PainNCT02529670
Low Level Laser Therapy in the Dorsal Root Ganglion in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain
A study testing Laser, Drug: Lidocaine and Radiofrequency in people with Pain and Low Back Pain, run by University of Nove de Julho at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
Chronic axial low back pain is a public health problem and has a high socioeconomic impact. The dorsal ganglion of the second spinal nerve (GDL2) is a cluster of neuronal bodies responsible for sensory afferent inputs from more than 80% of the lumbar region. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain, Low Back Pain, Nociceptive Pain
- What is being tested?
- Laser, Drug: Lidocaine and Radiofrequency
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 31 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- Mar 2014to Dec 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Chronic low back pain (more than 3 months of nociceptive or neuropathic pain).
- No neurological deficits
Who cannot join
- Active lumbar cancer
- Active infection
- Coagulation disorders
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Study of the Effect of Low Level Laser Therapy in the Dorsal Root Ganglion in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain
Chronic axial low back pain is a public health problem and has a high socioeconomic impact. The dorsal ganglion of the second spinal nerve (GDL2) is a cluster of neuronal bodies responsible for sensory afferent inputs from more than 80% of the lumbar region. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is proven effective to help relieve pain. Thus, the aim of this project is to determine the effect of LLLT on GDL2 when applied to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic axial low back pain. Methodology: 45 patients will be randomized into three groups: laser, radiofrequency and local anesthetic. The patient will be positioned in a prone horizontal position under anesthetic monitoring. The intervertebral foramen between the second and third lumbar vertebrae will be accessed by percutaneous puncture guided by fluoroscopy. In the local anesthetic group, injection of 1 ml lidocaine without vasoconstrictor will be applied in the tubes G20, 150 mm long and 5 mm active tip in contact with the target. In the radiofrequency group, neuromodulation will be held for 300 seconds at 42oC. In the laser group, the laser Photon III® (DCM) will be applied through optic fiber crossing G18 cannulas, during 84 seconds. The pain score will be assessed by visual analog scale. Temperature will be measured and aspirate periganglionic sample, trans-operatively, to study Interleucins-1β and TNF-alpha assessed by ELISA and genetic evaluation trough RNA seek, RNA isolation and ATP quantification. The data will be evaluated for normality and subjected to appropriate statistical analysis, in order to seek representation, as same as the level of significance of the studied samples.
- Conditions
- Pain, Low Back Pain, Nociceptive Pain, Neuropathic Pain, Low Level Laser Therapy
- Being tested
- Laser, Drug: Lidocaine, Radiofrequency
- Keywords
- Low Level Laser Therapy, Low Back Pain, Diagnosis, Genetic, Clinical trial
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Low Back Pain, Nociceptive Pain, Neuralgia, Disease
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LaserProcedure or surgery
Low level laser therapy will be delivered through Laser Photon III ® (DMC) in the second lumbar dorsal root ganglion.
Drug: LidocaineProcedure or surgery
1 mL of Lidocaine will be delivered in the second lumbar dorsal root ganglion through fluoroscopy.
RadiofrequencyProcedure or surgery
Radiofrequency will be delivered during 300 seconds, 42oC in the second lumbar dorsal root ganglion.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Laser | Experimental | 15 patients will be positioned in a prone horizontal position under anesthetic monitoring. The intervertebral foramen between the second and third lumbar vertebrae will be accessed by percutaneous puncture guided by fluoroscopy. Laser Photon III® (DCM) will be applied through fiber optics crossing G18 cannulas, during 84 seconds. Receives: Procedure: Laser |
| Radiofrequency | Active comparator | 15 patients will receive radiofrequency in the second dorsal root ganglion through tubes G20, 150 mm long and 5 mm active tip in contact with the target, neuromodulation will be held for 300 seconds at 42oC. Receives: Procedure: Radiofrequency |
| Drug: Lidocaine | Active comparator | In the local anesthetic group, 15 patients will receive the injection of 1 ml lidocaine without vasoconstrictor will be applied in the tubes G18, 150 mm long to block the second dorsal root ganglion. Receives: Procedure: Drug: Lidocaine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain Intensity Measure using Visual Analog Scale
Self reported pain intensity following Visual Analog Scale, scored 0-10 (0=no pain; 10=the worst pain ever).
Measured: 5 minutes before procedure
Pain Intensity Measure using the change in Visual Analog Scale from baseline at 1 month
Patients will report the intensity of the pain using the score in visual analogue scale, scored 0-10 (0=no pain; 10=the worst pain ever).
Measured: 5 minutes after procedure
Pain Intensity Measure using the Visual Analog Scale
In follow up, patients will report the intensity of the pain using the score in visual analogue scale, scored 0-10 (0=no pain; 10=the worst pain ever).
Measured: 1 month and 6 months after procedure
Secondary outcomes (1)
Immunochemistry to analyse IL-1, IL-10, TNF alfa.
Through the needle used the sample will be collected and examined by immunocytochemical staining and ELISA.
