Rectal NeoplasmsPhase 3OPERANCT02505750
Safety of a Boost (CXB or EBRT) in Combination With Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Early Rectal Adenocarcinoma
A Phase 3 study testing 3D conformal EBRT, Contact X-ray brachytherapy 50 kV and Capecitabine in people with Rectal Neoplasms, run by Centre Antoine Lacassagne at 18 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
The investigators propose to conduct a randomised study on cT2, cT3a-b tumours less than 5 cm using two different techniques of radiotherapy boost following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) (CAP45): EBRT (9 Gy/5 fractions) or CXB (90 Gy/3 fractions). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rectal Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- 3D conformal EBRT, Contact X-ray brachytherapy 50 kV and Capecitabine
- Type of treatment
- Medical device, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 148 participants
- Where
- 18 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 24 Jun 2015to Jun 2030
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adenocarcinoma of the rectum classified clinically T2, T3a, T3b (penetration in the mesorectal fat between 1 to 5 mm) by TNM classification (Tumour Node Metastase), < 5 cm largest diameter, < half rectal circumference (by MRI staging), N0-N1 (any node < 8 mm diameter on MRI), M0
- Operable patient
- Tumour accessible to endocavitary contact X-Ray Brachytherapy with a distance from the lower tumour border to the anal verge ≤ 10cm
- 18 years or above
- No comorbidity preventing treatment
- Adequate birth control
Show all 9Show fewer
- Patient having read the information note and having signed the informed consent
- Health care insurance available
- Follow-up possible
Who cannot join
- Inoperable patient
- T1, T3cd, T4, T≥ 5cm, T≥ ½ circumference
- Patient N2 at diagnosis or N1 with any node > 8 mm diameter
- Patient presenting metastasis at diagnosis
- Previous pelvic irradiation
- Tumour with extramural vascular invasion
Show all 14Show fewer
- Simultaneous progressive cancer
- Tumour invading external anal sphincter and within 1 mm, and the levator muscle
- Patient unable to receive CXB or CRT
- Tumour with poor differentiation (G3)
- People particularly vulnerable as defined in Articles L.1121-5 to -8 of the French Healthcare Code, including: person deprived of freedom by an administrative or judicial decision, adult being the object of a legal protection measure or outside state to express their consent, pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Any significant concurrent medical illness that in the opinion of the investigator would preclude protocol therapy
- Patient with history of poor compliance or current or past psychiatric conditions or severe acute or chronic medical conditions that would interfere with the ability to comply with the study protocol
- Concurrent enrolment in another clinical trial using an investigational anti-cancer treatment within 28 days prior to the first dose of study treatment
Trial locations and contacts
18 sites in 3 countries.
18 sites in 3 countries
France12 sites
CHRU Besançon
Besançon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, 25030
Clinique de la Sauvegarde
Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 69009
Centre Léon Bérard
Lyon, 69008
Centre d'oncologie et de radiothérapie Mâcon
Mâcon, 71000
Institut Paoli Calmettes
Marseille, 13009
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
Nice, 06189
Hospices Civils de Lyon - Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud
Pierre-Bénite, 69495
Centre Jean Godinot
Reims, Champagne-Ardenne, 51726
Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42270
Clinique Charcot
Sainte-Foy-lès-Lyon, 69110
Hôpital de la Croix Rouge Française - Centre de Radiothérapie St Louis
Toulon, 83100
Centre de radiothérapie Bayard
Villeurbanne, 69100
United Kingdom5 sites
Royal Surrey County Hospital
Guildford, GU2 7XX
Spire Hull and East Riding Hospital
Hull, HU10 7AZ
Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust
Liverpool, L9 7BA
Christie Hospital
Manchester, M204BX
University Hospital
Nottingham, NG5 8RX
About this study
Official title: European Phase III Study Comparing a Radiation Dose Escalation Using 2 Different Approaches : External Beam Radiation Therapy Versus Endocavitary Radiation Therapy With Contact X-ray Brachytherapy 50 kiloVolts (kV) for Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma
The investigators propose to conduct a randomised study on cT2, cT3a-b tumours less than 5 cm using two different techniques of radiotherapy boost following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) (CAP45): EBRT (9 Gy/5 fractions) or CXB (90 Gy/3 fractions). The endpoint will be organ preservation at 3 years without non-salvageable local pelvic recurrence. The proof of this concept will be of most benefit for all patients but especially for the elderly who usually are not fit for or keen to undergo major surgery.
