AnesthesiaNCT02703090
Near Infrared Spectroscopy Cortical Response to Noxious and Auditory Stimuli in Subjects Under General Anesthesia
A study testing Remifentanil and Normal saline in people with Anesthesia and Pain, run by Boston Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The primary aim is to utilize near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in patients under general anesthesia to measure changes in brain blood flow in the bilateral somatosensory cortices and the prefrontal cortices in response to noxious stimulation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 to 30 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Anesthesia, Pain
- What is being tested?
- Remifentanil and Normal saline
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 44 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2016to 10 Mar 2020
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 to 30 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- 12-30 years of age
- Structurally normal heart
- Right-handed
- English-speaking
Who cannot join
- Unable to cooperate or understand the study
- Neurologic disease
- Diabetes mellitus
- Syndrome of greater than minor severity.
- Smoker
- Scalp or hair does not permit sufficient optical light detection
- Unable to keep his/her head still for a period of 200 consecutive seconds
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
About this study
Official title: Assessing the Cortical Response to Noxious and Auditory Stimuli Using Near Infrared Spectroscopy in Subjects Under General Anesthesia
The primary aim is to utilize near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in patients under general anesthesia to measure changes in brain blood flow in the bilateral somatosensory cortices and the prefrontal cortices in response to noxious stimulation.
Read the detailed description
Participants:
Patients with a structurally normal heart scheduled to undergo elective electrophysiology study with catheter ablation of an arrhythmia under general anesthesia were recruited. Forty one patients were enrolled from October 2016 to March 2020. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants or their respective parents/guardians before the study and written assent was obtained from children ≥7 years of age. All study procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB-P00021030) of Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts and the study registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02703090).
Randomization, Allocation concealment and blinding:
The hospital research pharmacy used a parallel group design, with block randomization to allocate the patients into either high-dose, low-dose or placebo groups. The clinical staff, research personnel and the patients were unaware of the drug allocated to a particular patient (double-blinded). The decision to unblind was made by the principal investigators (B.K and D.B) and performed by the pharmacy after all the data were acquired, preprocessed and were ready for group level statistical analysis.
Power Analysis:
In our pilot study we had useable data from five of the eleven patients enrolled (45%). The signal of interest had a mean value of -3.764x10-7 Moles with a standard deviation of 2.135x10-7 Moles. This resulted in a standardized effect size of 1.763, when using a zero mean for the null case. In order to achieve a 90% power level for this measure, the number of usable data sets is therefore 8 for each group (total of 24 patients). Considering our previous success rate of 45%, approximately 18 patients will need to be enrolled into each group. However, only 41 patients were able to complete the study, as recruitment was discontinued in March 2020 (a year earlier than projected) due to the Coronavirus pandemic in the United States. The decision to unblind was ultimately made by the principal investigators (B.K and D.B).
fNIRS Acquisition: Changes in hemoglobin concentration during the procedure were recorded using a multichannel continuous wave fNIRS system (CW7, Tech En, Massachusetts, USA) at 690 and 830 nm wavelengths and a sampling frequency of 25 Hz. A customized head probe consisting of 9 optical sources, 12 long-separation optical detectors placed at a distance of 3 cm from the source, and 9 short-separation optical detectors placed at a distance of 0.8 cm from the source, was used. Of the total 33 channels (a channel being a source and detector pair), 24 channels recorded cortical hemoglobin concentration changes and 9 channels recorded physiological hemoglobin concentration changes from extra-cerebral tissue.
Cortical regions of interest:
The 24 channels recorded activity from three different cortical regions viz. left lateral prefrontal cortex (left lPFC), medial frontopolar cortex (mFPC), and right somatosensory cortex (S1). Twelve of these 24 channels were subdivided into six regions of interest (ROI) based on their consistent activation/deactivation to acute nociception in previous studies.