Measured: Samples collected 1 minute after the application of laser, radiofrequency or lidocaine
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2014
- Primary completionMar 2016
- Study completionDec 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Nove de Julho
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Vanessa Milanesi Holanda, University of Nove de Julho
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02529670
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 53123716.3.0000.5511
- Status last verified
- Jun 2018
- First submitted
- 11 Aug 2015
- Last updated
- 18 Jun 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Rydevik BL, Myers RR, Powell HC. Pressure increase in the dorsal root ganglion following mechanical compression. Closed compartment syndrome in nerve roots. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989 Jun;14(6):574-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198906000-00004.
PubMed 2749371Hart LG, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC. Physician office visits for low back pain. Frequency, clinical evaluation, and treatment patterns from a U.S. national survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Jan 1;20(1):11-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199501000-00003.
PubMed 7709270Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI. Back pain prevalence and visit rates: estimates from U.S. national surveys, 2002. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 1;31(23):2724-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000244618.06877.cd.
PubMed 17077742Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006 May;10(4):287-333. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
PubMed 16095934Frymoyer JW, Cats-Baril WL. An overview of the incidences and costs of low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am. 1991 Apr;22(2):263-71.
PubMed 1826550Katz JA. Getting the lowdown on back pain. Nursing. 2001 Dec;31(12):24. doi: 10.1097/00152193-200131120-00008. No abstract available.
PubMed 11921711Schaeffer V, Meyer L, Patte-Mensah C, Mensah-Nyagan AG. Progress in dorsal root ganglion neurosteroidogenic activity: basic evidence and pathophysiological correlation. Prog Neurobiol. 2010 Sep;92(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.04.009. Epub 2010 May 10.
PubMed 20438798de Souza Grava AL, Ferrari LF, Defino HL. Cytokine inhibition and time-related influence of inflammatory stimuli on the hyperalgesia induced by the nucleus pulposus. Eur Spine J. 2012 Mar;21(3):537-45. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2027-8. Epub 2011 Sep 25.
PubMed 21947908Chow R, Yan W, Armati P. Electrophysiological effects of single point transcutaneous 650 and 808 nm laser irradiation of rat sciatic nerve: a study of relevance for low-level laser therapy and laser acupuncture. Photomed Laser Surg. 2012 Sep;30(9):530-5. doi: 10.1089/pho.2012.3248. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
PubMed 22779441Lauria G, Bakkers M, Schmitz C, Lombardi R, Penza P, Devigili G, Smith AG, Hsieh ST, Mellgren SI, Umapathi T, Ziegler D, Faber CG, Merkies IS. Intraepidermal nerve fiber density at the distal leg: a worldwide normative reference study. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2010 Sep;15(3):202-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8027.2010.00271.x.
PubMed 21040142
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jun 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study of the Effect of Low Level Laser Therapy in the Dorsal Root Ganglion in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02529670
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 53123716.3.0000.5511
- Conditions
- Pain, Low Back Pain, Nociceptive Pain, Neuropathic Pain, Low Level Laser Therapy
- Keywords
- Low Level Laser Therapy, Low Back Pain, Diagnosis, Genetic, Clinical trial
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Nove de JulhoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.
- Study start
- Mar 2014
- Primary completion
- Mar 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Chronic axial low back pain is a public health problem and has a high socioeconomic impact. The dorsal ganglion of the second spinal nerve (GDL2) is a cluster of neuronal bodies responsible for sensory afferent inputs from more than 80% of the lumbar region. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT) is proven effective to help relieve pain. Thus, the aim of this project is to determine the effect of LLLT on GDL2 when applied to assist in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic axial low back pain. Methodology: 45 patients will be randomized into three groups: laser, radiofrequency and local anesthetic. The patient will be positioned in a prone horizontal position under anesthetic monitoring. The intervertebral foramen between the second and third lumbar vertebrae will be accessed by percutaneous puncture guided by fluoroscopy. In the local anesthetic group, injection of 1 ml lidocaine without vasoconstrictor will be applied in the tubes G20, 150 mm long and 5 mm active tip in contact with the target. In the radiofrequency group, neuromodulation will be held for 300 seconds at 42oC. In the laser group, the laser Photon III® (DCM) will be applied through optic fiber crossing G18 cannulas, during 84 seconds. The pain score will be assessed by visual analog scale. Temperature will be measured and aspirate periganglionic sample, trans-operatively, to study Interleucins-1β and TNF-alpha assessed by ELISA and genetic evaluation trough RNA seek, RNA isolation and ATP quantification. The data will be evaluated for normality and subjected to appropriate statistical analysis, in order to seek representation, as same as the level of significance of the studied samples.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Laser | Experimental | Procedure: Laser15 patients will be positioned in a prone horizontal position under anesthetic monitoring. The intervertebral foramen between the second and third lumbar vertebrae will be accessed by percutaneous puncture guided by fluoroscopy. Laser Photon III® (DCM) will be applied through fiber optics crossing G18 cannulas, during 84 seconds. |
| Radiofrequency | Active comparator | Procedure: Radiofrequency15 patients will receive radiofrequency in the second dorsal root ganglion through tubes G20, 150 mm long and 5 mm active tip in contact with the target, neuromodulation will be held for 300 seconds at 42oC. |
| Drug: Lidocaine | Active comparator | Procedure: Drug: LidocaineIn the local anesthetic group, 15 patients will receive the injection of 1 ml lidocaine without vasoconstrictor will be applied in the tubes G18, 150 mm long to block the second dorsal root ganglion. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Chronic low back pain (more than 3 months of nociceptive or neuropathic pain).