The hypothesis of this study is to determine whether the addition of an endocavitary boost with CXB after standard treatment with nCRT, increases the chance of rectum and anus preservation by 20%-unites in early rectal adenocarcinoma without locally progressive disease (organ preservation in control arm 20%, in experimental arm 40%).
Read more
Main objective To demonstrate that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in combination with a boost given with CXB (Arm B) is superior to the same neoadjuvant therapy plus a boost with EBRT alone (Arm A) in terms of rectum (organ) preservation without non salvageable local disease at 3 years post treatment start, or permanent deviating stoma.
Study Design Open-label, phase III, prospective, multi-centre, international, randomised 1:1, 2 arm study designed to evaluate the efficacy of a CXB boost versus an EBRT boost.
Read the detailed description
Rationale - current state of knowledge Current guidelines for cT2-T3 (clinical stage T2 and T3) low and middle rectal cancer recommend radical total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery that may involves permanent stoma or a low anterior resection with sometimes poor bowel function.
Randomised trials have shown that neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (nCRT) reduces the risk of local recurrence by more than half. At 3 years, it is close to or below 5% with acceptable toxicity at many centers. On the other hand, it provides no definite improvement in overall survival and does not increase the chances of conservative surgery.
Rectal adenocarcinoma is rather radioresistant and the dose required to achieve 50% sterilization is close to 90 grays (Gy), which is a high dose causing toxicities when given with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Among the radiotherapy techniques able to achieve safely such a high dose, Contact X-Ray Brachytherapy 50 Kv (CXB) is an appealing method.
The Lyon R96-2 randomised trial using CXB showed an increased clinical complete response (cCR) rate from 2% to 29% and an improvement by 30% the chance of avoiding a permanent stoma (72% vs. 42%). In addition, some patients achieving cCR were able to preserve not only the sphincter but the whole rectum (organ preservation) either after local excision or using only a "watch and wait" strategy.
Such a conservative approach is receiving a growing interest all over the world among colorectal cancer specialists. The extensive and pioneering work of Prof. Habr Gama in Brazil is presently considered as a reference for the use chemoradiotherapy and an EBRT boost (total dose 54 Gy/30 f/6 weeks) followed by watch and wait in case of cCR to preserve organ, i.E. to avoid surgery.
Research Hypothesis The investigators propose to conduct a randomised study on cT2, cT3a-b tumours less than 5 cm using two different techniques of radiotherapy boost following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) (CAP45): EBRT (9 Gy/5 fractions) or CXB (90 Gy/3 fractions). The endpoint will be organ preservation at 3 years without non-salvageable local pelvic recurrence. The proof of this concept will be of most benefit for all patients but especially for the elderly who usually are not fit for or keen to undergo major surgery.
The hypothesis of this study is to determine whether the addition of an endocavitary boost with CXB after standard treatment with nCRT, increases the chance of rectum and anus preservation by 20%-unites in early rectal adenocarcinoma without locally progressive disease (organ preservation in control arm 20%, in experimental arm 40%).
Main objective To demonstrate that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in combination with a boost given with CXB (Arm B) is superior to the same neoadjuvant therapy plus a boost with EBRT alone (Arm A) in terms of rectum (organ) preservation without non salvageable local disease at 3 years post treatment start, or permanent deviating stoma.
Study Design Open-label, phase III, prospective, multi-centre, international, randomised 1:1, 2 arm study designed to evaluate the efficacy of a CXB boost versus an EBRT boost.
Randomisation:
Arm A: 3D conformal EBRT 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction/5 weeks) with concurrent chemotherapy using capecitabine (825 mg/m2 bid, on radiation days).
A cone down EBRT targeting the Gross Tumour Volume (GTV) will deliver a boost dose of 9 Gy in 5 fractions. On week 14 after the start of treatment, the tumour response evaluation will guide the final strategy: surgery (radical TME or local excision) or watch-and-wait (W-W).
Arm B divided in 2 subgroups depending on the tumour diameter:
B1: If the tumour is < 3 cm, a CXB boost dose (90Gy/3 fractions/4 weeks) will be initially delivered to the tumour. After 2 weeks rest, patients will receive 3D conformal EBRT 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction/5 weeks) with concurrent chemotherapy using capecitabine (825 mg/m2 bid, on radiation days). Clinical evaluation will be performed 3 weeks after the end of irradiation (week 14) and will guide the final strategy (surgery or W-W) as in arm A.
