Heart FailureNCT02672163
Autologous Atrial Appendage Derived Cells in the Treatment of Heart Failure
A study testing CABG surgery and AADC therapy in people with Heart Failure, run by Helsinki University Central Hospital at 1 site in Finland.
Trial summary
This study aims to evaluate the safety and clinical feasibility of epicardially delivered autologous atrial appendage micrografts in the treatment of heart failure. The micrografts consisting atrial-derived cells and their extracellular matrix, are placed on an infarction scar during CABG surgery. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Failure
- What is being tested?
- CABG surgery and AADC therapy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 36 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFinland
- Study dates
- Feb 2016to Dec 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Informed consent obtained
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between ≤50% and ≥15%
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II-IV heart failure symptoms
Who cannot join
- Heart failure due to left ventricular outflow tract obstruction
- History of life-threatening and possibly repeating ventricular arrhythmias or resuscitation, or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
- Stroke or other disabling condition within 3 months before screening
- Severe valve disease or scheduled valve surgery
- Renal dysfunction (GFR <84 ml/min/1.73m)
- Other disease limiting life expectancy
- Contraindications for coronary angiogram or MRI
- Participation in some other clinical trial
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Epicardial Delivery of Autologous Atrial Appendage Micrografts During Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery - Safety and Feasibility Study
This study aims to evaluate the safety and clinical feasibility of epicardially delivered autologous atrial appendage micrografts in the treatment of heart failure. The micrografts consisting atrial-derived cells and their extracellular matrix, are placed on an infarction scar during CABG surgery.
Read the detailed description
The atrial appendages are a tissue reservoir for cardiomyocyte stem and precursor cells. During coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery part of the right atrial appendage can be excised upon insertion of the right atrial cannula of the heart-lung machine. This study aims to address the surgical feasibility and patient safety of epicardially delivered atrial appendage micrografts during CABG surgery.
Autologous cardiac cells are harvested from right atrial appendage during CABG of six patients. Micrografts consisting atrial appendage-derived cells (AADCs) and their extracellular matrix (ECM) of the atrial appendage are mechanically processed. The cells are placed on a tissue-engineered sheet with fibrin gel and tissue clue and further delivered epicardially on top of a infarction scar. Parameters including echocardiography reflecting cardiac insufficiency are studied pre- and post-operatively as well as at three and six months of the follow-up. Cardiac functional magnetic resonance imaging is performed preoperatively and at six-months follow-up. 20 patients will be recruited to serve as a control group. They are scheduled for elective CABG and are treated according to the normal hospital protocol, without the ECM sheet.
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Being tested
- CABG surgery, AADC therapy
- Keywords
- autologous micrografts, heart failure, coronary artery bypass surgery, cell therapy, atrial appendage, epicardial cell delivery
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CABG surgeryProcedure or surgery
Elective CABG surgery
AADC therapyProcedure or surgery
Atrial appendage derived cells are placed on the site of a infarct scar with matrix sheet
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| AACD-Therapy group | Experimental | 6 patients are recruited to the AADC-therapy group. Autologous atrial appendage derived cells (AADCs) are harvested from the appendage tissue removed during the venal cannulation of bypass. The cells and their extracellular matrix are placed with tissue clue to Cormatrix-sheet and further on top of the myocardium in the area of infarction scar. The procedure is done simultaneously with CABG surgery. The patients will be carefully monitored after the operations and cardiac MRI and echocardiogram will be performed previously to surgery as well as during the follow ups. Receives: Procedure: CABG surgery; Procedure: AADC therapy |
| Control group | Active comparator | 20 patients are recruited to form the control group. They are patients scheduled for elective CABG surgery and they meet the same inclusion and exclusion criteria as the therapy group. There patients are followed as the hospital protocol with out any additional imagination or blood tests. Receives: Procedure: CABG surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Safety; need for vasoactive medication
For assessing haemodynamics during the operation and at the intensive care unit
Measured: 6 months
Safety; cardiac index in l/min/m
For assessing haemodynamics during the operation and at the intensive care unit
Measured: 6 months
Safety; hemoglobin in g/l
For assessing haemodynamics during the operation and at the intensive care unit
Measured: 6 months
Safety; oxygen saturation in the pulmonary arterial blood (SvO2) in %
For assessing haemodynamics during the operation and at the intensive care unit
Measured: 6 months
Safety; serum potassium level in mmol/l
For assessing haemodynamics during the operation and at the intensive care unit
Measured: 6 months
Safety; blood glucose level in mmol/l
For assessing haemodynamics during the operation and at the intensive care unit
Measured: 6 months
Safety; Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) in %
For assessing cardiac function during and after the operation by echocardiogram
Measured: 6 months
Safety; pericardial effusion in mm
For assessing cardiac function after the operation by echocardiogram
Measured: 6 months
Safety: telemetric monitoring of rhythm
For assessing cardiac function after the operation
Measured: 6 months
Feasibility: Success in completing the delivery of the cell sheet to the myocardium
Measured in 0= success, 1= no success
Measured: 6 months
Feasibility: Waiting time in minutes for the cell sheet
Waiting time in minutes for the finished cell sheet to be placed on the myocardium after doing all the required anastomoses
Measured: 6 months
Feasibility: Waiting time in minutes for the heart
Waiting time in minutes for the the heart after doing all the anastomoses and before the cell sheet is finished
Measured: 6 months
Feasibility: Closing the right atrial appendage
Closing the right atrial appendage after removing the standardized tissue piece for preparing the cell sheet. According to the hospital protocol, appendage is closed with purse string suture. 0 = no additional suturing needed, 1 = additional suturing needed.
