Shock, CardiogenicFRENSHOCKNCT02703038
French Observatory on the Management of Cardiogenic Shock in 2016
An observational study of Shock, Cardiogenic, run by French Cardiology Society at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is defined as an organ hypoperfusion secondary to low cardiac output. Catches diagnostic management, and therapeutic monitoring of these patients remain highly variable from one center to another and even from one doctor to another within the same team. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Shock, Cardiogenic
- How many people
- 777 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Apr 2016to Jul 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult patient (> 18 years) with cardiogenic shock table defined by the combination of a low cardiac output even as the filling pressures are normal or high, originally of hypoperfusion and suffering of organ.
Who may be able to join
- Informed consent
- Cardiogenic shock authenticated by the existence of at least one positive test for each of the following three parts:
- Low cardiac output (1 criterion necessary and sufficient):
- Clinic: SBP <90mmHg and / or need to maintain inotropic or vasopressor to maintain SBP> 90 mmHg
- Echocardiography: IC <2.2L / min / m2 and / or LVEF <30%
- Hemodynamics by Swan Ganz catheterization or right: IC 2.2 l / min / m2 (B) elevation of pulmonary pressure / left surcharge (1 criterion necessary and sufficient):
Show all 14Show fewer
- Clinical (IVD and abortion);
- Radiological (Surcharge on RT or chest CT);
- Organic (NTproBNP> 900pg / ml or BNP> 400pg / ml);
- Echocardiography (E / A> 2 if LVEF <45% or E / Ea> 13 if normal LVEF, or PAPS> 35mmHg and / or TDE <150ms and / or Ap-Am> 30ms and / or E / 2 Vp≥ , 5);
- Right Swan Ganz catheterization or (pulmonary capillary pressures> 15mmHg and / or mPAP> 25mmHg)
- Organs malperfusion (1 criterion necessary and sufficient):
- Clinic: oliguria <30ml / kg / h, mottling, consciousness disorders)
- Organic: arterial lactate> 2 mmol / L, liver failure, kidney failure
Who cannot join
- Final diagnosis retained other than cardiogenic shock
- Cardiac arrest without spontaneous activity in the hospital management
- Post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock
- Deprived of liberty patient
- Refusal or lack of consent
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is defined as an organ hypoperfusion secondary to low cardiac output. Catches diagnostic management, and therapeutic monitoring of these patients remain highly variable from one center to another and even from one doctor to another within the same team. The management protocols are often not standardized or non-existent.
It appears therefore necessary to make an inventory of the management practices of the CS in France in 2016, prerequisite to a common work of standardization of practices and the creation of specialized networks to support these complex patients.
Read the detailed description
The Observatory FRENSHOCK proposes to set up a cohort of 500 patients recruited prospectively over a period of 6 months.
Patients will be followed up at 1 month and 1 year Patients should have agreed to participate in the observatory, knowing that participation or refusal to participate will not alter the therapeutic attitude of the physician responsible for the patient. The study of phenotypic characteristics will not change the therapeutic approach of the medical teams.
- Conditions
- Shock, Cardiogenic
- Keywords
- cardiogenic shock, observatory
- Medical subject headings
- Shock, Cardiogenic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiogenic shock | Patient with cardiogenic shock table defined by the combination of a low cardiac output even as the filling pressures are normal or high, originally of hypoperfusion and organ suffering. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mortality at day 30
Death rate at 30 days of follow-up
Measured: 30 days
Secondary outcomes (2)
Analysis of mortality at day 30 by subgroup on age, sex, NYHA grade, initial etiology
Rate of mortality at day 30 distributed by subgroup on age, sex, NYHA grade, initial etiology (Including ischemic versus non-ischemic heart disease, type and assistance and medical treatment)
Measured: 30 days
Mortality at 1 year
Death rate at 1 year of follow-up
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2016
- Primary completionJul 2018
- Study completionJul 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (26)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Shock, CardiogenicStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 777 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- French Cardiology Society
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clément DELMAS, Principal investigator, AP
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02703038
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 15897
- Acronym
- FRENSHOCK
- Status last verified
- Aug 2019
- First submitted
- 23 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 15 Aug 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Reynolds HR, Hochman JS. Cardiogenic shock: current concepts and improving outcomes. Circulation. 2008 Feb 5;117(5):686-97. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.613596. No abstract available.