Anesthetic and fNIRS Protocol:
The anesthetic technique was standardized for all patients and the hospital research pharmacy used block randomization to allocate the patients into three groups, Group 1: high-dose remifentanil - 0.5 mcg/kg/min (HD), Group 2: low-dose remifentanil - 0.25 mcg/kg/min (LD), and Group 3: placebo - 0.9% NaCL (PL). The syringes were prepared by the hospital pharmacy and this randomized controlled trial was double-blinded. Following premedication with 2 mg IV midazolam, anesthesia was induced with fentanyl (1.5 mcg/kg up to a maximum of 3 mcg/kg) and a standard dose of propofol titrated to effect. Rocuronium was used for neuromuscular blockade for endotracheal intubation and during the procedure. No additional fentanyl was administered after induction of anesthesia. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (end-tidal concentration 1% to 4%), adjusting the end-tidal concentration to maintain a Bispectral Index (BIS) (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) value between 40 to 60. The test drug infusion and fNIRS monitoring was started after induction of anesthesia while the patient was being prepped and continued until just after the last ablation. A qualified member of the research team continuously monitored the fNIRS data quality throughout the procedure and time-stamped each ablation attempt. A research nurse and/or research assistant manually documented the time, duration and mode (radiofrequency (RF) and/or cryoablation) of each ablation attempt. An audio stimulus prompting a motor task was presented as a control to the patient at least 45 minutes after the start of the procedure.
fNIRS Preprocessing: The fNIRS data was preprocessed and analyzed using in-house scripts in MATLAB R2019b platform. The raw fNIRS data of each subject was first converted from intensity measures to optical density measures. Head-motion correction was then performed using a wavelet-based algorithm. To remove physiological (heart rate, respiration) and other confounding noise sources, a third-order bandpass filter at 0.01-0.15 Hz was applied. Using the modified Beer-Lambert law, optical density measures were converted to oxy-, deoxy- and total-hemoglobin concentrations using hmrOD2conc function in the Homer2 toolbox. A linear temporal regression of the resulting concentration of oxygenated hemoglobin (deltaHbO) time series of each channel was regressed using both the nearest short-separation (physiological channel) signal and the global average of all short-separation signals as the nuisance regressor to remove the effect of extra-cerebral tissue on cortical activity. The residuals of the deltaHbO time series from temporal regression were then used to perform a third-order polynomial fit to regress non-linear drifts and linear trends before further analysis.
fNIRS Data Analysis: The primary outcome measure was the changes in HbO concentration to ablation in placebo vs. remifentanil groups. Therefore, the low and high dose remifentanil subgroups were combined and compared to the placebo group. For those regions that were statistically different between placebo and remifentanil, a post-hoc analysis was performed to identify any differences between the two doses. Secondary outcome measures included the changes in HbO concentration to actual or intended movement, in response to the auditory instruction, and/or the auditory stimuli. Combined analysis of the remifentanil subgroups, and sex-based differences were supplemented to the analysis defined in the protocol on an ad-hoc basis.
Cortical Response to Ablation: The fNIRS hemodynamic response to an ablation event was computed using the block-averaging technique whereby the preprocessed deltaHbO time series was averaged across the total number of ablations for each subject. Since the duration of ablation varied between events and between individuals, each block or trial was defined as the 5 seconds before the start of an ablation event and the 20 seconds following the start of ablation for consistency. Each block was then normalized to the 5 seconds of baseline prior to the start of the ablation in a given block. Hemodynamic-based measures quantified from the block-averaged hemodynamic response to ablation stimuli included: (1) Peak deltaHbO (PeakHbO) which was defined as the maximum HbO concentration change from 4 seconds to 15 seconds following stimulus after subtracting the average HbO concentration change during the initial 0-3 seconds of stimulus; PeakHbO for deactivation to stimulus was computed on the absolute hemodynamic response. (2) Minimum deltaHbO (NadirHbO) was defined as the greatest decrease in HbO concentration in the 15 seconds following the start of ablation; (3) Area under the deltaHbO curve (AUC) was defined as the integral of the HbO curve during the 0-15 seconds period following the start of stimulus. The deltaHbO curve was first scaled using the minimum HbO concentration change for that duration i.e., the NadirHbO becomes the 0 baseline for calculation of AUC. Two sample t-tests were performed to compare the activation measures between placebo and drug groups. A statistical threshold of p<0.05, with multiple comparison correction using Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery rate (FDR) approach at an alpha of 0.05 was employed to minimize Type-I errors. Multiple comparison correction using FDR was applied for comparisons from all three measures (PeakHbO, NadirHbO, AUC) together. Results that survived the FDR-p threshold are reported to be significant at FDR-corrected p<0.05. Results with p values > FDR-p threshold did not survive multiple comparison correction. The FDR-p threshold, and the original p values are both provided for all comparisons. The 95% confidence intervals were generated using false coverage-statement rate that defines the confidence interval coverage corresponding to the FDR-adjusted p-values. A post-hoc analysis using two sample t-test was performed to identify dose-dependent differences between the remifentanil groups (low-dose vs. high-dose).
