AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Respiratory FailureNCT02598492

Imputation of PaO2 From SaO2

An observational study of Acute Respiratory Failure, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 3 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aims of this study are (1) to find out the relationship between PaO2 and SaO2 among mechanically ventilated patients and (2) to create a reliable system to utilize SF ratios to impute the PF ratios in assessing the respiratory parameter of the SOFA score. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Acute Respiratory Failure
What is being tested?
arterial blood gas
How many people
646 participants
Where
3 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
1 Sep 2015to 31 Dec 2020
How long will I take part?
1 Year
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adults > 18 years old who are invasively mechanically ventilated in an ED or ICU

Who may be able to join

  • Mechanically ventilated patient in a participating ICU or ED.
  • Arterial blood gas ordered and obtained for clinical reasons.

Who cannot join

  • Age < 18 years
  • Pregnancy
  • Prisoners

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 2 countries.

3 sites in 2 countries

China2 sites
  • PLA General Hospital

    Beijing

  • Guangzhou Red Cross Hospital

    Guangzhou, Guangdong

Other trials in China

United States1 site
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Imputation of PaO2 From SaO2 in the Respiratory Component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score

The aims of this study are (1) to find out the relationship between PaO2 and SaO2 among mechanically ventilated patients and (2) to create a reliable system to utilize SF ratios to impute the PF ratios in assessing the respiratory parameter of the SOFA score.

Read the detailed description

The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is validated as a measure of severity of illness over time in intensive care unit (ICU) patients and can be used to follow the course of organ dysfunction and response to treatment1. SOFA has become a frequently used scoring system of patients in multi-organ failure, given its high sensitivity and specificity as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients2. The severity of respiratory dysfunction is measured in the SOFA score by PaO2/FiO2 (PF) ratio, which is also used as a measure of severity of hypoxemia in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

An invasive sampling of arterial blood gas (ABG) is required to measure the PaO2 for the PF. Often, patients with less severe hypoxemia may not clinically undergo ABG testing on a routine basis; hence the clinical and research utility of the SOFA scoring system is reduced. Furthermore, previous studies revealed concerns about anemia following repeated blood sampling; hence, the tendency to implement less invasive approaches have led to less frequent ABG measurements in critically ill patients3. However, almost all ICU patients are monitored with pulse oximeters, which measure the percent saturation of hemoglobin with oxygen (SpO2). Whether SpO2 can be used to impute PaO2 for determining the PF ratio has not been robustly evaluated in a prospective study of critically ill patients.

Prior work investigating the association between PaO2 and SpO2 includes a post hoc study of ARDS Network patients4. This study excluded patients at altitude, used a linear model for a highly non-linear relationship, and could not determine whether SpO2 and PaO2 were simultaneously measured. A similar approach was applied to ARDS Network patients to derive an SpO2-based respiratory subscore of the SOFA score5. Several similar, retrospective studies have been performed in mechanically ventilated children, consistently using linear models of correlation between SF and PF ratios, with similar limitations6-9.

The Ellis inversion10 of the Severinghaus equation11 provides a useful non-linear method for imputing PaO2 from SaO2. This technique has been used in multiple cohorts of patients with pneumonia12-14. This simple calculation can be improved by incorporating PaCO2 and pH values, which could be available from venous blood gases that may be obtained in patients without arterial catheters. Because Severinghaus/Ellis estimates SaO2, a method for estimating SaO2 from SpO2 is necessary. There is no current validated and reliable method for calculating SaO2 on the basis of a measured SpO2. Skin pigmentation affects accuracy of SpO2, as do sex and oximeter type15,16.

The aims of this study are (1) to find out the relationship between PaO2 and SaO2 among mechanically ventilated patients and (2) to create a reliable system to utilize SF ratios to impute the PF ratios in assessing the respiratory parameter of the SOFA score.

Being tested
arterial blood gas
Keywords
Mechanical Ventilator

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • arterial blood gasOther

    Also called oxygena saturation

    Just record clinical lab data

Study groups in NCT02598492
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Imputation of SF to PFPatients required invasive mechanical ventilation within 6 hours after intubation
Receives: Other: arterial blood gas

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To evaluate the relationship between PaO2 and SaO2 among mechanically ventilated patients

    Measured: one year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. To utilize SF ratios to impute the PF ratios in assessing the respiratory parameter of the SOFA score

    Measured: one year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Nov 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Sep 2015
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2020
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
646 participants (actual)
Target duration
1 Year
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02598492
Sponsor's protocol ID
2015P001945
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
4 Nov 2015
Last updated
8 Mar 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Vincent JL, de Mendonca A, Cantraine F, Moreno R, Takala J, Suter PM, Sprung CL, Colardyn F, Blecher S. Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Working group on "sepsis-related problems" of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Crit Care Med. 1998 Nov;26(11):1793-800. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199811000-00016.