B2: If the tumour is ≥ 3 cm, patients will receive EBRT first 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction/5 weeks) with concurrent chemotherapy using capecitabine (825 mg/m2 bid, on radiation days).
A CXB boost dose (90 Gy/3 fractions/4 weeks) will be delivered to residual tumour, after a rest of 2 weeks. On week 14 after the start of treatment, the tumour response evaluation will guide the final strategy (surgery or W-W) as in arm A. Adjuvant chemotherapy will be left to institution choice.
Number of subjects: Taking alpha=5% and bêta=7.5% with 10% patients not evaluable after randomisation, 236 patients (118 patients/arm) must be enrolled to show a 50% increase in the main endpoint at 3 years (from 20% to 40%).This study will show a hazard ratio of 0.56. Stopping rule: non-salvageable local recurrence rate > 10% checked by the independent Data Monitoring Committee every 80 patients.
- Conditions
- Rectal Neoplasms
- Being tested
- 3D conformal EBRT, Contact X-ray brachytherapy 50 kV, Capecitabine
- Medical subject headings
- Rectal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
3D conformal EBRTRadiation
External Beam Radiation Therapy
Contact X-ray brachytherapy 50 kVDevice
CapecitabineDrug
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| EBRT 45 Gy/capecitabine + EBRT boost | Active comparator | 3D conformal EBRT 45 Gy (1.8Gy/fraction/5 weeks) with concurrent chemotherapy using capecitabine (825 mg/m2 bid, on radiation days).
A cone down EBRT targeting the GTV will deliver a boost dose of 9 Gy in 5 fractions. On week 14 after the start of treatment, the tumour response evaluation will guide the final strategy: surgery (radical TME or local excision) or watch-and-wait (W-W). Receives: Radiation: 3D conformal EBRT; Drug: Capecitabine |
| EBRT 45 Gy/capecitabine + CXB boost | Experimental | Arm B divided in 2 subgroups depending on the tumour diameter:
B1: If the tumour is < 3 cm, a CXB boost dose (90Gy/3 fractions/4 weeks) will be initially delivered to the tumour. After 2 weeks rest, patients will receive 3D conformal EBRT 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction/5 weeks) with concurrent chemotherapy using capecitabine (825 mg/m2 bid, on radiation days). Clinical evaluation will be performed 3 weeks after the end of irradiation (week 14) and will guide the final strategy (surgery or W-W) as in arm A.
B2: If the tumour is ≥ 3 cm, patients will receive EBRT first 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction/5 weeks) with concurrent chemotherapy using capecitabine (825 mg/m2 bid, on radiation days).
A CXB boost dose (90 Gy/3 fractions/4 weeks) will be delivered to residual tumour, after a rest of 2 weeks. On week 14 after the start of treatment, the tumour response evaluation will guide the final strategy (surgery or W-W) as in arm A. Adjuvant chemotherapy will be left to institution choice. Receives: Radiation: 3D conformal EBRT; Device: Contact X-ray brachytherapy 50 kV; Drug: Capecitabine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of rectum preservation either with local excision or watch and wait strategy after neoadjuvant treatment without non salvageable locally progressive disease at 3 years post treatment, or permanent stoma.
The primary analysis will take place when approximately 138 events have occurred.
The evaluation of the rate of rectum preservation without progressive local disease at 3 years will be performed using a Log rank test stratified by center.
