Septic ShockREALISMNCT02638779
REAnimation Low Immune Status Markers
A study testing Blood sampling in people with Septic Shock and Severe Trauma, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The fact that sepsis disrupts immune system homeostasis by inducing an initial cytokine storm, that participates to occurrence of organ failures and early death, followed by a compensatory anti-inflammatory response leading to immunosuppression, is now well established. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Septic Shock, Severe Trauma, Severe Burn
- What is being tested?
- Blood sampling
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 552 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 11 Dec 2015to 27 Jun 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient or next of kin having been informed of the conditions of the study and having signed the informed consent form
- Patient hospitalized for :
- Septic shock
- Severe trauma (including severe burn)
- Major surgery
- Normal clinical examination
- Signed informed consent form
- Person with social security insurance
Who cannot join
- Patient with severe neutropenia (neutrophil count <0.5 g/l)
- Patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy
- Patients receiving corticosteroids (IV or Per os)
- Use of therapeutic antibodies
- Hematological disease under treatment, or treated within 5 years before inclusion
- End of chemotherapy within the 6 months prior to inclusion
Show all 36Show fewer
- Patient with innate or acquired immune deficiency (for example severe combined immunodeficiency, HIV or AIDS, any stage)
- Patients for whom a care limitation was pronounced at time of enrolment
- Anticipated length of stay before discharge from the ICU is estimated at less than 48 hours
- Participation in an intervention study
- Extra-corporeal circulation in the month preceding inclusion in case of cardiac surgery
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Patient with no social security insurance, with restricted liberty or under legal protection
- Person with an infectious syndrome during the last 90 days
- Extreme physical stress within the last week
- Person having received within the last 90 days, a treatment based on
- Antivirals
- Antibiotics
- Antiparasitics
- Antifungics
- Person having received within the last 15 days, a treatment based on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
- Person having received within the last 24 months, a treatment based on
- Immunosuppressive therapy
- Corticosteroids (IV or Per os)
- Therapeutic antibodies
- Chemotherapy
- History of :
- innate or acquired immune deficiency
- Hematological disease
- Solid tumor
- Severe chronic disease
- Surgery or hospitalization within the last 2 years
- Pregnancy within the last year
- Participation to a phase I clinical assay during the last year
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women
- Person with restricted liberty or under legal protection
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
France1 site
Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation - Hôpital Edouard Herriot
Lyon, 69437
About this study
The fact that sepsis disrupts immune system homeostasis by inducing an initial cytokine storm, that participates to occurrence of organ failures and early death, followed by a compensatory anti-inflammatory response leading to immunosuppression, is now well established. This immunomodulating response results in a higher risk of secondary infections and is associated to 2/3 of deaths related to septic shocks. Follow up of patients' immune status with time is crucial to guide therapy management. Objective of REALISM project is to demonstrate existence of this immunosuppression phase, by providing strong epidemiologic data for septic shock patients, but also by extension to other situations of inflammatory aggressions like severe severe trauma or burns, or major surgery. This project will provide tools to predict occurrence of secondary infections and guide patient management by comparing innovating immunomonitoring tools to reference tests non already adapted to a routine patient management.
Targeted populations are adult patients hospitalized for septic shock, severe trauma (including severe burn) or major surgery and healthy volunteers, whom blood samples will serve to validate reference intervals of the two reference tests.
- Conditions
- Septic Shock, Severe Trauma, Severe Burn, Major Surgery
- Being tested
- Blood sampling
- Keywords
- Septic shock, severe trauma, severe burn, major surgery, immunosuppression, Healthcare-Associated Infections
- Medical subject headings
- Shock, Septic, Wounds and Injuries, Burns, Cross Infection
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Blood samplingBiological
Specific Blood sampling will be performed in patients and healthy volunteers
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Blood sampling | Experimental | Blood sampling will be performed in all patients and healthy volunteers Receives: Biological: Blood sampling |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of patients meeting the definition of of injury-induced-immunosuppression
The immunosuppression status will be determined from two immunological reference tests: (1) lymphocyte proliferation in response to ex vivo T cell stimulation (adaptive immunity) (Poujol et al., 2014) and (2) the production of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) by monocytes in response to ex vivo stimulation by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (innate immunity) (Duffy et al., 2014). The values measured will be defined as normal or abnormal, depending on whether they are within reference intervals (RI) derived from an independent set of healthy volunteers. For this purpose, the definition of immunosuppression will be: an abnormal result in at least one of the two "reference" tests (outside the reference intervals defining normal values), and on at least two consecutive samples. The same reference test must be abnormal in two successive samples examined for the patient to be considered immunosuppressed.