Sex-related differences in pain response:
Hemodynamic measures of activation (PeakHbO, NadirHbO, and AUC) during ablation was compared between male (n=16) and female (n=16) participants using a two-way Analysis of Covariance (ANOVA) with sex (males, and females), and drug (drug, and PL) as factors. Effect of biological sex was evaluated due to the altered pain sensitivity and treatment outcomes typically found in male vs female patients. Significant effects of sex were obtained using a statistical threshold of p<0.05, and a multiple comparison correction using Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery rate was applied at alpha of 0.05 to account for Type-I errors.The 95% confidence intervals were also adjusted for effects that were significant at FDR-corrected p<0.05 using method proposed by Benjamini and Yuketeili.
Cortical Response to non-painful stimuli:
The fNIRS hemodynamic response to auditory stimuli instructing individuals to perform a motor imagery task was also computed using the block averaging technique. The task paradigm lasted for a total of 5 minutes and was presented at least once during the procedure in every subject. A single run with five blocks of stimuli was used to calculate hemodynamic response to auditory stimuli during the procedure. A block was defined as the 5 seconds before auditory cue instructing the patient to start the task (lasting a duration of 1 second), and the 29 seconds following the first auditory cue, including the auditory cue to end task at 15 seconds. Hemodynamic-based measures quantified from the block-averaged hemodynamic response were also defined using the peak change in HbO concentration (PeakHbO), Nadir of deltaHbO concentration (NadirHbO), and AUC measures described earlier. A mixed ANOVA was performed to compare the activation measures during the two types of stimulus between placebo and drug groups and their interaction, where "task" is the within-subject factor with two levels (audio and pain/ablation) and "group" is the between-subject factor with two levels (remifentanil and placebo). A statistical threshold of p<0.05 with multiple comparison correction using Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery rate approach at an alpha of 0.05 was once again employed. Multiple comparison correction using FDR was applied for comparisons from each measure (PeakHbO, NadirHbO, AUC) separately. As noted earlier, the 95% confidence intervals were adjusted for effects that were significant at FDR-corrected p<0.05 using method proposed by Benjamini and Yuketeili.
- Conditions
- Anesthesia, Pain
- Being tested
- Remifentanil, Normal saline
- Medical subject headings
- Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RemifentanilDrug
Also called Ultiva
Normal salineDrug
Also called Placebo
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Normal saline infusion Receives: Drug: Normal saline |
| Drug lower dose | Active comparator | Remifentanil infusion Receives: Drug: Remifentanil |
| Drug higher dose | Active comparator | Remifentanil infusion Receives: Drug: Remifentanil |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to Ablation
Changes in peak oxyhemoglobin concentration (PeakHbO) to ablation in placebo vs. the remifentanil groups.
Measured: 5 seconds before the start of an ablation event and the 20 seconds following the start of ablation
Changes in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to Ablation
Changes in nadir oxyhemoglobin concentration (NadirHbO) to ablation in placebo vs. remifentanil groups.
Measured: 5 seconds before the start of an ablation event and the 20 seconds following the start of ablation
Changes in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to Ablation
Changes in oxyhemoglobin concentration area under the curve (AUC) to ablation in placebo vs. remifentanil groups.
Measured: during the 0- to 15-second period following the start of stimulus
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2016
- Primary completion10 Mar 2020
- Study completion10 Mar 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AnesthesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Boston Children's HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Children's Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Barry Kussman, Boston Children's Hospital
- Investigators
- Barry D Kussman, MBBCh, Principal investigator, Boston Children's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02703090
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB-P00021030
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 2 Mar 2016
- Last updated
- 15 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Karunakaran KD, Kussman BD, Peng K, Becerra L, Labadie R, Bernier R, Berry D, Green S, Zurakowski D, Alexander ME, Borsook D. Brain-based measures of nociception during general anesthesia with remifentanil: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2022 Apr 22;19(4):e1003965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003965. eCollection 2022 Apr.