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (9)
Left ventricular wall thickness
Measured by MRI
Measured: 6 months
Change in the amount of myocardial scar tissue
Measured by MRI
Measured: 6 months
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction
Measured by MRI
Measured: 6 months
Plasma concentrations of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels
Measured: 6 months
New York Heart Association class
Measured: 6 months
Days in hospital
Measured: 1 month
Changes in the quality of life.
measured by questionnaire
Measured: 6 months
Change in movement and diastolic function of left ventricular wall
Measured by MRI
Measured: 6 months
Local changes in systolic and diastolic function
Measured by echocardiogram
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2016
- Primary completionDec 2019
- Study completionDec 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heart FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Helsinki University Central HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Helsinki University Central Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ari Harjula, Helsinki University Central Hospital
- Investigators
- Ari Harjula, Prof, Study director, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02672163
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 180/13/03/02/2013
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 28 Dec 2015
- Last updated
- 5 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lehtinen M, Patila T, Vento A, Kankuri E, Suojaranta-Ylinen R, Poyhia R, Harjula A; Helsinki BMMC Collaboration. Prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial of bone marrow cell transplantation combined with coronary surgery - perioperative safety study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Dec;19(6):990-6. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu265. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
PubMed 25142068Lehtinen M, Schildt J, Ahonen A, Nikkinen P, Lauerma K, Sinisalo J, Kankuri E, Vento A, Patila T, Harjula A; Helsinki BMMC Collaboration. Combining FDG-PET and 99mTc-SPECT to predict functional outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Sep;16(9):1023-30. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev032. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
PubMed 25762563Lehtinen M, Patila T, Kankuri E, Lauerma K, Sinisalo J, Laine M, Kupari M, Vento A, Harjula A; Helsinki BMMC Collaboration. Intramyocardial bone marrow mononuclear cell transplantation in ischemic heart failure: Long-term follow-up. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Jul;34(7):899-905. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.01.989. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
PubMed 25797522Lampinen M, Vento A, Laurikka J, Nystedt J, Mervaala E, Harjula A, Kankuri E. Rational Autologous Cell Sources For Therapy of Heart Failure - Vehicles and Targets For Gene and RNA Therapies. Curr Gene Ther. 2016;16(1):21-33. doi: 10.2174/1566523216666160104141809.
PubMed 26725880Nummi A, Mulari S, Stewart JA, Kivisto S, Teittinen K, Nieminen T, Lampinen M, Patila T, Sintonen H, Juvonen T, Kupari M, Suojaranta R, Kankuri E, Harjula A, Vento A; AADC consortium. Epicardial Transplantation of Autologous Cardiac Micrografts During Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 14;8:726889. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.726889. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34595223Nummi A, Nieminen T, Patila T, Lampinen M, Lehtinen ML, Kivisto S, Holmstrom M, Wilkman E, Teittinen K, Laine M, Sinisalo J, Kupari M, Kankuri E, Juvonen T, Vento A, Suojaranta R, Harjula A; AADC consortium. Epicardial delivery of autologous atrial appendage micrografts during coronary artery bypass surgery-safety and feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 Dec 20;3:74. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0217-9. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 29276625
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Epicardial Delivery of Autologous Atrial Appendage Micrografts During Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery - Safety and Feasibility Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02672163
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 180/13/03/02/2013
- Conditions
- Heart Failure
- Keywords
- autologous micrografts, heart failure, coronary artery bypass surgery, cell therapy, atrial appendage, epicardial cell delivery
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 36 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Helsinki University Central HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2016
- Primary completion
- Dec 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to evaluate the safety and clinical feasibility of epicardially delivered autologous atrial appendage micrografts in the treatment of heart failure. The micrografts consisting atrial-derived cells and their extracellular matrix, are placed on an infarction scar during CABG surgery.
