nerve monitoring |
Primary outcome
Return of urinary continence following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
Time frame: 6 month
The proportion of subjects who have urinary continence following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) at 6 months postoperatively.
2 secondary outcomes
Return of erectile function following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy
Time frame: catheter removal which typically occurs at 1 week, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month
Time to urinary continence
Time frame: catheter removal which typically occurs at 1 week, 1 month, 3 month, 6 month, 12 month
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Apr 2018.
Related trials for Urinary Incontinence
Recruiting
Safety and Performance of UCon Patch Electrode
Urinary Incontinence, Urinary Incontinence, Urge
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Examining the Effects of Intra-detrusor Botox at Time of HoLEP in Men With Overactive Bladder Symptoms
Urinary Incontinence, Overactive Bladder Syndrome
Recruiting
Rehabilitation and Sex Therapy to Optimize Recovery After Prostate Cancer Treatment
Prostate Cancer, Urinary Incontinence
Recruiting
UCon Treatment of Overactive Bladder (OAB) in Males
Urinary Incontinence, Urge Incontinence
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Overactive Bladder Symptoms and Urinary Incontinence In Women With Rheumatoid Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intraoperative nerve monitoring in people with Urinary Incontinence and Erectile Dysfunction, run by ProPep Surgical, LLC at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Apr 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Return of urinary continence following robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (time frame: 6 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Apr 2018.