Measured: Up to 2 months after injury
Secondary outcomes (5)
Proportion of patients with a deficiency of the innate or adaptive immunity
Intensity of the innate immune deficiency will be measured using the production of TNF by monocytes in response to ex vivo stimulation by LPS (Duffy et al., 2014). Intensity of the adaptive immune deficiency will be measured using the lymphocyte proliferation in response to ex vivo T cell stimulation (Poujol et al., 2014). The values measured will be defined as normal or abnormal, depending on whether they are within reference intervals derived from an independent set of healthy volunteers. We will describe for all groups of patients:
- The proportion of patients with a deficiency of the innate immunity, defined by an abnormal TNF secretion test result after LPS stimulation, for at least two consecutive samples.
- The proportion of patients with a deficiency of the adaptive immunity, defined by an abnormal lymphocyte proliferation, for at least two consecutive samples.
- The proportion of patients with at least one abnormal test on Days 1, 3-4, 5-7, 13/18, 26/36 and 52/68
Measured: Up to 2 months after injury
Comparison of performance of the reference tests and new biomarkers for the diagnosis of immunosuppression
Reference tests being non-standardized and cumbersome to implement, and time to results being incompatible with clinical practice, the use of simpler and quicker tests, based on the use of new biomarkers, would allow the individualization of patient management based on the patient's immune status. One of the secondary objectives is to evaluate the performance of new biomarkers compared to the two reference tests to diagnose immunosuppression. Different types of markers and tests will be evaluated: Viral reactivation markers, host-response markers, immune functional assays, immunophenotyping.
Measured: Up to one week after injury
Correlation between the immunosuppression status and the incidence of healthcare-associated infections
To evaluate the association between the immunosuppression status as defined in primary objective and the occurrence of secondary infections related to healthcare, the association of the immunosuppression status upon the occurrence of secondary infection will be examined first, and secondly any possible association between the levels of each of the reference tests and the occurrence of secondary infections will be characterized. In this analysis, a secondary infection related to healthcare will be defined as an infection occurring after inclusion in the study, between inclusion and day 28.
Measured: Up to 28 days after injury
Correlation between immunosuppression and mortality
We will examine the association between immunosuppression (as defined in the primary objective) and in-hospital mortality. Association will be evaluated par measuring occurrence of mortality at days 14, 28, 60 and 90, in the different groups.
Measured: Up to 90 days after injury
Comparison of immune status before and after surgery in the population of surgical patients
The possibility of taking a sample before surgical stress should allow measurements of the impact of the procedure on the host response, and especially on any subsequent onset of immunosuppression. Oncological pathologies and treatments implemented prior to surgery may also be associated with immunosuppression, and for this reason patients hospitalized for cancer surgery will be compared to those hospitalized for vascular surgery. Impact of surgery on immunosuppression will be measured by comparing immune status as defined by the reference tests, in the population of surgical patients before and after surgery.
Measured: Up to 2 months after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study start11 Dec 2015
- Primary completion27 Jun 2018
- Study completion27 Jun 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Septic ShockStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hospices Civils de LyonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 552 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospices Civils de Lyon
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bioaster, BioMérieux, Sanofi
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02638779
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 69HCL15_0379
- Other IDs
- 2015-A01293-46
- Acronym
- REALISM
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 18 Dec 2015
- Last updated
- 19 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Rol ML, Venet F, Rimmele T, Moucadel V, Cortez P, Quemeneur L, Gardiner D, Griffiths A, Pachot A, Textoris J, Monneret G; REALISM study group. The REAnimation Low Immune Status Markers (REALISM) project: a protocol for broad characterisation and follow-up of injury-induced immunosuppression in intensive care unit (ICU) critically ill patients. BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 21;7(6):e015734. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015734.
PubMed 28637738Venet F, Textoris J, Blein S, Rol ML, Bodinier M, Canard B, Cortez P, Meunier B, Tan LK, Tipple C, Quemeneur L, Reynier F, Leissner P, Vedrine C, Bouffard Y, Delwarde B, Martin O, Girardot T, Truc C, Griffiths AD, Moucadel V, Pachot A, Monneret G, Rimmele T; REALISM study group. Immune Profiling Demonstrates a Common Immune Signature of Delayed Acquired Immunodeficiency in Patients With Various Etiologies of Severe Injury. Crit Care Med. 2022 Apr 1;50(4):565-575. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005270.