Measured: 3 years post treatment
Secondary outcomes (4)
Clinical Complete Response (assessed by digital rectal examination, endoscopy with photos and MRI)
Measured: Week 14
Overall Survival
Time between date of randomisation and date of death due to any causes. Patients who were not reported as having died at the time of the study will be censored at the date they were last known to be alive
Measured: 3 years post treatment
Disease-free survival
Time between date of randomisation to time of recurrence, either local or distant metastasis or death due to any cause). Patients without an event will be censored at last date the patient was known to be disease-free. Recurrence of rectal cancer will be based on tumour assessment made by investigator
Measured: 3 years post treatment
Tumour regression score on the operative specimen
Measured: week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study start24 Jun 2015
- Primary completion7 Jun 2023
- Study completionJun 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rectal NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Enrolment
- 148 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Antoine Lacassagne
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centre de Haute Energie, Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Hôpital de la Timone, Centre de radiothérapie Bayard, Centre Oncologie Radiothérapie de Mâcon, Centre Leon Berard, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Clinique Charcot, Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Spire Hull and East Riding Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jérôme DOYEN, M.D, PhD, Principal investigator, Centre Antoine Lacassagne
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02505750
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2014/14
- Other IDs
- 2014-A01851-46
- Acronym
- OPERA
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 21 Apr 2015
- Last updated
- 20 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Sun Myint A, Rao C, Barbet N, Thamphya B, Pace-Loscos T, Schiappa R, Magne N, Martel-Lafay I, Mineur L, Deberne M, Zilli T, Dhadda A, Gerard JP. The safety and efficacy of total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery following dose-escalation: Surgical outcomes from the organ preservation in early rectal adenocarcinoma (OPERA) trial, a European multicentre phase 3 randomised trial (NCT02505750). Colorectal Dis. 2023 Nov;25(11):2160-2169. doi: 10.1111/codi.16773. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
PubMed 37837240Gerard JP, Barbet N, Schiappa R, Magne N, Martel I, Mineur L, Deberne M, Zilli T, Dhadda A, Myint AS; ICONE group. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with radiation dose escalation with contact x-ray brachytherapy boost or external beam radiotherapy boost for organ preservation in early cT2-cT3 rectal adenocarcinoma (OPERA): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Apr;8(4):356-367. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00392-2. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
PubMed 36801007
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- European Phase III Study Comparing a Radiation Dose Escalation Using 2 Different Approaches : External Beam Radiation Therapy Versus Endocavitary Radiation Therapy With Contact X-ray Brachytherapy 50 kiloVolts (kV) for Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02505750
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OPERA / 2014/14
- Conditions
- Rectal Neoplasms
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 148 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Antoine LacassagneUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Centre de Haute Energie, Centre Azuréen de Cancérologie, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Hôpital de la Timone, Centre de radiothérapie Bayard, Centre Oncologie Radiothérapie de Mâcon, Centre Leon Berard, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Clinique Charcot, Institut de Cancérologie Lucien Neuwirth, The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Spire Hull and East Riding Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
- Study start
- 24 Jun 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Jun 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators propose to conduct a randomised study on cT2, cT3a-b tumours less than 5 cm using two different techniques of radiotherapy boost following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) (CAP45): EBRT (9 Gy/5 fractions) or CXB (90 Gy/3 fractions). The endpoint will be organ preservation at 3 years without non-salvageable local pelvic recurrence. The proof of this concept will be of most benefit for all patients but especially for the elderly who usually are not fit for or keen to undergo major surgery.
The hypothesis of this study is to determine whether the addition of an endocavitary boost with CXB after standard treatment with nCRT, increases the chance of rectum and anus preservation by 20%-unites in early rectal adenocarcinoma without locally progressive disease (organ preservation in control arm 20%, in experimental arm 40%).
Main objective To demonstrate that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in combination with a boost given with CXB (Arm B) is superior to the same neoadjuvant therapy plus a boost with EBRT alone (Arm A) in terms of rectum (organ) preservation without non salvageable local disease at 3 years post treatment start, or permanent deviating stoma.
Study Design Open-label, phase III, prospective, multi-centre, international, randomised 1:1, 2 arm study designed to evaluate the efficacy of a CXB boost versus an EBRT boost.
Detailed description
Rationale - current state of knowledge Current guidelines for cT2-T3 (clinical stage T2 and T3) low and middle rectal cancer recommend radical total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery that may involves permanent stoma or a low anterior resection with sometimes poor bowel function.
Randomised trials have shown that neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (nCRT) reduces the risk of local recurrence by more than half. At 3 years, it is close to or below 5% with acceptable toxicity at many centers. On the other hand, it provides no definite improvement in overall survival and does not increase the chances of conservative surgery.
Rectal adenocarcinoma is rather radioresistant and the dose required to achieve 50% sterilization is close to 90 grays (Gy), which is a high dose causing toxicities when given with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Among the radiotherapy techniques able to achieve safely such a high dose, Contact X-Ray Brachytherapy 50 Kv (CXB) is an appealing method.
The Lyon R96-2 randomised trial using CXB showed an increased clinical complete response (cCR) rate from 2% to 29% and an improvement by 30% the chance of avoiding a permanent stoma (72% vs. 42%). In addition, some patients achieving cCR were able to preserve not only the sphincter but the whole rectum (organ preservation) either after local excision or using only a "watch and wait" strategy.