PubMed 35452458
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessing the Cortical Response to Noxious and Auditory Stimuli Using Near Infrared Spectroscopy in Subjects Under General Anesthesia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02703090
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB-P00021030
- Conditions
- Anesthesia, Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Boston Children's HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 10 Mar 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 15 Dec 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary aim is to utilize near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) in patients under general anesthesia to measure changes in brain blood flow in the bilateral somatosensory cortices and the prefrontal cortices in response to noxious stimulation.
Detailed description
Participants:
Patients with a structurally normal heart scheduled to undergo elective electrophysiology study with catheter ablation of an arrhythmia under general anesthesia were recruited. Forty one patients were enrolled from October 2016 to March 2020. Written informed consent was obtained from the participants or their respective parents/guardians before the study and written assent was obtained from children ≥7 years of age. All study procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB-P00021030) of Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts and the study registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02703090).
Randomization, Allocation concealment and blinding:
The hospital research pharmacy used a parallel group design, with block randomization to allocate the patients into either high-dose, low-dose or placebo groups. The clinical staff, research personnel and the patients were unaware of the drug allocated to a particular patient (double-blinded). The decision to unblind was made by the principal investigators (B.K and D.B) and performed by the pharmacy after all the data were acquired, preprocessed and were ready for group level statistical analysis.
Power Analysis:
In our pilot study we had useable data from five of the eleven patients enrolled (45%). The signal of interest had a mean value of -3.764x10-7 Moles with a standard deviation of 2.135x10-7 Moles. This resulted in a standardized effect size of 1.763, when using a zero mean for the null case. In order to achieve a 90% power level for this measure, the number of usable data sets is therefore 8 for each group (total of 24 patients). Considering our previous success rate of 45%, approximately 18 patients will need to be enrolled into each group. However, only 41 patients were able to complete the study, as recruitment was discontinued in March 2020 (a year earlier than projected) due to the Coronavirus pandemic in the United States. The decision to unblind was ultimately made by the principal investigators (B.K and D.B).
fNIRS Acquisition: Changes in hemoglobin concentration during the procedure were recorded using a multichannel continuous wave fNIRS system (CW7, Tech En, Massachusetts, USA) at 690 and 830 nm wavelengths and a sampling frequency of 25 Hz. A customized head probe consisting of 9 optical sources, 12 long-separation optical detectors placed at a distance of 3 cm from the source, and 9 short-separation optical detectors placed at a distance of 0.8 cm from the source, was used. Of the total 33 channels (a channel being a source and detector pair), 24 channels recorded cortical hemoglobin concentration changes and 9 channels recorded physiological hemoglobin concentration changes from extra-cerebral tissue.
Cortical regions of interest:
The 24 channels recorded activity from three different cortical regions viz. left lateral prefrontal cortex (left lPFC), medial frontopolar cortex (mFPC), and right somatosensory cortex (S1). Twelve of these 24 channels were subdivided into six regions of interest (ROI) based on their consistent activation/deactivation to acute nociception in previous studies.
Anesthetic and fNIRS Protocol:
The anesthetic technique was standardized for all patients and the hospital research pharmacy used block randomization to allocate the patients into three groups, Group 1: high-dose remifentanil - 0.5 mcg/kg/min (HD), Group 2: low-dose remifentanil - 0.25 mcg/kg/min (LD), and Group 3: placebo - 0.9% NaCL (PL). The syringes were prepared by the hospital pharmacy and this randomized controlled trial was double-blinded. Following premedication with 2 mg IV midazolam, anesthesia was induced with fentanyl (1.5 mcg/kg up to a maximum of 3 mcg/kg) and a standard dose of propofol titrated to effect. Rocuronium was used for neuromuscular blockade for endotracheal intubation and during the procedure. No additional fentanyl was administered after induction of anesthesia. Anesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane (end-tidal concentration 1% to 4%), adjusting the end-tidal concentration to maintain a Bispectral Index (BIS) (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) value between 40 to 60. The test drug infusion and fNIRS monitoring was started after induction of anesthesia while the patient was being prepped and continued until just after the last ablation. A qualified member of the research team continuously monitored the fNIRS data quality throughout the procedure and time-stamped each ablation attempt. A research nurse and/or research assistant manually documented the time, duration and mode (radiofrequency (RF) and/or cryoablation) of each ablation attempt. An audio stimulus prompting a motor task was presented as a control to the patient at least 45 minutes after the start of the procedure.