    PubMed 9824069
  • Vincent JL, Ferreira F, Moreno R. Scoring systems for assessing organ dysfunction and survival. Crit Care Clin. 2000 Apr;16(2):353-66. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0704(05)70114-7.

    PubMed 10768086
  • Ferguson ND, Frutos-Vivar F, Esteban A, Fernandez-Segoviano P, Aramburu JA, Najera L, Stewart TE. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: underrecognition by clinicians and diagnostic accuracy of three clinical definitions. Crit Care Med. 2005 Oct;33(10):2228-34. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000181529.08630.49.

    PubMed 16215375
  • Rice TW, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Hayden DL, Schoenfeld DA, Ware LB; National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute ARDS Network. Comparison of the SpO2/FIO2 ratio and the PaO2/FIO2 ratio in patients with acute lung injury or ARDS. Chest. 2007 Aug;132(2):410-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-0617. Epub 2007 Jun 15.

    PubMed 17573487
  • Pandharipande PP, Shintani AK, Hagerman HE, St Jacques PJ, Rice TW, Sanders NW, Ware LB, Bernard GR, Ely EW. Derivation and validation of Spo2/Fio2 ratio to impute for Pao2/Fio2 ratio in the respiratory component of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score. Crit Care Med. 2009 Apr;37(4):1317-21. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819cefa9.

    PubMed 19242333
  • Khemani RG, Patel NR, Bart RD 3rd, Newth CJL. Comparison of the pulse oximetric saturation/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio and the PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio in children. Chest. 2009 Mar;135(3):662-668. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2239. Epub 2008 Nov 24.

    PubMed 19029434
  • Khemani RG, Thomas NJ, Venkatachalam V, Scimeme JP, Berutti T, Schneider JB, Ross PA, Willson DF, Hall MW, Newth CJ; Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Network Investigators (PALISI). Comparison of SpO2 to PaO2 based markers of lung disease severity for children with acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2012 Apr;40(4):1309-16. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823bc61b.

    PubMed 22202709
  • Thomas NJ, Shaffer ML, Willson DF, Shih MC, Curley MA. Defining acute lung disease in children with the oxygenation saturation index. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2010 Jan;11(1):12-7. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181b0653d.

    PubMed 19561556
  • Lobete C, Medina A, Rey C, Mayordomo-Colunga J, Concha A, Menendez S. Correlation of oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio with Pao2/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio in a heterogeneous sample of critically ill children. J Crit Care. 2013 Aug;28(4):538.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.12.006. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

    PubMed 23395312
  • Ellis RK. Determination of PO2 from saturation. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1989 Aug;67(2):902. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1989.67.2.902. No abstract available.

    PubMed 2793692
  • Severinghaus JW. Simple, accurate equations for human blood O2 dissociation computations. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1979 Mar;46(3):599-602. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1979.46.3.599.

    PubMed 35496
  • Lanspa MJ, Jones BE, Brown SM, Dean NC. Mortality, morbidity, and disease severity of patients with aspiration pneumonia. J Hosp Med. 2013 Feb;8(2):83-90. doi: 10.1002/jhm.1996. Epub 2012 Nov 26.

    PubMed 23184866
  • Dean NC, Jones JP, Aronsky D, Brown S, Vines CG, Jones BE, Allen T. Hospital admission decision for patients with community-acquired pneumonia: variability among physicians in an emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2012 Jan;59(1):35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.07.032. Epub 2011 Sep 9.

    PubMed 21907451
  • Brown SM, Jones BE, Jephson AR, Dean NC; Infectious Disease Society of America/American Thoracic Society 2007. Validation of the Infectious Disease Society of America/American Thoracic Society 2007 guidelines for severe community-acquired pneumonia. Crit Care Med. 2009 Dec;37(12):3010-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b030d9.

    PubMed 19789456
  • Bickler PE, Feiner JR, Severinghaus JW. Effects of skin pigmentation on pulse oximeter accuracy at low saturation. Anesthesiology. 2005 Apr;102(4):715-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200504000-00004.

    PubMed 15791098

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Acute Respiratory Failure, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 3 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Mar 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in China, United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To evaluate the relationship between PaO2 and SaO2 among mechanically ventilated patients (time frame: one year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02598492, which also lists 18 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Mar 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in