Such a conservative approach is receiving a growing interest all over the world among colorectal cancer specialists. The extensive and pioneering work of Prof. Habr Gama in Brazil is presently considered as a reference for the use chemoradiotherapy and an EBRT boost (total dose 54 Gy/30 f/6 weeks) followed by watch and wait in case of cCR to preserve organ, i.E. to avoid surgery.
Research Hypothesis The investigators propose to conduct a randomised study on cT2, cT3a-b tumours less than 5 cm using two different techniques of radiotherapy boost following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) (CAP45): EBRT (9 Gy/5 fractions) or CXB (90 Gy/3 fractions). The endpoint will be organ preservation at 3 years without non-salvageable local pelvic recurrence. The proof of this concept will be of most benefit for all patients but especially for the elderly who usually are not fit for or keen to undergo major surgery.
The hypothesis of this study is to determine whether the addition of an endocavitary boost with CXB after standard treatment with nCRT, increases the chance of rectum and anus preservation by 20%-unites in early rectal adenocarcinoma without locally progressive disease (organ preservation in control arm 20%, in experimental arm 40%).
Main objective To demonstrate that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in combination with a boost given with CXB (Arm B) is superior to the same neoadjuvant therapy plus a boost with EBRT alone (Arm A) in terms of rectum (organ) preservation without non salvageable local disease at 3 years post treatment start, or permanent deviating stoma.
Study Design Open-label, phase III, prospective, multi-centre, international, randomised 1:1, 2 arm study designed to evaluate the efficacy of a CXB boost versus an EBRT boost.
Randomisation:
Arm A: 3D conformal EBRT 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction/5 weeks) with concurrent chemotherapy using capecitabine (825 mg/m2 bid, on radiation days).
A cone down EBRT targeting the Gross Tumour Volume (GTV) will deliver a boost dose of 9 Gy in 5 fractions. On week 14 after the start of treatment, the tumour response evaluation will guide the final strategy: surgery (radical TME or local excision) or watch-and-wait (W-W).
Arm B divided in 2 subgroups depending on the tumour diameter:
B1: If the tumour is < 3 cm, a CXB boost dose (90Gy/3 fractions/4 weeks) will be initially delivered to the tumour. After 2 weeks rest, patients will receive 3D conformal EBRT 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction/5 weeks) with concurrent chemotherapy using capecitabine (825 mg/m2 bid, on radiation days). Clinical evaluation will be performed 3 weeks after the end of irradiation (week 14) and will guide the final strategy (surgery or W-W) as in arm A.
B2: If the tumour is ≥ 3 cm, patients will receive EBRT first 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction/5 weeks) with concurrent chemotherapy using capecitabine (825 mg/m2 bid, on radiation days).
A CXB boost dose (90 Gy/3 fractions/4 weeks) will be delivered to residual tumour, after a rest of 2 weeks. On week 14 after the start of treatment, the tumour response evaluation will guide the final strategy (surgery or W-W) as in arm A. Adjuvant chemotherapy will be left to institution choice.
Number of subjects: Taking alpha=5% and bêta=7.5% with 10% patients not evaluable after randomisation, 236 patients (118 patients/arm) must be enrolled to show a 50% increase in the main endpoint at 3 years (from 20% to 40%).This study will show a hazard ratio of 0.56. Stopping rule: non-salvageable local recurrence rate > 10% checked by the independent Data Monitoring Committee every 80 patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| EBRT 45 Gy/capecitabine + EBRT boost | Active comparator | Radiation: 3D conformal EBRT, Drug: Capecitabine3D conformal EBRT 45 Gy (1.8Gy/fraction/5 weeks) with concurrent chemotherapy using capecitabine (825 mg/m2 bid, on radiation days). A cone down EBRT targeting the GTV will deliver a boost dose of 9 Gy in 5 fractions. On week 14 after the start of treatment, the tumour response evaluation will guide the final strategy: surgery (radical TME or local excision) or watch-and-wait (W-W). |