fNIRS Preprocessing: The fNIRS data was preprocessed and analyzed using in-house scripts in MATLAB R2019b platform. The raw fNIRS data of each subject was first converted from intensity measures to optical density measures. Head-motion correction was then performed using a wavelet-based algorithm. To remove physiological (heart rate, respiration) and other confounding noise sources, a third-order bandpass filter at 0.01-0.15 Hz was applied. Using the modified Beer-Lambert law, optical density measures were converted to oxy-, deoxy- and total-hemoglobin concentrations using hmrOD2conc function in the Homer2 toolbox. A linear temporal regression of the resulting concentration of oxygenated hemoglobin (deltaHbO) time series of each channel was regressed using both the nearest short-separation (physiological channel) signal and the global average of all short-separation signals as the nuisance regressor to remove the effect of extra-cerebral tissue on cortical activity. The residuals of the deltaHbO time series from temporal regression were then used to perform a third-order polynomial fit to regress non-linear drifts and linear trends before further analysis.
fNIRS Data Analysis: The primary outcome measure was the changes in HbO concentration to ablation in placebo vs. remifentanil groups. Therefore, the low and high dose remifentanil subgroups were combined and compared to the placebo group. For those regions that were statistically different between placebo and remifentanil, a post-hoc analysis was performed to identify any differences between the two doses. Secondary outcome measures included the changes in HbO concentration to actual or intended movement, in response to the auditory instruction, and/or the auditory stimuli. Combined analysis of the remifentanil subgroups, and sex-based differences were supplemented to the analysis defined in the protocol on an ad-hoc basis.
Cortical Response to Ablation: The fNIRS hemodynamic response to an ablation event was computed using the block-averaging technique whereby the preprocessed deltaHbO time series was averaged across the total number of ablations for each subject. Since the duration of ablation varied between events and between individuals, each block or trial was defined as the 5 seconds before the start of an ablation event and the 20 seconds following the start of ablation for consistency. Each block was then normalized to the 5 seconds of baseline prior to the start of the ablation in a given block. Hemodynamic-based measures quantified from the block-averaged hemodynamic response to ablation stimuli included: (1) Peak deltaHbO (PeakHbO) which was defined as the maximum HbO concentration change from 4 seconds to 15 seconds following stimulus after subtracting the average HbO concentration change during the initial 0-3 seconds of stimulus; PeakHbO for deactivation to stimulus was computed on the absolute hemodynamic response. (2) Minimum deltaHbO (NadirHbO) was defined as the greatest decrease in HbO concentration in the 15 seconds following the start of ablation; (3) Area under the deltaHbO curve (AUC) was defined as the integral of the HbO curve during the 0-15 seconds period following the start of stimulus. The deltaHbO curve was first scaled using the minimum HbO concentration change for that duration i.e., the NadirHbO becomes the 0 baseline for calculation of AUC. Two sample t-tests were performed to compare the activation measures between placebo and drug groups. A statistical threshold of p<0.05, with multiple comparison correction using Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery rate (FDR) approach at an alpha of 0.05 was employed to minimize Type-I errors. Multiple comparison correction using FDR was applied for comparisons from all three measures (PeakHbO, NadirHbO, AUC) together. Results that survived the FDR-p threshold are reported to be significant at FDR-corrected p<0.05. Results with p values > FDR-p threshold did not survive multiple comparison correction. The FDR-p threshold, and the original p values are both provided for all comparisons. The 95% confidence intervals were generated using false coverage-statement rate that defines the confidence interval coverage corresponding to the FDR-adjusted p-values. A post-hoc analysis using two sample t-test was performed to identify dose-dependent differences between the remifentanil groups (low-dose vs. high-dose).
Sex-related differences in pain response:
Hemodynamic measures of activation (PeakHbO, NadirHbO, and AUC) during ablation was compared between male (n=16) and female (n=16) participants using a two-way Analysis of Covariance (ANOVA) with sex (males, and females), and drug (drug, and PL) as factors. Effect of biological sex was evaluated due to the altered pain sensitivity and treatment outcomes typically found in male vs female patients. Significant effects of sex were obtained using a statistical threshold of p<0.05, and a multiple comparison correction using Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery rate was applied at alpha of 0.05 to account for Type-I errors.The 95% confidence intervals were also adjusted for effects that were significant at FDR-corrected p<0.05 using method proposed by Benjamini and Yuketeili.