PubMed 18250279Aissaoui N, Puymirat E, Tabone X, Charbonnier B, Schiele F, Lefevre T, Durand E, Blanchard D, Simon T, Cambou JP, Danchin N. Improved outcome of cardiogenic shock at the acute stage of myocardial infarction: a report from the USIK 1995, USIC 2000, and FAST-MI French nationwide registries. Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(20):2535-43. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs264. Epub 2012 Aug 26.
PubMed 22927559Jeger RV, Radovanovic D, Hunziker PR, Pfisterer ME, Stauffer JC, Erne P, Urban P; AMIS Plus Registry Investigators. Ten-year trends in the incidence and treatment of cardiogenic shock. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Nov 4;149(9):618-26. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00005.
PubMed 18981487Thiele H, Allam B, Chatellier G, Schuler G, Lafont A. Shock in acute myocardial infarction: the Cape Horn for trials? Eur Heart J. 2010 Aug;31(15):1828-35. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq220. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
PubMed 20610640Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, Ferenc M, Olbrich HG, Hausleiter J, de Waha A, Richardt G, Hennersdorf M, Empen K, Fuernau G, Desch S, Eitel I, Hambrecht R, Lauer B, Bohm M, Ebelt H, Schneider S, Werdan K, Schuler G; Intraaortic Balloon Pump in cardiogenic shock II (IABP-SHOCK II) trial investigators. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II): final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial. Lancet. 2013 Nov 16;382(9905):1638-45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61783-3. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
PubMed 24011548Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, Ferenc M, Olbrich HG, Hausleiter J, Richardt G, Hennersdorf M, Empen K, Fuernau G, Desch S, Eitel I, Hambrecht R, Fuhrmann J, Bohm M, Ebelt H, Schneider S, Schuler G, Werdan K; IABP-SHOCK II Trial Investigators. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2012 Oct 4;367(14):1287-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1208410. Epub 2012 Aug 26.
PubMed 22920912Sleeper LA, Reynolds HR, White HD, Webb JG, Dzavik V, Hochman JS. A severity scoring system for risk assessment of patients with cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK Trial and Registry. Am Heart J. 2010 Sep;160(3):443-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.06.024.
PubMed 20826251Katz JN, Stebbins AL, Alexander JH, Reynolds HR, Pieper KS, Ruzyllo W, Werdan K, Geppert A, Dzavik V, Van de Werf F, Hochman JS; TRIUMPH Investigators. Predictors of 30-day mortality in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction despite a patent infarct artery. Am Heart J. 2009 Oct;158(4):680-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.08.005.
PubMed 19781431Thiele H, Ohman EM, Desch S, Eitel I, de Waha S. Management of cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J. 2015 May 21;36(20):1223-30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv051. Epub 2015 Mar 1.
PubMed 25732762De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, Madl C, Chochrad D, Aldecoa C, Brasseur A, Defrance P, Gottignies P, Vincent JL; SOAP II Investigators. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 4;362(9):779-89. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907118.
PubMed 20200382McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, Auricchio A, Bohm M, Dickstein K, Falk V, Filippatos G, Fonseca C, Gomez-Sanchez MA, Jaarsma T, Kober L, Lip GY, Maggioni AP, Parkhomenko A, Pieske BM, Popescu BA, Ronnevik PK, Rutten FH, Schwitter J, Seferovic P, Stepinska J, Trindade PT, Voors AA, Zannad F, Zeiher A; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2012 Jul;33(14):1787-847. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs104. Epub 2012 May 19. No abstract available.
PubMed 22611136Mebazaa A, Nieminen MS, Packer M, Cohen-Solal A, Kleber FX, Pocock SJ, Thakkar R, Padley RJ, Poder P, Kivikko M; SURVIVE Investigators. Levosimendan vs dobutamine for patients with acute decompensated heart failure: the SURVIVE Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2007 May 2;297(17):1883-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.17.1883.
PubMed 17473298Felker GM, Benza RL, Chandler AB, Leimberger JD, Cuffe MS, Califf RM, Gheorghiade M, O'Connor CM; OPTIME-CHF Investigators. Heart failure etiology and response to milrinone in decompensated heart failure: results from the OPTIME-CHF study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Mar 19;41(6):997-1003. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)02968-6.
