AzTrials
AzTrials

Intellectual DisabilityANINCT02451761

Apparently Balanced Chromosomal Translocation/ Next-generation Sequencing/ Intellectual Disability

An observational study of Intellectual Disability and Congenital Abnormalities, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangement (ABCR) associated with an abnormal phenotype is a rare but problematic event. It occurs in 6% of de novo reciprocal translocations and 9% of de novo inversions. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 3 months and older
What is being tested?
Blood sampling
How many people
55 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
Apr 2015to Feb 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 3 months and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients presenting intellectual disability and/or multiple congenital anomalies

Who may be able to join

  • Abnormal phenotype: intellectual disability and/or multiple congenital anomalies.
  • Post-natal cases
  • ABCR diagnosed by standard karyotype, including reciprocal translocation, inversion, insertion and Complex Chromosomal Rearrangement (CCR).
  • de novo ABCR. Inherited ABCR could be included if the transmitting parent shows also an abnormal phenotype or if the rearrangement involves an imprinted chromosome.
  • Array-CGH results normal that mean absence of pathogenic imbalances. Identification of Variant Of Unknown Significance (VOUS) does not prevent from inclusion.
  • Information and written consent of patient or his legal representative (information and consent form available on request).
  • Covered by a Health System

Who cannot join

  • Pathogenic genomic imbalance demonstrated by array-CGH.
  • Identification of an independent etiology (i.e. monogenic disease, environment,…).
  • Rejection to participate ton the study
  • Weight inferior to 6 kg

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • laboratoire de Cytogénétique Constitutionnelle - Centre de Biologie et Pathologie Est

    Bron, 69677

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Molecular Characterization of Apparently Balanced Chromosomal Rearrangements by Next-generation Sequencing in 55 Patients With Intellectual Disability and/or Multiple Congenital Anomalies

Apparently balanced chromosomal rearrangement (ABCR) associated with an abnormal phenotype is a rare but problematic event. It occurs in 6% of de novo reciprocal translocations and 9% of de novo inversions. Abnormal phenotype, including intellectual disability and / or multiple congenital anomalies (ID/MCA) may be explained either by associated cryptic genomic imbalances detectable by array-CGH or by gene disruption at the breakpoint. However, breakpoint cloning using conventional methods (i.e., fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), Southern blot) is often laborious and time consuming and cannot be performed routinely. Without complete investigation of these rearrangements, genetic counseling is a real challenge. Recently, the investigators and others showed that Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) is a powerful and rapid technique to characterize ABCR breakpoints at the molecular level.

The ANI project (ABCR NGS ID) aims at characterizing at the molecular level ABCR in 55 patients presenting with intellectual disability and/or multiple congenital anomalies (ID/MCA) using NGS. The investigators make the hypothesis that ABCR account for the patient phenotype, either by gene disruption or position effect, since genomic imbalance would have been previously excluded by array-Comparative Genomic Hybridization (CGH).

Read more

The ANI project is a 3-year-long study that will be conducted by a consortium of 21 partners, including 19 french hospital cytogenetics laboratories, a research team (TIGER), and a cellular biotechnology center. Patients will be recruited by each Cytogenetics laboratory. ABCR breakpoints will be molecularly characterized by NGS and a first bio-informatics analysis. The results will be verified by amplification of junction fragments by polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) followed by Sanger sequencing, allowing the localization of breakpoints at the base-pair level. In some complex cases, FISH experiment will be necessary to clarify the results. A second bio-informatics analysis will then determine breakpoints' characteristics (sequence, repeated elements, gene and regulatory elements). Finally, for each breakpoint, gene expression studies will be performed including the gene disrupted by the breakpoint and two neighboring genes. All these data, together with those already available in the literature and databases will be integrated to determine if the gene could account for the patient's phenotype, allowing an appropriate genetic counseling.

This project will identify new candidate genes involved in ID and developmental anomalies. It will also contribute to the development and evaluation of NGS as a diagnostic tool for ABCR and ID/MCA. It will also allow unraveling mechanisms and functional consequences of ABCR, in particular in term of position effect.

In conclusion, the ANI project will contribute to the improvement of diagnostic management and genetic counseling of patients with ID/MCA and ABCR. It will also contribute to the understanding of ABCR physiopathology and to the unraveling of pathway involved in development and brain function, thus improving genetic counseling for ID/MCA patients in general.

Being tested
Blood sampling
Keywords
chromosomal rearrangement, next generation sequencing, intellectual disability, multiple congenital anomalies, gene disruption
Medical subject headings
Intellectual Disability, Congenital Abnormalities, Abnormalities, Multiple

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02451761
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SequencingBlood sampling will be carried out in all patients ; molecular analysis and sequencing will be performed on these samples
Receives: Biological: Blood sampling

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Identification of candidate genes and genes responsible for the phenotype disrupted at the breakpoints

    Blood samples will be collected at inclusion ; analysis wil be performed at the end of the study (between 30 and 36 months)

    Measured: At the end of the study (36 months)

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Development of a routine bio-informatic protocol for analysis of ABCR by NGS

    Ratio between the number of breakpoints detected by both karyotype ans NGS and the number of breakpoints detected by karyotype alone.

    Measured: At the end of the study (36 months)

  2. Number of patients presenting at least one disrupted gene

    This outcome will help us ti confirm the NGS performance for the detection of breakpoints of ABCR.

    Measured: At the end of the study (36 months)

  3. Number of patients for which a diagnosis could be performed

    Number of patients for which a diagnosis could be performed (responsible gene) compared to the total number of patients. This ration will be compared to a reference raio of 10% by a unilateral test. This will allow us to evaluate a next-generation sequencing strategy in clinical context (diagnostic yield)

    Measured: At the end of the study (36 months)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 May 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2015
  3. Primary completionFeb 2017
  4. Study completionFeb 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
55 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02451761
Sponsor's protocol ID
2014.858
Acronym
ANI
Status last verified
Aug 2016
First submitted
6 May 2015
Last updated
23 Mar 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Intellectual Disability and Congenital Abnormalities, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Identification of candidate genes and genes responsible for the phenotype disrupted at the breakpoints (time frame: At the end of the study (36 months)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 1 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in