Detailed description
The atrial appendages are a tissue reservoir for cardiomyocyte stem and precursor cells. During coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery part of the right atrial appendage can be excised upon insertion of the right atrial cannula of the heart-lung machine. This study aims to address the surgical feasibility and patient safety of epicardially delivered atrial appendage micrografts during CABG surgery.
Autologous cardiac cells are harvested from right atrial appendage during CABG of six patients. Micrografts consisting atrial appendage-derived cells (AADCs) and their extracellular matrix (ECM) of the atrial appendage are mechanically processed. The cells are placed on a tissue-engineered sheet with fibrin gel and tissue clue and further delivered epicardially on top of a infarction scar. Parameters including echocardiography reflecting cardiac insufficiency are studied pre- and post-operatively as well as at three and six months of the follow-up. Cardiac functional magnetic resonance imaging is performed preoperatively and at six-months follow-up. 20 patients will be recruited to serve as a control group. They are scheduled for elective CABG and are treated according to the normal hospital protocol, without the ECM sheet.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| AACD-Therapy group | Experimental | Procedure: CABG surgery, Procedure: AADC therapy6 patients are recruited to the AADC-therapy group. Autologous atrial appendage derived cells (AADCs) are harvested from the appendage tissue removed during the venal cannulation of bypass. The cells and their extracellular matrix are placed with tissue clue to Cormatrix-sheet and further on top of the myocardium in the area of infarction scar. The procedure is done simultaneously with CABG surgery. The patients will be carefully monitored after the operations and cardiac MRI and echocardiogram will be performed previously to surgery as well as during the follow ups. |
| Control group | Active comparator | Procedure: CABG surgery20 patients are recruited to form the control group. They are patients scheduled for elective CABG surgery and they meet the same inclusion and exclusion criteria as the therapy group. There patients are followed as the hospital protocol with out any additional imagination or blood tests. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Informed consent obtained
- Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) between ≤50% and ≥15%
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II-IV heart failure symptoms
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Heart failure due to left ventricular outflow tract obstruction
- History of life-threatening and possibly repeating ventricular arrhythmias or resuscitation, or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator
- Stroke or other disabling condition within 3 months before screening
- Severe valve disease or scheduled valve surgery
- Renal dysfunction (GFR <84 ml/min/1.73m)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CABG surgeryElective CABG surgery | Procedure or surgery | AACD-Therapy group, Control group |
| AADC therapyAtrial appendage derived cells are placed on the site of a infarct scar with matrix sheet | Procedure or surgery | AACD-Therapy group |
Primary outcome
Safety; need for vasoactive medication
Time frame: 6 months
For assessing haemodynamics during the operation and at the intensive care unit
Safety; cardiac index in l/min/m
Time frame: 6 months
For assessing haemodynamics during the operation and at the intensive care unit
Safety; hemoglobin in g/l
Time frame: 6 months
For assessing haemodynamics during the operation and at the intensive care unit
Safety; oxygen saturation in the pulmonary arterial blood (SvO2) in %
Time frame: 6 months
For assessing haemodynamics during the operation and at the intensive care unit
Safety; serum potassium level in mmol/l
Time frame: 6 months
For assessing haemodynamics during the operation and at the intensive care unit
Safety; blood glucose level in mmol/l
Time frame: 6 months
For assessing haemodynamics during the operation and at the intensive care unit
Safety; Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) in %
Time frame: 6 months
For assessing cardiac function during and after the operation by echocardiogram
Safety; pericardial effusion in mm
Time frame: 6 months
For assessing cardiac function after the operation by echocardiogram
Safety: telemetric monitoring of rhythm
Time frame: 6 months
For assessing cardiac function after the operation
Feasibility: Success in completing the delivery of the cell sheet to the myocardium
Time frame: 6 months
Measured in 0= success, 1= no success
Feasibility: Waiting time in minutes for the cell sheet
Time frame: 6 months
Waiting time in minutes for the finished cell sheet to be placed on the myocardium after doing all the required anastomoses
Feasibility: Waiting time in minutes for the heart
Time frame: 6 months
Waiting time in minutes for the the heart after doing all the anastomoses and before the cell sheet is finished
Feasibility: Closing the right atrial appendage
Time frame: 6 months
Closing the right atrial appendage after removing the standardized tissue piece for preparing the cell sheet. According to the hospital protocol, appendage is closed with purse string suture. 0 = no additional suturing needed, 1 = additional suturing needed.