PubMed 12651048Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, Sanborn TA, White HD, Talley JD, Buller CE, Jacobs AK, Slater JN, Col J, McKinlay SM, LeJemtel TH. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med. 1999 Aug 26;341(9):625-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199908263410901.
PubMed 10460813Dzavik V, Sleeper LA, Cocke TP, Moscucci M, Saucedo J, Hosat S, Jiang X, Slater J, LeJemtel T, Hochman JS; SHOCK Investigators. Early revascularization is associated with improved survival in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK Trial Registry. Eur Heart J. 2003 May;24(9):828-37. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00844-8.
PubMed 12727150
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Aug 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- French Observatory on the Management of Cardiogenic Shock in 2016
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02703038
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FRENSHOCK / 15897
- Conditions
- Shock, Cardiogenic
- Keywords
- cardiogenic shock, observatory
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 777 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- French Cardiology SocietyUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is defined as an organ hypoperfusion secondary to low cardiac output. Catches diagnostic management, and therapeutic monitoring of these patients remain highly variable from one center to another and even from one doctor to another within the same team. The management protocols are often not standardized or non-existent.
It appears therefore necessary to make an inventory of the management practices of the CS in France in 2016, prerequisite to a common work of standardization of practices and the creation of specialized networks to support these complex patients.
Detailed description
The Observatory FRENSHOCK proposes to set up a cohort of 500 patients recruited prospectively over a period of 6 months.
Patients will be followed up at 1 month and 1 year Patients should have agreed to participate in the observatory, knowing that participation or refusal to participate will not alter the therapeutic attitude of the physician responsible for the patient. The study of phenotypic characteristics will not change the therapeutic approach of the medical teams.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiogenic shock | – | –Patient with cardiogenic shock table defined by the combination of a low cardiac output even as the filling pressures are normal or high, originally of hypoperfusion and organ suffering. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult patient (> 18 years) with cardiogenic shock table defined by the combination of a low cardiac output even as the filling pressures are normal or high, originally of hypoperfusion and suffering of organ.
Key inclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Informed consent
- Cardiogenic shock authenticated by the existence of at least one positive test for each of the following three parts:
- Low cardiac output (1 criterion necessary and sufficient):
- Clinic: SBP <90mmHg and / or need to maintain inotropic or vasopressor to maintain SBP> 90 mmHg
- Echocardiography: IC <2.2L / min / m2 and / or LVEF <30%
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Final diagnosis retained other than cardiogenic shock
- Cardiac arrest without spontaneous activity in the hospital management
- Post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock
- Deprived of liberty patient
- Refusal or lack of consent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Mortality at day 30
Time frame: 30 days
Death rate at 30 days of follow-up
2 secondary outcomes
Analysis of mortality at day 30 by subgroup on age, sex, NYHA grade, initial etiology
Time frame: 30 days
Mortality at 1 year
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Aug 2019.
- Background: PubMed 18250279Reynolds HR, Hochman JS. Cardiogenic shock: current concepts and improving outcomes. Circulation. 2008 Feb 5;117(5):686-97. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.613596. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 22927559Aissaoui N, Puymirat E, Tabone X, Charbonnier B, Schiele F, Lefevre T, Durand E, Blanchard D, Simon T, Cambou JP, Danchin N. Improved outcome of cardiogenic shock at the acute stage of myocardial infarction: a report from the USIK 1995, USIC 2000, and FAST-MI French nationwide registries. Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(20):2535-43. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs264. Epub 2012 Aug 26.
- Background: PubMed 18981487Jeger RV, Radovanovic D, Hunziker PR, Pfisterer ME, Stauffer JC, Erne P, Urban P; AMIS Plus Registry Investigators. Ten-year trends in the incidence and treatment of cardiogenic shock. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Nov 4;149(9):618-26. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00005.