| EBRT 45 Gy/capecitabine + CXB boost | Experimental | Radiation: 3D conformal EBRT, Device: Contact X-ray brachytherapy 50 kV, Drug: CapecitabineArm B divided in 2 subgroups depending on the tumour diameter: B1: If the tumour is < 3 cm, a CXB boost dose (90Gy/3 fractions/4 weeks) will be initially delivered to the tumour. After 2 weeks rest, patients will receive 3D conformal EBRT 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction/5 weeks) with concurrent chemotherapy using capecitabine (825 mg/m2 bid, on radiation days). Clinical evaluation will be performed 3 weeks after the end of irradiation (week 14) and will guide the final strategy (surgery or W-W) as in arm A. B2: If the tumour is ≥ 3 cm, patients will receive EBRT first 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction/5 weeks) with concurrent chemotherapy using capecitabine (825 mg/m2 bid, on radiation days). A CXB boost dose (90 Gy/3 fractions/4 weeks) will be delivered to residual tumour, after a rest of 2 weeks. On week 14 after the start of treatment, the tumour response evaluation will guide the final strategy (surgery or W-W) as in arm A. Adjuvant chemotherapy will be left to institution choice. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Adenocarcinoma of the rectum classified clinically T2, T3a, T3b (penetration in the mesorectal fat between 1 to 5 mm) by TNM classification (Tumour Node Metastase), < 5 cm largest diameter, < half rectal circumference (by MRI staging), N0-N1 (any node < 8 mm diameter on MRI), M0
- Operable patient
- Tumour accessible to endocavitary contact X-Ray Brachytherapy with a distance from the lower tumour border to the anal verge ≤ 10cm
- 18 years or above
- No comorbidity preventing treatment
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Inoperable patient
- T1, T3cd, T4, T≥ 5cm, T≥ ½ circumference
- Patient N2 at diagnosis or N1 with any node > 8 mm diameter
- Patient presenting metastasis at diagnosis
- Previous pelvic irradiation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 3D conformal EBRTExternal Beam Radiation Therapy | Radiation | EBRT 45 Gy/capecitabine + CXB boost, EBRT 45 Gy/capecitabine + EBRT boost |
| Contact X-ray brachytherapy 50 kV | Device | EBRT 45 Gy/capecitabine + CXB boost |
| Capecitabine | Drug | EBRT 45 Gy/capecitabine + CXB boost, EBRT 45 Gy/capecitabine + EBRT boost |
Primary outcome
Rate of rectum preservation either with local excision or watch and wait strategy after neoadjuvant treatment without non salvageable locally progressive disease at 3 years post treatment, or permanent stoma.
Time frame: 3 years post treatment
The primary analysis will take place when approximately 138 events have occurred. The evaluation of the rate of rectum preservation without progressive local disease at 3 years will be performed using a Log rank test stratified by center.
4 secondary outcomes
Clinical Complete Response (assessed by digital rectal examination, endoscopy with photos and MRI)
Time frame: Week 14
Overall Survival
Time frame: 3 years post treatment
Disease-free survival
Time frame: 3 years post treatment
Tumour regression score on the operative specimen
Time frame: week 24
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 Oct 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37837240Sun Myint A, Rao C, Barbet N, Thamphya B, Pace-Loscos T, Schiappa R, Magne N, Martel-Lafay I, Mineur L, Deberne M, Zilli T, Dhadda A, Gerard JP. The safety and efficacy of total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery following dose-escalation: Surgical outcomes from the organ preservation in early rectal adenocarcinoma (OPERA) trial, a European multicentre phase 3 randomised trial (NCT02505750). Colorectal Dis. 2023 Nov;25(11):2160-2169. doi: 10.1111/codi.16773. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36801007Gerard JP, Barbet N, Schiappa R, Magne N, Martel I, Mineur L, Deberne M, Zilli T, Dhadda A, Myint AS; ICONE group. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with radiation dose escalation with contact x-ray brachytherapy boost or external beam radiotherapy boost for organ preservation in early cT2-cT3 rectal adenocarcinoma (OPERA): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Apr;8(4):356-367. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00392-2. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
Related trials for Rectal Neoplasms
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingObservational study
Pre- and On-treatment Multi-omics Profiling of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Rectal Neoplasms
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Natural History Study of Early Life Exposures in Agriculture (ELEA)
Prostate Cancer, Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Tislelizumab in People With Colorectal Cancer
Colorectal Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jérôme DOYEN, M.D, PhD principal investigator
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
18 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing 3D conformal EBRT, Contact X-ray brachytherapy 50 kV and Capecitabine in people with Rectal Neoplasms, run by Centre Antoine Lacassagne at 18 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 18 sites in France, United Kingdom, Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of rectum preservation either with local excision or watch and wait strategy after neoadjuvant treatment without non salvageable locally progressive disease at 3 years post treatment, or permanent stoma. (time frame: 3 years post treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02505750, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Oct 2026.