9 secondary outcomes
Left ventricular wall thickness
Time frame: 6 months
Change in the amount of myocardial scar tissue
Time frame: 6 months
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction
Time frame: 6 months
Plasma concentrations of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels
Time frame: 6 months
New York Heart Association class
Time frame: 6 months
Days in hospital
Time frame: 1 month
Changes in the quality of life.
Time frame: 6 months
Change in movement and diastolic function of left ventricular wall
Time frame: 6 months
Local changes in systolic and diastolic function
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Mar 2020.
- Background: PubMed 25142068Lehtinen M, Patila T, Vento A, Kankuri E, Suojaranta-Ylinen R, Poyhia R, Harjula A; Helsinki BMMC Collaboration. Prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial of bone marrow cell transplantation combined with coronary surgery - perioperative safety study. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2014 Dec;19(6):990-6. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivu265. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
- Background: PubMed 25762563Lehtinen M, Schildt J, Ahonen A, Nikkinen P, Lauerma K, Sinisalo J, Kankuri E, Vento A, Patila T, Harjula A; Helsinki BMMC Collaboration. Combining FDG-PET and 99mTc-SPECT to predict functional outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Sep;16(9):1023-30. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jev032. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
- Background: PubMed 25797522Lehtinen M, Patila T, Kankuri E, Lauerma K, Sinisalo J, Laine M, Kupari M, Vento A, Harjula A; Helsinki BMMC Collaboration. Intramyocardial bone marrow mononuclear cell transplantation in ischemic heart failure: Long-term follow-up. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015 Jul;34(7):899-905. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2015.01.989. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
- Background: PubMed 26725880Lampinen M, Vento A, Laurikka J, Nystedt J, Mervaala E, Harjula A, Kankuri E. Rational Autologous Cell Sources For Therapy of Heart Failure - Vehicles and Targets For Gene and RNA Therapies. Curr Gene Ther. 2016;16(1):21-33. doi: 10.2174/1566523216666160104141809.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34595223Nummi A, Mulari S, Stewart JA, Kivisto S, Teittinen K, Nieminen T, Lampinen M, Patila T, Sintonen H, Juvonen T, Kupari M, Suojaranta R, Kankuri E, Harjula A, Vento A; AADC consortium. Epicardial Transplantation of Autologous Cardiac Micrografts During Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Sep 14;8:726889. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.726889. eCollection 2021.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29276625Nummi A, Nieminen T, Patila T, Lampinen M, Lehtinen ML, Kivisto S, Holmstrom M, Wilkman E, Teittinen K, Laine M, Sinisalo J, Kupari M, Kankuri E, Juvonen T, Vento A, Suojaranta R, Harjula A; AADC consortium. Epicardial delivery of autologous atrial appendage micrografts during coronary artery bypass surgery-safety and feasibility study. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2017 Dec 20;3:74. doi: 10.1186/s40814-017-0217-9. eCollection 2017.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Heart Failure
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Ferric Derisomaltose in Patients With Acute Heart Failure and Iron Deficiency on Exercise Capacity and Quality of Life(COREVIVE-HFrEF)
Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Iron Deficiency
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Bimagrumab in Participants With HFpEF
Heart Failure, Diastolic, Diastolic Heart Failure
Recruiting
Evaluation of a French Hospital Discharge Therapeutic Education Program by Nurses for Heart Failure Patient (EduSor)
Heart Failure
Active, not recruiting
Assessment of Combined CCM and ICD Device in HFrEF
Heart Failure, Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction
Not yet recruiting
RELIEVE-HFrEF TRIAL: REducing Lung congestIon Symptoms Using the v-wavE Shunt in adVancEd Heart Failure With Reduced EF
Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction, Heart Failure Chronic
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ari Harjula, Prof study director
Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CABG surgery and AADC therapy in people with Heart Failure, run by Helsinki University Central Hospital at 1 site in Finland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Finland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Safety; need for vasoactive medication (time frame: 6 months). The study lists 13 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02672163, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Mar 2020.