AzTrials
AzTrials

Ischemic Cerebrovascular AccidentASTERNCT02523261

Interest of Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique (ADAPT) for Thrombectomy Revascularisation of Large Vessel Occlusion in Acute Ischaemic Stroke

A study testing direct aspiration procedure and stent retriever procedure in people with Ischemic Cerebrovascular Accident, run by Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild at 8 sites in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Mechanical thrombectomy (TM) is now validated through 4 randomized controlled trials of high scientific level as the reference treatment of cerebral infarction associated with proximal cerebral occlusion (MR CLEAN, ESCAPE 2014, 2015). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Ischemic Cerebrovascular Accident
What is being tested?
direct aspiration procedure and stent retriever procedure
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
381 participants
Where
8 sitesFrance
Study dates
10 Oct 2015to Feb 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age > 18 years with no upper age limit.
  • Cerebral infarction in the anterior circulation
  • Occlusion of the anterior circulation proven by CT angiography or MR angiography
  • With or without previous Intravenous thrombolysis
  • Start of thrombectomy procedure within 6 hours of symptoms onset.
  • Patient expresses verbally his non-opposition to be enrolled in the study ; in case patient cannot communicate, verbal non-opposition is obtained from his close / trusted person

Who cannot join

  • Absence of indication for thrombectomy
  • Cons-indication for thrombectomy
  • Presence of cerebral infarction of the posterior circulation
  • Occlusion of the cervical carotid artery
  • Allergy to x-ray contrast products
  • Patient was bedridden or using a wheelchair most of the day (pre-event modified Rankin Scale score > 3) prior to stroke
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Patient under legal protection
  • No affiliation to health insurance
  • Secondary exclusion criteria
  • Lack of access route for catheterization

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 1 country.

8 sites in 1 country

France8 sites
  • CHU Pellegrin

    Bordeaux

  • Hospices Civils de Lyon

    Bron

  • CHU Dupuytren

    Limoges

  • CHU Hôpital Gui de Chaulac

    Montpellier

  • Hôpital Neurologique

    Nancy

  • Hôpital Guillaume et René LAENNEC

    Nantes

  • Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild

    Paris, 75019

  • Hôpital Foch

    Suresnes

Other trials in France

About this study

Mechanical thrombectomy (TM) is now validated through 4 randomized controlled trials of high scientific level as the reference treatment of cerebral infarction associated with proximal cerebral occlusion (MR CLEAN, ESCAPE 2014, 2015). These studies have shown for the first time a major decrease (-35%) of disability related to severe cerebral infarction and reduction in mortality. These studies only used thrombectomy devices called stent retriever for obtaining recanalization rates ranging from 58-72% for the 2 largest studies (MR CLEAN, ESCAPE 2014, 2015). This criterion "recanalization" is important because it largely determines the functional prognosis of patients with severe cerebral infarction (Khatri, 2014).

These results are exciting but we can do even better. Indeed, already new thrombectomy devices are available with a special interest for ADAPT (A Direct Aspiration First Pass Technic). This distal suction system, with a high level of endovascular navigability, provides high recanalization rates (> 90%), low morbidity, with a synergistic effect with stent retriever (Turk A, Kowoll 2014 and 2015). To date, these technic (ADAPT) has never been assessed in a randomized controlled trial.

We have previously conducted a comparative observational study between two recanalization strategies by thrombectomy using first-line ADAPT or the most widely used stent retriever. The interventional neuroradiologist could, in case of recanalization failure with the Solitaire system, used another thrombectomy material left to the operator's choice. 244 consecutive patients on two centers (Rothschild Foundation, and Foch Hospital, France) admitted for a cerebral infarction associated with proximal occlusion were included. This is so far the largest series of patients with ADAPT system. The complete recanalization rate was 84% with ADAPT versus 68% with stent retriever (P = 0.006). Unpublished data, Oral presentation at the European Stroke Organization, April 2015). Our research aims to show that a first line strategy of recanalization by thrombectomy using a distal suction system (ADAPT) is superior that the use of a stent retriever.