- No neurological deficits
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Active lumbar cancer
- Active infection
- Coagulation disorders
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LaserLow level laser therapy will be delivered through Laser Photon III ® (DMC) in the second lumbar dorsal root ganglion. | Procedure or surgery | Laser |
| Drug: Lidocaine1 mL of Lidocaine will be delivered in the second lumbar dorsal root ganglion through fluoroscopy. | Procedure or surgery | Drug: Lidocaine |
| RadiofrequencyRadiofrequency will be delivered during 300 seconds, 42oC in the second lumbar dorsal root ganglion. | Procedure or surgery | Radiofrequency |
Primary outcome
Pain Intensity Measure using Visual Analog Scale
Time frame: 5 minutes before procedure
Self reported pain intensity following Visual Analog Scale, scored 0-10 (0=no pain; 10=the worst pain ever).
Pain Intensity Measure using the change in Visual Analog Scale from baseline at 1 month
Time frame: 5 minutes after procedure
Patients will report the intensity of the pain using the score in visual analogue scale, scored 0-10 (0=no pain; 10=the worst pain ever).
Pain Intensity Measure using the Visual Analog Scale
Time frame: 1 month and 6 months after procedure
In follow up, patients will report the intensity of the pain using the score in visual analogue scale, scored 0-10 (0=no pain; 10=the worst pain ever).
1 secondary outcome
Immunochemistry to analyse IL-1, IL-10, TNF alfa.
Time frame: Samples collected 1 minute after the application of laser, radiofrequency or lidocaine
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jun 2018.
- Background: PubMed 2749371Rydevik BL, Myers RR, Powell HC. Pressure increase in the dorsal root ganglion following mechanical compression. Closed compartment syndrome in nerve roots. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989 Jun;14(6):574-6. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198906000-00004.
- Background: PubMed 7709270Hart LG, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC. Physician office visits for low back pain. Frequency, clinical evaluation, and treatment patterns from a U.S. national survey. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1995 Jan 1;20(1):11-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199501000-00003.
- Background: PubMed 17077742Deyo RA, Mirza SK, Martin BI. Back pain prevalence and visit rates: estimates from U.S. national surveys, 2002. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 1;31(23):2724-7. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000244618.06877.cd.
- Background: PubMed 16095934Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, Cohen R, Gallacher D. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006 May;10(4):287-333. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
- Background: PubMed 1826550Frymoyer JW, Cats-Baril WL. An overview of the incidences and costs of low back pain. Orthop Clin North Am. 1991 Apr;22(2):263-71.
- Background: PubMed 11921711Katz JA. Getting the lowdown on back pain. Nursing. 2001 Dec;31(12):24. doi: 10.1097/00152193-200131120-00008. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 20438798Schaeffer V, Meyer L, Patte-Mensah C, Mensah-Nyagan AG. Progress in dorsal root ganglion neurosteroidogenic activity: basic evidence and pathophysiological correlation. Prog Neurobiol. 2010 Sep;92(1):33-41. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.04.009. Epub 2010 May 10.
- Background: PubMed 21947908de Souza Grava AL, Ferrari LF, Defino HL. Cytokine inhibition and time-related influence of inflammatory stimuli on the hyperalgesia induced by the nucleus pulposus. Eur Spine J. 2012 Mar;21(3):537-45. doi: 10.1007/s00586-011-2027-8. Epub 2011 Sep 25.
- Background: PubMed 22779441Chow R, Yan W, Armati P. Electrophysiological effects of single point transcutaneous 650 and 808 nm laser irradiation of rat sciatic nerve: a study of relevance for low-level laser therapy and laser acupuncture. Photomed Laser Surg. 2012 Sep;30(9):530-5. doi: 10.1089/pho.2012.3248. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
- Background: PubMed 21040142Lauria G, Bakkers M, Schmitz C, Lombardi R, Penza P, Devigili G, Smith AG, Hsieh ST, Mellgren SI, Umapathi T, Ziegler D, Faber CG, Merkies IS. Intraepidermal nerve fiber density at the distal leg: a worldwide normative reference study. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2010 Sep;15(3):202-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8027.2010.00271.x.
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Laser, Drug: Lidocaine and Radiofrequency in people with Pain and Low Back Pain, run by University of Nove de Julho at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jun 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain Intensity Measure using Visual Analog Scale (time frame: 5 minutes before procedure). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02529670, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jun 2018.