PubMed 34534131Mallet F, Diouf L, Meunier B, Perret M, Reynier F, Leissner P, Quemeneur L, Griffiths AD, Moucadel V, Pachot A, Venet F, Monneret G, Lepape A, Rimmele T, Tan LK, Brengel-Pesce K, Textoris J. Herpes DNAemia and TTV Viraemia in Intensive Care Unit Critically Ill Patients: A Single-Centre Prospective Longitudinal Study. Front Immunol. 2021 Nov 2;12:698808. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.698808. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34795661Peronnet E, Blein S, Venet F, Cerrato E, Fleurie A, Llitjos JF, Kreitmann L, Terraz G, Conti F, Gossez M, Rimmele T, Textoris J, Lukaszewicz AC, Brengel-Pesce K, Monneret G; REAnimation Low Immune Status Marker (REALISM) Study Group. Immune Profiling Panel Gene Set Identifies Critically Ill Patients With Low Monocyte Human Leukocyte Antigen-DR Expression: Preliminary Results From the REAnimation Low Immune Status Marker (REALISM) Study. Crit Care Med. 2023 Jun 1;51(6):808-816. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005832. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
PubMed 36917594Bodinier M, Peronnet E, Brengel-Pesce K, Conti F, Rimmele T, Textoris J, Vedrine C, Quemeneur L, Griffiths AD, Tan LK, Venet F, Maucort-Boulch D, Monneret G; REALISM study group. Monocyte Trajectories Endotypes Are Associated With Worsening in Septic Patients. Front Immunol. 2021 Nov 29;12:795052. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.795052. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34912347
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- REAnimation Low Immune Status Markers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02638779
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- REALISM / 69HCL15_0379
- Conditions
- Septic Shock, Severe Trauma, Severe Burn, Major Surgery
- Keywords
- Septic shock, severe trauma, severe burn, major surgery, immunosuppression, Healthcare-Associated Infections
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 552 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospices Civils de LyonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Bioaster, BioMérieux, Sanofi
- Study start
- 11 Dec 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 27 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Jun 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The fact that sepsis disrupts immune system homeostasis by inducing an initial cytokine storm, that participates to occurrence of organ failures and early death, followed by a compensatory anti-inflammatory response leading to immunosuppression, is now well established. This immunomodulating response results in a higher risk of secondary infections and is associated to 2/3 of deaths related to septic shocks. Follow up of patients' immune status with time is crucial to guide therapy management. Objective of REALISM project is to demonstrate existence of this immunosuppression phase, by providing strong epidemiologic data for septic shock patients, but also by extension to other situations of inflammatory aggressions like severe severe trauma or burns, or major surgery. This project will provide tools to predict occurrence of secondary infections and guide patient management by comparing innovating immunomonitoring tools to reference tests non already adapted to a routine patient management.
Targeted populations are adult patients hospitalized for septic shock, severe trauma (including severe burn) or major surgery and healthy volunteers, whom blood samples will serve to validate reference intervals of the two reference tests.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Blood sampling | Experimental | Biological: Blood samplingBlood sampling will be performed in all patients and healthy volunteers |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patient or next of kin having been informed of the conditions of the study and having signed the informed consent form
- Patient hospitalized for :
- Normal clinical examination
- Signed informed consent form
- Person with social security insurance
Key exclusion criteria (36 listed)
- Patient with severe neutropenia (neutrophil count <0.5 g/l)
- Patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy
- Patients receiving corticosteroids (IV or Per os)
- Use of therapeutic antibodies
- Hematological disease under treatment, or treated within 5 years before inclusion
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Blood samplingSpecific Blood sampling will be performed in patients and healthy volunteers | Biological | Blood sampling |
Primary outcome
Percentage of patients meeting the definition of of injury-induced-immunosuppression
Time frame: Up to 2 months after injury
The immunosuppression status will be determined from two immunological reference tests: (1) lymphocyte proliferation in response to ex vivo T cell stimulation (adaptive immunity) (Poujol et al., 2014) and (2) the production of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) by monocytes in response to ex vivo stimulation by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (innate immunity) (Duffy et al., 2014). The values measured will be defined as normal or abnormal, depending on whether they are within reference intervals (RI) derived from an independent set of healthy volunteers. For this purpose, the definition of immunosuppression will be: an abnormal result in at least one of the two "reference" tests (outside the reference intervals defining normal values), and on at least two consecutive samples. The same reference test must be abnormal in two successive samples examined for the patient to be considered immunosuppressed.