Being tested
direct aspiration procedure, stent retriever procedure
Medical subject headings
Ischemic Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • direct aspiration procedureProcedure or surgery

    Revascularization by endovascular thrombectomy using the distal aspiration first pass technique

  • stent retriever procedureProcedure or surgery

    Revascularization by endovascular thrombectomy using a mechanical thrombectomy device

Study groups in NCT02523261
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ADAPTExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: direct aspiration procedure
Stent RetrieverActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: stent retriever procedure

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Complete recanalization percentage

    Proportion of patients in which complete recanalization is achieved as defined by a TICI score equal to 2b or 3

    Measured: Immediately after the revascularization procedure is completed

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Aug 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start10 Oct 2015
  3. Primary completionOct 2016
  4. Study completionFeb 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
381 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02523261
Sponsor's protocol ID
MPN_2015_22
Acronym
ASTER
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
12 Aug 2015
Last updated
22 Jan 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Maier B, Robichon E, Bourcier R, Dargazanli C, Labreuche J, Thion LA, Leguen M, Riem R, Desilles JP, Boulouis G, Delvoye F, Hebert S, Redjem H, Smajda S, Escalard S, Blanc R, Piotin M, Lapergue B, Mazighi M; ASTER Trialdagger. Association of Hypotension During Thrombectomy and Outcomes Differs With the Posterior Communicating Artery Patency. Stroke. 2021 Aug;52(9):2964-2967. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034542. Epub 2021 Jun 17.

    PubMed 34134507
  • Derraz I, Pou M, Labreuche J, Legrand L, Soize S, Tisserand M, Rosso C, Piotin M, Boulouis G, Oppenheim C, Naggara O, Bracard S, Clarencon F, Lapergue B, Bourcier R; ASTER and the THRACE Trials Investigators. Clot Burden Score and Collateral Status and Their Impact on Functional Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2021 Jan;42(1):42-48. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6865. Epub 2020 Nov 12.

    PubMed 33184069
  • Ducroux C, Piotin M, Gory B, Labreuche J, Blanc R, Ben Maacha M, Lapergue B, Fahed R; ASTER Trial investigators. First pass effect with contact aspiration and stent retrievers in the Aspiration versus Stent Retriever (ASTER) trial. J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Apr;12(4):386-391. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015215. Epub 2019 Aug 30.

    PubMed 31471527
  • Rosso C, Blanc R, Ly J, Samson Y, Lehericy S, Gory B, Marnat G, Mazighi M, Consoli A, Labreuche J, Saleme S, Costalat V, Bracard S, Desal H, Piotin M, Lapergue B; ASTER Trial and Pitie-Salpetriere Investigators. Impact of infarct location on functional outcome following endovascular therapy for stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019 Mar;90(3):313-319. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-318869. Epub 2018 Nov 13.

    PubMed 30425161
  • Guenego A, Lecler A, Raymond J, Sabben C, Khoury N, Premat K, Botta D, Boisseau W, Maier B, Ciccio G, Redjem H, Smajda S, Ducroux C, Di Meglio L, Davy V, Olivot JM, Wang A, Duplantier J, Roques M, Krystal S, Koskas P, Collin A, Ben Maacha M, Hamdani M, Zuber K, Blanc R, Piotin M, Fahed R; Aspiration versus STEnt-Retriever (ASTER) trial investigators. Hemorrhagic transformation after stroke: inter- and intrarater agreement. Eur J Neurol. 2019 Mar;26(3):476-482. doi: 10.1111/ene.13859. Epub 2018 Dec 7.

    PubMed 30414302
  • Fahed R, Ben Maacha M, Ducroux C, Khoury N, Blanc R, Piotin M, Lapergue B; ASTER Trial Investigators. Agreement between core laboratory and study investigators for imaging scores in a thrombectomy trial. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018 Dec;10(12):e30. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-013867. Epub 2018 May 14.

    PubMed 29760012
  • Lapergue B, Blanc R, Gory B, Labreuche J, Duhamel A, Marnat G, Saleme S, Costalat V, Bracard S, Desal H, Mazighi M, Consoli A, Piotin M; ASTER Trial Investigators. Effect of Endovascular Contact Aspiration vs Stent Retriever on Revascularization in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Large Vessel Occlusion: The ASTER Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Aug 1;318(5):443-452. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.9644.

    PubMed 28763550
  • Blanc R, Redjem H, Ciccio G, Smajda S, Desilles JP, Orng E, Taylor G, Drumez E, Fahed R, Labreuche J, Mazighi M, Lapergue B, Piotin M. Predictors of the Aspiration Component Success of a Direct Aspiration First Pass Technique (ADAPT) for the Endovascular Treatment of Stroke Reperfusion Strategy in Anterior Circulation Acute Stroke. Stroke. 2017 Jun;48(6):1588-1593. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016149. Epub 2017 Apr 20.

    PubMed 28428348

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing direct aspiration procedure and stent retriever procedure in people with Ischemic Cerebrovascular Accident, run by Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild at 8 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Complete recanalization percentage (time frame: Immediately after the revascularization procedure is completed). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02523261, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jan 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in