- Background: PubMed 20610640Thiele H, Allam B, Chatellier G, Schuler G, Lafont A. Shock in acute myocardial infarction: the Cape Horn for trials? Eur Heart J. 2010 Aug;31(15):1828-35. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq220. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
- Background: PubMed 24011548Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, Ferenc M, Olbrich HG, Hausleiter J, de Waha A, Richardt G, Hennersdorf M, Empen K, Fuernau G, Desch S, Eitel I, Hambrecht R, Lauer B, Bohm M, Ebelt H, Schneider S, Werdan K, Schuler G; Intraaortic Balloon Pump in cardiogenic shock II (IABP-SHOCK II) trial investigators. Intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock (IABP-SHOCK II): final 12 month results of a randomised, open-label trial. Lancet. 2013 Nov 16;382(9905):1638-45. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61783-3. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
- Background: PubMed 22920912Thiele H, Zeymer U, Neumann FJ, Ferenc M, Olbrich HG, Hausleiter J, Richardt G, Hennersdorf M, Empen K, Fuernau G, Desch S, Eitel I, Hambrecht R, Fuhrmann J, Bohm M, Ebelt H, Schneider S, Schuler G, Werdan K; IABP-SHOCK II Trial Investigators. Intraaortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med. 2012 Oct 4;367(14):1287-96. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1208410. Epub 2012 Aug 26.
- Background: PubMed 20826251Sleeper LA, Reynolds HR, White HD, Webb JG, Dzavik V, Hochman JS. A severity scoring system for risk assessment of patients with cardiogenic shock: a report from the SHOCK Trial and Registry. Am Heart J. 2010 Sep;160(3):443-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.06.024.
- Background: PubMed 19781431Katz JN, Stebbins AL, Alexander JH, Reynolds HR, Pieper KS, Ruzyllo W, Werdan K, Geppert A, Dzavik V, Van de Werf F, Hochman JS; TRIUMPH Investigators. Predictors of 30-day mortality in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction despite a patent infarct artery. Am Heart J. 2009 Oct;158(4):680-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.08.005.
- Background: PubMed 25732762Thiele H, Ohman EM, Desch S, Eitel I, de Waha S. Management of cardiogenic shock. Eur Heart J. 2015 May 21;36(20):1223-30. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv051. Epub 2015 Mar 1.
- Background: PubMed 20200382De Backer D, Biston P, Devriendt J, Madl C, Chochrad D, Aldecoa C, Brasseur A, Defrance P, Gottignies P, Vincent JL; SOAP II Investigators. Comparison of dopamine and norepinephrine in the treatment of shock. N Engl J Med. 2010 Mar 4;362(9):779-89. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0907118.
- Background: PubMed 22611136McMurray JJ, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, Auricchio A, Bohm M, Dickstein K, Falk V, Filippatos G, Fonseca C, Gomez-Sanchez MA, Jaarsma T, Kober L, Lip GY, Maggioni AP, Parkhomenko A, Pieske BM, Popescu BA, Ronnevik PK, Rutten FH, Schwitter J, Seferovic P, Stepinska J, Trindade PT, Voors AA, Zannad F, Zeiher A; ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2012 Jul;33(14):1787-847. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs104. Epub 2012 May 19. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 17473298Mebazaa A, Nieminen MS, Packer M, Cohen-Solal A, Kleber FX, Pocock SJ, Thakkar R, Padley RJ, Poder P, Kivikko M; SURVIVE Investigators. Levosimendan vs dobutamine for patients with acute decompensated heart failure: the SURVIVE Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2007 May 2;297(17):1883-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.17.1883.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Shock, Cardiogenic
RecruitingObservational study
Evaluation of Acid-base Disorders and Ventilation Settings in Cardiogenic Shock and Post-cardiac Arrest Patients: Comparison With VentilO Algorithm
Cardiac Arrest (CA), Cardiogenic Shock
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Hemodynamic Evaluation of Left Atrial Pressure in Relationship to Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure in Cardio Thoracic Patients
Cardiogenic Shock, Pulmonary Edema Cardiac Cause
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Capital Offload-Shock
Hypervolemia, Cardiogenic Shock
Recruiting
CRP Apheresis in Infarct-Related Cardiogenic Shock
Cardiogenic Shock, Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)
RecruitingObservational study
Cardiogenic Shock Working Group Registry
Cardiogenic Shock
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clément DELMAS principal investigator
AP
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Shock, Cardiogenic, run by French Cardiology Society at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Aug 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mortality at day 30 (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02703038, which also lists 26 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Aug 2019.