Cortical Response to non-painful stimuli:
The fNIRS hemodynamic response to auditory stimuli instructing individuals to perform a motor imagery task was also computed using the block averaging technique. The task paradigm lasted for a total of 5 minutes and was presented at least once during the procedure in every subject. A single run with five blocks of stimuli was used to calculate hemodynamic response to auditory stimuli during the procedure. A block was defined as the 5 seconds before auditory cue instructing the patient to start the task (lasting a duration of 1 second), and the 29 seconds following the first auditory cue, including the auditory cue to end task at 15 seconds. Hemodynamic-based measures quantified from the block-averaged hemodynamic response were also defined using the peak change in HbO concentration (PeakHbO), Nadir of deltaHbO concentration (NadirHbO), and AUC measures described earlier. A mixed ANOVA was performed to compare the activation measures during the two types of stimulus between placebo and drug groups and their interaction, where "task" is the within-subject factor with two levels (audio and pain/ablation) and "group" is the between-subject factor with two levels (remifentanil and placebo). A statistical threshold of p<0.05 with multiple comparison correction using Benjamini-Hochberg false-discovery rate approach at an alpha of 0.05 was once again employed. Multiple comparison correction using FDR was applied for comparisons from each measure (PeakHbO, NadirHbO, AUC) separately. As noted earlier, the 95% confidence intervals were adjusted for effects that were significant at FDR-corrected p<0.05 using method proposed by Benjamini and Yuketeili.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Normal salineNormal saline infusion |
| Drug lower dose | Active comparator | Drug: RemifentanilRemifentanil infusion |
| Drug higher dose | Active comparator | Drug: RemifentanilRemifentanil infusion |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 to 30 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- 12-30 years of age
- Structurally normal heart
- Right-handed
- English-speaking
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Unable to cooperate or understand the study
- Neurologic disease
- Diabetes mellitus
- Syndrome of greater than minor severity.
- Smoker
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RemifentanilAlso: Ultiva | Drug | Drug higher dose, Drug lower dose |
| Normal salineAlso: Placebo | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Changes in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to Ablation
Time frame: 5 seconds before the start of an ablation event and the 20 seconds following the start of ablation
Changes in peak oxyhemoglobin concentration (PeakHbO) to ablation in placebo vs. the remifentanil groups.
Changes in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to Ablation
Time frame: 5 seconds before the start of an ablation event and the 20 seconds following the start of ablation
Changes in nadir oxyhemoglobin concentration (NadirHbO) to ablation in placebo vs. remifentanil groups.
Changes in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to Ablation
Time frame: during the 0- to 15-second period following the start of stimulus
Changes in oxyhemoglobin concentration area under the curve (AUC) to ablation in placebo vs. remifentanil groups.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Dec 2025.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35452458Karunakaran KD, Kussman BD, Peng K, Becerra L, Labadie R, Bernier R, Berry D, Green S, Zurakowski D, Alexander ME, Borsook D. Brain-based measures of nociception during general anesthesia with remifentanil: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS Med. 2022 Apr 22;19(4):e1003965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003965. eCollection 2022 Apr.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Anesthesia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
"Comparison of Oxygen Reserve Index (ORI), End-Tidal Oxygen, and Time-Based Preoxygenation Targets With Arterial Blood Gas During Preoxygenation
Preoxygenation Adequacy Assessed by Oxygen Reserve Index, End-tidal Oxygen and Arterial Blood Gas
RecruitingObservational study
Comparison of Hemodynamic Responses During Anesthesia Induction Using Eleveld and Schnider
Spinal (Fusion) Surgery, Total Intravenous Anesthesia
Not yet recruiting
A Randomized Controlled SaCo-VLM Trial
General Anaesthesia Using Supraglotic Airway
Not yet recruiting
Bispectral Index-Guided Propofol Sedation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Deep Sedation, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
RecruitingPhase 4
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Comparison of Hemodynamics and Respiratory Function Between Ciprofol and Propofol in Elderly Patients Undergoing Non-intubated General Anesthesia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Barry D Kussman, MBBCh principal investigator
Boston Children's Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Remifentanil and Normal saline in people with Anesthesia and Pain, run by Boston Children's Hospital at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Dec 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in Cortical Oxyhemoglobin Concentrations to Ablation (time frame: 5 seconds before the start of an ablation event and the 20 seconds following the start of ablation). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02703090, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Dec 2025.