5 secondary outcomes
Proportion of patients with a deficiency of the innate or adaptive immunity
Time frame: Up to 2 months after injury
Comparison of performance of the reference tests and new biomarkers for the diagnosis of immunosuppression
Time frame: Up to one week after injury
Correlation between the immunosuppression status and the incidence of healthcare-associated infections
Time frame: Up to 28 days after injury
Correlation between immunosuppression and mortality
Time frame: Up to 90 days after injury
Comparison of immune status before and after surgery in the population of surgical patients
Time frame: Up to 2 months after surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Dec 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 28637738Rol ML, Venet F, Rimmele T, Moucadel V, Cortez P, Quemeneur L, Gardiner D, Griffiths A, Pachot A, Textoris J, Monneret G; REALISM study group. The REAnimation Low Immune Status Markers (REALISM) project: a protocol for broad characterisation and follow-up of injury-induced immunosuppression in intensive care unit (ICU) critically ill patients. BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 21;7(6):e015734. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015734.
- Results publication: PubMed 34534131Venet F, Textoris J, Blein S, Rol ML, Bodinier M, Canard B, Cortez P, Meunier B, Tan LK, Tipple C, Quemeneur L, Reynier F, Leissner P, Vedrine C, Bouffard Y, Delwarde B, Martin O, Girardot T, Truc C, Griffiths AD, Moucadel V, Pachot A, Monneret G, Rimmele T; REALISM study group. Immune Profiling Demonstrates a Common Immune Signature of Delayed Acquired Immunodeficiency in Patients With Various Etiologies of Severe Injury. Crit Care Med. 2022 Apr 1;50(4):565-575. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005270.
- Results publication: PubMed 34795661Mallet F, Diouf L, Meunier B, Perret M, Reynier F, Leissner P, Quemeneur L, Griffiths AD, Moucadel V, Pachot A, Venet F, Monneret G, Lepape A, Rimmele T, Tan LK, Brengel-Pesce K, Textoris J. Herpes DNAemia and TTV Viraemia in Intensive Care Unit Critically Ill Patients: A Single-Centre Prospective Longitudinal Study. Front Immunol. 2021 Nov 2;12:698808. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.698808. eCollection 2021.
- Results publication: PubMed 36917594Peronnet E, Blein S, Venet F, Cerrato E, Fleurie A, Llitjos JF, Kreitmann L, Terraz G, Conti F, Gossez M, Rimmele T, Textoris J, Lukaszewicz AC, Brengel-Pesce K, Monneret G; REAnimation Low Immune Status Marker (REALISM) Study Group. Immune Profiling Panel Gene Set Identifies Critically Ill Patients With Low Monocyte Human Leukocyte Antigen-DR Expression: Preliminary Results From the REAnimation Low Immune Status Marker (REALISM) Study. Crit Care Med. 2023 Jun 1;51(6):808-816. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005832. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34912347Bodinier M, Peronnet E, Brengel-Pesce K, Conti F, Rimmele T, Textoris J, Vedrine C, Quemeneur L, Griffiths AD, Tan LK, Venet F, Maucort-Boulch D, Monneret G; REALISM study group. Monocyte Trajectories Endotypes Are Associated With Worsening in Septic Patients. Front Immunol. 2021 Nov 29;12:795052. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.795052. eCollection 2021.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Septic Shock
RecruitingObservational study
Clinical Value of EMR3 in Sepsis Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Prognosis: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Study
Sepsis
Not yet recruiting
Hemodynamic Resuscitation Guided by Non-Invasive Mean Systemic Filling Pressure to Prevent Acute Kidney Injury in Septic Shock
Acute Kidney Injury Due to Sepsis
Recruiting
Veno-arterial Carbon Dioxide Partial Pressure Difference (CO2gap) for Early Resuscitation of Septic Shock
Sepsis - to Reduce Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit, Septic Shock
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Cardiac Index Measurement Using Right Ventricular Pressure Curve Analysis and Thermodilution Via a Swan-Ganz IQ™ Catheter.
Septic Shock
RecruitingPhase 3
A Trial of Adjunctive Fludrocortisone (50mcg, 100mcg or Placebo) in Critically Ill Patients With Septic Shock Receiving Hydrocortisone, Evaluating Survival and Functional Recovery and the Influence of Transcriptomic Response
Septic Shock
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Blood sampling in people with Septic Shock and Severe Trauma, run by Hospices Civils de Lyon at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 36 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of patients meeting the definition of of injury-induced-immunosuppression (time frame: Up to 2 months after injury). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02638779, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Dec 2025.